Differences in TBI Prevalence, Outcomes, and Symptoms in Colorado - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

differences in tbi prevalence
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Differences in TBI Prevalence, Outcomes, and Symptoms in Colorado - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Differences in TBI Prevalence, Outcomes, and Symptoms in Colorado CB Eagye TBI Prevalence Research Studies Initial Research Project Colorado Study of TBI Prevalence and Associated Outcomes - 2007 Funded by the CDC Statewide


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Differences in TBI Prevalence, Outcomes, and Symptoms in Colorado

CB Eagye

slide-2
SLIDE 2

TBI Prevalence Research Studies

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Initial Research Project

  • Colorado Study of TBI Prevalence and Associated

Outcomes - 2007

  • Funded by the CDC
  • Statewide population-based survey to gather the

lifetime history of TBI using a random-digit-dial method

  • 2,701 adults aged 18 and over interviewed using a

modified CATI version of the OSU-TBI-ID

  • Plus standardized current assessments of 11 post-

concussive symptoms and 10 negative outcomes

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Initial Research Project

  • Three Sections of Survey Questions:
  • Random selection of survey participants

following CDC BRFSS methodology

  • Modified CATI version of the Ohio State TBI

Identification Method (OSU TBI-ID) gathering the lifetime history of traumatic injuries focusing on TBI, gathering enough information to characterize their severity and care paths (hospitalized, ED visit, physician office, or no medical care)

  • Assess current demographics, post-concussive

symptoms, and outcomes

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Initial Research Project

  • Primary Objective:
  • To estimate the number of adults with a

lifetime history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and current negative symptoms and outcomes in the state of Colorado

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Secondary Analysis Research Project

  • Using the same dataset:
  • Respondents from the sample were weighted

to the 2016 population characteristics of 14 administrative Planning Regions in Colorado using iterative proportional fitting, to estimate the prevalence of TBI and negative outcomes and symptoms in those Regions

  • Plotted prevalence results on a series of

Planning Region-specific bar charts

  • Funded by MINDSOURCE
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Tertiary Analysis Research Project

  • Using the same dataset:
  • Respondents from the sample were weighted to

the 2016 population characteristics of urban, rural, and frontier areas using iterative proportional fitting, to estimate the prevalence of TBI and negative outcomes and symptoms

  • Plotted prevalence results on a map
  • Investigated sample data in terms of

race/ethnicity

  • Funded by MINDSOURCE
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Maps of Colorado

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Our Fair State

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Colorado Counties with Population 2016 Census – 4,243,855 Adult Coloradans

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Colorado Population-Based Regions

Colorado Rural Health Center, 2016 All counties that are not designated as parts of Metropolitan Areas are considered rural; those with a population density of six or fewer persons per square mile are considered frontier.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Study Sample Location by County

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Colorado Statewide Statistics

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Injury and TBI Rates in Colorado

  • N = 2,701
  • 19.8% Report no traumatic injury in their lifetime
  • 37.7% Report one or more traumatic injuries, but none

involving TBI

  • 42.5% Report one or more mild to severe TBI
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Rates by Most Severe TBI Reported

  • 42.5% Report 1 or more mild to severe TBI
  • 18.1% Report mild TBI without LOC
  • 18.4% Report mild TBI with LOC < 30 min
  • 3.6% Report moderate TBI (LOC > 30 min)
  • 2.4% Report severe TBI (LOC > 24 hours)
  • 24.4% Report 1 or more TBI with LOC
slide-16
SLIDE 16

TBI Severity by Treatment Location

No TBI Mild TBI No LOC Mild TBI with LOC Moderate/ Severe TBI Admitted to Hospital 10.5% 13.9% 18.4% 66.6% Emergency Room 29.3% 41.2% 40.2% 24.9% Physicians Office 16.3% 12.5% 9.6% 3.1% No Treatment 43.8% 32.4% 31.7% 5.4% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

slide-17
SLIDE 17

19.9% 38.3% 17.8% 18.1% 3.5% 2.4%

Statewide Age 18+: 6 Injury Groups

No Injury - 844,092 Injury No TBI - 1,627,233 Mild TBI No LOC - 754,787 Mild TBI with LOC - 767,710 Moderate TBI - 149,708 Severe TBI - 100,352

