Peer research Mike Seal Journey User of mental health and drug - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Peer research Mike Seal

Journey

User of mental health and drug services

Volunteer Practitioner Manager/ Development worker Trainer/ researcher consultant Academic

Peer research conducted

Critical incidents in entrenched rough sleepers exiting homelessness – Groundswell Touch: street youth work interventions with young people involved with violence Revolving doors: peer research in probation Commissioning together: multiple exclusion peer research Homeless Health Initiative report (2009) Queens Nursing Institute

lClient review of health services (2009) Herfordshire Primary Care Trust lStreets Ahead: good practice in tackling Rough Sleeping: client perspectives (2008) DCLG lLondon Borough on Croydon: Client consultation report (2008) Croydon City Council lTelford and Wrekin: Client perceptions on homeless strategy (2008) Telford City Council lClient perceptions on the Homelessness strategy (2008) Liverpool City Council lEast Midlands Homelessness Strategy (2007) (User involvement aspect) Centre for Urban

Studies, Birmingham University

lBeing supported: user perspectives on Supported People funded Services, (2006)

Groundswell: London

latest

Critical incidents in entrenched rough sleepers

exiting homelessness – Groundswell

Touch: street youth work interventions with

young people involved with violence

Revolving doors: peer research in probation Commissioning together: multiple exclusion

peer research

Why peer research?

1.Claims about power and epistemology (knowledge) 2.Claims about the nature of the data that peer

researchers can obtain

3.Claims about the emancipatory and empowering impact

• f using peer researchers

4.Trendy and hard to argue with?(Banardos:2006,Burns and Schubotz:2009,

France:2000, Freeman et al. 1996; Kaseniemi 2001; Griesel et al 2002; Involve:2004, NYA:2010, Winston 2007) .

But....

• Dangers of tokenism (Arnstein:1968,

Hart:1992)

• Tyranny of the group (Cooke:2001)
• Simplistic notions of peer/ community (Gujit

and Shah 1998)

Bu But t but ut

• Don’t underestimate power to understand

complicated research skills

• Don’t underestimate transferable skills that

people have

• Don’t be picky about where you involve people,

they will express if they do not understand.

• Let research grow from skills but don’t be afraid

to push and challenge people

• Be prepared to push your own boundaries

Power and knowledge

larising from insights of feminist research into the construction of knowledge

and the falsity of ‘objectivity’ (Bowles and Duell, Klein, 1983; Coppock:2011, Smith, 1974; Stanley and Wise, 1983).

lOne of the central tenants of participatory research (Cooke and Kothari: 2004,

Kumar: 2002, Petty et al:1995) is to work with letting unheard voices be heard but not descend into romanticisation of the other.

lpeer research reduces the inherent power imbalances within research by

involving people in the process and that they therefore have a stake in knowledge creation (Kilpatrick et al: 2007).

Reality and thoughts

The professional researcher has power of determining what constitutes research and knowledge Take time to deconstruct knowledge (every one want to do questionnaires!) and ethics (everyone wants to do secret shopping) There is power is the symbolism of peers, people can see that knowledge creation is something they can be involved in Equally involve workers and other stakeholders or they will sabotage – make it pushy but real.

• 'experts on their own lives'
• able to relate to those with experience better
• less intimidating than other adults
• able to talk the same language
• being able to talk about ‘taboo’ subjects with peers
• ability to share common experiences
• being on the same side
• able to make the interview situation ‘informal’.

Data peers can obtain (Hobbiss et al: 1998, Kirby: 1999)

but

traditionally in research it is accepted that the

• bserver and the observed should not

“contaminate” the other (Du Bois)

Sometimes people are more likely to talk to

stranger (Simmel:1921) For issues like gender (McLaughlin 2005) and local accent (McCartan et al. 2004) it can be detrimental to the relationship between them

But, but…….

Importance of developing “conscious partiality” (Mies:1983, p123),contingent self revelation and leverage in order to challenge and shake up life world near peer – close enough to feel safe, but different to challenge and be a blueprint self & poxy trust Power of symbolism of peer researchers See it as a pedagogic process

research is also justified in terms of efficiency in that it encourages closer intimacy and fuller discussion between researchers and researched, and fuller understanding of the data. (Alderson, 2001, p. 140)