Prevalence and factors associated with late referral presentation of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

prevalence and factors associated with late referral
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Prevalence and factors associated with late referral presentation of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Prevalence and factors associated with late referral presentation of CKD patients to nephrologists at KNH renal clinic. Dr. D M Killingo Physician - Narok District Hospital Background Attention to CKD is increasing worldwide, due to high


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Prevalence and factors associated with late referral presentation of CKD patients to nephrologists at KNH renal clinic.

  • Dr. D M Killingo

Physician - Narok District Hospital

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

 Attention to CKD is increasing worldwide, due

to high incidence from:

  • aging, hypertension, diabetes and

infectious diseases

  • the huge cost of treatment of ESRD1.

 Timing & quality of care before dialysis affects

morbidity and mortality in CKD patients2

1.Lysaght MJ. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:37-40.

  • 2. Stack AG. Am J Kidney Dis 2003; 41: 310–318
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Referral/presentation is late when management could

have been improved by earlier contact with renal services3

  • Definitions vary btn need for immediate dialysis and

dialysis < 6months after first contact with a nephrologist.4

  • NKF: late referral - CKD stage 4&5
  • prevalence: 15%-80% worldwide

3..Eadington D.W. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11: 2124–2126 4.Lameire ,et al. Kidney Int 2002; 61: S27–S34.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Factors contributing to late referral 5

 CKD aetiology  advanced age, M>F, low SES, lack of

dse awareness, denial

 distance , cost, delayed dx, Lack of

specialists.

5.Navaneethan et al BMC Nephrology 2008 9:3

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Study Justification

 CKD is a public health problem due to high

incidence and prevalence of patients requiring RRT, with poor outcomes and high cost of care.

 Late referral/presentation is common and

  • bviates the opportunity for significant delay
  • f disease progression and institution of

proactive strategies to reduce ESRD in the population.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Broad objective

 To determine the prevalence and factors associated with the late

referral presentation of CKD to nephrologists at the KNH renal clinic and the. Specific objectives

  • 1. To document socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of

patients at first visit to nephrologists in the KNH renal clinic.

  • 2. To determine the proportion of CKD patients presenting late at

referral to nephrologists in the KNH renal clinic.

  • 3. To determine the factors associated with late referral/presentation of

CKD patients to nephrologists at the KNH renal clinic.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Methodology

Study design: Cross-sectional descriptive survey. Study site: KNH renal clinic Study population: 97 CKD patients on first referral visit to nephrologists Study period – Sept - Dec 2008

Inclusion criteria

  • patients over 18 years at first visit to nephrologist
  • signed informed consent

 Exclusion criteria

  • Pts already on follow up by nephrologist
  • Refusal to consent
slide-8
SLIDE 8

RES RESULTS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Base line c har ac te r istic s of the CKD patie nts

Ag e distr ibution

Me an age = 48.01(±15.34) ye ar s Range :18- 88 yr s Pe ak = 50- 55 ye ar s. Male s=52 F e male s=45; M: F = 1.2:1.

80 60 40 20

Age

15 12 9 6 3

Frequency

Mean = 48.01 Std Dev. =15.34

slide-10
SLIDE 10

So c io - de mo g r a phic c ha r a c te r istic s

n=97 F a c to r F r e q ue nc y Pe r c e nta g e

Ma r ita l Sta tus

  • Sing le
  • Ma r

r ie d

  • Se p a r

a te d 20 66 11 20.6 68.0 11.3

E duc a tio n

  • No ne
  • Pr

ima r y

  • Se c o nd a r

y

  • T

e rtia ry 25 27 27 18 25.8 27.8 27.8 18.6

E mplo ye d

37 38.1

Me dic a l insur a nc e

29 29.9

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Re side nc e

35.6 26 16.3 10.6 6.7 2.9 1 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Per cent

Central Nairobi Eastern Rift Valley Nyanza Western N/Eastern Coast

Province Majority of the CKD patie nts c ame from c e ntral provinc e followe d by Nairobi.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Clinic al c har ac te r istic s.

Pa tie nts’ c ompla ints a t pr

e se ntation.

