Policymakers Tahoe Truckee Airport District Board of Directors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

policymakers
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Policymakers Tahoe Truckee Airport District Board of Directors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Effective Public Service for Policymakers Tahoe Truckee Airport District Board of Directors July 8, 2019 Michael G. Colantuono, Esq. Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC Districts Purpose to encourage airport development by


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Effective Public Service for Policymakers

Tahoe Truckee Airport District Board of Directors July 8, 2019 Michael G. Colantuono, Esq. Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-2
SLIDE 2

District’s Purpose

  • “to encourage airport … development by communities

and to distribute the cost uniformly among all who benefit” (PUC § 22002.)

  • Your mission statement:
  • “The Truckee Tahoe Airport is a community Airport that

provides high quality aviation facilities and services to meet local needs, and strives for low impact on our neighbors while enhancing the benefit to the community-at-large.”

  • Aviation
  • Low impact on neighbors
  • Community benefit

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Board’s Purpose

  • Govern the District:
  • “The Board of Directors of the Airport provides oversight and

leadership to the District. The Board is comprised of five members with various backgrounds, offering a wide range of experience and perspectives to every topic.”

  • Listen and work collaboratively to find solutions
  • Act by consensus if possible, by majority when

necessary

  • Represent the whole community ― pilots, neighbors

and others

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC 3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Goals of Meeting Management

  • Comply with the law
  • Balance efficiency w/ public input
  • Make meetings shorter
  • Relieve “meeting anxiety”
  • Deal w/ disruptive people
  • Avoid parliamentary paralysis
  • Present a public face of competence, civility and

efficiency

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Public Participation Requirements

  • Brown Act: off-agenda, on-agenda, and special

meeting comment

  • Public Hearing Requirements
  • Due Process
  • First Amendment – no content-specific regulation other

than to preserve purpose of the meeting

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Be Prepared

  • Ask questions at meetings the public needs to hear;

get your own information needs met “off-line”

  • Give staff a heads-up about your questions
  • Read the agenda packet and write down your

questions and comments where you can find them

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Don’t Be Too Efficient

  • Don’t violate the Brown Act by deciding matters
  • utside of meetings
  • Daisy chain and serial meetings
  • Email
  • Don’t give the impression you aren’t listening
  • Be careful in using electronic devices during meetings

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Manage Conflict

  • Manage debates; prevent repeated debates on single

issue

  • Chair should remain above the fray
  • Cooperate to create a positive image for the Board and

the District

  • Rotate the Presidency
  • Team-building, retreats, study sessions, and social

contacts to foster cooperation and trust

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Manage Conflict

  • Disagreement is inevitable; mistrust is not
  • An ethos of teamwork is necessary to protect the
  • rganization’s public credibility and ability to function

effectively; it takes work

  • Don’t send people home angry if you can avoid it

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Don’t Attack Staff

  • You look like a bully because staff cannot defend

themselves

  • Doing so makes the District look incompetent
  • (You hired these people, didn’t you?)
  • Questions about staff performance belong in closed

session or the GM’s office

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Common Law Bias/Due Process

11

“Never let your sense of morals get in the way of doing what is right.”

–Isaac Asimov

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Common Law Bias/Due Process

12

  • Public officials cannot use their official

position for private benefit.

  • Due process in an administrative hearing

demands an appearance of fairness and the absence of even a probability of outside influence on the adjudication.

  • Doesn’t preclude holding opinions; just

participation in a quasi-judicial decision by someone with a closed mind.

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The Appearance of Bias

13

How it may look to others …

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Constitutional guarantee that residents and property owners may not be deprived of:

  • Life
  • Liberty (good reputation, incarceration)
  • Property (civil service job, real or personal

property)

  • Without “due process of law.”

14

Due Process

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Administrative hearing requirement

  • Quasi-judicial proceedings
  • E.g., development issues, permits, etc.

15

Due Process

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Requires:

  • Notice of the intended action;
  • Opportunity to prepare;
  • Opportunity to be heard; and
  • Fair and impartial hearing by an

unbiased decision-maker.

16

Due Process

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Ethical Decision-Making

“Whenever two good people argue over principles, they are both right.” Marie Ebner von Eschenbach

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Is the action legal?
  • Does it meet your own sense of right and wrong?
  • Is it good public policy? Is it safe?
  • Is it consistent with the agency’s or the community’s

values?

  • Does it comply with the Golden Rule?

18

General Thoughts on Ethical Decision- Making

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Don’t be afraid to invite ethics into the room
  • There is often more than one “right” answer and it is
  • kay to disagree about what is right or wrong

19

Ethical Decision-making (Cont.)

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Advocates vs. Policymakers

  • Advocates & Activists
  • Commitment to goals, ideals, beliefs
  • Speak for themselves
  • Can be goads to change
  • Can be irresponsible to all but their consciences
  • Policymakers
  • Commitment to listening and avoiding prejudgment
  • Seek to represent the community as a whole
  • Must act collectively & collaboratively
  • Have responsibility to lead institutions on which many

depend for livelihoods and more

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Spending Public Money

  • The Board has spending authority
  • But expenditures must
  • Be legal
  • Comply with internal controls to provide accountability and

transparency

  • Legal constraints
  • Public purpose of the District
  • No political advocacy
  • No self-dealing
  • Within budget
  • Compliant with other agency policies

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

“Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things.”

Peter Drucker

22

Conclusion

7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Questions?

23 7/9/2019 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC

Northern California 420 Sierra College Drive, Suite 140 Grass Valley, CA 95945-5091 (530) 432-7357 www.chwlaw.us

7/9/2019 24 (c) 2019 Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, PC