PFAS Exposure and Bioavailability Albert L. Juhasz a and Richard - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pfas exposure and bioavailability
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PFAS Exposure and Bioavailability Albert L. Juhasz a and Richard - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Application of Soil Amendments for Reducing PFAS Exposure and Bioavailability Albert L. Juhasz a and Richard Stewart b a Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Australia b Ziltek Pty Ltd, Adelaide, Australia PFAS Exposure and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Application of Soil Amendments for Reducing PFAS Exposure and Bioavailability

Albert L. Juhasza and Richard Stewartb

aFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Australia bZiltek Pty Ltd, Adelaide, Australia

slide-2
SLIDE 2

PFAS Exposure and Remediation

❖ High electronegativity ❖ High bond strength ❖ Limits oxidation of per-fluoro compounds ❖ Poly-fluoro compounds (+ precursors) may undergo transformation

0 .0 2 .5 5 .0 7 .5 1 0 .0 0 .0 1 0 .1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 A m e n d m e n t a p p lic a tio n (% w /w ) P F A S ( g l
  • 1; A S L P -D I)
slide-3
SLIDE 3

PFAS Exposure and Remediation

Aim: Assess the impact of soil amendments on: 1. PFAS leachability 2. PFAS bioavailability

RemBindTM technology, jointly owned by the CSIRO and Ziltek Pty Ltd, has been fully commercialised by Ziltek Pty Ltd (US Patent 8,940,958 B2) RemBindTM: Composite product comprising amorphous aluminium hydroxide, kaolin clay and activated carbon

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PFAS Exposure and Remediation – Research Approach

Bench scale immobilisation studies RemBindTM formulations Application rates PFAS mobility ASLP-DI Effect of pH MEP PFAS bioavailability In vivo mouse model Fate of pure compounds Assessment of RBA

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PFOS and PFHxS Leachability – Pre- and Post-Amendment

0 .0 2 .5 5 .0 7 .5 1 0 .0 0 .1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0

P F O S L e a c h a b ility in s o il Z 2 A m e n d m e n t a p p lic a tio n (% w /w ) P F A S ( g l

  • 1; A S L P -D I)

R e m B in d 1 0 0 R e m B in d 2 0 0 R e m B in d 3 0 0

P F O S + P F H x S In te rim la n d fill a c c e p t a n c e c r it e r ia ( d o u b le c o m p o s it e lin e d ( 7  g l

  • 1)

0 .0 2 .5 5 .0 7 .5 1 0 .0 0 .0 1 0 .1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0

P F H x S L e a c h a b ility in s o il Z 2 A m e n d m e n t a p p lic a tio n (% w /w ) P F A S ( g l

  • 1; A S L P -D I)

R e m B in d 1 0 0 R e m B in d 2 0 0 R e m B in d 3 0 0

slide-6
SLIDE 6

PFAS Bioavailability – Research Approach

❖ C57BL/6 mice – well established breed ❖ 10 day exposure study (9 + 1) ❖ For each treatment – 4 operational units, each comprising 3 mice ❖ PFAS (0.01-1.0 µg kg-1), contaminated soil (1% w/w) or amended soil (up to 10% w/w) added to AIN93G chow ❖ PFAS-AIN93G chow supplied ad libitum ❖ Health, consumption, excretion data monitored daily ❖ Following exposure, PFAS concentration in tissue / excreta is determined ❖ Determine dose-response and bioavailability endpoints ❖ Determine PFAS relative bioavailability in soil using pure compounds as the reference

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Assessment of In Vivo PFAS Distribution

L ive r K id n e y G I F a e c e s U rin e C a rc a s s

PFBS PFHxS PFOS

4 5 6 7 8 5 1 0 1 5

P F C A C -c h a in le n g th U rin a ry e x c re tio n ( g )

8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 2 4 6 8

P F C A C -c h a in le n g th L iv e r a c c u m u la tio n ( g )

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Assessment of PFAS Bioavailability

❖ Short-chain PFAS were excreted in the urine; PFCA were excreted to a greater extent than PFSA. ❖ Urinary excretion decreased with increasing perfluoralkyl chain length. ❖ PFAS accumulated in the liver; increasing accumulation with increasing carbon chain length was observed for PFCA up to a cut off

  • f C11.

❖ Linear dose-responses were observed; urinary excretion (PFBS, C4-C6 PFCA), accumulation in organs and / or carcass.

5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 5

P F A S C o n s u m p tio n ( g ) P F A S a c c u m u la tio n - k id n e y a n d liv e rs ( g )

PFOS PFOA

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Assessment of PFAS Relative Bioavailability

Z 2

5 1 0 1 5 2 0 2 2 2 4 2 6

P F A S (m g k g

  • 1)

8 :2 F T S P F O A P F H p S P F H xS P F O S P F H x S P F H p S P F O S P F O A 8 : 2 F T S

5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0

P F A S R e la tiv e B io a v a ila b ility (% ) U n a m e n d e d s o il A m e n d e d s o il

Z 2 Z 3 Z 4

5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0

S o il P F O A R e la tiv e B io a v a ila b ility (% )

Z 2 Z 3 Z 4

5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0

P F O S R e la tiv e B io a v a ila b ility (% ) U n a m e n d e d s o il A m e n d e d s o il

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Conclusions

❖ Amendment of PFAS-contaminated soil with RembindTM (at 5% w/w) reduced PFAS leachability by > 99% ❖ Dose-response studies highlighted differences in PFAS fate in vivo → this has implications for bioavailability endpoint monitoring. ❖ PFAS RBA in contaminated soil was reduced by > 75% when soil was amended with 5% w/w RembindTM. ❖ Future research includes the development of new RembindTM formulations that can further reduce PFAS RBA.

Acknowledgements

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Albert.Juhasz@unisa.edu.au