Othe r- he a da c he , b o ne pa ins, indig e stio n

slide-13
SLIDE 13

General physical examination findings

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Patie nts’ Known risk fac tors for CKD at pre se ntation

DM-diabetes mellitus, HTN-hypertension, HIV- human immunodeficiency virus PKD-polycystic kidney disease

76.2% ha d a t le a st o ne kno wn risk fa c to r fo r CK D

38.1 38.1 8.2 6.3 5.2 2.1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Pe r c e nt

HT N DM HIV PKD Obstruc tive Uropa thy He pa titis B

Known risk for CKD

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Dur ation that patie nts had known of the diagnosis of kidne y dise ase [fr

  • m the ir

pr

  • i. he alth c ar

e pr

  • vide r

s].

At pr e se ntation 87.6% of the CKD patie nts had be e n infor me d that the y had a Kidne y dise ase . Most patie nts (41.2% ) had known that the y a kidne y dise ase for 3- 6 months.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Staging of the CKD patients.

CKD Sta g e F re que nc y Pe rc e nta g e Me a n GF R 1 3 3.1 102. 2 16 16.5 73.8 3 36 37.1 44.5 4 23 23.7 25.2 5 19 19.6 10.6

T

he pr e vale nc e of late r e fe r r al/ of CKD patie nts (stage s 4 &5)=43.3%

[me an GF R=15.6(±1.6] ml/ min/ 1.73M2).

55, 56.7% 42, 43.3% E arly (S tage 1, 2 & 3) Late (S tage 4 & 5)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Pa tie nt ba se line c ha r a c te r istic s a nd the a ssoc ia tion with the la te pr e se nta ion. le ve l

Variable

L a te (n=42) E a r ly (n=55)

P value

50.70 (±15.2) 45.93 (±15.2)

0.13 Age (mean)

Frequency % Frequency %

Ge nde r

Ma le F e ma le 25 17 59.5% 40.5% 27 28 49.1% 50.9%

0.307 0.307 Ma r ita l sta tus

Sing le Ma rrie d Se pa ra te d 5 30 7 11.9% 71.4% 16.7% 15 36 4 27.3% 65.5% 7.2%

0.06 0.53 0.15

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Educat cation None Primary Secon

  • nda

dary Tertiar ary Lat ate (42) 42) 10 10 13 13 11 11 8 % 23. 23.8% 31. 31.0% 26. 26.2% 19. 19.0% Early y (55) 55) 15 15 14 14 16 16 10 10 % 27. 27.3% 25. 25.5% 29. 29.1% 18. 18.2% P v val alue 0. 0.70 70 0. 0.55 55 0. 0.75 75 0. 0.91 91

NO S SIGNIFICANT asso assoc b betwe ween Lat ate referral an and ag age, g gender, m mar arital st stat atus or educa cation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

No sig nific a nt a sso c ia tio n b tn employment status, medical insurance and late ref

presentation.

L a te (n=42) E a rly (n=55)

c o unt % c o unt %

P- va lue

E mployme nt

E mplo ye d Un-e mplo ye d 16 26 38.1% 61.9% 21 34 38.2% 61.8%

0.993 0.993 Me dic al insur anc e No ne Ye s

27 15 64.3% 35.7% 41 14 74.5% 25.5%

0.274 0.274

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Signific ant assoc iation btn patie nt’s r e side nc e and late r e fe r r al/ pr e se ntation

L a te (n=42) E a rly (n=55)

R e side nc e

c o unt % c o unt %

P- va lue Outside Na irobi Within Na irobi

36 6 85.7% 14.3% 37 18 67.3% 32.7%

0.037 0.037

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Known r isk fac tor s for CKD and the assoc iation with late r e fe r r al/ pr e se ntation L

a te

(n=42)

E a r ly

( n=55) Risk fa c to r Co unt % c o unt % P-va lue Dia b e te s Me llitus 15 35.7% 22 40.0%

0.667

Hype rte nsio n 18 42.9% 19 34.5% 0.404 HIV 5 11.9% 3 5.5% 0.253 Ob struc tive uro pa thy 3 7.1% 2 3.6% 0.439 Po lyc ystic kid ne y d ise a se 6 14.3% 0% *0.004

HIV-huma n immuno de fic ie nc y virus

All the 6 patie nts with PKD pr e se nte d in CKD stage 4/ 5.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

NO signific ant assoc iation btn late r e fe r r al of CKD patie nts and the r e fe r r ing he alth c ar e pr

  • vide r

s.

