POQC Discussion Jennifer J. Griggs, MD, MPH, FACP, FASCO Program - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

poqc discussion
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

POQC Discussion Jennifer J. Griggs, MD, MPH, FACP, FASCO Program - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

POQC Discussion Jennifer J. Griggs, MD, MPH, FACP, FASCO Program Director Objectives What is the relationship between Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and MOQC? How does Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan benefit from MOQCs work?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

POQC Discussion

Jennifer J. Griggs, MD, MPH, FACP, FASCO Program Director

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Objectives

  • What is the relationship between Blue Cross Blue

Shield of Michigan and MOQC?

  • How does Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan benefit

from MOQC’s work?

  • What is ASCO?
  • What is QOPI?
  • How do we collect data? Which data do we collect?
  • What do we do with the data?
  • What value does MOQC provide to practices?

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

BCBSM, MOQC, and the CQI’s

  • The Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium (MOQC)

is one of 17 Collaborative Quality Initiatives (CQI’s).

  • The CQI’s are part of the Blue Cross/Blue Shield of

Michigan’s (BCBSM) Value Partnerships, a collection

  • f patient safety, clinical quality, and care process

efforts.

  • Hospitals and physicians share data to develop best

practices around areas of care with high c gh costs and high v gh variation.

3

(All those acronyms)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

How BCBSM relates to the CQI’s

  • Hospital & physician performance not judged
  • Blue Cross never sees individual hospital or physician

data

  • The data are used only to identify areas of opportunity

for improvement. Other Ways in Which BCBSM Relates to the CQI’s

  • BCBSM funds the CQIs
  • Approves our budget
  • Approves our Statement of Work (SOW)

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

So what does BCBSM get out of the CQI’s?

Value Partnerships initiatives have saved more than $1.4 billion in health care expenses.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

There are currently 17 CQIs

  • Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium
  • Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative
  • Michigan Bariatric Surgery Consortium
  • Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative
  • Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative
  • Michigan O

Onc ncology Q Qua uality C Conso sortium

  • Hospital Medicine Safety Consortium
  • Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Project
  • Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative
  • Michigan Radiation Oncology Quality Consortium
  • Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative for Quality Improvement
  • Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative
  • Michigan Value Collaborative
  • Anesthesiology Performance Improvement and Reporting Exchange
  • Michigan Pharmacists Transforming Care and Quality Consortium
  • Michigan Emergency Department Improvement Collaborative
  • Integrated Michigan Patient-Centered Alliance on Care Transitions

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

  • International organization with over 40,000 oncology providers
  • Represent oncologists and allied health professionals & their patients
  • Activities include scientific dissemination, advocacy, quality

advancement, and more

  • Core values are Evidence, Care, Impact
  • Quality measurement & certification “arm” of ASCO
  • Includes 177 validated measures in adult oncology
  • Branching into pediatrics & into hematology
  • Certifies practices across the country & internationally
  • Committee in ASCO works to keep QOPI up-to-date
  • Measures group in ASCO keep quality measures up-to-date
  • All committees are volunteer-based & include patients
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

MOQC Coordinating Center

MOQC’s Structure

10

MOQC Steering Committee

Patient and Caregiver Oncology Quality Council (POQC)

Practices

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Committees that Report to the Steering Committee

11

Steering Committee Research & Publication Committee Measures Committee Advanced Imaging Workgroup

slide-12
SLIDE 12

How do we collect data?

  • Practices identify patient charts that meet criteria
  • Criteria differ by measure
  • Professional abstractors go through patient records
  • All abstractors are trained in protecting confidentiality
  • Paper charts (unusual)
  • Electronic records (more common)
  • Combination of paper charts and electronic records
  • Abstractors may work for practices or be MOQC

abstractors

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

MOQC Measures

  • Selected by the MOQC Measures Committee
  • Chosen with patient and caregiver input
  • Committee meets annually to revisit measures
  • Approved by Steering Committee
  • Measures need to
  • Be meaningful
  • Demonstrate some gap in care
  • Be feasible to measure
  • Be addressable through practice system(s)

13

Subset of QOPI Measures

slide-14
SLIDE 14

VBR

Measure Module

Name of QOPI Measure

MOQC

Performance

QOPI

Performance

Core

Pain addressed appropriately

81% 82%

X

Core* Pain addressed appropriately by second office visit and during most recent office visits

74% 75%

Core* Antineoplastic treatment administered to patients with metastatic solid tumor with

performance status of 3, 4, or undocumented (Lower Score Better)

23% 21%

Core

Oral antineoplastic/chemotherapy treatment monitored on visit/contact following start of therapy: medication adherence assessed

72% 66%

Core

Signed patient consent for antineoplastic treatment

76% 79%

X

Core

Tobacco cessation counseling administered or patient referred in past year

42% 35%

Core* Smoking/tobacco use cessation administered appropriately in past year

86% 89%

Sympto m

Aprepitant/fosaprepitant or netupitant prescribed with low or moderate risk emetic antineoplastic/chemotherapy treatment (Lower Score Better)

18% 9%

Sympto m

Infertility risks discussed prior to antineoplastic treatment with patients of reproductive age

38% 37%

X

EOL*

Pain addressed appropriately

77% 80%

EOL*

Dyspnea addressed appropriately

77% 77%

EOL

Hospice enrollment within 3 days of death (Lower Score Better)

18% 16%

X

EOL** Hospice enrollment, palliative care referral/services, or documented discussion

66% 76%

Breast PET, CT, or radionuclide bone scan ordered by practice within 60 days after diagnosis to stage

I, IIA, or IIB breast cancer (Lower Score Better)

42% 22%

Breast

Serum tumor marker surveillance ordered by practice between 30 days and 365 days after diagnosis of breast cancer in patients who received treatment with curative intent (Lower Score Better)

96% 87%

Colorect al*

Complete family history documented for patients with invasive colorectal cancer

32% 32%

Colorect al

Colonoscopy before or within 6 months of curative colorectal resection or completion of primary adjuvant antineoplastic treatment

70% 85%

NSCLC GCSF administered to patients who received antineoplastic treatment for metastatic NSCLC

(Lower Score Better)

27% 23%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What do we do with the data?

