SLIDE 1
Perspectives on institutional evaluation & change
Professor Robin Middlehurst Kingston University London & Higher Education Academy
SLIDE 2 Outline
- Key questions
- A changing environment for higher education
- Drivers, impact
- Evaluation & measurement in higher
education
- Sources, focus, methods
- The Change agenda
- QA & institutional change
- Future prospects?
SLIDE 3 Key Questions
- What are the drivers of change in HE?
- General & country-specific
- What are we evaluating & measuring?
- Are we measuring what matters?
- What changes are being sought in HE?
- Are evaluation systems aligned & appropriate as
drivers of institutional change?
- Models of change
- What kinds of approaches do we need in future?
SLIDE 4 Drivers of change in HE
- Economic competitiveness in a
knowledge economy (quality & innovation)
- Social & cultural development: social
cohesion, access & mobility, employability, social justice
- Globalisation & internationalisation
- European (& other regional) development
- Technological change (convergence &
speed)
- Financial stability & sustainability
- Big global (& local) challenges
SLIDE 5 International higher education challenges
- USA – cost of HE, student progression & success
- Australia – cost of HE, economic change, internationalisation,
technology developments
- Brazil, Indonesia – research quality and competitiveness,
economic & social development
- Japan – demographic change & internationalisation
- KSA – research development, HE expansion
- Malaysia – developing nation status by 2020
- UK – cost & efficiency of HE, research & innovation,
international competitiveness
- South Africa – social transformation, quality enhancement
SLIDE 6 Policy developments
- Funding changes (Australia, UK)
- HE expansion – public & private sectors (China,
Middle East, Asia)
- Enhancing research (Germany, Brazil, KSA)
- Enhancing teaching & learning (US, UK, Hong
Kong, Europe)
- Enterprise & Entrepreneurship (US, UK, Australia,
Europe)
- Governance & management (Scotland, Wales)
- ?? Community engagement & development
SLIDE 7
What & how are we evaluating?
SLIDE 8
International Rankings: position, reputation
SLIDE 9
Rankings - International
SLIDE 10
What are we measuring?
SLIDE 11
What are we measuring?
SLIDE 12
What are we measuring?
SLIDE 13
What are we measuring?
SLIDE 14
Subject accreditations
SLIDE 15
Evaluating management
SLIDE 16
Evaluating management
SLIDE 17
Evaluating research
SLIDE 18
Evaluating research
SLIDE 19
Evaluating teaching & learning
SLIDE 20 Evaluating teaching & learning
- Institution-wide QA policies
- Developing a quality culture at HEI level
- Programme monitoring
- Measuring design, content & delivery of
programmes
- Teaching & learning support
- Continuing education for faculty, pedagogy
enhancement, support for student learning
(OECD/IMHE 2008)
SLIDE 21 Principles of good practice in undergraduate education
- Student-faculty contact
- Co-operation among students & influential
interactions with other students
- Active learning & time on task
- Prompt feedback to students
- High expectations
- Quality of teaching received
- Respecting diverse talents and ways of learning
(Gibbs, 2010)
SLIDE 22
Are we measuring what matters?
SLIDE 23
Change agendas: EU Modernisation of HE
SLIDE 24
EU change agenda for teaching & learning
SLIDE 25
Change models - 1
SLIDE 26
Change models - 2
SLIDE 27
People & the change cycle
SLIDE 28
Innovation - 1
SLIDE 29
Innovation - 2
SLIDE 30
Looking to the future…
SLIDE 31
Looking to the future…
SLIDE 32
In conclusion, what matters is….
Innovation & creativity… The higher education ecosystem which involves collaboration & partnerships… Transformational change (doing things differently & doing different things) not just doing more of the same or doing the same things better…
SLIDE 33 The first step is to measure whatever can be easily
- measured. This is OK as far as it goes. The second step is
to disregard that which can't be easily measured or to give it an arbitrary quantitative value. This is artificial and
- misleading. The third step is to presume that what can't be
measured easily really isn't important. This is blindness. The fourth step is to say that what can't be easily measured really doesn't exist. This is suicide.
Daniel Yankelovich "Corporate Priorities: A continuing study of the new demands on business." (1972)
…& don’t forget the problems with measurement!