Presentation on Technical Memorandum Prepared for the January 14, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation on technical memorandum
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Presentation on Technical Memorandum Prepared for the January 14, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation on Technical Memorandum Prepared for the January 14, 2014 INTRODUCTION Agenda Introduction System Performance Finance Governance and Organizational Structure Ethics 2 INTRODUCTION Memo Overview Memo contains


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presentation on Technical Memorandum

Prepared for the

January 14, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

INTRODUCTION

Agenda

  • Introduction
  • System Performance
  • Finance
  • Governance and Organizational Structure
  • Ethics
slide-3
SLIDE 3

INTRODUCTION

Memo contains background on four topics

  • Information comes from secondary sources and selected interviews
  • Topics represents key dimensions of a successful transit system

Four topics have important interactions

1. System Performance depends on effective Governance (management) structure and finance (adequate resources) 2. Finance depends on Governance and Ethics and a plan to improve System Performance 3. Governance depends on Ethical system and access to adequate finance 4. Ethics depends on effective Governance structure

3

Memo Overview

slide-4
SLIDE 4

INTRODUCTION

General Observations Based on literature review and case studies

  • Clear regional goals are important
  • Organized changes should be part of a strategy and are more

effective if part of a process that is transparent, targeted, objective and focused on results

  • Focus on customers is a key part of a world class system
  • Case studies showed
  • A clear overall benefit to consolidation
  • State involvement can be advantageous

4

Observations

slide-5
SLIDE 5

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Trends In Unlinked Trips By Service Board and Mode

5

60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0 160.0 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2012 Percent of 1981

Unlinked Passenger Trips

CTA Rail CTA Bus CTA Total Pace Bus Metra Rail Service Board Ridership, 1981 – 2012 (percent of 1981 trips). Data Source: National Transit Database

slide-6
SLIDE 6

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Metra Growth Compared With Other Metro Areas

6

80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0 200.0 220.0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Percent of 1991

Commuter Rail Ridership, 1991–2012

Chicago Metra New York LIRR & Metro-North Boston MBTA Philadelphia SEPTA NJ Transit Comparison of Change in Commuter Rail Ridership, 1991-2012. Data Source: National Transit Database

slide-7
SLIDE 7

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Change In Reliance On Transit Since 1980 For US Metro Areas

7

Change in Share of Central City Residents Using Transit for Commuting, 1980-2012 Source: Metropolitan Planning Council, 2013

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Total NEIL Transit Ridership Has Grown By 25 % Since 1995

8

Change in Annual Ridership on Chicago-Region Transit Services Source: Metropolitan Planning Council, 2013

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Vehicle Revenue Miles

In terms of service (measured as revenue miles) strong growth since 1991 by CTA rail, Pace, and Metra. Decline since 2005 other than for Metra.

9

Vehicle Revenue Miles (millions) Data Source: RTA

Agency 1991 1995 2000 2005 2012 1991-2012

change (%)

2005-2012

change (%)

CTA Rail 57.6 45.3 55.6 68.9 65.2 13.2

  • 5.4

CTA Bus 71.7 70.7 61.9 66.8 52.4

  • 26.9
  • 21.5

Pace Bus 18.4 18.9 19.6 20.4 20.2 9.5

  • 1.0

Metra Rail 29.8 32.3 35.9 38.3 43.2 44.6 12.8 NEIL Total 177.6 167.1 173.1 194.4 181.0 1.9

  • 6.9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

ADA/Paratransit Service is Fastest Growing Budget Item

10

2,000,000 2,200,000 2,400,000 2,600,000 2,800,000 3,000,000 3,200,000 3,400,000 3,600,000 3,800,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Pace ADA Passenger Trips

Pace ADA Passenger Trips Data Source: RTA

slide-11
SLIDE 11

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Service Boards are Among the Least Expensive Transit Systems

11

Operating Efficiency, U.S. Heavy Rail Systems Source: Metropolitan Planning Council, 2013

slide-12
SLIDE 12

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Unlinked Transit Trips Since 1991 For Selected Metro Areas

12

80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0 160.0 170.0 180.0 1991 1996 2001 2006 2012 Percent of 1991

Unlinked Passenger Trips

Chicago RTA New York MTA Los Angeles-Long Beach Region Washington, DC-MD-VA WMATA San Francisco-Oakland Region Philadelphia SEPTA Boston MBTA Ridership Data Source: National Transit Database

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Daily Per Capita Ridership for Selected International Metro Regions

13

Source: Metropolitan Planning Council, 2013

slide-14
SLIDE 14

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Several Suburban Job Centers Are Not Located Near Rail Lines

