Potato disease resistance and towards development of a plant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
potato disease resistance and towards development of a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Potato disease resistance and towards development of a plant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aug 15, 2022 14 likes •288 views

Potato disease resistance and towards development of a plant strengthener Erik Andreasson Resistance Biology Unit Department of Plant Protection Biology SLU Alnarp Sweden Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se The host:

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Potato disease resistance and towards development of a plant strengthener

Erik Andreasson Resistance Biology Unit Department of Plant Protection Biology SLU –Alnarp Sweden

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

The host: Potato

  • 3-most important food crop –food security
  • Tetraploid and relative heterozygot

– In Sweden approximately 20-30% of the fungicides are used on potato (only 1% of land). Treatments 7-15 times. – Almost irreplacable part of Nordic cuisine

  • Loss of approximately 7 billion/year in control effort and

lost production.

– Very high yield potential, high protein and vitamin content – Easy to transform – Gene flow very low risk (easy GM fields) – 4-5000 SEK/ha extra income if late blight problem solved (Eriksson et al 2016, Potato Research)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

  • Oomyceet-”algsvamp”
  • Phytophthora –plant destroyer
  • Irish Potato Famine 1845

Start of Plant Pathology

  • 100% crop loss in one week
  • The major fungicide target in Sweden
  • Major resistance genes isolated

Phytophthora infestans causing Late blight disease (bladmögel) and tuber blight

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Alternaria solani causing Early Blight

  • No major resistance gene so far

indentifed

  • Limited number of fungicides
  • Increasing problems with fungicide

resistance

  • Large variations between years in

Sweden

Photo:

  • E. Liljeroth
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Some methods

  • Gene technology
  • Gene editing
  • Induced resistance (IR) by

exogenous compounds

  • Biological control ?
  • Combinations
  • Background check on IR
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

One year from transformation of 3 stacked resistance genes into field trials

Kieu et al, submitted

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

2019 Field trial (Picture on Wikipedia)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

CRISPR/Cas9 deletion in a susceptibility gene in King Edward food potato gives late blight reduction "Gene edited potatoes for reduced pesticide

usage". NNF Project 2019

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Quantitative proteome analysis of 3 different immune reactions

Upregulat ed in PTI Upregulated in ETI-IpiO Upregulated in ETI-AVR2 Downregulated in ETI-IpiO Downregulated in ETI-AVR2 Downregulated in PTI

Burra et al 2018, Resjö et al MCP Resjö et al 2019, IJMS, unpublished

1 2 3 4 5 Acpi Mbm1 T-16 Cont

Mean lesion diameter

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Phosphite can prolong the intervals of fungicide treatment

Treatment Interval Late blight (rAUDPC) Yield (ton/ha) StarchContent (%) Starch Yield (ton/ha) Untreated control 7 days 0.221a1 45.2c1 22.3b1 10.0d1 Fungicide 100% dose 7 days 0.090cd 49.8ab 23.1ab 11.5abc Fungicide 50% dose 7 days 0.093cd 49.6ab 23.4a 11.6ab Phosphite 100% dose 7 days 0.105c 49.4ab 22.4b 11,0bc Phosphite 50% dose 7 days 0.129b 47.8bc 22.8ab 10.8c Combination Fungicide50%/Phosphite50% 7 days 0.085d 49.9ab 22.8ab 11.3abc Combination Fungicide100%/Phosphite100% 14 days 0.084d 52.0a 22.8ab 11,8a

Liljeroth et al, submitted

EA2

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Slide 10 EA2

Erik Andreasson; 31-10-2019

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

BABA-beta amino butyric acid – a resistance inducer (no fungicidal effect)

Liljeroth et al 2010. Eur J Plant Pathol 127:171–183

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

BABA Shirlan AUDPCr AUDPCr(first period) Yield

kg ha−1 L ha−1 ton ha−1 Cultivar: Bintje Superb Bintje Superb Bintje Superb Borgeby A 0.66a 0.57a 0.4033a 0.2561a 55.3b 66.5c B 0.4 0.11c 0.02c 0.0002c 0.0002c 68.7a 83.1a C 0.3 0.15bc 0.04c 0.0004c 0.0002c 70.5a 79.7ab D 0.2 0.30b 0.09c 0.0574c 0.0003c 62.9a 73.5abc E 0.2 0.52a 0.44b 0.2066b 0.1269b 64.5a 67.9bc F 0.1 0.3 0.14bc 0.03c 0.0002c 0.0002c 67.2a 82.1a G 0.2 0.2 0.15bc 0.08c 0.0003c 0.0002c 68.0a 78.6ab H 0.1 0.2 0.14bc 0.05c 0.0002c 0.0003c 66.2a 78.1ab

Liljeroth et al 2010. Eur J Plant Pathology 127:171–183

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

SBE

Plant strengthener from sugar beet Industry

  • Raw material ”for free”
  • Fairy large and consistent quantity of

raw material

Växtresurs Sverige AB

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Phytophthora (bladmögel)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Sporangia Phytophthora

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Alternaria solani (lesion reduction mm)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Leason size (mm) untreated SBE

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Hyphal growth of Alternaria solani

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Day 3 Day 7 Day 10

hyphal growth (mm)

20% EtOH strobulin SBE

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Hyphal growth of Botrytis cinerea

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Day 6 Day 10

Hyphal growth (mm) Axis Title

control SBE

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

SBE induce PR1 (marker for plant immunity)

PR1

Con BABA SBE

Moushib et al EJPP, patented

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

SBE

  • Not direct toxic to pathogens
  • Activate plant immune system
  • Active componds unknown
  • Upscaling (concentration) and formulation

needed –now at 600 l level (Norups Gård)

  • Field testing in several systems
  • Combinations with fungicides?
  • Greening
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

How frequent are plant immunity active in nature and agriculture? -Why do we get results that varies Lankinen et al 2018, PloS One 13(11):e0207253

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

July and August

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se

Resistance Biology Unit, Department of Plant Protection Biology, SLU Alnarp

Erland Liljeroth Svante Resjö Marit Lenman Mia Mogren Sophie Brouwer Nam Kieu Phuong Awais Zahid Helena Mattisson Salla Maartilla Eu Sheng Wang Erik Alexandersson Erik Andreasson

Marc Gislain, CIP Kenya, Jonathan Jones, Sainsbury Lab, UK, Åsa Lankinen, SLU Thanks to: Mistra, SSF (strategiska stiftelsen), Formas, SLF, SLU, VR, Plant Link, EU (SJV)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences www.slu.se