preamble The cuboid lemma and Maltsev categories Marino Gran and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

preamble the cuboid lemma and mal tsev categories
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

preamble The cuboid lemma and Maltsev categories Marino Gran and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

preamble The cuboid lemma and Maltsev categories Marino Gran and Diana Rodelo drodelo@ualg.pt Centre for Mathematics of the University of Coimbra University of Algarve, Portugal 9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Maltsev categories


slide-1
SLIDE 1

preamble

slide-2
SLIDE 2

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 1 / 18

The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories

Marino Gran and Diana Rodelo

drodelo@ualg.pt

Centre for Mathematics of the University of Coimbra

University of Algarve, Portugal

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Contents

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 2 / 18

Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Preliminaries

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 3 / 18

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Regular categories

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 4 / 18

· C regular cat =

  • lex
  • ·
  • ·
  • ·

·

  • Rf

f1

  • f2

A

f

■ ■ ■ ■ ■ B coeq

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Regular categories

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 4 / 18

· C regular cat =

  • lex
  • ·
  • ·
  • ·

·

  • Rf

f1

  • f2

A

f

■ ■ ■ ■ ■ B coeq · C regular ⇒ A

∀ f

  • p

❉ ❉ ❉ B P m

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Regular categories

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 4 / 18

· C regular cat =

  • lex
  • ·
  • ·
  • ·

·

  • Rf

f1

  • f2

A

f

■ ■ ■ ■ ■ B coeq · C regular ⇒ A

∀ f

  • p

❉ ❉ ❉ B P m

③ · C regular

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 5 / 18

· relation R from A to B

  • R

r1,r2 A × B

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 5 / 18

· relation R from A to B

  • R

r1,r2 A × B

  • pposite

R◦ from B to A

  • R

r2,r1 B × A

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 5 / 18

· relation R from A to B

  • R

r1,r2 A × B

  • pposite

R◦ from B to A

  • R

r2,r1 B × A map A

f

B

  • A

f=1A,f A × B A f ◦=f,1A B × A

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 5 / 18

· relation R from A to B

  • R

r1,r2 A × B

  • pposite

R◦ from B to A

  • R

r2,r1 B × A map A

f

B

  • A

f=1A,f A × B A f ◦=f,1A B × A

  • · R ֌ A × B, S ֌ B × C
  • SR ֌ A × C
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 5 / 18

· relation R from A to B

  • R

r1,r2 A × B

  • pposite

R◦ from B to A

  • R

r2,r1 B × A map A

f

B

  • A

f=1A,f A × B A f ◦=f,1A B × A

  • · R ֌ A × B, S ֌ B × C
  • SR ֌ A × C

· R = r2r◦

1

and Rf = f ◦f ( = f2f ◦

1 )

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 5 / 18

· relation R from A to B

  • R

r1,r2 A × B

  • pposite

R◦ from B to A

  • R

r2,r1 B × A map A

f

B

  • A

f=1A,f A × B A f ◦=f,1A B × A

  • · R ֌ A × B, S ֌ B × C
  • SR ֌ A × C

· R = r2r◦

1

and Rf = f ◦f ( = f2f ◦

1 )

· ff ◦f = f and f ◦ff ◦ = f ◦ ( difunctional )

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 5 / 18

· relation R from A to B

  • R

r1,r2 A × B

  • pposite

R◦ from B to A

  • R

r2,r1 B × A map A

f

B

  • A

f=1A,f A × B A f ◦=f,1A B × A

  • · R ֌ A × B, S ֌ B × C
  • SR ֌ A × C

· R = r2r◦

1

and Rf = f ◦f ( = f2f ◦

1 )

· ff ◦f = f and f ◦ff ◦ = f ◦ ( difunctional ) · ff ◦ = 1B iff f regular epi

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 5 / 18

· relation R from A to B

  • R

r1,r2 A × B

  • pposite

R◦ from B to A

  • R

r2,r1 B × A map A

f

B

  • A

f=1A,f A × B A f ◦=f,1A B × A

  • · R ֌ A × B, S ֌ B × C
  • SR ֌ A × C

· R = r2r◦

1

and Rf = f ◦f ( = f2f ◦

1 )

