permanent v determinant an exponential lower bound
play

Permanent V. Determinant: An Exponential Lower Bound Assuming - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Permanent V. Determinant: An Exponential Lower Bound Assuming Symmetry J.M. Landsberg and Nicolas Ressayre Texas A&M University and Univ. Lyon I ITCS 2016 1 / 8 Valiants conjecture Theorem (Valiant) Let P be a homogeneous polynomial


  1. Permanent V. Determinant: An Exponential Lower Bound Assuming Symmetry J.M. Landsberg and Nicolas Ressayre Texas A&M University and Univ. Lyon I ITCS 2016 1 / 8

  2. Valiant’s conjecture Theorem (Valiant) Let P be a homogeneous polynomial of degree m in M variables. Then there exists an n and n × n matrices A 0 , A 1 , . . . , A M such that P ( y 1 , . . . , y M ) = det n ( A 0 + y 1 A 1 + · · · + y M A M ) . Write P ( y ) = det n ( A ( y )). Let dc( P ) be the smallest n that works. Let Y = ( y i j ) be an m × m matrix and let perm m ( Y ) denote the permanent, a homogeneous polynomial of degree m in M = m 2 variables. Conjecture (Valiant, 1979) dc(perm m ) grows faster than any polynomial in m. 2 / 8

  3. State of the art dc(perm 2 ) = 2 (classical) dc(perm m ) ≥ m 2 2 (Mignon-Ressayre, 2005) dc(perm m ) ≤ 2 m − 1 (Grenet 2011, explicit expressions) dc(perm 3 ) = 7 (Alper-Bogart-Velasco 2015), In particular, Grenet’s representation for perm 3 : y 3 y 3 y 3  0 0 0 0  3 2 1 y 1 1 0 0 0 0 0  1  y 1   0 1 0 0 0 0  2   y 1  perm 3 ( y ) = det 7 0 0 1 0 0 0   3 ,  y 2 y 2  0 0 1 0 0   2 1   y 2 y 2 0 0 0 1 0   3 1 y 2 y 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 is optimal. 3 / 8

  4. Guiding principle: Optimal expressions should have interesting geometry Geometric Complexity Theory principle: perm m and det n are special because they are determined by their symmetry groups : Let G det n be the subgroup of the group of invertible linear maps C n 2 → C n 2 preserving the determinant, the symmetry group of det n . For example: B , C : n × n matrices with det( BC ) = 1, then det n ( BXC ) = det n ( X ), and det n ( X T ) = det n ( X ). These maps generate G det n . Let G perm m be the symmetry group of perm m , a subgroup of the group of invertible linear maps C m 2 → C m 2 . For example, E , F : m × m permutation matrices or diagonal matrices with determinant one, then perm m ( EYF ) = perm m ( Y ), and perm m ( Y T ) = perm m ( Y ). These generate G perm m . Let G L perm m be the subgroup of the group of invertible linear maps C m 2 → C m 2 generated by the E ’s. 4 / 8

  5. Equivariance Proposition (L-Ressayre) Grenet’s expressions are G L perm m -equivariant, namely, given E ∈ G L perm m , there exist n × n matrices B , C such that A Grenet , m ( EY ) = BA Grenet , m ( Y ) C. For example, let   t 1 E ( t ) = t 2  .  t 3 Then A Grenet , m ( E ( t ) Y ) = B ( t ) A Grenet , m ( Y ) C ( t ), where  t 3  t 1 t 3     t 1 t 3   and C ( t ) = B ( t ) − 1 .   B ( t ) = t 1 t 3     1     1   1 5 / 8

  6. Main results Theorem (L-Ressayre) Among G L perm m -equivariant determinantal expressions for perm m , Grenet’s size 2 m − 1 expressions are optimal and unique up to trivialities. Theorem (L-Ressayre) There exists a G perm m -equivariant determinantal expression for � 2 m − 1 ∼ 4 m . � perm m of size m Theorem (L-Ressayre) Among G perm m -equivariant determinatal expressions for perm m , the � 2 m � − 1 expressions are optimal and unique up to trivialities. size m In particular, Valiant’s conjecture holds in the restricted model of equivariant expressions. 6 / 8

  7. Restricted model � general case? Howe-Young duality endofunctor : The involution on the space of symmetric functions (exchanging elementary symmetric functions with complete symmetric functions) extends to modules of the general linear group. Punch line: can exchange symmetry for skew-symmetry. Proof came from first proving an analogous theorem for det m (with the extra hypothesis that rank A 0 = n − 1) and then using the endofunctor to guide the proof. Same idea was used in Efremeko-L-Schenck-Weyman: (i) quadratic limit of the method of shifted partial derivatives for Valiant’s conjecture and (ii) linear strand of the minimal free resolution of the ideal generated by subpermanents. 7 / 8

  8. More detail on the endofunctor Idea: we know a lot about the determinant. Use the endofunctor to transfer information about the determinant to the permanent. The catch: the projection operator. Illustration: Given a linear map f : C n → C n , one obtains linear maps f ∧ k : Λ k C n → Λ k C n , whose matrix entries are the size k minors of f and whose eigenvalues are the elementary symmetric functions of the eigenvalues of f . In particular the map f ∧ n : Λ n C n = C → Λ n C is multiplication by the scalar det n ( f ). One also has linear maps f ◦ k : S k C n → S k C n , whose eigenvalues are the complete symmetric functions of the eigenvalues of f . The map f ◦ k is Howe-Young dual to f ∧ k . Project S n C n to the line spanned by the square-free monomial. The image of the map induced from f ◦ n is the permanent. 8 / 8

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend