PCC Mission KPIs
Core Theme: Diversity, Inclusion, and Global Education March 2017
PCC Mission KPIs Core Theme: Diversity, Inclusion, and Global - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
PCC Mission KPIs Core Theme: Diversity, Inclusion, and Global Education March 2017 Overview Background on Mission Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Diversity, Inclusion, and Global Education KPIs Discussion Your ideas on
Core Theme: Diversity, Inclusion, and Global Education March 2017
and Global Education
Governors
education
KPIs
time student equivalent”, with sub-groups by race/ethnicity, gender, age, international status, online enrollment, underprepared students and other relevant populations
age, international status, online enrollment, underprepared students and other relevant populations
KPIs, continued
Education Data System (IPEDS) Human Resources Survey (sub- populations to include full-time faculty, adjunct faculty, staff and administrators) compared with US Census Bureau data for Pima County and the United States
KPIs, continued
Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (CCFSSE) questions on “How much does this college emphasize encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds?”
Until Fall 2016, reports were static. Today, the end user can interactively generate reports in the Webi system.
We will see some snapshots here, then spend a few minutes in Webi (pimareports.pima.edu).
Beginning November 2016, interactive daily registration reports have been available in the WebI system. Let’s look at this for various demographic groups in the Webi report that is compiled every day.
Beginning November 2016, interactive daily registration reports are available in Webi.
The reports can break down the data by several factors.
Outcomes of six-year cohort beginning Fall 2009
Let’s see the results at large and for specific race/ethnicities, and Pell Grant status…
In Webi, we can “slice and dice” the data for various sup-populations based on combinations of:
We are developing this reporting capability in WebI. Let’s have a look…
Each year, the College reports to IPEDS the employee counts based on
Our examples here focus on administration and full-time faculty.
1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 8 7 6 8 9 13 11 9 44 44 48 46 38 10 20 30 40 50 60 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Number of Pima Community College Administrators, by Race/Ethnicity (IPEDS)
American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black Or African American Hispanic White
3.4% 2.8% 1.5% 3.6% 3.6% 3.4% 11.1% 10.6% 10.7%
14.5% 15.5% 18.1% 16.7% 16.1% 80.0% 75.9% 66.7% 69.7% 67.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Distribution of Pima Community College Administrators by Race/Ethnicity American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black Or African American Hispanic White
3.7% 3.3% 4.3% 4.1% 4.3% 2.2% 2.3% 2.0% 2.6% 2.4%
14.6% 15.3% 14.5% 14.2% 14.7% 77.7% 77.4% 77.2% 77.0% 76.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Distribution of Pima Community College Full-time Faculty by Race/Ethnicity Other Asian Black Or African American Hispanic White
Compare current employee (fulltime faculty and administrators) representation to US Census estimates (2015): Notes:
current unavailability of distinct categories in Census data.
available for educational level.
% of PCC administrators 2015 % of PCC full- time faculty 2015 % of Pima County
degree or higher, age 25+ % of Pima County pop., age 25+ White, non-Hispanic 69.7 76.9 77.9 60.5 Hispanic 16.7 14.7 12.7 30.1
Compare current full-time faculty race/ethnic breakdown to 2016 applicant pool
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 Applicants Other or Multiracial 3 3 3 3 3 1 American Indian/Alaskan Native 4 4 5 3 3 4 Asian 15 13 17 16 16 2 Black Or African American 9 9 8 10 9 2 Hispanic 59 61 57 55 55 9 White, non-Hispanic 313 309 304 298 287 50 Total 403 399 394 385 373 68
Compare current full-time faculty applicant breakdown to 2016 applicant pool
1.5% 1.0% 1.0% 1.3% 5.9%
3.7% 3.3% 4.3% 4.2% 4.3% 2.9% 2.2% 2.3% 2.0% 2.6% 2.4% 2.9%
14.6% 15.3% 14.5% 14.3% 14.7% 13.2% 77.7% 77.4% 77.2% 77.4% 76.9% 73.5%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% 120.0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2016 Applicants
Other or Multiracial American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian Black Or African American Hispanic White, non-Hispanic
From the Student engagement data, from Community College (Faculty) Survey
Question: How much does this college emphasize encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds? Compare the results between:
Question: How much does this college emphasize encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds?
CCFSSE (Faculty) CCSSE Part-time Full-time All Faculty Students Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Little 14 7.5 8 5.1 22 6.4 246 18.5 Some 55 29.6 47 29.7 102 29.7 369 27.8 Quite a bit 67 36.0 64 40.5 131 38.1 400 30.1 Very Much 50 26.9 39 24.7 89 25.9 312 23.5 Total 186 100.0 158 100.0 344 100.0 1328 100.0
Compare PCC’s student survey results with the aggregates of other colleges
CCSSE (Students) PCC Custom Group (20 select colleges) 2014 Cohort Count % Count % Count % Very Little 246 18.5 3259 17.8 72333 16.9 Some 369 27.8 5526 30.1 130636 30.5 Quite a bit 400 30.1 5280 28.8 127009 29.6 Very Much 312 23.5 4275 23.3 98717 23.0 Total 1328 100.0 18340 100.0 428695 100.0
Compare PCC’s student survey results with the aggregates of all participating colleges
PCC CCFSSE Part-time Full-time All Faculty All Faculty Count % Count % Count % Count % Very Little 14 7.5 8 5.1 22 6.4 2,036 6.5 Some 55 29.6 47 29.7 102 29.7 8,489 27.2 Quite a bit 67 36.0 64 40.5 131 38.1 10,871 34.9 Very Much 50 26.9 39 24.7 89 25.9 9,773 31.4 Total 186 100.0 158 100.0 344 100.0 31,169 100.0