Power Spectral Density of Digitally Modulated Signals Saravanan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Power Spectral Density of Digitally Modulated Signals

Saravanan Vijayakumaran sarva@ee.iitb.ac.in

Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay

August 22, 2013

1 / 22

PSD Definition for Digitally Modulated Signals

• Consider a real binary PAM signal

u(t) =

∞

• n=−∞

bng(t − nT) where bn = ±1 with equal probability and g(t) is a baseband pulse of duration T

• PSD = F [Ru(τ)] Neither SSS nor WSS

2 / 22

Cyclostationary Random Process

Definition (Cyclostationary RP)

A random process X(t) is cyclostationary with respect to time interval T if it is statistically indistinguishable from X(t − kT) for any integer k.

Definition (Wide Sense Cyclostationary RP)

A random process X(t) is wide sense cyclostationary with respect to time interval T if the mean and autocorrelation functions satisfy mX(t) = mX(t − T) for all t, RX(t1, t2) = RX(t1 − T, t2 − T) for all t1, t2.

3 / 22

Power Spectral Density of a Cyclostationary Process

To obtain the PSD of a cyclostationary process with period T

• Calculate autocorrelation of cyclostationary process RX(t, t − τ)
• Average autocorrelation between 0 and T, RX(τ) = 1

T

T

0 RX(t, t − τ) dt

• Calculate Fourier transform of averaged autocorrelation RX(τ)

4 / 22

Power Spectral Density of a Realization

Time windowed realizations have finite energy xTo(t) = x(t)I[− To

2 , To 2 ](t)

STo(f) = F(xTo(t)) ˆ Sx(f) = |STo(f)|2 To (PSD Estimate)

PSD of a realization

¯ Sx(f) = lim

To→∞

|STo(f)|2 To |STo(f)|2 To − ⇀ ↽ − 1 To

• To

2

− To

2

xTo(u)x∗

To(u − τ) du = ˆ

Rx(τ)

5 / 22

Power Spectral Density of a Cyclostationary Process

X(t)X ∗(t − τ) ∼ X(t + T)X ∗(t + T − τ) for cyclostationary X(t) ˆ Rx(τ) = 1 To

• To

2

− To

2

x(t)x∗(t − τ) dt = 1 KT

• KT

2

− KT

2

x(t)x∗(t − τ) dt for To = KT = 1 T T 1 K

K 2

• k=− K

2

x(t + kT)x∗(t + kT − τ) dt − →

K→∞

1 T T E [X(t)X ∗(t − τ)] dt = 1 T T RX(t, t − τ) dt = RX(τ) PSD of a cyclostationary process = F[RX(τ)]

6 / 22

PSD of a Linearly Modulated Signal

• Consider

u(t) =

∞

• n=−∞

bnp(t − nT)

• u(t) is cyclostationary wrt to T if {bn} is stationary
• u(t) is wide sense cyclostationary wrt to T if {bn} is WSS
• Suppose Rb[k] = E[bnb∗

n−k]

