Population Reference Bureau and Hopkins Population Center 5 th Annual - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Mar 13, 2023 211 likes •447 views

Population Reference Bureau and Hopkins Population Center 5 th Annual Symposium on Policy and Health The Effects of Military Deployment on Family Health Oct. 28, 2011 National Press Club, Washington, DC David R. Segal, Professor of

SLIDE 1

Population Reference Bureau and Hopkins Population Center 5th Annual Symposium on Policy and Health

“The Effects of Military Deployment on Family Health”

Oct. 28, 2011

National Press Club, Washington, DC

David R. Segal, Professor of Sociology, and Director of the Center for Research on Military Organization, University of Maryland Robert W. Blum, William H. Gates Sr. Professor and Chair, Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Cmdr. (Dr.) Gregory H. Gorman, U.S. Navy, Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed

Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Valerie Maholmes, Director, Social and Affective Development/Child Maltreatment and Violence Program, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

SLIDE 2

The Demography of Military Families

Symposium on Policy and Population Health

October 28, 2011

National Press Club, Washington DC

Sponsored by: The Population Reference Bureau and The Hopkins Population Center

Dr. David R. Segal

dsegal@umd.edu

Department of Sociology University of Maryland 2112 Art-Sociology Bldg. College Park, MD 20742

Center for Research on Military Organization

SLIDE 3

Figure 1. Participation in the US Armed Forces, 1801-2011

% of total US population in the armed forces 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000

War of 1812 (1812-1815) Mexican War (1846-1848) Civil War (1861-1865) World War I (1917-1918) Spanish-American War (1898) Korean War (1950-1953) Vietnam War (1964-1973) Gulf War (1991) OEF & OIF (2001, 2003 - present) World War II (1941-1945)

Sources: DoD Personnel and Military Casualty Statistics, 2000-2011 (http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personnel/MILITARY/miltop.htm) and the following U.S. Census Bureau publications: Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970 (1975) (http://www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/statab.html), Historical National Population Estimates 1900-1999, Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for the United States, Regions, States, and Puerto Rico: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008 (http://www.census.gov/popest/states/NST-ann-est.html)

SLIDE 4

Military Families

Spouse and family satisfaction

with military life is major factor in decisions to stay in or separate from the military

Military families take many

different forms

Increased diversity means

changing experiences and expectations regarding the demands of the military lifestyle

There are more military family

members than service members (1:1.4)

SLIDE 5

Figure 2. Percent Married by Age and Sex for Military and Civilians in the Labor Force, 2009

Source: “Population Representation in the Military Services”, DoD 2009

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45+

Age (years)

Percent Married Male Military Male Civilian Female Military Female Civilian

SLIDE 6

Military Spouses

While the vast majority of civilians who are married to

civilian personnel are women, there is a small but growing number of military husbands who face unique challenges

– Gender norms and expectations – Employment opportunities – Social isolation

Army Navy Marine Corps Air Force Total DoD Male 6.3% 7.3% 2.1% 10.0% 6.9% Female 93.7% 92.7% 97.9% 90.0% 93.1%

Table 1. Distribution of Sex of Military Spouses by Service Branch

Source: DoD Profile of the Military Community, 2009

SLIDE 7

The Youthfulness of Military Families

Compared to their

civilian counterparts, service members are:

– More likely to be married – More likely to be married at younger ages – More likely to have young children at home

SLIDE 8

Figure 3. Percent of Junior Enlisted Men and Women Married Compared With Similar Civilians, 2010

36% 37% 24% 33% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Men Women Junior Enlisted (E1-E4) Civilian with comparable earnings (ages 18-24)

Source: DMDC Active Duty Family Marital Status Report (2010), March 2010 Current Population Survey

SLIDE 9

Figure 4. Age Distribution of Children in Military Families

0 to 5 42% 6 to 11 31% 12 to 18 23% 19 to 22 4%

Of military families with

children, 73% of children are under 12 years old

Grade school children

whose parents were cumulatively deployed 19 months or longer experienced negative academic performance compared with children whose parents had not deployed or deployed less than 19 months