slide-18
SLIDE 18

59.5% 49.4% 52.9% 53.2% 58.7% 49.6% 52.6% 57.0% 67.5% 69.3% 72.2% 24.1% 29.3% 15.7% 20.1% 14.2% 19.5% 20.3% 14.4% 11.8% 12.1% 11.0% 11.2% 19.9% 19.7% 20.7% 20.8% 24.2% 19.5% 20.0% 16.2% 15.6% 13.8% 5.2% 1.4% 11.8% 6.0% 6.3% 6.7% 7.7% 8.6% 4.5% 3.0% 3.1% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-74 75+ Moderate/Severe TBI Mild TBI with LOC Mild TBI No LOC No TBI

Statewide Injuries by Age Groups

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Statewide Injuries by Sex

64.9% 51.5% 14.5% 21.1% 15.9% 20.3%

4.8% 7.0% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

Female Male Moderate/Severe TBI Mild TBI with LOC Mild TBI No LOC No TBI

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Statewide Injuries by Race

58.5% 56.3% 57.1% 16.6% 30.8% 9.1% 19.5% 10.5% 16.0%

5.4% 2.4% 17.9% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

Non-Hispanic White Hispanic Other Minority Moderate/Severe TBI Mild TBI with LOC Mild TBI No LOC No TBI

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Regional Demographic Differences

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Gender Differences in Colorado

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Urban Rural Frontier Female Male

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Age Differences in Colorado

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Urban Rural Frontier 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+

slide-24
SLIDE 24

TBI Prevalence Differences in Colorado

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% No TBI Mild TBI No LOC Mild TBI with LOC Moderate/Severe TBI Urban Rural Frontier

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

TBI Prevalence by Urban/Rural/Frontier

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Negative Outcomes and Post- Concussive Symptoms Urban/Rural/Frontier Geographic Designations

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Assessing Outcomes Associated with TBI

  • Used standardized survey questions from other surveys to

ask about current status

  • All outcomes were dichotomized to determine the

percentage of people reporting good vs negative

  • utcomes
  • Can’t determine causation, only association
  • Can relate the percent of people with negative outcomes

to the severity of the TBI reported

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Assessing Outcomes Associated with TBI

  • Disability – yes to either “Are you limited in any way in any activities

because of physical, mental, or emotional problems?” or “Do you now have any health problem that requires you to use special equipment?”

  • Work limitation – yes to “Are you limited in the kind or amount of

work you can do because of any impairment or health problem?

  • General health fair or poor – “Would you say that in general your

health is (excellent, very good, good, fair, poor)?”

  • 2+ days/mo poor physical health – “Now thinking about your

physical health, which includes physical illness and injury, for how many days during the past 30 days was your physical health not good?”

  • 2+ days/mo poor mental health – “Now thinking about your mental

health, which includes stress, depression, and problems with emotions, for how many days during the past 30 days was your mental health not good?”

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Assessing Outcomes Associated with TBI

  • Problem alcohol use – CDC guidelines: greater than 2 drinks per day

for men (1 for women) or 5+ drinks in one sitting.

  • Needs help withADLs – “Do you receive or need help from another

person with bathing, dressing, eating, getting in/out bed or chairs, using the toilet, or getting around inside the home?”

  • Needs supervision for ADLs – “Do you need to be reminded or do

you have someone who stays nearby when bathing, dressing, eating, getting in/out bed or chairs, using the toilet, or getting around inside the home?”

  • Cognitive complaints – Alertness Behavior Subscale of the Sickness

Impact Profile – endorsement of any of 16 items like “I react slowly to

  • things. I do not finish things I start. I have difficulty reasoning and

solving problems. I forget a lot. I have difficulty getting along with

  • thers.”
  • Low life satisfaction – below average score on Diener Satisfaction

with Life Scale – 5 items like “The conditions in my life are excellent. So far I have gotten the imprtant things I want in life.”