· ff ◦f = f and f ◦ff ◦ = f ◦ ( difunctional ) · ff ◦ = 1B iff f regular epi

relative

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Equivalence relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 6 / 18

· R ֌ A × A is: reflexive 1A ≤ R

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Equivalence relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 6 / 18

· R ֌ A × A is: reflexive 1A ≤ R symmetric R◦ ≤ R

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Equivalence relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 6 / 18

· R ֌ A × A is: reflexive 1A ≤ R symmetric R◦ ≤ R transitive RR ≤ R

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Equivalence relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 6 / 18

· R ֌ A × A is: reflexive 1A ≤ R symmetric R◦ ≤ R transitive RR ≤ R         equivalence

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Equivalence relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 6 / 18

· R ֌ A × A is: reflexive 1A ≤ R symmetric R◦ ≤ R transitive RR ≤ R         equivalence · Rf effective equivalence relation

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Equivalence relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 6 / 18

· R ֌ A × A is: reflexive 1A ≤ R symmetric R◦ ≤ R transitive RR ≤ R         equivalence · Rf effective equivalence relation · exact fork Rf

f1 f2

A

f B

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Equivalence relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 6 / 18

· R ֌ A × A is: reflexive 1A ≤ R symmetric R◦ ≤ R transitive RR ≤ R         equivalence · Rf effective equivalence relation · exact fork Rf

f1 f2

A

f B

·Rf

f1

  • f2

A

f

  • p

❇ ❇ ❇ ❇ B P m

⑤ ⑤

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Equivalence relations

Contents Preliminaries Regular categories Relations Equivalence relations Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 6 / 18

· R ֌ A × A is: reflexive 1A ≤ R symmetric R◦ ≤ R transitive RR ≤ R         equivalence · Rf effective equivalence relation · exact fork Rf

f1 f2

A

f B

·Rf

f1

  • f2

A

f

  • p

❇ ❇ ❇ ❇ B P m

⑤ ⑤ ⇒ Rf = Rp

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Regular Mal’tsev categories

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 7 / 18

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Definition

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 8 / 18

· C Mal’tsev cat =

  • lex
  • reflexive = equivalence
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Definition

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 8 / 18

· C Mal’tsev cat =

  • lex
  • reflexive = equivalence

· Exs.

  • Gp, Alg(T),

T w/ group op.

  • quasi-groups, Heyting algebras
  • lex + additive
  • (Topos)op
  • C Mal’tsev

⇒ C/X, X/C, Gp(C), · · · Mal’tsev

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Definition

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 8 / 18

· C Mal’tsev cat =

  • lex
  • reflexive = equivalence

· Exs.

  • Gp, Alg(T),

T w/ group op.

  • quasi-groups, Heyting algebras
  • lex + additive
  • (Topos)op
  • C Mal’tsev

⇒ C/X, X/C, Gp(C), · · · Mal’tsev · Prop. [ CLP, Diagram chasing in Mal’cev cats ] C

  • regular. TFAE:

(a) C Mal’tsev cat (b) RfRg = RgRf

( RS = SR for equivalence relations )

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Regular pushouts

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 9 / 18

· C

c g

  • (1)

A

f

  • D

d t

  • B,

s

  • g · t = 1, f · s = 1, c · t = s · d
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Regular pushouts

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 9 / 18

· C

c g

  • (1)

A

f

  • D

d t

  • B,

s

  • g · t = 1, f · s = 1, c · t = s · d

always a pushout

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Regular pushouts

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 9 / 18

· C

c g

  • (1)

A

f

  • D

d t

  • B,

s

  • g · t = 1, f · s = 1, c · t = s · d

always a pushout · regular po: g, c : C ։ D ×B A regular epi

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Regular pushouts

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 9 / 18

· C

c g

  • (1)