Sources: DoD Profile of the Military Community, 2009; RAND “Effects of Soldiers’ Deployment on Children’s Academic Performance and Behavioral Health”, 2011

SLIDE 10

Moving with the Military

Military families are both

tied migrants and tied stayers

Move on average every

two to three years

Move 2.4 times more

than civilian families

Move further distances

than civilian families

Source: Cooney et al. “Moving with the Military”, 2009

SLIDE 11

Figure 5. Mobility of Armed Forces Personnel and Employed Civilians, 2009-2010

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, “General Mobility of Persons 16 Years and Over, by Sex, Age, Race and Hispanic Origin, Region, and Labor Force Status: 2009 to 2010”

SLIDE 12

Spouse Employment

Frequent relocation presents special challenges to civilian

spouses seeking employment

In labor market areas surrounding military bases, civilian

women experience:

– Higher unemployment: 2.3 points higher than in other labor market areas – Lower wages: 5% lower than in other labor market areas

Employment and wage effects occur due to confluence of:

– Human capital penalties associated with tied migration – Contextual effects of military presence – Employer monopsony

Source: Booth et al. 2000, Booth 2003

SLIDE 13

Figure 6. Underemployment Among Military and Civilian Wives in the Labor Force, 2010

Source: RAND “Measuring Underemployment Among Military Spouses”, 2010

SLIDE 14

Spouse Employment

Geographic mobility influences spouse satisfaction

– For each additional year of tour length, the likelihood of spouse dissatisfaction decreased by 4.2% – For each additional year at current location, the likelihood of spouse dissatisfaction decreased by 5.6%

Spouse satisfaction with job opportunities varies by

gender, race, and class

– Female spouses less dissatisfied than male spouses – Black spouses more dissatisfied than white spouses – Enlisted spouses more dissatisfied than officer’s spouses

Source: Cooney et al. “Moving with the Military”, 2009

SLIDE 15

Military Families Become Veteran Families

The military is a short-

term career for all but a few service members

Average length of service

approximately 7 years

In 2009, approximately

180,00 personnel separated from the military

– With 1.4 family members for every service member, this means more than 250,000 military family members became veteran family members

Figure 7. Type of Separation, 2009

Source: DoD “Profile of the Military Community”, 2009

SLIDE 16

Figure 8. Unemployment Rate of Veterans and Nonveterans by Sex and Age (%), 2010

5 10 15 20 25 18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years Male Veterans Male Nonveterans Female Veterans Female Nonveterans

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics “Employment Situation of Veterans, 2010”

SLIDE 17

Wounded Warriors

Improved weapons and armor technology means that

service members are more likely to survive serious injuries than in past conflicts

Long-term caretaking responsibilities often fall to

spouses and parents who must face multiple sources of emotional, financial, and family responsibility stressors

Increased attention to the “invisible wounds of war”

emphasizes both short-term and long-term affects of war

n service members, veterans, and their families

Source: RAND “The Invisible Wounds of War” 2008

SLIDE 18

Figure 9. Annual New PTSD and TBI Diagnoses, All Services 2000-2010

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 PTSD TBI

Sources: Congressional Research Service: US Military Casualty Statistics (2010), DoD Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (2011)

SLIDE 19

Figure 10. Prevalence of Mental Health Conditions Following Deployment to OIF (%)

0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Depression Anxiety PTSD Any of the above Pre-OIF 3 Months Post-OIF 12 Months Post-OIF

SLIDE 20

Conclusions

The all-volunteer military will continue to be a

demographically diverse force with more family members than service members

– Diversity in military family demographics – Diversity in family structures

Family satisfaction with military lifestyle affects

service member satisfaction and decisions

– Work-family conflict, morale, and job performance – Retention and career decisions

SLIDE 21

Conclusions

Potential strains of military lifestyle affect all

families, but expectations and needs can vary greatly by family characteristics

– Service branch, active duty and reservist families – Gender of spouse – Education and social class – Race and ethnicity – Single parent and dual-service families

Military service continues to affect veterans and

families after service is completed

– Employment and earnings – Physical and mental health

SLIDE 22