PPP CONFERENCE HONG KONG 2005
The Exclusion of Scottish Firms in Scotland’s PFI Projects
Kirsty Hunter and Professor John Kelly
Glasgow Caledonian University School of the Built and Natural Environment E-mail: khu@gcal.ac.uk
PPP CONFERENCE HONG KONG 2005 The Exclusion of Scottish Firms in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
PPP CONFERENCE HONG KONG 2005 The Exclusion of Scottish Firms in Scotlands PFI Projects Kirsty Hunter and Professor John Kelly Glasgow Caledonian University School of the Built and Natural Environment E-mail: khu@gcal.ac.uk Structure of
Glasgow Caledonian University School of the Built and Natural Environment E-mail: khu@gcal.ac.uk
A Background to the PFI PFI Projects in Scotland The Research Project Research Methodology Issues Identified in Interviews Barriers to Entry The Questionnaire The PFI Players PFI Supply Chain Information Results Problems Encountered Conclusions & Further Work
delivery of public services
buildings
£2.7b investment in PFI 1998-2003 (Audit Scotland, 2002)
School Building Programme
Healthcare
Infrastructure
Water
Glasgow Housing Stock Transfer
Quantity Surveyors Architects Contractors Other members of the core construction team
management firms and other members of the typical core construction project team are based in Scotland?”
“The Treasury have a record of excluding smaller firms through restrictive PFI, prime contracting and Procure 21.”
Core Project Team Organisation Location
Architect EMBT RMJM Barcelona, Spain Scotland Construction Manager Bovis Lend Lease London (Scottish Office) Quantity Surveyor DL&E London (Scottish Office) Consulting Engineer Arup London (Scottish Office) Planning Supervisor Turner & Townsend London (Scottish Office)
Strand A – Analysis of SE Database Strand B – Investigation of the PFI Journal Strand C – Structured Interviews of Case
Study Research
Strand D – Questionnaire Survey of
Construction Faculty Board Members
Strand E – Study of Single Project
Specialist Skills
Small number of lawyers & project managers Involvement of council employees with non technical
background
Use of local supply chain dependent on availability of
skills
Fragmentation
Formation of strategic alliance / consortium
Bureaucracy & Size
Number of regulatory bodies Large size of projects or bundled projects Same contenders – PFI a specialised market Provision of different PFI packages
High Costs & Demands on Resources
High bidding / participation costs High project values High financial risks Lack of credibility and contacts prevents involvement Demands on management time Commitment to more than one PFI - pressure on resources Acquiring capital investment / cash flow to engage in PFI Acquiring expensive consultancy expertise Acquiring sub-contractors - committed to other projects
88% contractors felt there were real barriers to the PFI (Dick & Akintoye, 1996; IPFA 2002)
Lack of appropriate skills High participation costs High project values High risk Lack of credibility and contracts Demands on management time
Respondents were asked:
Council area they were from PFI projects they have worked on & nature of
input to projects identified
Procuring agencies / concession companies
they have been involved with
To identify any other members of the supply
chain
Dwindling UK interest… Treasury Review (complete – Nov 2004) Increasing overseas interest…
Bilfinger Berger (German) Hochtief (German) Bouygues (French)
Overseas interest is positive because UK
interest is deteriorating???
Sector i.e. education, health Project Sponsor / Client Special Purpose Company (SPC) / Consortium Contractor Facilties Management Provider Engineer(s) Lenders / Debt Financing Design Advisors to the Consortium i.e. financial & legal Advisors to the Client i.e. financial, legal & technical
RICS questionnaire Interviews with technical advisors Scottish Executive PFI project fact files National Health Service (NHS) database on
projects (for health projects only)
Sector
Projects I dentified
Projects with I nformation Percentage
with I nformation
Health 118 82 69% Local Authority 32 16 50% Water and Sewerage 9 1 11% Scottish Executive and its Agencies 5 2 40% Further Education 4 3 75% Public Sector 3 2 67% Police 1 1 100%
Total 172 107 62%
Head / Main office in Scotland Office in Scotland, Head / Main office in
England or overseas
Based in England or overseas only Global company – no particular head office
(has office in Scotland)
Contractor Facilities Manager Architect Legal Advisor to Client Financial Advisor to Client Technical Advisor
Balfour Beatty (7) Gardner Merchant / Sodhexo (5) Keppie (4) Central Legal Office (25) PWC (23) Faithful & Gould / Atkins (8) Roberston Group (5) Roberston FM (2) HMA/3D Holmes Partnership(3) Dundas & Wilson (10) Deloitte Touche (14) Mackenzie Partnership (7) Sir Robert McAlpine (4) ISS Mediclean (2) Aedas (3) Shephard & Wedderburn (8) Ernst Young (6) Currie & Brown (7) Morrison (4) Initial Healthcare (2) Young & Gault (2) McGrigor Donald (8) Quayle Munro (5) Canmore Partnership (7) James Walker (4) HBG FM (2) HLM Design (2) McClure Naismith (7) Newchurch & Co (5) Mott MacDonald (4) HBG (4) Dumfries Facilities (2) Fife Council (2) MacRoberts (7) Amey (2) BLB (2) Burness (7)
With exception of the legal entity, the majority of
profit from Scotland’s PFI is being absorbed south
Based in Scotland…
20% financial advisors 29% facilities management providers 33% contractors 40% technical advisors 43% architects
17/37 organisations publish their profits in
Scotland compared to 20 in England
Information on Scotland’s PFI projects
being readily available
Databases incomplete Response rate in questionnaire
Few practices participating in Scottish PFI
projects
Knowledge of supply chain
Bidding costs & other PFI costs Huge challenges for Scottish firms PFI is a maturing market ‘Two-tier’ market With exception of the legal entity, the majority of
profit from Scotland’s PFI is being absorbed south of the border
Initial premise that PFI in Scotland is undertaken
mainly by organisations south of the border is disproved…
Very small constituency of firms operating in the PFI
market in Scotland (Glasgow / Edinburgh based)
Current PFI system creates a ‘vicious circle’
Requires significant changes…
PFI and non-PFI routes Bespoke project contracts Different approach to risk allocation Reserve all smaller public sector