14

Transit connectivity and 15 Largest Job Centers Source: Center for Neighborhood Technology

slide-15
SLIDE 15

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

Business recruiters emphasize these factors

  • Reliability
  • Frequency – off peak in particular
  • Seamless – few transfers
  • Convenient to housing and employment
  • Clean, friendly, and customer focused
  • Safe

NEIL transit quality not cited as the primary reason firm’s selected

  • ther locations – but often mentioned in the top 2-3 reasons

15

Perception of Transit

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

$31 billion backlog For NEIL Region

  • Buses in good shape
  • Rail cars older – 50-60 percent beyond FTA’s minimum life
  • SGR numbers probably high
  • But overall probably low since they do not include the need to expand

service

16

.

State of Good Repair

slide-17
SLIDE 17

SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

17

Agency Average Age

(years)

Beyond Useful Life (%) FTA Minimum Life CTA Bus 6.3 0.0 12 years/500k miles

(see note)

CTA Rail 24.3 54.1 25 years All CTA 13.8 22.6

  • Pace Bus

7.7 5.5 12 years/500k miles

(see note)

Metra 29.7 59.8 25 years RTA Average 14.4 30.3 Not applicable

.

2012 Vehicle Age Data by Service Board Data Source: RTA

State of Good Repair

slide-18
SLIDE 18

FINANCE

No consistent pattern among metro areas in source of operating subsidies. NEIL region depends on dedicated sales taxes (as do half a dozen others) and on state aid (second to Philadelphia)

18

Funding Source as Percentage of Operations Subsidies Source: Metropolitan Planning Council, 2013

Funding Sources

slide-19
SLIDE 19

FINANCE

Complex Flow of Funds With Rules Developed Over Past 30 Years

19

Current Allocation of Public Transportation Funding at RTA

Current Allocation of Public Transportation Funding

slide-20
SLIDE 20

FINANCE

Lessons Learned from private transit operations

  • Use standard equipment types (Southwest Airlines model)
  • Improve employee availability
  • Use corporate asset management techniques

20

There are More Options Than Simply Raising Taxes…

slide-21
SLIDE 21

FINANCE

21

  • 1. Performance Based Management, demonstrating that the new or

existing governance entity can manage the existing funding and service effectively is a critical element for public trust in investing in the

  • services. Four examples include:
  • Pooled Purchases
  • Maximize use of existing staff
  • Organizationally driven asset management
  • Consolidation of administrative functions

There are More Options Than Simply Raising Taxes…

slide-22
SLIDE 22

FINANCE

22

  • 2. Take advantage of new Urban Mobility
  • Shared assets rather than owned – cars and bicycles
  • Transportation network firms – Uber is best known
  • Private shuttle buses
  • Telecommuting
  • Autonomous vehicles

There are More Options Than Simply Raising Taxes…

slide-23
SLIDE 23

FINANCE

23

  • 3. New Technology
  • 3-D Printing
  • Integrate asset management with information systems (and

location information There are More Options Than Simply Raising Taxes…

  • 4. Fare Increase
  • 5. Increased Tax Receipts
slide-24
SLIDE 24

GOVERNANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES

The Transit System is Governed by 4 Independent Boards with 47 Board Members appointed by 21 Elected Officials

24

Chart of Appointments

The Current System is Complex

slide-25
SLIDE 25

GOVERNANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES

RTA

  • Reviews and approves annual financial plans for the three

Service Boards

  • Prepares five-year capital program and strategic plan
  • Provides oversight of programs
  • Can issue bonds
  • Super majority approval required for budgets

IDOT, CMAP, City Of Chicago and Individual Service Boards

25

Agencies in the Region

slide-26
SLIDE 26

GOVERNANCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES

  • Reviewed governance and funding practices for
  • Boston,
  • New York,
  • San Francisco, and
  • Los Angeles
  • Governance models vary widely
  • Financial structure varies as well. Additional funds linked to

crises as well as governance changes.

26

Case Studies

slide-27
SLIDE 27

ETHICS

  • Federal
  • State
  • Ethics training by Attorney General
  • Regional
  • Survey Carried Out Of Ethics Practices
  • RTA and Service Boards
  • Transit agencies in Boston, Philadelphia, New York, and San

Francisco

27

Legal Requirements, But Culture is Important

slide-28
SLIDE 28

ETHICS

  • Appointment process and qualifications for board members
  • Compensation for board members
  • Term limits
  • Executives and employees
  • State of Illinois law
  • Office of the Executive Inspector General

28

Legal Requirements, But Culture is Important

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Questions?

29