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Assessing Symptoms Associated with TBI

  • Symptoms – Reporting having the following common post-

concussive symptoms several days or more per month:

  • Tiredness
  • Sleep disturbance
  • Irritability
  • Headaches
  • Poor concentration
  • Poor memory
  • Noise/light sensitivity
  • Dizziness
  • Tinnitus
  • Poor balance
  • Poor vision
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Percent of Cognitive Complaints across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Percent of 2+ Days Poor Mental Health across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Percent of 2+ Days Poor Physical Health across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Percent of Disability across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Percent of Problem Alcohol Use across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Percent of Work Limitation across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Percent of Low Life Satisfaction across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Percent of Poor General Health across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Percent of Needing Help with ADLs across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Percent of Needing Supervision with ADLs across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Percent of Tiredness across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Percent of Sleep Disturbance across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Percent of Irritability across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Percent of Headaches across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Percent of Poor Concentration across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Percent of Poor Memory across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Percent of Noise/Light Sensitivity across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Percent of Dizziness across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Percent of Tinnitus across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Percent of Poor Balance across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Percent of Poor Vision across Urban/Rural/Frontier Regions, by TBI Severity Level

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Race Maps and Statistics

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Race vs Ethnicity

White Black Asian Native Hawaiian

  • r Other

Pacific Islander American Indian or Alaskan Native Other Don't Know Refused Total Yes 68 1 9 230 15 1 324 No 2212 42 12 2 20 62 3 16 2369 Total 2280 43 12 2 29 292 18 17 2693 Are you Hispanic or Latino?

  • The U.S. Census Bureau considers race and ethnicity to be two separate

and distinct concepts

  • The Census Bureau defines race as a person’s self-identification with one
  • r more social groups. An individual can report as White, Black or African

American, Asian, American Indian and Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, or some other race. Survey respondents may report multiple races.

  • Ethnicity determines whether a person is of Hispanic origin or not. For

this reason, ethnicity is broken out in two categories, Hispanic or Latino and Not Hispanic or Latino. Hispanics may report as any race.

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Sample Subject Location by Race – All Races

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Sample Subject Location by Race – White Only

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Sample Subject Location by Race – All Non-White

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

Sample Subject Location by Ethnicity – Hispanic

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

Sample Subject Location by Race – American Indian/Alaska Native

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

Sample Subject Location by Race – Asian

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60

Sample Subject Location by Race – Black

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

Sample Subject Location by Race – Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62

Sample Subject Location by Race – Other

slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

Sample Subject Location by Race – Don’t Know

slide-64
SLIDE 64

64

Sample Subject Location by Race – Refused

slide-65
SLIDE 65

65

Race Statistics

slide-66
SLIDE 66

66

Race by TBI Severity

slide-67
SLIDE 67

67

Race by TBI Severity Statistical Comparison

White American Indian/ Alaskan Native Asian Black Don't Know Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander Other Refused White

  • 0.0445

N/A 0.1742 0.1856 N/A 0.0189 0.0642 American Indian/ Alaskan Native

  • N/A

0.1414 0.1189 N/A 0.0168 0.1910 Asian

  • N/A

N/A N/A N/A N/A Black

  • 0.1782

N/A 0.0743 0.1426 Don't Know

  • N/A

0.1512 0.1565 Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander

  • N/A

N/A Other

  • 0.0289

Refused

  • N/A = Can't do calculation because of too many zero values in TBI Severity Categories

Alpha = 0.05/5 (Bonferroni correction) Only White versus Other used a chi-squared test; all else used Fisher's Exact

