SLIDE 1
Presentation for Residential Ratepayer Advisory Board January 23, 2017 Patricia Martin Chair, Rindge Energy Commission Ratepayer
SLIDE 2 Background & Experience
- BSEE from UNH in 1978 (Retired in 2011)
- Engaged in Energy Management & Efficiency
projects since the 1970s
- Named in 7 US Patents for low power circuit
design, user interfaces and communications for portable computers
- Frequent attendee at legislative and PUC
hearings on energy policy
SLIDE 3 Motivation & Purpose
- Veteran of US Air Force (1973-1975) and NH
Air National Guard (1975-1979)
- Member of “Operation Free,” a veteran’s
- rganization dedicated to combating Climate
Change as a risk multiplier to National Security
- Present an alternative perspective to the
Business Industry Association’s (BIA) claim that NH faces an “Energy Cost Crisis” requiring more natural gas
SLIDE 4 Agenda for today Compare NH with US averages for:
- Total Energy = heat + transportation + electric
- Electricity Consumption and causes of high
rates
SLIDE 5 Energy Cost
- Whether it’s a gas, electric or oil bill, the
amount you pay for your energy is based on the price per unit times the number of units you use.
- The BIA argues that we have an “Energy Cost
Crisis” based solely on the price per unit. It is definitely an important factor, but the response to the problem can be dealt with by reducing the number of units consumed too.
SLIDE 6
The numbers the BIA uses to sell the “Energy Cost Crisis”
SLIDE 7
Since we don’t all live in the same geographical/climatic region, other factors need to be considered
SLIDE 8
NH ranks #19 for total energy expenditure/person and #28 for % of GDP
SLIDE 9
Energy.gov interactive map for 2012
SLIDE 10
NH spends 10% more than US Average
SLIDE 11
Massachusetts spends less than the US average
SLIDE 12
4 of 6 NE States rank in the top 5 for Energy Efficiency by ACEEE. Maine ranks #11 and NH ranks #21
SLIDE 13 Conclusions on Total Energy
- New Hampshire pays some of the highest
prices per unit for energy, but energy efficiency efforts reduce our burden and put us in the “middle of the pack” for cost/person and % of GDP
- Transportation represents 2/3rds of our total
energy expense (Why doesn’t the BIA push mass transportation?)
SLIDE 14
Electricity
SLIDE 15
California has made major investments in Energy Efficiency and Renewables, but doesn’t experience our high rates
SLIDE 16
What’s in my monthly bill?
SLIDE 17
Transmission + Distribution charges on my bill total 6.6 cents/kWh vs US average of 3.4 cents/kWh
SLIDE 18
Generation Charges (supply) are 10 to 50% higher than US average of 6.5 cents/kWh
SLIDE 19
…unless you buy default supply service from Eversource which is almost double the US average of 6.5 cents/kWh
SLIDE 20
Compare the Eversource default energy supply price with this headline from “Utility Dive!”
SLIDE 21 Thanks to Restructuring, I can buy my energy supply from a competitive supplier
- 24 month contract with Fairpoint Energy for
8.9 cents/kWh
- 100% renewable energy (covered by
Renewable Energy Credits for wind)
- Most commercial and industrial customers
have switched to competitive energy suppliers, but only about 20% of residential customers have done so
SLIDE 22
…but, I have no choice with transmission and distribution charges. Why are they so high?
SLIDE 23 Instead of tackling high transmission and distribution charges, the BIA and ISO-NE are:
- Trying to upend restructuring by allowing the
utilities to charge electric ratepayers a tariff for pipeline construction
- Putting energy supply diversity and renewable
energy suppliers at risk by dominating the market with cheap natural gas fired electricity
- Cheaper, but for how long? (All our eggs in one
basket…what could go wrong?)
- New England Power Generators Association does
not support the electric ratepayer tariff and have not signed contracts for pipeline capacity
SLIDE 24
Natural Gas and Electricity Generation in ISO-NE (Decreasing fuel diversity)
SLIDE 25
Renewable energy challenges natural gas on price
SLIDE 26
SLIDE 27 Offshore wind resources are plentiful, stronger and more consistent than those on
- land. Research suggests that more than four times the current generating capacity of
US electric power plants is available from state and federal waters off the coast of the United States and Great Lakes.
SLIDE 28
Solar and Wind Plants in the US
SLIDE 29
Solar and wind plants in New England
SLIDE 30
Hydro and Biomass plants in New England
SLIDE 31 Conclusion on Electric Energy costs
- Energy Efficiency measures bring down the cost
- f our monthly bills
- The BIA opposes RGGI, an Energy Efficiency
Resource Standard (EERS) and renewable energy (net metering) despite the success of these programs in neighboring states and (notably) California
- The BIA’s (formerly named) Energy Committee is
funded (at least in part) by the American Petroleum Institute
SLIDE 32 Natural Gas for Home Heating
- After decades of gas distribution companies
telling towns in NH that expanding natural gas distribution for domestic use was not “cost effective (for them),” Liberty is trying to expand it’s franchises to several regions of the State in
- rder to justify large capacity contracts and more
pipelines
- As “customers of last resort,” we are also
conveniently located along the path to the coast and LNG export terminals
SLIDE 33 Expedited Gas Exports Poised to Rankle Russia (Bloomberg headline 12/16/16)
- The U.S. first exported cargo out of its lone LNG-
capable terminal, Sabine Pass in Louisiana, in February, a shipment that ultimately touched down in Brazil. Since then, U.S. exporters have sent LNG to countries in the Middle East, Western Europe, South America and Asia. The vast majority of 2016 shipments have gone to South America, followed by Asia. As far as Europe, U.S. exporters only landed cargo in Spain and Portugal.
- Yet industry has long complained of a sluggish
regulatory process. Nearly 30 export applications remained under review at the Energy Department as of the end of November.
SLIDE 34 Maritimes & Northeast feeds the Dracut, MA hub, but flow to be reversed
http://pieridaeenergy.com/goldboro-lng/
- Pieridae is currently developing the Goldboro
LNG project which consists of an LNG processing facility, storage tanks and marine works. The facility will be located at the Goldboro Industrial Park in Guysborough County, Nova Scotia,
- Canada. The natural gas supply feeding the
project is to be delivered via the existing Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, located directly adjacent to the project.
SLIDE 35
What could go wrong if we start shipping LNG worldwide?
SLIDE 36
Trends in home heating – Moving away from Natural Gas (except Northeast)
SLIDE 37
$0.16/kWh is reasonable with a “Heat Smart” contract
SLIDE 38 Expanding Natural Gas franchises in New Hampshire:
- Commits the customer to a 20 year investment
($10K residential) in a heating source that is NOT the most efficient (compared with air source heat pumps)
- Makes the competition for available natural gas
for electricity generation in New England during the winter months much worse
- At the very least, every additional therm of gas
should be offset with a therm of efficiency PLUS EERS commitments
SLIDE 39 The Future of Energy in NH is ELECTRIFYING!!! (fueled by solar, wind, biomass/fuels, hydro and nuclear)
- Electric and hybrid cars
- Electric powered heat pumps for heat and ac
- Modernized Grid (Smart Grid) manages peak
demand response and distributed generation
- Energy Efficiency and renewable energy
projects support jobs and entrepreneurship
SLIDE 40
So, what’s it going to be? This?
SLIDE 41
Or this?