Pre-Award Risk-Based Assessment Tawanna Fields-Mphande October - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pre award risk based assessment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Pre-Award Risk-Based Assessment Tawanna Fields-Mphande October - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pre-Award Risk-Based Assessment Tawanna Fields-Mphande October 14,2016 Overview Pre-Award Risk-Based Assessment Process Risk-Based Assessment Timeline Agency-Wide Compliance & Monitoring Updates Resources Risk-Based


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Pre-Award Risk-Based Assessment

Tawanna Fields-Mphande October 14,2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • Pre-Award Risk-Based Assessment Process
  • Risk-Based Assessment Timeline
  • Agency-Wide Compliance & Monitoring

Updates

  • Resources
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Risk-Based Assessment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Law

  • The Uniform Guidance (Super Circular)

requires all Pass-Through entity to conduct a risk-based assessment prior to making

  • awards. (OMNI Federal Circular §200.331)
  • To comply with this requirement, the Office of

Career Technical Education will conduct an annual risk assessment of all Perkins recipients.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Required Monitoring Activities

Framework for evaluating risks before applicant receives funding:

  • Financial stability
  • History of performance
  • Reports from single-audit findings
  • Applicant’s ability to effectively implement

statutory, regulatory or other requirements

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Risk-Based Assessment

The risk-based assessment process is designed to conduct a more thorough review for Perkins recipients with higher risk factors. The risk-based assessment review identifies potential problems that could lead to risks in the accountability, fiscal accounting and grant

  • perations.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Purpose and Intent

Provide preventative assistance before mistakes are made Increase efficient use of resources & transparency Reduce, waste, fraud & abuse Ensure that subrecipients use federal funds for the intended purpose

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Criteria Selection Process

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Criteria Selection Process

Just kidding!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Criteria Selection Process

Risk-based assessment criteria used to determine risk for FY17 districts (2016-2017 school year):

  • Previously non-compliant;
  • Failure to meet accountability measures;
  • New career-technical education personnel;
  • Failure to meet required deadlines; and
  • Single Audit Findings.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Pre-Award Risk-Based Assessment Tool

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Assessment Tool

High Medium Low

Based on the results of the risk-based assessment tool, all districts will be categorized as high, medium or low risk.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Risk-Based Assessment Tool

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Assessment Scores

0 to 1 points low risk 2 to 3 points medium risk 4 to 7 points high risk

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Risk Levels

Risk Level Monitoring Guidelines Risk Levels High (4-7) Required to submit detailed financial reports such as general ledgers, supporting documentation and performance reports. On-site monitoring will be at the discretion of the education program specialist. Medium (2-3) Required to receive additional targeted assistance. Required attendance at trainings/conferences. Follow-up with district via phone audit review. Low (0-1) No known programmatic, financial instability or significant audit findings. No significant program changes. The district shall receive technical assistance upon request.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

FY18 Pre-Award Risk Assessment Timeline

May 2017 High-Risk Districts Notified April 2017 Pre-Award Risk Assessment June 2017 Monitoring Guidelines implemented July 2017 Funds allocated to field

Note: The timeline is contingent on the availability of data.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Agency-Wide Updates

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Pre-Award Risk-Assessment

Agency-Wide Process

1

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Agency-Wide Process

  • All federal programs are required to

implement the risk-assessment process.

  • Each departments process is unique to their

grant.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Program Monitoring Agency-Wide Process

2

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Monitoring

  • Working collaboratively to reduce our foot-

print in the field.

  • In FY16:

– There were a total of 112 districts/organizations with overlap –Team approach – 107 onsite/desk review and 5 with desk review only overlap

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Compliance Dashboard

3

slide-23
SLIDE 23

New Compliance Dashboard

slide-24
SLIDE 24

In Summary

  • A high-risk assessment score should

NEVER be interpreted as a negative reflection.

  • Technical assistance will be provided
  • FY2017 districts were notified in August,

2016

  • Notification of high-risk will be sent via the

CCIP and email to the Superintendent

  • Compliance dashboard coming soon!
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Resources

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Scheduled to be Monitored

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Additional Resources

  • Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006

http://www.fldoe.org/workforce/perkins/pdf/Perkins_IV_text.pdf

  • U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circulars

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/

  • Education Department General Administrative Requirements

(EDGAR)

  • http://www.ed.gov/policy/fund/reg/edgarReg/edgar.html
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Resources

  • Subpart A – Acronyms & Definitions (§200.0 -§200.99)
  • Subpart B – General Provisions (§200.100 - §200.113)
  • Subpart C – Pre-Federal Award Requirements and

Contents

  • of Federal Awards (§200.200 - §200.211)
  • Subpart D – Post-Federal Award Requirements

Standards for

  • Financial and Program Management (§200.300 -

§200.345)

  • Subpart E – Cost Principles (§200.400 - §200.475)
  • Subpart F – Audit Requirements (§200.500 - §200.521
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Miguel Ruiz

slide-30
SLIDE 30

education.ohio.gov

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Social Media

@OHEducation @OHEducationSupt OhioFamiliesAndEducation OhioEdDept