Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

poverty party alignment and reducing corruption through
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization: Evidence from Guatemala Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Academia Against Corruption in the Americas Conference May 18, 2020 Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization: Evidence from Guatemala

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed)

Academia Against Corruption in the Americas Conference

May 18, 2020

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 1 / 14

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Research Question & Motivation

Economics + Politics/Institutions ⇒ ↓ Corruption

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 2 / 14

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Literature ⇒ Theory

↓ Poverty ⇒ ↑ discount clientelism (e.g., Stokes et al. 2013) Alignment ⇒ ↑ resources (Greene 2010; Brollo & Nannicini 2012) Alignment ⇒ clarity of responsibility (Schwindt-Bayer & Tavits 2016) Elections ⇒ ↑ control of politicians (Barro 1973; Ferejohn 1986) Alignment + ↓ Poverty + Close Election ⇒ ↓ Corruption

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 3 / 14

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Theory (Graphic Presentation) [1]

Alignment + ↓ Poverty + Close Election ⇒ ↓ Corruption

Link to working paper with formal model: www.mikedenly.com/files/dg-corruption.pdf

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 4 / 14

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Theory (Graphic Presentation) [2]

Link to working paper with formal model: www.mikedenly.com/files/dg-corruption.pdf

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 5 / 14

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why Guatemala? (Data)

Poverty rate: 59% (World Bank 2017) Governors of departments (provinces/states) appointed by the President Supreme Audit Institution (Contralor´ ıa General de Cuentas)

Independence protected by the Constitution Publish audit data online

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 6 / 14

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Research Design

Method Close-Election Regression Discontinuity Design Dependent Variables Number of municipal audit infractions in each municipality-year Amounts (log) associated with those infractions Treatment Alignment: Mayor party matches President’s party Running Variable Margin of victory for mayor Key Subgroups/Results Poverty reduced since last census () Poverty increased since last census (✗) Whole sample (✗)

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 7 / 14

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Results: Infractions

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 8 / 14

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results: Amounts (Log)

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 9 / 14

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Additional Material in the Paper

Same tests for extreme poverty Separate models by year and electoral term Testing the poverty, alignment, close election mechanisms individually McCrary (2008) density tests of running variable Tests for potential endogeneity between poverty and corruption AND MUCH MORE: Link to working paper: www.mikedenly.com/files/dg-corruption.pdf

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 10 / 14

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Conclusion

1 Economic growth ⇒ democracy (Acemoglu et al. 2019)

BUT ↓ Poverty + Alignment + Close Election ⇒ ↓ Corruption

AND ↓ Corruption ⇒ ↑ Democracy (Lagunes 2012)

2 Limitation: subgroup analyses

Different paths (external validity)

3 Scope condition: party system stability Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 11 / 14

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Questions?

Thank you!

Comments/feedback welcome: mdenly@utexas.edu Link to working paper: www.mikedenly.com/files/dg-corruption.pdf

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 12 / 14

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Party Alignment Patterns by Electoral Term

Term Years Municipalities Infractions Amount Log Amount Coded Aligned Mean Mean Mean 2004-2007 2007 22% 4.86 181,967.5 Q 10.51 2008-2011 2008-2011 31% 20.77 442,884.8 Q 12.38 2012-2015 2012-2015 36% 26.10 449,274.2 Q 12.56 2016-2019 2016-2018 31.74 568,759.2 Q 12.60 Note: all amounts deflated to account for inflation.

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 13 / 14

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Additional Material in the Paper

Same tests for extreme poverty Separate models by year and electoral term Different orders of polynomial fit Testing the poverty, alignment, close election mechanisms individually McCrary (2008) density tests of running variable Tests for potential endogeneity between poverty and corruption Placebo tests at varying cutoffs Re-estimation of results with

  • nly the last two years and final

year before the election Outlier tests Results with covariates using Calonico et al.’s (2019) algorithm Tests for political bias in audit distributions Link to working paper: www.mikedenly.com/files/dg-corruption.pdf

Mike Denly (UT) & Akshat Gautam (KC Fed) Poverty, Party Alignment, and Reducing Corruption through Modernization 14 / 14