Persisting Informal Employment: What Explains It? David Kucera - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

persisting informal employment what explains it
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Persisting Informal Employment: What Explains It? David Kucera - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Persisting Informal Employment: What Explains It? David Kucera Decent Work Forum XXXI December 12, 2008 Presentation Overview I. Formal-Informal Employment Dynamics and Economic Growth Informal employment and growth patterns


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Persisting Informal Employment: What Explains It?

David Kucera Decent Work Forum XXXI December 12, 2008

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Presentation Overview

I. Formal-Informal Employment Dynamics and Economic Growth

  • Informal employment and growth patterns
  • Theoretical foundations
  • New developments: Forms of informal

employment that can be complementary with economic growth and globalization

II. The Effect of Labour Regulations on Informal Employment

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Cross-country patterns suggest that the share of informal employment declines alongside economic growth…

ARG BEN BFA BOL BRA CHL COL CRI DOM DZA ECU EGY GIN GTM HND HTI IDN IND IRN KEN KGZ LBN MAR MDA MEX MLI MOZ PAK PAN PER PHL PRY ROM RUS SLV SYR TCD THA TUN TUR VEN YEM ZAF ZMB

20 40 60 80 100 Share of informal empl in total non-agricultural employment 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 PWT: Real GDP per capita (Constant Prices: Chain series, 2000)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

…Yet in recent years, informal employment has persisted in the face of economic growth

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Why does informal employment persist? Theoretical foundations

  • Harris-Todaro (1970) versus Lewis

(1954) Models of dual labour markets for developing countries

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Most models of formal-informal employment dynamics are based on the Harris-Todaro Model

“The distinguishing feature of this model is that [rural-urban] migration proceeds in response to urban-rural differences in expected earnings…with the urban unemployment [i.e., informal employment] rate acting as an equilibrating force on such migration.”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Paradox: In the Harris-Todaro model, more formal employment and urbanization result in more informal employment Two-fold policy package:

  • 1. Restrictions on rural-urban migration and/or

rural development

  • 2. Limited wage subsidies and/or direct

employment by governments Emphasis on rural poverty and development

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Dilemma for Harris-Todaro model as a general model for developing countries

Economic growth is characterized by

  • urbanization. Without urbanization, no

economic growth. Harris-Todaro model does not provide a clear path to long-run relationship between higher GDP/capita and lower shares of informal employment

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

In the Lewis Model the shift of unskilled workers from the informal (“subsistence”) sector to the formal (“capitalist”) sector is constrained by the number of jobs in the formal sector, which is in turn constrained by the scarcity of formal sector capital

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Lewis model provides a more useful foundation for evaluating formal- informal employment dynamics

Lewis emphasized demand side

  • constraints. That is, the cause of

persisting informal employment is too few formal jobs.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

New developments

Emerging forms of informal employment can be complementary with economic growth and globalization Informal employment in formal establishments (2003 ILO Definition) Informal employment in global commodity chains

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Data on emerging forms of informal employment is scarce

  • Anecdotal evidence suggests it is growing

alongside other forms of irregular, precarious employment

  • E.g., Posthuma and Nathan (2009) find

informal employment throughout global commodity chains, in upper and lower tiers

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

To what extent have these developments weakened the linkage between economic growth and declining informal employment?

  • Anecdotal evidence suggests a serious

challenge to growth-oriented policies for reducing informal employment

Economic growth is not enough

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

  • II. The Effect of Labour Market

Regulations on Informal Employment

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Informality: Exit and Exclusion, World Bank (2007) “A substantial body of literature sees the size of the informal sector to be determined substantially by regulatory distortions or corruption…. For the [LAC] region and several countries, a credible case can be built that labor legislation had a substantial impact on the size of the formal sector”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Law and Employment: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean – J. Heckman and C. Pagés (2004) Description: Seven country studies use micro datasets to estimate the effects of “job security costs” on formal employment in Argentina, Barbados, Brazil, Chile, Jamaica, Peru and Trinidad and Tobago Results: Statistically significant results only for Argentina and Peru, with higher job security costs associated with lower formal employment But what are the implications of job security costs for informal employment?...

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

…consider the case of Peru “Labor Market Reforms and Their Impact over Formal Labor Demand and Job Market Turnover: The Case of Peru” - J. Saavedra and M. Torero (2004) Job security costs fell while formal employment increased in Peru in the 1990s. However, informal employment increased even more rapidly, with the result that falling job security costs

  • ccurred alongside a rising share of informal

employment. Results for Peru are typical for the region...

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

“The Cost of Job Security Regulation: Evidence from Latin American Labor Markets” – J. Heckman and C. Pagés-Serra (2000) Description: Cross-country panel data analysis of OECD and LAC countries, 1990-1999 Model of: Share of self-employment Key explanatory variable: Job security index Results: OLS Fixed effects OECD plus LAC 1.37 (5%)

  • 8.43 (1%)

LAC 1.09 (10%)

  • 8.34 (1%)
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

“The Determinants of Rising Informality in Brazil: Evidence from Gross Worker Flows” – M. Bosch, E. Goni and W. Maloney (2007)

Description: Cross-industry panel data analysis, 1983-2002 Models of: share of formal employment, formal job creation and destruction Key explanatory variables: % of unionized workers, labour costs Results:

  • Greater unionization is associated with higher shares of

formal employment

  • Estimated positive and negative effects on formal job

creation and destruction cancel each other over time

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

The authors conclude that the increase in informal employment in Brazil in the 1990s resulted from “increases in union power” and “rising labor costs”

  • Fig. 4: Union Enrollment Rate, Brazil, 1986-1999

26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 1986 1992 1993 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999

Source: Bosch, Goni, and Maloney (2007)

  • Fig. 5: Real Manufacturing Wage Index, Brazil, 1994-2002 (2000 = 100)

90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Source: ILO, Key Indicators of the Labour Market, 5th Ed., 2007

  • Fig. 6: Hourly Compensation Costs in Manufacturing (wage plus non-wage),

US dollars, Brazil, 1996-2002

2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Source: ILO, Key Indicators of the Labour Market, 5th Ed, 2007

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Given what is at stake for workers in developing countries, advocates of weakening of labour regulations as a policy to reduce informal employment

  • ught to hold themselves to a high

technical standard

This standard has not been met

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Concluding remarks

The main cause of persisting informal employment is too few formal jobs

Contrary to:

Predictions of the Harris-Todaro model Supply-side approaches Approaches emphasizing rigid labour markets The notion of “voluntary” informal employment “Exit” and “exclusion” more generally (WB 2007)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Concluding remarks cont’d…

Emerging forms of informal employment appear to have weakened the linkage between economic growth and declining informal employment The empirical evidence suggests that labour market regulations are not generally a cause of persisting informal employment The debate on labour regulations should not be about regulation versus deregulation, but about the optimal design and implementation of labour regulations