• Let Sb(z) = ∞

k=−∞ Rb[k]z−k

• The PSD of u(t) is given by

Su(f) = Sb

• e j2πfT |P(f)|2

T

7 / 22

PSD of a Linearly Modulated Signal

Ru(τ) = 1 T T Ru(t + τ, t) dt = 1 T T

∞

• n=−∞

∞

• m=−∞

E [bnb∗

mp(t − nT + τ)p∗(t − mT)] dt

= 1 T

∞

• k=−∞

∞

• m=−∞

−(m−1)T

−mT

E [bm+kb∗

mp(λ − kT + τ)p∗(λ)] dλ

= 1 T

∞

• k=−∞

∞

−∞

E [bm+kb∗

mp(λ − kT + τ)p∗(λ)] dλ

= 1 T

∞

• k=−∞

Rb[k] ∞

−∞

p(λ − kT + τ)p∗(λ) dλ

8 / 22

PSD of a Linearly Modulated Signal

Ru(τ) = 1 T

∞

• k=−∞

Rb[k] ∞

−∞

p(λ − kT + τ)p∗(λ) dλ ∞

−∞

p(λ + τ)p∗(λ) dλ − ⇀ ↽ − |P(f)|2 ∞

−∞

p(λ − kT + τ)p∗(λ) dλ − ⇀ ↽ − |P(f)|2e −j2πfkT Su(f) = F [Ru(τ)] = |P(f)|2 T

∞

• k=−∞

Rb[k]e −j2πfkT = Sb

• e j2πfT |P(f)|2

T where Sb(z) = ∞

k=−∞ Rb[k]z−k. 9 / 22

Power Spectral Density of Line Codes

Line Codes

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Unipolar NRZ Polar NRZ Bipolar NRZ Manchester

Further reading: Digital Communications, Simon Haykin, Chapter 6

11 / 22

Unipolar NRZ

• Symbols independent and equally likely to be 0 or A

P (b[n] = 0) = P (b[n] = A) = 1 2

• Autocorrelation of b[n] sequence

Rb[k] =     

A2 2

k = 0

A2 4

k = 0

• p(t) = I[0,T)(t) ⇒ P(f) = Tsinc(fT)e −jπfT
• Power Spectral Density

Su(f) = |P(f)|2 T

∞

• k=−∞

Rb[k]e −j2πkfT

12 / 22

Unipolar NRZ

Su(f) = A2T 4 sinc2(fT) + A2T 4 sinc2(fT)

∞

• k=−∞

e −j2πkfT = A2T 4 sinc2(fT) + A2 4 sinc2(fT)

∞

• n=−∞

δ

• f − n

T

• =

A2T 4 sinc2(fT) + A2 4 δ(f)

13 / 22

Normalized PSD plot

0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 fT

Su(f) A2T

Unipolar NRZ

14 / 22

Polar NRZ

• Symbols independent and equally likely to be −A or A

P (b[n] = −A) = P (b[n] = A) = 1 2

• Autocorrelation of b[n] sequence

Rb[k] =    A2 k = 0 k = 0

• P(f) = Tsinc(fT)e −jπfT
• Power Spectral Density

Su(f) = A2Tsinc2(fT)

15 / 22

Normalized PSD plots

0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 fT

Su(f) A2T

Unipolar NRZ Polar NRZ

16 / 22

Manchester

• Symbols independent and equally likely to be −A or A

P (b[n] = −A) = P (b[n] = A) = 1 2

• Autocorrelation of b[n] sequence

Rb[k] =    A2 k = 0 k = 0

• P(f) = jTsinc

fT

2

• sin

πfT

2

• e−jπfT
• Power Spectral Density

Su(f) = A2Tsinc2 fT 2

• sin2

πfT 2

• 17 / 22

Normalized PSD plots

0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 fT

Su(f) A2T

Unipolar NRZ Polar NRZ Manchester

18 / 22

Bipolar NRZ

• Successive 1’s have alternating polarity

→ Zero amplitude 1 → +A or − A

• Probability mass function of b[n]

P (b[n] = 0) = 1 2 P (b[n] = −A) = 1 4 P (b[n] = A) = 1 4

• Symbols are identically distributed but they are not independent

19 / 22

Bipolar NRZ

• Autocorrelation of b[n] sequence

Rb[k] =    A2/2 k = 0 − A2/4 k = ±1

• therwise
• Power Spectral Density

Su(f) = Tsinc2(fT) A2 2 − A2 4

• e j2πfT + e −j2πfT

= A2T 2 sinc2(fT) [1 − cos(2πfT)] = A2Tsinc2(fT) sin2(πfT)

20 / 22

Normalized PSD plots

0.5 1 1.5 2 0.5 1 fT

Su(f) A2T

Unipolar NRZ Polar NRZ Manchester Bipolar NRZ

21 / 22

Thanks for your attention

22 / 22