SLIDE 11 Criterion for Merit Review
Criterion 1. Potential for study to improve health care and outcomes
- Was the research question generated and prioritized by the PCORnet PPRN
community and their patients/participants?
- Does the applicant present a credible plan by which findings could rapidly be
disseminated and implemented, resulting in improvements in practice and patient
Criterion 2. Technical merit
- Are each of the comparators clearly described and well justified?
- Are the sample sizes and power estimates presented based on realistic and careful
evaluations? Is the effect size adequately justified?
Criterion 3. Patient-centeredness
- Does the application include a thorough description about which outcomes (both
benefits and harms) are important to patients?
Criterion 4. Patient and stakeholder engagement
- Does the application show evidence of active engagement among scientists, patients,
and other stakeholders throughout the entire research process?