Prevalence and factors associated with late referral presentation of CKD patients to nephrologists at KNH renal clinic.
- Dr. D M Killingo
Physician - Narok District Hospital
Prevalence and factors associated with late referral presentation of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Prevalence and factors associated with late referral presentation of CKD patients to nephrologists at KNH renal clinic. Dr. D M Killingo Physician - Narok District Hospital Background Attention to CKD is increasing worldwide, due to high
Physician - Narok District Hospital
1.Lysaght MJ. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:37-40.
3..Eadington D.W. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996; 11: 2124–2126 4.Lameire ,et al. Kidney Int 2002; 61: S27–S34.
5.Navaneethan et al BMC Nephrology 2008 9:3
Broad objective
To determine the prevalence and factors associated with the late
referral presentation of CKD to nephrologists at the KNH renal clinic and the. Specific objectives
patients at first visit to nephrologists in the KNH renal clinic.
referral to nephrologists in the KNH renal clinic.
CKD patients to nephrologists at the KNH renal clinic.
Study design: Cross-sectional descriptive survey. Study site: KNH renal clinic Study population: 97 CKD patients on first referral visit to nephrologists Study period – Sept - Dec 2008
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Base line c har ac te r istic s of the CKD patie nts
Ag e distr ibution
Me an age = 48.01(±15.34) ye ar s Range :18- 88 yr s Pe ak = 50- 55 ye ar s. Male s=52 F e male s=45; M: F = 1.2:1.
80 60 40 20
Age
15 12 9 6 3
Frequency
Mean = 48.01 Std Dev. =15.34
So c io - de mo g r a phic c ha r a c te r istic s
n=97 F a c to r F r e q ue nc y Pe r c e nta g e
Ma r ita l Sta tus
r ie d
a te d 20 66 11 20.6 68.0 11.3
E duc a tio n
ima r y
y
e rtia ry 25 27 27 18 25.8 27.8 27.8 18.6
E mplo ye d
37 38.1
Me dic a l insur a nc e
29 29.9
Re side nc e
35.6 26 16.3 10.6 6.7 2.9 1 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Per cent
Central Nairobi Eastern Rift Valley Nyanza Western N/Eastern Coast
Province Majority of the CKD patie nts c ame from c e ntral provinc e followe d by Nairobi.
Clinic al c har ac te r istic s.
Pa tie nts’ c ompla ints a t pr
e se ntation.
Othe r- he a da c he , b o ne pa ins, indig e stio n
General physical examination findings
Patie nts’ Known risk fac tors for CKD at pre se ntation
DM-diabetes mellitus, HTN-hypertension, HIV- human immunodeficiency virus PKD-polycystic kidney disease
76.2% ha d a t le a st o ne kno wn risk fa c to r fo r CK D
38.1 38.1 8.2 6.3 5.2 2.1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Pe r c e nt
HT N DM HIV PKD Obstruc tive Uropa thy He pa titis B
Known risk for CKD
Dur ation that patie nts had known of the diagnosis of kidne y dise ase [fr
pr
e pr
s].
At pr e se ntation 87.6% of the CKD patie nts had be e n infor me d that the y had a Kidne y dise ase . Most patie nts (41.2% ) had known that the y a kidne y dise ase for 3- 6 months.
Staging of the CKD patients.
CKD Sta g e F re que nc y Pe rc e nta g e Me a n GF R 1 3 3.1 102. 2 16 16.5 73.8 3 36 37.1 44.5 4 23 23.7 25.2 5 19 19.6 10.6
T
he pr e vale nc e of late r e fe r r al/ of CKD patie nts (stage s 4 &5)=43.3%
[me an GF R=15.6(±1.6] ml/ min/ 1.73M2).
55, 56.7% 42, 43.3% E arly (S tage 1, 2 & 3) Late (S tage 4 & 5)
Pa tie nt ba se line c ha r a c te r istic s a nd the a ssoc ia tion with the la te pr e se nta ion. le ve l
Variable
L a te (n=42) E a r ly (n=55)
P value
50.70 (±15.2) 45.93 (±15.2)
0.13 Age (mean)
Frequency % Frequency %
Ge nde r
Ma le F e ma le 25 17 59.5% 40.5% 27 28 49.1% 50.9%
0.307 0.307 Ma r ita l sta tus
Sing le Ma rrie d Se pa ra te d 5 30 7 11.9% 71.4% 16.7% 15 36 4 27.3% 65.5% 7.2%
0.06 0.53 0.15
Educat cation None Primary Secon
dary Tertiar ary Lat ate (42) 42) 10 10 13 13 11 11 8 % 23. 23.8% 31. 31.0% 26. 26.2% 19. 19.0% Early y (55) 55) 15 15 14 14 16 16 10 10 % 27. 27.3% 25. 25.5% 29. 29.1% 18. 18.2% P v val alue 0. 0.70 70 0. 0.55 55 0. 0.75 75 0. 0.91 91
NO S SIGNIFICANT asso assoc b betwe ween Lat ate referral an and ag age, g gender, m mar arital st stat atus or educa cation
No sig nific a nt a sso c ia tio n b tn employment status, medical insurance and late ref
presentation.
L a te (n=42) E a rly (n=55)
c o unt % c o unt %
P- va lue
E mployme nt
E mplo ye d Un-e mplo ye d 16 26 38.1% 61.9% 21 34 38.2% 61.8%
0.993 0.993 Me dic al insur anc e No ne Ye s
27 15 64.3% 35.7% 41 14 74.5% 25.5%
0.274 0.274
Signific ant assoc iation btn patie nt’s r e side nc e and late r e fe r r al/ pr e se ntation
L a te (n=42) E a rly (n=55)
R e side nc e
c o unt % c o unt %
P- va lue Outside Na irobi Within Na irobi
36 6 85.7% 14.3% 37 18 67.3% 32.7%
0.037 0.037
Known r isk fac tor s for CKD and the assoc iation with late r e fe r r al/ pr e se ntation L
a te
(n=42)
E a r ly
( n=55) Risk fa c to r Co unt % c o unt % P-va lue Dia b e te s Me llitus 15 35.7% 22 40.0%
0.667
Hype rte nsio n 18 42.9% 19 34.5% 0.404 HIV 5 11.9% 3 5.5% 0.253 Ob struc tive uro pa thy 3 7.1% 2 3.6% 0.439 Po lyc ystic kid ne y d ise a se 6 14.3% 0% *0.004
HIV-huma n immuno de fic ie nc y virus
All the 6 patie nts with PKD pr e se nte d in CKD stage 4/ 5.
NO signific ant assoc iation btn late r e fe r r al of CKD patie nts and the r e fe r r ing he alth c ar e pr
s.
L a te (n=42) E a r ly (n=55)
c o unt % c o unt % P-va lue
R e fe r r ing he a lth c a r e pr
Clinic al o ffic e r (1) Me d ic al o ffic e r (66) physic ia n spe c ialist (22) Othe r spe c ia list (8) (surg e o ns & g yna e c o lo g ists) 30 8 4 .0% 71.4% 19.0% 9.5% 1 36 14 4 1.8% 65.5% 25.5% 7.3%
*0.38
0.53 0.46 0.69
NONE
e fe r r ing he alth c ar e fac ilitie s was signific antly assoc iate d with late r e fe r r al pr e se ntation.
L a te (n=42) E a r ly (n=55)
c o unt % c o unt %
P-va lue
R e fe r r ing he a lth c a r e fa c ility
He a lth c e ntre Priva te ho spita l Distric t ho spita l Pro vinc ia l ho spita l K e nya tta N. ho spita l(K NH) 10 23 2 7 .0% 23.8% 54.8% 4.8% 16.7% 1 10 26 2 16 1.8% 18.18% 47.3% 3.6% 29.1%
*0.38 0.50 0.47 0.78 0.15
Re fe rra ls fro m KNH: Surg ic a l o ut pa tie nt c linic (SOPC) -2 Dia b e tic o ut pa tie nt c linic (DOPC)-10 Me dic a l o ut pa tie nt c linic (MOPC)-6 Gyna e c o lo g y o ut pa tie nt c linic (GOPC)-1 Ca sua lty de pa rtme nt-4
Dur ation (days) fr
e fe r r e d to the time se e n by a ne phr
e nal c linic
L ate (n=42) E ar ly (=55) Dur ation (days) me an(±SD) n=97 Me an Rank Me an Rank P- value
F r
e fe r r al to time se e n by ne phr
33.9(±1.9) 44.9 52.1 0.214 F r
e fe r r al to booking
r e nal c linic 14.8(±2.5) 48.1 49.7 0.79 F r
booking to time se e n by ne phr
15.5((±1.9) 38.4 57.1 0.001
Pa tie nt opinion on re a sons for la te pre se nta tion
L ac k of mone y to c ate r for hospital e xpe nse s Be ing unawar e of pr e se nc e of kidne y dise ase Not knowing the tr e atme nt options for kidne y dise ase L ac k of awar e ne ss of dise ase implic ations if not tr e ate d e ar ly Poor ly e quippe d public he alth fac ilitie s Use of alte r native tr e atme nt
Kofi Annan, 09 / 09 /1999