A

f

  • D

d t

  • B,

s

  • g · t = 1, f · s = 1, c · t = s · d

always a pushout · regular po: g, c : C ։ D ×B A regular epi ⇔ cg◦ = f ◦d ( gc◦ = d◦f )

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Regular pushouts

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 9 / 18

· C

c g

  • (1)

A

f

  • D

d t

  • B,

s

  • g · t = 1, f · s = 1, c · t = s · d

always a pushout · regular po: g, c : C ։ D ×B A regular epi ⇔ cg◦ = f ◦d ( gc◦ = d◦f ) Rc

  • Rd

gRc = Rd ( gc◦cg◦ = d◦d )

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Regular pushouts

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 9 / 18

· C

c g

  • (1)

A

f

  • D

d t

  • B,

s

  • g · t = 1, f · s = 1, c · t = s · d

always a pushout · regular po: g, c : C ։ D ×B A regular epi ⇔ cg◦ = f ◦d ( gc◦ = d◦f ) Rc

  • Rd

gRc = Rd ( gc◦cg◦ = d◦d ) relative

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Regular pushouts

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 9 / 18

· C

c g

  • (1)

A

f

  • D

d t

  • B,

s

  • g · t = 1, f · s = 1, c · t = s · d

always a pushout · regular po: g, c : C ։ D ×B A regular epi ⇔ cg◦ = f ◦d ( gc◦ = d◦f ) Rc

  • Rd

gRc = Rd ( gc◦cg◦ = d◦d ) relative · Prop. [ Bourn, The denormalised 3 × 3 L ] C

  • regular. TFAE:

(a) C Mal’tsev cat (b) (1) always regular po

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Regular pushouts

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 9 / 18

· C

c g

  • (1)

A

f

  • D

d t

  • B,

s

  • g · t = 1, f · s = 1, c · t = s · d

always a pushout · regular po: g, c : C ։ D ×B A regular epi ⇔ cg◦ = f ◦d ( gc◦ = d◦f ) Rc

  • Rd

gRc = Rd ( gc◦cg◦ = d◦d ) relative · Prop. [ Bourn, The denormalised 3 × 3 L ] C

  • regular. TFAE:

(a) C Mal’tsev cat (b) (1) always regular po Proof: calculus of relations

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Stability property

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 10 / 18

· Lem. [ Bourn, The denormalised 3 × 3 L ] C regular Mal’tsev. In: W ×D C

k

  • γ

◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗

v

Y ×B A

h

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

α

  • P

P P P P P P C

g c

A

f

  • W

j

  • δ

◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ Y

i

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

β

◗ ◗ ◗ D

t

  • d

B

s

  • v is a regular epi
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Stability property

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 10 / 18

· Lem. [ Bourn, The denormalised 3 × 3 L ] C regular Mal’tsev. In: W ×D C

k

  • γ

◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗

v

Y ×B A

h

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

α

  • P

P P P P P P C

g c

A

f

  • W

j

  • δ

◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ Y

i

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

β

◗ ◗ ◗ D

t

  • d

B

s

  • v is a regular epi

· Rem. α, β, γ, δ arbitrary maps and c, d, w, v regular epis

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Stability property

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 10 / 18

· Lem. [ Bourn, The denormalised 3 × 3 L ] C regular Mal’tsev. In: W ×D C

k

  • γ

◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗

v

Y ×B A

h

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

α

  • P

P P P P P P C

g c

A

f

  • W

j

  • δ

◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ Y

i

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

β

◗ ◗ ◗ D

t

  • d

B

s

  • v is a regular epi

· Rem. α, β, γ, δ arbitrary maps and c, d, w, v regular epis · Prop. C

  • regular. TFAE:

(a) C Mal’tsev cat (b) v is a regular epi

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Stability property

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories Definition Regular pushouts Stability property The Cuboid Lemma The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 10 / 18

· Lem. [ Bourn, The denormalised 3 × 3 L ] C regular Mal’tsev. In: W ×D C

k

  • γ

◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗

v

Y ×B A

h

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

α

  • P

P P P P P P C

g c

A

f

  • W

j

  • δ

◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗ ◗

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ Y

i

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

β

◗ ◗ ◗ D

t

  • d

B

s

  • v is a regular epi

· Prop. C

  • regular. TFAE:

(a) C Mal’tsev cat (b) v is a regular epi C

g

❍ ❍ ❍ ❍ ❍ ❍ ❍ ❍ ❍

v=g,c D ×B A f ′

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

d′

❖ ❖ ❖ ❖ ❖ C

g c

A

f

  • D

t

■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ D ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

d

  • P

P P P D

t

  • d

B

s

slide-40
SLIDE 40

The Cuboid Lemma

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 11 / 18

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Aim

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 12 / 18

· Aim. Mal’tsev ⇔ stability pp ⇔ Cuboid Lemma

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Aim

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 12 / 18

· Aim. Mal’tsev ⇔ stability pp ⇔ Cuboid Lemma · Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Aim

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 12 / 18

· Aim. Mal’tsev ⇔ stability pp ⇔ Cuboid Lemma · Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Aim

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 12 / 18

· Aim. Mal’tsev ⇔ stability pp ⇔ Cuboid Lemma · Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn)

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Aim

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 12 / 18

· Aim. Mal’tsev ⇔ stability pp ⇔ Cuboid Lemma · Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Aim

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 12 / 18

· Aim. Mal’tsev ⇔ stability pp ⇔ Cuboid Lemma · Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Aim

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 12 / 18

· Aim. Mal’tsev ⇔ stability pp ⇔ Cuboid Lemma · Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack) ⇔ (1) Goursat po (GR)

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Aim

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 12 / 18

· Aim. Mal’tsev ⇔ stability pp ⇔ Cuboid Lemma · Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack) ⇔ (1) Goursat po (GR) ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma (GR)

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Aim

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 12 / 18

· Aim. Mal’tsev ⇔ stability pp ⇔ Cuboid Lemma · Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack) ⇔ (1) Goursat po (GR) ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma (GR) ⇔ ?

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Aim

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 12 / 18

· Aim. Mal’tsev ⇔ stability pp ⇔ Cuboid Lemma · Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack) ⇔ (1) Goursat po (GR) ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma (GR) ⇔ Cuboid Lemma

slide-51
SLIDE 51

3 × 3 Lemma

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 13 / 18

· (denormalised) 3 × 3 Lemma: R¯

g ¯ g1

  • ¯

g2

  • t2
  • t1

Rg

g1

  • g2
  • v

Rf

f1

  • f2
  • Rc

c2

  • c1
  • ¯

g

A

g

  • c

C

f

S

s2

  • s1

B

d

D upper row ⇔ lower row exact exact

slide-52
SLIDE 52

3 × 3 Lemma

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 13 / 18

· (denormalised) 3 × 3 Lemma: R¯

g ¯ g1

  • ¯

g2

  • t2
  • t1

Rg

g1

  • g2
  • v

Rf

f1

  • f2
  • Rc

c2

  • c1
  • ¯

g

A

g

  • c

C

f

S

s2

  • s1

B

d

D upper row ⇔ lower row exact exact · Gran, Rodelo: Goursat ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma

slide-53
SLIDE 53

3 × 3 Lemma

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 13 / 18

· (denormalised) 3 × 3 Lemma: R¯

g ¯ g1

  • ¯

g2

  • t2
  • t1

Rg

g1

  • g2
  • v

Rf

f1

  • f2
  • Rc

c2

  • c1
  • ¯

g

A

g

  • c

C

f

S

s2

  • s1

B

d

D upper row ⇔ lower row exact exact · Gran, Rodelo: Goursat ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma ⇔ split 3 × 3 Lemma

slide-54
SLIDE 54

3 × 3 Lemma

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 13 / 18

· (denormalised) 3 × 3 Lemma: R¯

g ¯ g1

  • ¯

g2

  • t2
  • t1

Rg

g1

  • g2
  • v

Rf

f1

  • f2
  • Rc

c2

  • c1
  • ¯

g

A

g

  • c

C

f

S

s2

  • s1

B

d

D upper row ⇔ lower row exact exact · Gran, Rodelo: Goursat ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma ⇔ split 3 × 3 Lemma