L a te (n=42) E a r ly (n=55)

c o unt % c o unt % P-va lue

R e fe r r ing he a lth c a r e pr

  • vide r

Clinic al o ffic e r (1) Me d ic al o ffic e r (66) physic ia n spe c ialist (22) Othe r spe c ia list (8) (surg e o ns & g yna e c o lo g ists) 30 8 4 .0% 71.4% 19.0% 9.5% 1 36 14 4 1.8% 65.5% 25.5% 7.3%

*0.38

0.53 0.46 0.69

slide-23
SLIDE 23

NONE

  • f the r

e fe r r ing he alth c ar e fac ilitie s was signific antly assoc iate d with late r e fe r r al pr e se ntation.

L a te (n=42) E a r ly (n=55)

c o unt % c o unt %

P-va lue

R e fe r r ing he a lth c a r e fa c ility

He a lth c e ntre Priva te ho spita l Distric t ho spita l Pro vinc ia l ho spita l K e nya tta N. ho spita l(K NH) 10 23 2 7 .0% 23.8% 54.8% 4.8% 16.7% 1 10 26 2 16 1.8% 18.18% 47.3% 3.6% 29.1%

*0.38 0.50 0.47 0.78 0.15

Re fe rra ls fro m KNH: Surg ic a l o ut pa tie nt c linic (SOPC) -2 Dia b e tic o ut pa tie nt c linic (DOPC)-10 Me dic a l o ut pa tie nt c linic (MOPC)-6 Gyna e c o lo g y o ut pa tie nt c linic (GOPC)-1 Ca sua lty de pa rtme nt-4

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Dur ation (days) fr

  • m the time patie nt was r

e fe r r e d to the time se e n by a ne phr

  • logist at KNH r

e nal c linic

L ate (n=42) E ar ly (=55) Dur ation (days) me an(±SD) n=97 Me an Rank Me an Rank P- value

F r

  • m r

e fe r r al to time se e n by ne phr

  • logist

33.9(±1.9) 44.9 52.1 0.214 F r

  • m r

e fe r r al to booking

  • f appointme nt at KNH

r e nal c linic 14.8(±2.5) 48.1 49.7 0.79 F r

  • m appointme nt

booking to time se e n by ne phr

  • logist

15.5((±1.9) 38.4 57.1 0.001

slide-25
SLIDE 25

patient Knowledge on the causes of Kidney illness

  • Alcohol
  • Cigarette smoking
  • Diet-fats, salt
  • Hypertension
  • Diabetes
  • Unclean water
  • Weather
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Pa tie nt opinion on re a sons for la te pre se nta tion

L ac k of mone y to c ate r for hospital e xpe nse s Be ing unawar e of pr e se nc e of kidne y dise ase Not knowing the tr e atme nt options for kidne y dise ase L ac k of awar e ne ss of dise ase implic ations if not tr e ate d e ar ly Poor ly e quippe d public he alth fac ilitie s Use of alte r native tr e atme nt

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Conclusion

  • 1. Late referral presentation of patients with CKD

to nephrologists at KNH renal clinic is highly prevalent at 43.3%.

  • 2. Patient’s residence was significantly associated

with late referral presentation to the nephrologist at KNH renal clinic.

  • 4. Other contributors to delayed presentation are:
  • Financial difficulties
  • Lack of awareness on the presence of CKD
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Recommendations.

1.Need to provide affordable renal replacement services in main regional hospitals through out the country.

2.

Need to improve awareness of CKD among H/C providers and general public

3.

A study should be carried out to assess the health care provider knowledge, practices and attitude towards the care of CKD patients.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Acknowledgements

 My supervisors: Prof. Kayima

  • Dr. A.J.O. Were
  • Prof. Amayo

 KNH ethics committee  Patients who participated in the study  KNH Renal clinic & Renal Lab. staff

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Towards a Culture of Prevention

“Today no one disputes that prevention is better and cheaper than reacting to crises after the fact. And yet our political and organizational cultures and practices remain

  • riented far more towards

reaction than prevention.”

Kofi Annan, 09 / 09 /1999

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Thank you.