PERCEPTUAL ACCOUNT OF SYMBOLIC REASON LANDY, ALLEN, ZEDNIK 2014 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

perceptual account of symbolic reason
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

PERCEPTUAL ACCOUNT OF SYMBOLIC REASON LANDY, ALLEN, ZEDNIK 2014 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PERCEPTUAL ACCOUNT OF SYMBOLIC REASON LANDY, ALLEN, ZEDNIK 2014 Rishav Raj Agarwal Arpit Agarwal WHAT IS SYMBOLIC REASONING? The science of reasoning by the aid of representative symbols a+b=b+a CONTEMPORARY VIEWS Symbolic Reasoning as


slide-1
SLIDE 1

PERCEPTUAL ACCOUNT OF SYMBOLIC REASON

LANDY, ALLEN, ZEDNIK 2014

Rishav Raj Agarwal Arpit Agarwal

slide-2
SLIDE 2

WHAT IS SYMBOLIC REASONING?

 The science of reasoning by the aid of representative symbols

a+b=b+a

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CONTEMPORARY VIEWS

 Symbolic Reasoning as grounded in the ability to

internally represent numbers, logical relationships, and mathemat ical rules in an abstract, amodal fashion.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

THE HYPOTHESIS

WHAT THE PAPER SUGGESTS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

PERCEPTUAL MANIPULATION THEORY

 Symbolic Reasoning is done by:

 Complex visual and auditory processes  Affordance learning  Pattern-matching  Grouping of notational structures

 Role of magnitude and quantity detection systems.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

EXPERIMENTS

TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

SOME KEY TERMS Consistency

¦2 * 3 ¦ - 4 2 * ¦ 3 - 4 ¦

Sensitivity

2 * 3 – 4 2 – 3 * 4

Validity

y + 2 = y + 3 - 1 5*X=6*X

slide-8
SLIDE 8

EXPERIMENT 1

 Set of 20 questions  Time limit  Response Time  The parameters in focus are orthogonal to other paramers.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

DESIGN OF THE EXPERIMENT

 All expressions will be presented in black text on a white background, using the font

glyphicons-halflings-regular on 15.6 inch monitors of resolution 1,366x768 (standard laptop screen).

 Participants used the keyboard to report validity judgments. The P and Q keys

signified valid and invalid judgments, respectively.

 Though there will be a time constraint, a timer shall run in the background which

would capture the response time of the participant with each stimulus.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 Letters such as i are avoided.  Testing on High School Students and College Students.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

AUTHORS’ EXPERIMENT

 Focused on accuracy  Response time not noted  Analysis carried out only correct answer.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

NOVELTY OF OUR APPROACH

 Motivation: Reasoning involves System 1.  The questions are time limited  Response time noted

slide-13
SLIDE 13

SUGGESTIONS BY AUTHOR

 RT’s won’t be sensitive to whether the answer depends on the order of operations  Limiting time should be effective in eliminating more sophisticated representations.  Mediocre mathematics students get the right answer by reasoning using ‘backup’

strategies, while experts just have better trained visual systems

 Consider leaving out feedback  Leave out the ‘insensitive’ items altogether

slide-14
SLIDE 14

EXPERIMENT II

 See whether people employed motion resources literally under any circumstances.

Y X 3 + 2 = 8 Y X 3 = 8 - 2 Y =

8−2 3

slide-15
SLIDE 15

REFERENCES

slide-16
SLIDE 16

 Kirshner, D. (1989). The visual syntax of algebra. J. Res. Math. Educ.20, 274–287.

doi: 10.2307/749516

 Landy, D., and Goldstone, R. L. (2007a). How abstract is symbolic thought? J. Exp.

  • Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.33, 720–733. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.720

 Landy, D., and Goldstone, R. L. (2009). “Pushing symbols,”Proceedings of the 31st

Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Amsterdam

 Landy, D., and Goldstone, R. L. (2010). How much symbolic manipulation is just

symbolic pushing?

 Landy, D., Allen C., and Zednik, C (2014). perceptual account of Symbolic reason.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Thank You Questions?