  • Disseminate the findings
  • Present in a way that allows practices to see where

they stand (“benchmark”)

  • Identify key areas for improvement
  • Develop quality improvement initiatives
  • Reward practices for performance (for select

measures)

  • Marketing by practices is not allowed → agreement of participation

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

MOQI

  • Measures quality using the QOPI platform
  • Selects a set of metrics from among the 177
  • Why not all 177 measures?
slide-17
SLIDE 17

What else does MOQC do?

  • Quality improvement projects
  • Education & outreach for providers and

patients

  • Harmonization of care
  • Advocacy for the medically-underserved
  • Asks provocative questions
slide-18
SLIDE 18

What are the benefits to practices?

  • Provides data benchmarked across region, state, nation
  • Helps providers improve quality by providing evidence-

based tools

  • Gives practices access to patient & caregiver

perspectives

  • Helps providers maintain board certification
  • Helps providers report required quality data to

Medicare

  • Provides opportunities for value-based reimbursement
  • Creates opportunities for collaboration around

improving care

slide-19
SLIDE 19

75% 83% 88% 87% 76% 82% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% A B C D E MOQC

Pain Managed Appropriately

19

First two office visits and most recent office visits

2017 78% Calendar Year 2017 2018 87%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Pain Managed Appropriately

20

Last two visits prior to death

2017 80% Calendar Year 2017

78% 86% 87% 86% 84% 85% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% A B C D E MOQC

2018 87%

slide-21
SLIDE 21

75% 56% 57% 67% 41% 45%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A B C D E MOQC

Tobacco Cessation

21

Counseling administered or patient referred

2017 45% Calendar Year 2017 2018 60%

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Hospice Enrollment/Discussion or Palliative Care Services

22

2017 70% Calendar Year 2017 2018 73%

42% 76% 67% 66% 61% 64%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A B C D E MOQC

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Antiresorptive therapy given to patients with breast cancer who have bone metastases

23

83% 62% 73% 74% 65% 69% 65% 54% 89% 50% 80% 67%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A B C D E MOQC QOPI

QOPI Measure Number BR61 1st bar: S14-S17; 2nd bar: F17

slide-24
SLIDE 24

PET, CT, or bone scan ordered by practice within 60 days after diagnosis for stages I or II breast cancer (Lower Score - Better) (Top 5 Measure)

24

21% 17% 25% 13% 32% 24% 23% 16% 14% 22% 12% 23% 18%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A B C D E MOQC QOPI

QOPI Measure Number BR62a1 1st bar: S14-S17; 2nd bar: F17

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Serum tumor marker surveillance ordered by practice between 30 – 365 days after diagnosis of early stage breast cancer (Lower Score - Better) (Top 5 Measure)

25

25% 0% 65% 88% 79% 68% 71% 71% 75% 97% 91% 95%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A B C D E MOQC QOPI

QOPI Measure Number BR62c1 1st bar: S14-S17; 2nd bar: F17

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Oral chemotherapy medication adherence assessed following start of therapy

26

64% 47% 88% 83% 56% 73% 65% 61% 92% 99% 93% 87% 89% 67%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A B C D E MOQC QOPI

QOPI Measure Number Core13oral6a 1st bar: S14-S17; 2nd bar: F17

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Signed patient consent for chemotherapy (including oral chemotherapy)

27

92% 79% 78% 76% 64% 76% 78% 84% 85% 79% 92% 66% 79% 67%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A B C D E MOQC QOPI

QOPI Measure Number Core14 1st bar: S14-S17; 2nd bar: F17

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Complete family history documented for patients with invasive colorectal cancer

28

2% 17% 23% 11% 18% 19% 23% 10% 17% 12% 16% 14% 14% 12%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A B C D E MOQC QOPI

QOPI Measure Number CRC63 1st bar: S14-S17; 2nd bar: F17

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Colonoscopy before or within 6 months of curative resection or completion of adjuvant chemotherapy

29

74% 89% 85% 92% 80% 84% 84% 93% 86% 84% 83% 76% 83% 82%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A B C D E MOQC QOPI

QOPI Measure Number CRC73 1st bar: S14-S17; 2nd bar: F17

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists for Cycle 1 low or moderate emetic risk chemotherapy (Lower Score - Better)

30

17% 17% 26% 18% 4% 25% 23% 17% 26% 28% 22% 9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A B C D E MOQC QOPI

QOPI Measure Number SMT28 1st bar: S14-S17; 2nd bar: F17

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Infertility risks discussed before chemotherapy with patients of reproductive age

31

17% 35% 35% 31% 49% 38% 38% 11% 33% 50% 33% 40% 39% 38%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A B C D E MOQC QOPI

QOPI Measure Number SMT33 1st bar: S14-S17; 2nd bar: F17