  • (1)

↑ Goursat po

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Stability properties

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 14 / 18

· Goursat po Rg

v

Rf C

c g

  • (1)

A

f

D

d t

  • B

s

  • v is a regular epi
slide-56
SLIDE 56

Stability properties

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 14 / 18

· Goursat po Rg

v

Rf C

c g

  • (1)

A

f

D

d t

  • B

s

  • v is a regular epi

· Mal’tsev vs Goursat W ×D C

k

  • γ

◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆

v

Y ×B A

h

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

α

▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ C

g c

A

f

  • W

j

  • δ

◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ Y

i

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

β

▼ ▼ ▼ D

t

  • d

B

s

  • Rg

g1

  • g2
  • v

Rf

f1

✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

f2

  • C

g c

A

f

  • C
  • g

■ ■ ■ ■

c

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ A ✤ ✤ ✤ ✤

f

■ ■ D

t

  • d

B

s

  • split pbs

kernel pairs

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Cuboid Lemma

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 15 / 18

· R¯

g ¯ g1

  • ¯

g2

  • t2
  • t1

Rg

g1

  • g2
  • v

Rf

f1

  • f2
  • Rc

c2

  • c1
  • ¯

g

A

g

  • c

C

f

S

s2

  • s1
  • B

d

  • D
slide-58
SLIDE 58

Cuboid Lemma

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 15 / 18

· R¯

g ¯ g1

  • ¯

g2

  • t2
  • t1

Rg

g1

  • g2
  • v

Rf

f1

  • f2
  • Rc

c2

  • c1
  • ¯

g

A

g

  • c

C

f

S

s2

  • s1
  • B

d

  • D
  • ·

T

¯ k

  • t1
  • t2
  • ¯

γ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ V

k✁✁✁ v

  • γ

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ X

h✂✂✂ α

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rw

¯ j

  • w1

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

w2

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

¯ δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ W

j

✁ ✁

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ Y

i

✂ ✂

β

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rc

¯ g

✁✁✁✁

c1

  • c2

C

g✄

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄

c

A

f✄

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄ S

¯ t

✁ ✁ ✁

s1

  • s2

D

t

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄

d

B

s

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Cuboid Lemma

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 15 / 18

· T

¯ k

  • t1
  • t2
  • ¯

γ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ V

k✁✁✁ v

  • γ

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ X

h✂✂✂ α

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rw

¯ j

  • w1

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

w2

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

¯ δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ W

j

✁ ✁

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ Y

i

✂ ✂

β

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rc

¯ g

✁✁✁✁

c1

  • c2

C

g✄

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄

c

A

f✄

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄ S

¯ t

✁ ✁ ✁

s1

  • s2

D

t

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄

d

B

s

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄ upper row exact ⇔ lower row exact

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Cuboid Lemma

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 15 / 18

· T

¯ k

  • t1
  • t2
  • ¯

γ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ V

k✁✁✁ v

  • γ

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ X

h✂✂✂ α

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rw

¯ j

  • w1

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

w2

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

¯ δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ W

j

✁ ✁

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ Y

i

✂ ✂

β

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rc

¯ g

✁✁✁✁

c1

  • c2

C

g✄

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄

c

A

f✄

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄ S

¯ t

✁ ✁ ✁

s1

  • s2

D

t

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄

d

B

s

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄ upper row exact ⇔ lower row exact · Rem. d regular epi, d · s1 = d · s2, v · t1 = v · t2

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Cuboid Lemma

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 15 / 18

· T

¯ k

  • t1
  • t2
  • ¯

γ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ V

k✁✁✁ v

  • γ

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ X

h✂✂✂ α

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rw

¯ j

  • w1

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

w2

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

¯ δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ W

j

✁ ✁

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ Y

i

✂ ✂

β

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rc

¯ g

✁✁✁✁

c1

  • c2

C

g✄

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄

c

A

f✄

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄ S

¯ t

✁ ✁ ✁

s1

  • s2

D

t

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄

d

B

s

✄ ✄ ✄ ✄ upper row exact ⇔ lower row exact · Rem. d regular epi, d · s1 = d · s2, v · t1 = v · t2

