permethylation of glycans
play

Permethylation of Glycans ag TM technology to enable LudgerT rapid, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Permethylation of Glycans ag TM technology to enable LudgerT rapid, reliable, high-throughput (HT) MALDI-TOF-MS analysis Glycan Permethylation CH 3 I, NaOH CH 3 Native glycan Permethylated glycan Carbon Hydrogen Oxygen Nitrogen


  1. Permethylation of Glycans ag TM technology to enable LudgerT rapid, reliable, high-throughput (HT) MALDI-TOF-MS analysis

  2. Glycan Permethylation CH 3 I, NaOH CH 3 Native glycan Permethylated glycan Carbon Hydrogen Oxygen Nitrogen Permethylation involves the addition of methyl groups (CH 3 ) to all of the hydroxyl and N -acetyl groups, and also methyl esterifies the carboxy function on the sialic acid. LT-PERMET-96 2

  3. Why Permethylate? (released N- and O-glycans) Improves and enhances Ionization efficiency of glycans on mass spec (MALDI-MS, ESI-MS) When compared to non-derivatized oligosaccharides Increased glycan Easier determination of hydrophobicity enables branching and glycosidic LC-MS analysis linkage positions Enables detection of both Relative and absolute neutral and acidic glycans quantitation can be performed in positive ion mode using By introducing isotope labelled internal standards MALDI-TOF-MS Stabilizes the labile sialic acid moieties LT-PERMET-96 3

  4. Conventional Permethylation Methods are Labour Intensive Slurry method A slurry of sodium hydroxide in dimethyl sulfoxide needs to be crushed and prepared as shown in the illustration and this slurry needs to be constantly vortexed before adding it to individual sample vials. This approach is slow, low throughput and labour intensive . Picture taken from: Akihiko Kameyama, (2014). GlycoPOD http://jcggdb.jp/GlycoPOD. Web.15,8,2014 Solid phase methods Solid phase permethylation techniques have been developed more recently however, many of these techniques are still labour intensive and repetitive which are not practical for large sample numbers (e.g. for the characterization of biopharmaceuticals). Reference: (1) Pilsoo Kang, Y. M. and M. V. N. RAPID Commun. MASS Spectrom. 2008, 22, 721 – 734. (2) Jeong, H.-J.; Kim, Y.-G.; Yang, Y.-H.; Kim, B.-G. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84 (7), 3453 – 3460. (3) Gao, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, L. Analyst 2015, 140 (5), 1566 – 1571. LT-PERMET-96 4

  5. Ludger Glycan Permethylation Kit (LT-PERMET-96) Simple to use Kit format is less labour intensive than conventional in-solution permethylation Data is comparable to Reliable and validated gold standard HILIC UHPLC data according to EMA ICH Q2 (2AB / Procainamide labelling) (R1) guidelines A microplate based Compatible with 96-well plate MALDI-TOF-MS and LC-MS Format of kit is convenient as it Absolute quantitation can be achieved is scalable between 1 to 96 samples. by introducing Isotope labelled internal standards. Method can be automated Suitable for N- and O-glycan analysis for HT, rapid sample prep and also aids linkage analysis Workflow can be adapted to a Easier determination of branching liquid handling robot and glycosidic linkage analysis LT-PERMET-96 5

  6. Components of the LT-PERMET-96 Kit 1. Derivatisation 2. Liquid Liquid Extraction Addition of 300µL DMSO Performing LLE to render Addition of 55µL Addition of 400µL DCM to LT-PERMET-96 plate the pH neutral prior to methyl Iodide and 1ml water (15 min incubation) MALDI-TOF-MS (1 hour incubation) measurement Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) Methyl Iodide (MeI) Dichloromethane (DCM) LT-PERMET-DMSO-96 LT-PERMET-MeI-96 LT-PERMET-DCM-96 LT-PERMET-96 6

  7. Permethylation Workflow using the LT-PERMET-96 kit

  8. Workflow - LudgerTag Permethylation for N-glycan Profiling and Identification N-glycans Glycoprotein Permethylated N-glycans E-PNG-01 LC-PERMET-96 LT-PERMET-96 LT-PERMET-96 PNGase F glycan release Glycan Enrichment Plate Permethylation Liquid-liquid extraction Native Glycans Fucose Galactose Mannose N -Acetylglucosamine N -Acetylneuraminic acid Permethylated Glycans Fucose Galactose Mannose N -Acetylglucosamine N -Acetylneuraminic acid LT-PERMET-96 8

  9. Workflow - LudgerTag Permethylation for O-glycan Profiling and Identification O-glycans Glycoprotein Permethylated O-glycans LL-HYDRAZ-A2 LC-CEX-A6 LT-PERMET-96 LT-PERMET-96 Hydrazine release CEX cartridge clean-up Permethylation Liquid-liquid extraction Native Glycans Fucose Galactose N -Acetylglucosamine N -Acetylgalactosamine N -Acetylneuraminic acid Permethylated Glycans Fucose Galactose N -Acetylglucosamine N -Acetylgalactosamine N -Acetylneuraminic acid LT-PERMET-96 9

  10. Recommended Components for Workflow – LudgerTag Permethylation for N- and O-glycan Profiling Product Product code N- glycans O- glycans PNGase F E-PNG-01 N-glycan release LL-HYDRAZ-A2* Hydrazinolysis or Orela Technical guide O-glycan release kit LL-ORELA-A2 Technical guide LC-PERMET-96 Enrichment plate Technical guide Cation exchange LC-CEX-A6 clean-up cartridges Technical guide LT-PERMET-96 Permethylation kit Technical guide *Note: although hydrazinolysis can also be used for N glycan release, we recommend PNGase F release for the workflow LT-PERMET-96 10

  11. LT-PERMET-96: Manual Workflow

  12. LT-PERMET-96: Manual Procedure Addition of DMSO, MeI and Incubation Addition of DCM and water Liquid-liquid extraction Ready for Analysis Click for our detailed procedure: LT-Permet-96 product guide LT-PERMET-96 12

  13. LT-PERMET-96: Automated Workflow The system can be adapted to a liquid handling robot, enabling reliable High Throughput (HT) Studies

  14. LT-PERMET-96: Automated HT Workflow Typical timeline for 96 samples 2h 2.5h 1h 3h ~1min/sample = 1.6h (16h incubation 37C°) (Plus drying time) (Plus 1.5h incubation) (Plus drying time) for data acquisition 1. Automated 2. Automated 3a. Automated 3b. Automated Liquid- 4. Data acquisition PNGase-F release HILIC-SPE enrichment Permethylation Liquid Extraction (LLE) (MALDI-TOF-MS) LT-PERMET-96 14

  15. Examples of how we’re using the LT-PERMET-96 system at Ludger

  16. Permethylated and 2-AB Labelled Human IgG N-glycan Profiles are Comparable • We analysed human IgG N-glycans using the automated HT permethylation method and compared the data to those obtained from UHPLC analysis by fluorescence detection as shown in Figure 1 Section A and B. • Glycan signals were integrated, normalized and the relative intensities and standard deviation was calculated for the 13 major N-glycan peaks. • The analysis confirmed that peaks with higher relative intensities (above 4%) showed good correlation between the two methods. • Therefore we conclude that the HT permethylation technique is comparable to UHPLC results and that it gives a reliable overview of the glycosylation profile in a short timespan. Figure 1 . Comparison of PNGase F released and purified human IgG N-glycans analyzed with orthogonal methods (A) MALDI-TOF-MS spectrum of permethylated human-IgG N-glycans (B) 2-AB labelled HILIC UHPLC chromatogram. Fucose Galactose Mannose N -Acetylglucosamine N -Acetylneuraminic acid LT-PERMET-96 16

  17. Permethylation Stabilises Fragile Sialic Acids • The relative intensities of triantennary, disialylated structures (H6N5S2) and triantennary, trisialylated structures (H6N5S3) from the A3G3S3 glycan standard C were determined by MALDI-TOF-MS after MALDI-TOF-MS HILIC UHPLC automated HT permethylation. • This data was then compared to the ratios obtained after procainamide labeling followed by HILIC UHPLC with fluorescence detection as shown in Figure 2. • Triplicate analysis and relative quantitation was performed for both fluorescent labeling and permethylation. Figure 2. Comparison of the glycosylation profiles of the A3G3S3 N-glycan standard analyzed after sample preparation using the liquid handling robot. (A) MALDI-TOF-MS spectrum after permethylation, (B) HILIC UHPLC • The analysis confirmed that the MALDI- chromatogram with fluorescence detection after procainamide labelling. (C) Histogram comparing the relative TOF-MS data from the sialylated N-glycan peak intensities of triantennary, disialylated structures (H6N5S2) and triantennary, trisialylated structures (H6N5S3) after triplicate analysis. The histogram shows comparable relative signal intensities between MALDI- standard gave similar and comparable TOF-MS and HILIC UHPLC analysis. The error bars depict standard deviation. results to that of the UHPLC data. LT-PERMET-96 17

  18. The LT-PERMET-96 System is Reliable for Semi-automated, HT MS based glycomics For more information on how permethylation is used at Ludger for R&D, visit: www.ludger.com/mass-spectrometry LT-PERMET-96 18

  19. How to Start Using the Ludger Glycan Permethylation Technology 1. Submit your samples 2. Method transfer 3. Use our permethylation for automated HT kit in your own lab We can transfer the glycan permethylation permethylation Contact us for a quotation methods to your lab and and place your order As part of our glycoprofiling services, provide technical support Catalogue # LT-PERMET-96 we can perform sample preparation and analysis for you in our labs LT-PERMET-96 19

  20. Contact Us If you have To request a quotation: For services, method transfer technical questions or LT-PERMET-96 kit Archana Shubhakar Sales Team Senior Scientist Quotations: info@ludger.com CLICK CLICK to contact Orders: sales@ludger.com to contact archana.shubhakar@ludger.com Sales Archana LT-PERMET-96 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend