Poverty and vulnerability to poverty in Ecuador: a microsimulation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

poverty and vulnerability to poverty in ecuador a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Poverty and vulnerability to poverty in Ecuador: a microsimulation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Poverty and vulnerability to poverty in Ecuador: a microsimulation approach Mauricio Cuesta Zapata Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales, Quito, Ecuador. m.cuesta@iaen.edu.ec H. Xavier Jara Institute for Social and Economic Research,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Poverty and vulnerability to poverty in Ecuador: a microsimulation approach

Mauricio Cuesta Zapata Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales, Quito, Ecuador. m.cuesta@iaen.edu.ec

  • H. Xavier Jara

Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK . hxjara@essex.ac.uk

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation

  • Over time people might flow in and out of poverty as a result of adverse economic

shocks

  • The concept of vulnerability to poverty considers the probability of being affected

by such shocks

  • In developing countries, vulnerability to poverty is often not considered due to

data limitations

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Poverty

ex-post measure of deprivation of some of life’s basic needs, such as food, shelter, clothing, education, health care and social security among other dimensions of wellbeing

Vulnerability

ex-ante measure of the person's well-being, which reveals future expectations and risks of their realization: loss of production, price increase, illness, unemployment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

          ≤ =

+ +

             

n consumptio current t h h t h n consumptio future t h h t h t h

e x c z e x c v ) , , , ( | ) , , , ( Pr

, 1 , 1 ,

α β α β

Vulnerability (vh,t)

where,

h

x is a vector of observable household characteristics

t

β describes the state of the economy

h

α time invariant household level effect, and

t h

e , idiosyncratic factors (shocks)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

( )

[ ]

) ( ), ( Pr

1 , 1 , , + +

= =

t h t h t h

c V c E f poor become v

This would be done using longitudinal data (where the same households are tracked over a number of periods) of sufficient length Using cross-sectional data we estimate using a three-step feasible generalized least squares (FGLS). (Amemiya, 1977).

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methodology

  • We use ECUAMOD, the tax-benefit microsimulation model for

Ecuador

  • ECUAMOD uses household representative microdata from the

National Survey of Income and Expenditures of Urban and rural Households 2011/2012 for 39,617 households and 153,341 individuals

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Estimation strategy

We estimate poverty and vulnerability to poverty by constructing a series of repeated cross-sections for years 2011 to 2016 using ECUAMOD based on ENIGHUR 2011/2012

  • No large labour market changes over this period
  • Focus on the role of the tax-benefit system
slide-8
SLIDE 8

The typical household head (HHH)

Female Male Age median age (years) 50 45 Education not completed primary 29% 20% primary 23% 29% ethnicity Mestizo 79% 79% Indigenous 6% 7% Marital status Separated 32% Widowed 27% Married 57% Single 34% Social security No social security 68% 57% Social security general 24% 32%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The tax policy benefits

1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% 90% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poorest Richest

Decile

Share of paid taxes

0% 0% 1% 2% 2% 4% 6% 9% 18% 58% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poorest Richest

Decile

Social insurance contribution

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The tax policy benefits

92% 88% 78% 69% 61% 43% 31% 15% 3% 1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Poorest Richest

Decile

Simulated Benefits

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The vulnerability results

N Mean Standard deviation Minimum Maximum poor-no-vulnerable 15% 93,2 38,7 155,5 poor-vulnerable 20% 89,9 37,4 155,3 no-poor-vulnerable 25% 340,6 240,8 155,61 2.296 no-poor-no-vulnerable 40% 512,2 844,4 155,55 31.544

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Poverty and vulnerability to poverty

23% 23% 24% 24% 24% 11% 11% 9% 9% 8% 34.7% 33.8% 32.6% 32.7% 31.5%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 No poor and vulnerable Relative poverty (disposable income < realtive poverty line) Total HHH population to be assisted (poor+vulnerable)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Concluding remarks

  • Microsimulation techniques can be used to estimate vulnerability to

poverty based on cross-sectional data

  • In Ecuador:
  • Around 20% of the population is identified as poor and vulnerable
  • Around 25% of the population is identified as non-poor but vulnerable
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Next steps

  • Exploit the advantages of ECUAMOD to simulate the effect of

increasing benefit amounts for certain population groups:

  • Poor and vulnerable
  • Non-poor but vulnerable
  • Account for changes in the labour market in a rigorous way (e.g. as in

nowcasting exercises using EUROMOD)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ECUAMOD