Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells for UAVs By Aza Walker, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells for uavs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells for UAVs By Aza Walker, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells for UAVs By Aza Walker, Ashwin Bhojwani, Rohan Kalyani, Abhinav Goli NPRE 470 April 26th, 2018 Introduction UAV - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle No human pilot required; directed by GPS Used


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells for UAVs

By Aza Walker, Ashwin Bhojwani, Rohan Kalyani, Abhinav Goli NPRE 470 April 26th, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • UAV - Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

○ No human pilot required; directed by GPS ○ Used in military surveillance applications

  • UAV surveillance missions typically are

about 40 hours

○ Attains altitude of 60,000 - 65,000 ft ○ Flight speed: 560 km/hr

  • Current UAVs use internal combustion

engines

○ Fuel source: petro-based (jet fuel) ○ Low efficiency ○ Results in production of greenhouse gases ■ Harmful to environment

  • Proposal: Design a UAV using hydrogen

and oxygen gas as fuel and oxidizer, respectively, in a PEMFC.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Engineering Requirements for UAV’s

  • Long range and lightweight

○ Low weight to high power output → High gravimetric power (W/kg)

  • Can function at high altitudes and velocities
  • Fuel management system

○ Can compactly store and dispense fuel

  • Thermal management system

○ Minimize losses by maintaining fuel cell op. temp. range

  • Air management system

○ Filter and pressurize supply air at the correct humidity ■ Air humidity can affect fuel cell performance

T.H. Bradley et al. / Journal of Power Sources 171 (2007) 793–801
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Diagram of PEMFC

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Electrochemical Reactions of the fuel cell

  • Reaction at Anode

2H2 4H+ + 4e-

  • Reaction at Cathode

O2 + 4H+ + 4e- 2H2O

  • Overall Reaction

2H2 + O2 2H2O

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Design and Structure

Specification Value Peak Power Output (W) 5000 Number of Cells 320 Cell active area (cm2) 64 Operating temperature (°C) 60 Hydrogen storage pressure (MPA) 30 Mass (kg) 49.6 Gravimetric Power (W/kg) 100.8

T.H. Bradley et al. / Journal of Power Sources 171 (2007) 793–801

Thermal management system Air management system Fuel management system

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Design and Structure

  • Fuel cells would be

located in the front of the UAV just before the wings

  • Other parts would be

similar to usual UAVs

http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/2071/05/36-new-mq-9-reaper-uav-attack-drones-ordered.html

Fuel Cell Stack Engine

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Hydrogen Storage in UAV

  • Storage methods:

○ Pressurized hydrogen gas ○ Liquid hydrogen ○ Metal Hydride (e.g. Sodium Borohydride)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Hydrogen Storage in UAV cont.

Liquid hydrogen is the best storage option; Gives longest runtime

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Characteristic features of FCs compared to

  • Batteries (Lithium)

○ Converts the fuel and oxidant but does not store any energy. Because air is used as the oxidant and is not stored with the fuel. ○ Runtime is ~5x greater for H2(g) and ~10x greater for H2(liq) ○ For endurance missions, only fuel storage is necessary while FC system mass constant to increase range. However if batteries are used, more batteries are necessary.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Characteristic features of FCs compared to

  • Internal Combustion Engine (ICE)

○ Superior in small-scale engines as they are noisy and polluting, give off high thermal signatures in situations where stealth is necessary ○ Due to higher energy density, ICEs can provide longer endurance ○ Higher altitude flexibility - FCs have positive control of air flow so power reductions can be adapted without oversizing propulsion systems

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Benefits of PEMFCs w/ H2 Storage

  • System

○ Higher power efficiency ○ Higher Energy density up to 5x more (gas H2) 50x more ( liq H2) and than ICE- 200 Wh/kg ○ Stability rating 1 on Cooper-Harper scale(1 best - 10 worst)

  • Surroundings

○ Friendly to the environment( No greenhouse emissions ) ○ Very low thermal, vibrational, and acoustic signatures

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Conclusion

  • While time of flight and cost is an issue, with more research and development

a fuel cell powered UAVs could be a very viable alternative to currently used methods to power UAVs.

  • Fuel cell powered UAVs will be better for the environment and they’ll be more

efficient.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

References

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.466.1837&rep=rep1&typ e=pdf http://www.unmannedsystemstechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/White- Paper-Fuel-Cell-Energy-Systems-for-UAVs.pdf

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Q&A