pegula ice arena
play

Pegula Ice Arena Shane Marshall | Construction Management Advisor: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pegula Ice Arena Shane Marshall | Construction Management Advisor: Raymond Sowers Building Information Construction Information Project Team Members First Puck Drop PSU vs. Army | October 11, 2013 Location: Pennsylvania State University |


  1. Pegula Ice Arena Shane Marshall | Construction Management Advisor: Raymond Sowers

  2. Building Information Construction Information Project Team Members First Puck Drop – PSU vs. Army | October 11, 2013 Location: Pennsylvania State University | University Park Schedule: Start | February, 2012 Function: Division 1 Hockey | Community Rink End | September, 2013 Size: 227,000 SF Delivery Method: CM at Risk Three Stories Height = 65 ft. above grade Cost: Project | $102 M Construction | $89 M LEED: Gold Potential Contract: Guaranteed Maximum Price Structure: Moment & Braced Frame Precast Stadia Mechanical: 12 Air Handling Units Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Project Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Introduction Community Rink Building Sequence Structural Breadth Building Enclosure Introduction Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  3. Community Rink Sequence off Critical Path Project Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Analysis 1 Building Sequence Introduction Community Rink Structural Breadth Building Enclosure Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  4. Main Rink vs. Community Rink Community Rink Critical Path Items Key Points from Schedule 1 • Community Rink line items Foundation Wall (foundation wall, underground MEP & SOG, and structural steel) lie on Underground the critical path MEP & SOG • Finishes have the potential to be Structural Steel expedited Main Rink Community Rink Project Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Original Schedule Building Sequence Introduction Community Rink Structural Breadth Building Enclosure Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  5. New Schedule Crane Finishes • Backward logic applied to removed Crane Driven Activities Finish Work Driven Activities (FRP SW #9 Ends) community rink schedule line items. Original Schedule New Schedule Original Schedule New Schedule Start Date 7/16/2012 7/16/2012 Start Date 5/18/2012 5/18/2012 • Exterior CMU along west portion of Total Days Saved Finish Date 10/26/2012 10/3/2012 Total Days Gained Finish Date 11/6/2012 10/15/2012 building now controls community rink. 23 Actual Days 103 80 22 Actual Days 174 151 • Structural steel (NW) finish-start 17 Working Days 75 58 16 Working Days 123 107 relationship with exterior CMU. • 17 days of float are available for the community rink. * There are not actually 17 days of crane reduction. Project Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Results Building Sequence Introduction Community Rink Structural Breadth Building Enclosure Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  6. Mechanical Units Key Point Proposed Structural Design Mechanical units rest over main rink and community rink Project Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 1 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Structural Breadth Community Rink Building Sequence Introduction Building Enclosure Structural Breadth Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  7. Load Calculations Structural Loads Structural Member Results Community Roof  DL = 3.6psf TPO + 5psf beam self-weight = 8.6psf  LL = 20psf (roof load)  SL = 30psf  W u = 1.2(8.6) +1.6(20) + 0.5(30) = 57.3psf  Point Load = 57.3psf * 47.5’ * 26’(worst case scenario) = 70.766kip Cantilevered Section Top Girder (Gridlines X3 to X4)  DL = 75psf (concrete slab) + 24psf (AHU weight) + 10psf girder self-weight = 109psf  LL = 20psf (roof load)  SL = 30psf  W u = 1.2(109) +1.6(20) + 0.5(30) = 180psf  Distributed Load = 180psf * 26’ = 4.68kip/ft Top Girder (Gridlines X4 to X5)  DL = 75psf (concrete slab) + 24psf (AHU weight) + 10psf girder self-weight = 109psf  LL = 20psf (roof load)  SL = 30psf  W u = 1.2(109) +1.6(20) + 0.5(30) = 180psf  Distributed Load = 180psf * 26’ = 4.68k ip/ft Bottom Girder (Gridlines X4 to X5)  DL = 75psf (concrete slab) + 10psf girder self-weight = 85psf  LL = 100psf (corridor)  W u = 1.2(85) +1.6(100) = 262psf  Distributed Load = 262psf * 27.4’ (worst case scenario) = 7.183kip/ft Project Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 1 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Structural Results Community Rink Building Sequence Introduction Building Enclosure Structural Breadth Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  8. Structural Figure Advantages Disadvantages  Finishes can begin more quickly ahead of the current schedule which will result in the project finishing three weeks ahead of  Significant increase in size of steel columns and girders. schedule.  Additional cost in steel. ($361,748)  Allows more float on community rink activities. Specifically  Potential foundation upgrades. mechanical room has much more time to get underground work  Minimal crane time saving. finished.  Significant aesthetic disruption at student entrance.  Decrease in general conditions o Employee Costs: $91,500 o Miscellaneous Costs: $8,175 o Total Costs: $99,675 Project Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 1 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Analysis 1 Conclusion Building Sequence Introduction Community Rink Building Enclosure Structural Breadth Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  9. Building Sequence Project Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Analysis 2 Community Rink Introduction Structural Breadth Building Sequence Building Enclosure Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  10. Schedule Logistics Logistics Excavation: Steel: Twice the amount of heavy Tight working conditions machinery Lack of maneuverability for Traffic flow on the site and steel deliveries at the site entrance Little to no shakeout area Base Summary Schedule Two Crews Summary Schedule Foundation and Concrete: Start January 26, 2012 January 26, 2012 Second crane has potential to Finish September 17, 2013 March 8, 2013 boom out over public buildings Tight working conditions and pathways Base Summary Schedule Excavation, Concrete, Steel Two Crews Lack of maneuverability to Start January 26, 2012 January 26, 2012 Cranes have potential to collide working spaces Finish September 17, 2013 August 23, 2013 Project Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Two Crews Community Rink Introduction Structural Breadth Building Sequence Building Enclosure Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  11. Original Sequence Proposed Sequence Proposed Sequence Different Project Start Point Task Name Duration Start Finish Notice to Proceed 0 days Thu 1/26/12 Thu 1/26/12 Mobilization 6 days Fri 1/27/12 Fri 2/3/12 Excavation - Bottom of SOG 51 days Mon 2/13/12 Mon 4/23/12 Excavation - Foundations 41 days Tue 3/27/12 Tue 5/22/12 Foundation Concrete 43 days Tue 3/27/12 Thu 5/24/12 2 weeks of schedule reduction!!! Underground MEP / SOG Concrete 60 days Fri 3/16/12 Fri 6/29/12 Project Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Start Location Community Rink Introduction Structural Breadth Building Sequence Building Enclosure Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  12. Two Crews Crane Sequence Advantages vs. Disadvantages Advantages  Rough-In and Finishes can begin more quickly (2 weeks of schedule reduction)  Roof enclosure has less chance to be “snowed out”  Potential alternative crane logistics Logistical Challenges  Potential for no SOG comeback pours Disadvantage • Most difficult sequence of steel / precast would be installed blind Work at Sequence 3 • Potential for increased crane time and additional cost Project Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Analysis 2 Conclusion Community Rink Introduction Structural Breadth Building Sequence Building Enclosure Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  13. Building Enclosure Project Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Analysis 3 Community Rink Building Sequence Introduction Structural Breadth Building Enclosure Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  14. Current Enclosure Proposed Wall System Vapor Barrier Issue Concrete Concrete XPS XPS Outside Outside Inside Inside Wall Temperature NO air/vapor barrier? Dew Point Temperature Plot the temperature lines & examine for locations where actual temperature falls below dewpoint temperature… CarbonCast Insulated Architectural Cladding That indicates a location for potential condensation Project Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Enclosure System Community Rink Building Sequence Introduction Structural Breadth Building Enclosure Architectural Breadth Geotech Investigation

  15. Panels South Facade North Facade Project Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Analysis 3 Façade Design Community Rink Building Sequence Introduction Structural Breadth Building Enclosure Geotech Investigation Architectural Breadth

  16. Enclosure Section Construction Drawings Structural Drawings Project Analysis 1 Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Analysis 3 Analysis 4 Analysis 3 Drawing Details Community Rink Building Sequence Introduction Structural Breadth Building Enclosure Geotech Investigation Architectural Breadth

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend