Per erfo formance rmance-Based Based Proj ojec ect t Se Sele - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Per erfo formance rmance-Based Based Proj

• jec

ect t Se Sele lection ction

AMPO Annual Conference September 27, 2018

Go Goals ls of

• f th

the e Process

• cess

Regionally-balanced Transparent Objective Data-driven decisions

Dev evelopmen elopmen t

Selection lection Process ess

FAST Act (Feder eral al Perfo formanc rmance e Measures) ures) HB HB-20 (State e Perfo formanc rmance e Measures) ures) Peer Agenc ncies es Criteri eria a and Process esses es TPB Priori rities ties and Direct ction ion TAC Review ew and Feedback back

Project ject Call Criter teria

Safet ety Infra rast structu ructure e Condi

• nditi

tion Cong

• nges

esti tion Reduc ucti tion Syste tem m Reliabi iability lity Frei eight t Move

• veme

ment t and Econo

• nomic

mic Vitality tality Enviro ironme mental tal Sustai tainability ability Reduc uced ed Pro roje ject t Deliv liver ery y Dela lays Pro roje ject Readin adines ess Cong

• nges

esti tion and Mobility

• bility
• Multimo

ltimodal dal Eleme ements ts

• Safety

ty Tra ravel el Time me Savin ings gs Regio ional l Impac act Econo

• nomic

mic Develo elopme pment Social ial and d Envir ironmen mental tal Impact acts Fundin ding Match Plannin ing Proc rocess ss Syste tem m Pres eser ervatio ation

Ali lignment ent wi with h Nationa nal l Goals ls

Project ject Call Criter teria

Safet ety y and Secur urit ity Syste tem m Pres eser ervatio ation Land d Use and Tra ransp sporta rtati tion Conn

• nnec

ectiv ivit ity Effic icie iency y and Perfo rforma mance Enviro ironme ment Noise

• ise and

d Nei eigh ghbo borhood d Char aract acter er Air ir Qual alit ity y and Ener ergy gy Social ial Equit uity Cos

• st

t Effec ecti tive Pro roje ject Dela lay Econo

• nomy

my Mobility

• bility and

Acces ess Pro roje ject Readin adines ess

• Cong
• nges

esti tion and Mobility

• bility
• Multimo

ltimodal dal Eleme ements ts

• Safet

ety

• Tra

ravel el Time me Savin ings gs

• Regio

ional l Impac act

• Econo
• nomic

mic Develo elopme pment

• Social

ial and d Envir ironmen mental tal Impact acts

• Fundin

ding Match

• Plannin

ing g Pro roces ess

• Syste

tem m Pres eser ervatio ation

• Ali

lignment ent wi with h Long-Rang nge e Pla lan

Project Score Planning Factors Project Readiness Cost/Benefit Analysis

Project ect Selec lectio tion n Proce cess ss

Project Score Planning Factors Project Readiness Cost/Benefit Analysis

Project ect Selecti lection

• n

Proce cess ss

Project Score Planning Factors Project Readiness Cost/Benefit Analysis

Project ect Selec lectio tion n Proce cess ss

Scori ring ng Cate tego gorie ries

Roadway ITS-Operations Transit Active Transportation Other TDM

Pla lann nning ng Fact ctors rs

Pla lann nning ng Fact ctor Sco cori ring ng

Project Score Planning Factors Project Readiness Cost/Benefit Analysis

Project ect Selec lectio tion n Proce cess ss

Cost st/Benefi /Benefit t Analy lysis sis fo for r Project ect Sco cori ring ng

Roadway ITS/Operations Transit Active Transportation Other

Performance Measure Planning Factors (50%) Cost/Benefit Analysis (50%)

Cost st/Benefi /Benefit t Ana nalys lysis is fo for r Project ect Sco cori ring ng

Purpose: pose:

• Sor
• rt

t Projec

• jects

ts

• Base

se on

• n Data

ta

Regional and local Land Use and Transportation growth estimates Projects included in 2040 Plan Crash statistics for the CAMPO region Crash reduction effectiveness measures

Not

• t int

ntende ended d to

• reflect

flect ful ull-scal scale e Co Cost st/Benefit Benefit of projects

• jects

Roadwa way Cate tegor gory y

• Travel

el Time me

Data from regional model, test with/without project CBA spreadsheet – convert time saving to $Value

• Sa

Safet ety

Need Effectiveness of project Cost Combine

• Each

h 50% o % of CB CBA score e or 25% o % of ov

• ver

erall ll score

Safe fety ty

Nee eed

Crash rating for facility type (lookup) Rate by County, by facility class, and urban/rural

Crash Rate per VMT Bastrop Burnet Caldwell Hays Travis Williamson Rural Interstate/Freeway N/A N/A 0.0009 N/A N/A N/A Principal Arterial 0.0010 0.0007 0.0008 0.0012 0.0006 0.0008

• Min. Arterial, Maj. Collector

0.0014 0.0010 0.0022 0.0017 0.0020 0.0015 Urban Interstate/Freeway 0.0013 N/A N/A 0.0003 0.0009 0.0008 Principal Arterial 0.0019 0.0037 0.0021 0.0018 0.0021 0.0018

• Min. Arterial, Maj. Collector

0.0032 0.0025 0.0054 0.0034 0.0029 0.0024

Source: CRIS data, TxDOT published VMT 2016

Safe fety ty

Effec ecti tivenes veness

Estimate for reduction in crash rates due to project design Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) lookup table

Examples

Combine

Safety: Need Effectiveness Cost Combine

ITS/Oper /Operations tions Cate tego gory y

Tool for Oper erati ations

• ns Bene

nefit fit Cost t Ana nalys ysis is (TO TOPS PS- BC)

T ravel Time Savings Improved T ravel Time Reliability Crash Reduction Fuel Consumption Savings Proj

• jec

ects ts rank nked ed by y reduct ductio ion n in in vehicle icle mil iles es traveled veled and scored

• red

Ridership estimates, mode splits by TAZ VMT savings, etc. +Suffici ficient docum cumen entat ation ion, , plan, , pil ilot

• t consid

siderat eration ion

FHWA Tool for Operations Benefit Cost Analysis (TOPS-BC)

T ra rans nsit Cate tegor

• ry

y

Act ctive ve Tra rans nspo porta rtation tion Cate tego gory y

Proje jects cts impa pacti ting ng number ers s of T Traffic c Area ea Zones es

TAZ is a proxy for density and mix of uses Buffer project limits, count TAZs Document

• Highe

her num umber er of T TAZ AZs affec ected ed res esul ult t in hi highe her r normali lize zed d score

Project Score Planning Factors Project Readiness Cost/Benefit Analysis

Project ect Selec lectio tion n Proce cess ss

Sco cori ring ng Proce cess ss

App pprova val l Proce cess ss

TPB Publi lic c Input TAC

Qu Quest estions? ions?

Ryan Collins Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization ryan.collins@campotexas.org David d Paine ne Freese and Nichols david.paine@freese.com