  • · lower row exact

⇒ upper row exact: v is a regular epi upper row exact ⇒ lower row exact: S = Rd

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Main results

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 16 / 18

· Thm. C

  • regular. TFAE:

(a) C Mal’tsev cat (b) Cuboid Lemma

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Main results

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 16 / 18

· Thm. C

  • regular. TFAE:

(a) C Mal’tsev cat (b) Cuboid Lemma T

¯ k

  • t1
  • t2
  • ¯

γ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ V

k✁✁✁ v

  • γ

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ X

h✂

α

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rw

¯ j

  • w1

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

w2

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

¯ δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ W

j

✁ ✁

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ Y

i

β

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rc

¯ g✁

✁ ✁ ✁

c1

  • c2

C

g✄✄✄✄ c

A

f✄✄✄✄

S

¯ t

✁ ✁ ✁

s1

  • s2

D

t

✄ ✄ ✄

d

B

s

✄ ✄ ✄ (a) ⇒ (b) · lower row exact ⇒ upper row exact ?

  • stability pp: c, d, w regular epis ⇒ v regular epi
slide-64
SLIDE 64

Main results

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 16 / 18

· Thm. C

  • regular. TFAE:

(a) C Mal’tsev cat (b) Cuboid Lemma T

¯ k

  • t1
  • t2
  • ¯

γ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ V

k✁✁✁ v

  • γ

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ X

h✂

α

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rw

¯ j

  • w1

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

w2

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

¯ δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ W

j

✁ ✁

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ Y

i

β

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rc

¯ g✁

✁ ✁ ✁

c1

  • c2

C

g✄✄✄✄ c

A

f✄✄✄✄

S

¯ t

✁ ✁ ✁

s1

  • s2

D

t

✄ ✄ ✄

d

B

s

✄ ✄ ✄ (a) ⇒ (b) · lower row exact ⇒ upper row exact ?

  • stability pp: c, d, w regular epis ⇒ v regular epi

· upper row exact ⇒ lower row exact ?

  • always true!
slide-65
SLIDE 65

Main results

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 16 / 18

· Thm. C

  • regular. TFAE:

(a) C Mal’tsev cat (b) Cuboid Lemma T

¯ k

  • t1
  • t2
  • ¯

γ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ V

k✁✁✁ v

  • γ

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ X

h✂

α

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rw

¯ j

  • w1

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

w2

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

¯ δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ W

j

✁ ✁

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ Y

i

β

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rc

¯ g✁

✁ ✁ ✁

c1

  • c2

C

g✄✄✄✄ c

A

f✄✄✄✄

S

¯ t

✁ ✁ ✁

s1

  • s2

D

t

✄ ✄ ✄

d

B

s

✄ ✄ ✄ (b) ⇒ (a) · cube with stability pp ?

  • Rw, Rc, S = Rd, T = Rw ×Rd Rc
  • lower row exact ⇒ upper row exact } v regular epi
slide-66
SLIDE 66

Main results

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 16 / 18

· Thm. C

  • regular. TFAE:

(a) C Mal’tsev cat (b) Cuboid Lemma T

¯ k

  • t1
  • t2
  • ¯

γ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ V

k✁✁✁ v

  • γ

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ X

h✂

α

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rw

¯ j

  • w1

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

w2

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

¯ δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ W

j

✁ ✁

w

❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴ ❴

δ

✳ ✳ ✳ ✳ Y

i

β

✲ ✲ ✲ ✲ Rc

¯ g✁

✁ ✁ ✁

c1

  • c2

C

g✄✄✄✄ c

A

f✄✄✄✄

S

¯ t

✁ ✁ ✁

s1

  • s2

D

t

✄ ✄ ✄

d

B

s

✄ ✄ ✄ (b) ⇒ (a) · cube with stability pp ?

  • Rw, Rc, S = Rd, T = Rw ×Rd Rc
  • lower row exact ⇒ upper row exact } v regular epi

Upper Cuboid Lemma

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Main results

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma Aim 3 × 3 Lemma Stability properties Cuboid Lemma Main results The relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 16 / 18

· Thm. C

  • regular. TFAE:

(a) C Mal’tsev cat (b) Cuboid Lemma (c) Upper Cuboid Lemma (b) ⇒ (a) · cube with stability pp ?

  • Rw, Rc, S = Rd, T = Rw ×Rd Rc
  • lower row exact ⇒ upper row exact } v regular epi

Upper Cuboid Lemma

slide-68
SLIDE 68

The relative context

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context From the absolute to the relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 17 / 18

slide-69
SLIDE 69

From the absolute to the relative context

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context From the absolute to the relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 18 / 18

· absolute context

  • relative context
slide-70
SLIDE 70

From the absolute to the relative context

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context From the absolute to the relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 18 / 18

· absolute context

  • relative context

· Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack) ⇔ (1) Goursat po (GR) ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma (GR) ⇔ Cuboid Lemma (GR)

slide-71
SLIDE 71

From the absolute to the relative context

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context From the absolute to the relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 18 / 18

· absolute context

  • relative context

· Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack) ⇔ (1) Goursat po (GR) ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma (GR) ⇔ Cuboid Lemma (GR) relative (T. Janelidze)

lex + E class of regular epis sth ...

slide-72
SLIDE 72

From the absolute to the relative context

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context From the absolute to the relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 18 / 18

· absolute context

  • relative context

· Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack) ⇔ (1) Goursat po (GR) ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma (GR) ⇔ Cuboid Lemma (GR) relative (T. Janelidze)

lex + E class of regular epis sth ...

relative version (Goedecke, T. Janelidze)

slide-73
SLIDE 73

From the absolute to the relative context

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context From the absolute to the relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 18 / 18

· absolute context

  • relative context

· Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack) ⇔ (1) Goursat po (GR) ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma (GR) ⇔ Cuboid Lemma (GR) relative (T. Janelidze)

lex + E class of regular epis sth ...

relative version (Goedecke, T. Janelidze) relative

E-relations

slide-74
SLIDE 74

From the absolute to the relative context

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context From the absolute to the relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 18 / 18

· absolute context

  • relative context

· Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack) ⇔ (1) Goursat po (GR) ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma (GR) ⇔ Cuboid Lemma (GR) relative (T. Janelidze)

lex + E class of regular epis sth ...

relative version (Goedecke, T. Janelidze) relative

E-relations

calculus of relations

  • calculus of E-relations
slide-75
SLIDE 75

From the absolute to the relative context

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context From the absolute to the relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 18 / 18

· absolute context

  • relative context

· Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack) ⇔ (1) Goursat po (GR) ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma (GR) ⇔ Cuboid Lemma (GR) relative (T. Janelidze)

lex + E class of regular epis sth ...

relative version (Goedecke, T. Janelidze) relative

E-relations

calculus of relations

  • calculus of E-relations

relative

E-relations

slide-76
SLIDE 76

From the absolute to the relative context

Contents Preliminaries Regular Mal’tsev categories The Cuboid Lemma The relative context From the absolute to the relative context

9 -13 July 2012 The cuboid lemma and Mal’tsev categories – 18 / 18

· absolute context

  • relative context

· Regular Goursat cats Mal’tsev cats

(3-permutable: RSR = SRS) (2-permutable: RS = SR)

⇔ (1) regular po (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Bourn) ⇒ 3 × 3 Lemma (Lack) ⇔ (1) Goursat po (GR) ⇔ 3 × 3 Lemma (GR) ⇔ Cuboid Lemma (GR) relative (T. Janelidze)

lex + E class of regular epis sth ...

relative version (Goedecke, T. Janelidze) relative

E-relations

calculus of relations

  • calculus of E-relations

relative

E-relations

relative version (Everaert, Goedecke

  • T. Janelidze, Van der Linden)