SLIDE 1
SOCI 325: Sociology of science
1
Agenda 1. Discussion questions
- 2. The Kuhnian
revolution
- 3. Reading discussion
2
SOCI 325: Sociology of science Agenda 1. Discussion questions 2. The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
SOCI 325: Sociology of science Agenda 1. Discussion questions 2. The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
SOCI 325: Sociology of science Agenda 1. Discussion questions 2. The Kuhnian revolution 3. Reading discussion 1 Discussion questions 2 Discussion questions Student question submissions So far: Todays submissions quite good.
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Discussion questions
3
Student question submissions
So far:
⦙ Today’s submissions quite good. ⦙ Three submissions are included in today’s questions.
Notes:
⦙ You must include a few (2–3) sentences motivating your question.
Why do you think the question in important? What kind of discussion do you hope it will spur?
⦙ Please limit your submission to one discussion prompt.
Focus on a single, broad concept from the reading(s).
⦙ Submissions are due by 5pm the day before.
SLIDE 4
Discussion questions
4
Question: Think about the ways that contemporary, mainstream science describes variation in human bodies (e.g. genes, BMI, hormone levels, …). Can you think of examples where certain disadvantaged groups in society are singled out by some of these descriptions? Do any of these scientifically described variations reflect existing cultural biases? Motivation: I have read accounts of different ways that people from marginalized groups experience discrimination that is couched in scientific terminology (e.g. Benjamin (2019) talking about race-based discrimination from AI, or news articles about women being misdiagnosed by doctors as having weight- related health problems because of BMI). I think it will be useful to consider how these types of issues are both similar to and different from the scientific racism Gould discusses.
Example submission
One (broad) idea, described in a few sentences Motivation that specifies where the question is coming from and where I hope it may lead.
SLIDE 5
5
The Kuhnian revolution
SLIDE 6
Kuhnian revolution
6
Thomas Kuhn (1922–1996)
⦙ Physicist by training ⦙ Transitioned to history and philosophy of science after PhD
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
⦙ First published in 1962 ⦙ Coined contemporary usage of the term ‘paradigm’ ⦙ Directly confronted the prevailing (norm-centric) view of science as an institution ⦙ Had a huge impact, arguably spurring its own paradigm shift in the philosophy and sociology of science
SLIDE 7
Kuhnian revolution
7
Anti-positivist
⦙ Positivism: observations inform and shape theories. ⦙ In TSSR, Kuhn suggests instead that the theoretical frameworks of a paradigm shape observations and define scientific facts. ⦙ For Kuhn, facts do not exist without a paradigm that can give them meaning. Observation is dependent on theory.
Anti-falsificationist
⦙ Falsificationism: theories are disproven by counter- examples. ⦙ Kuhn argues that counter-examples (anomalies) do not normally cause crisis. ⦙ Only during revolutions in paradigm are anomalies employed as justification for new worldviews.
Why was Kuhn revolutionary?
SLIDE 8
8
Discussion
SLIDE 9
Discussion
9
Small-group discussions:
⦙ If you are not in a group, try to find one with less than 5 before forming a new group ⦙ Choose a new facilitator who will keep the discussion focussed and make sure everyone is able to participate. ⦙ Choose a new secretary who will take notes and summarize the group’s responses for submission. ⦙ Download today’s discussion questions (Microsoft Word format) from the link on the syllabus. Make a copy and upload to MyCourses.
https://soci325.netlify.com/discussion_questions/04.02.docx
Notes (again):
⦙ Try to respond to (almost) all of the questions. ⦙ Avoid terse, bullet-point style. ⦙ Refer directly to the text.
SLIDE 10
Required reading:
- van den Brink and Benschop (2012)
Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs
Next class
10