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Thank You

3425 S. Clarkson Street, Englewood, CO 80113 craighospital.org

CB Eagye 303-789-8557 peagye@craighospital.org

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Additional Information

slide-70
SLIDE 70

70

Negative Outcomes SuperTable

Female Male Non- Hispanic White Hispanic Other Minority No TBI Mild TBI No LOC Mild TBI w/LOC Moderate/ Severe TBI Urban 51.4 44.8 46.3 51.7 61.4 42.5 48.6 59.8 68.7 Rural 52.4 43.5 44.3 53.8 64.6 44.5 52.1 53.2 46.3 Frontier 54.5 36.3 48.8 23.4 0.0 29.2 44.7 42.7 82.4 Urban 38.3 27.5 31.6 36.2 42.6 28.4 36.2 39.8 48.5 Rural 30.2 28.5 28.2 31.6 34.7 30.2 31.4 25.7 32.0 Frontier 31.2 16.6 23.2 33.7 0.0 29.4 28.7 9.0 14.7 Urban 29.7 27.1 29.0 24.2 30.6 22.0 34.8 37.9 44.1 Rural 29.6 25.0 29.1 14.4 30.2 27.8 23.7 27.7 26.7 Frontier 19.7 21.8 19.7 36.6 0.0 22.8 15.9 16.9 23.6 Urban 30.9 25.2 29.5 18.3 28.6 21.7 29.1 42.0 47.7 Rural 33.6 31.0 35.4 13.8 45.7 27.0 32.0 38.4 61.1 Frontier 25.9 19.1 23.2 23.1 0.0 24.7 15.7 29.1 17.6 Urban 10.6 36.6 23.1 30.5 14.7 21.4 26.1 26.7 25.3 Rural 17.7 28.1 22.7 20.0 33.7 22.4 14.4 26.4 37.1 Frontier 6.6 17.3 13.4 2.0 0.0 7.1 15.7 15.6 19.2 Urban 24.4 17.3 21.6 14.3 23.7 16.2 21.1 30.9 38.3 Rural 21.8 22.9 22.9 12.9 43.6 17.3 22.3 28.8 47.0 Frontier 16.1 16.4 17.6 10.7 0.0 18.7 16.0 11.2 14.0 Urban 16.1 16.0 15.4 8.7 31.3 12.5 16.7 20.0 38.6 Rural 10.1 10.0 9.7 9.7 18.1 7.1 7.2 16.0 21.6 Frontier 9.3 8.9 10.0 4.5 0.0 6.7 9.8 7.7 15.1 Urban 12.9 9.6 10.1 18.3 16.2 8.6 10.1 18.5 20.8 Rural 14.2 14.7 13.0 26.0 7.2 12.8 5.3 19.3 32.5 Frontier 8.4 24.1 17.4 16.8 0.0 11.6 11.8 27.8 26.4 Urban 2.5 1.1 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.8 7.5 Rural 1.1 1.4 1.5 0.5 0.0 1.4 0.2 0.3 6.9 Frontier 2.3 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 Urban 1.5 0.7 1.2 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.8 1.3 3.3 Rural 1.1 0.7 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 6.9 Frontier 2.3 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 Work Limitation Low Life Satisfaction General Health Fair or Poor Needs Help with ADLs Needs Supervision for ADLs

Percentage Who Endorse the Negative Outcome

Cognitive Complaints 2+ Days/Month Poor Mental Health 2+ Days/Month Poor Physical Health Disability Problem Alcohol Use

No statistically significant difference between groups.

slide-71
SLIDE 71

71

Post-Concussive Symptoms SuperTable

No statistically significant difference between groups.

slide-72
SLIDE 72

72

Colorado 2010 Census Maps (CO Department of Local Affairs)

https://demography.dola.colorado.gov/gis/thematic-maps/

slide-73
SLIDE 73

73

Colorado 2010 Census Maps

slide-74
SLIDE 74

74

Colorado 2010 Census Maps

slide-75
SLIDE 75

75

Colorado 2012-2016 Maps

slide-76
SLIDE 76

76

Colorado 2012-2016 Maps

slide-77
SLIDE 77

77

Colorado 2012-2016 Maps

slide-78
SLIDE 78

78

Colorado 2012-2016 Maps

slide-79
SLIDE 79

79

Colorado 2012-2016 Maps

slide-80
SLIDE 80

80

Colorado 2012-2016 Maps

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Colorado Study Publications

  • Whiteneck GG, Cuthbert JP, Corrigan JD, Bogner JA. Prevalence
  • f Self-Reported Lifetime History of Traumatic Brain Injury and

Associated Disability: A Statewide Population-Based Survey. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):E55-62.

  • Whiteneck GG, Cuthbert JP, Corrigan JD, Bogner JA. Risk of

Negative Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Statewide Population-Based Survey. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Jan- Feb;31(1):E43-54.

  • Cuthbert JP, Whiteneck GG, Corrigan JD, Bogner J. The

Reliability of a Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview Version

  • f the Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury

Identification Method. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Jan- Feb;31(1):E36-42.