Corporate Overview
May 2018
Patient-Centric Science-Based Performance-Driven
Patient-Centric Science-Based Performance-Driven Corporate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Patient-Centric Science-Based Performance-Driven Corporate Overview May 2018 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation, in addition to historical information, contains certain forward- looking statements made pursuant to the Private
Corporate Overview
May 2018
Patient-Centric Science-Based Performance-Driven
This presentation, in addition to historical information, contains certain forward- looking statements made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied herein. Factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to, new product development (including clinical trials outcome and regulatory requirements/actions); competitive risks to marketed products; forecasts of future
acceptable terms, if at all; as well as those discussed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2
3
Immunomedics is deeply committed to become the leading antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) company worldwide delivering breakthrough therapies to treat complex cancers and transform patient outcomes.
Sacituzumab govitecan/IMMU-132 (anti-Trop-2-SN-38 ADC) Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (FDA granted BTD) BLA IMMU-140 (anti-HLA-DR-SN-38 ADC) Labetuzumab govitecan/IMMU-130 (anti-CEACAM5-SN-38 ADC) Metastatic urothelial cancer Metastatic colorectal cancer Solid and liquid cancers
First-in-Class Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Programs
Milatuzumab (anti-CD74) for autoimmune diseases Veltuzumab (anti-CD20) for cancer and autoimmune diseases
Other Product Candidates
Epratuzumab (anti-CD22) for relapsed pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (E1)-3s (bispecific antibody) IMMU-114 (anti-HLA-DR) for hematologic malignancies Research/Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Solid tumors IITs Registration Metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer
5
Potential to address approximately 90% of all human cancers
Linker for SN-38
Suite of Humanized Antibodies for Creating ADCs
1. hRS7, used in sacituzumab govitecan, targets Trop-2 for solid cancers 2. Labetuzumab, used in IMMU-130, targets CEACAM5 for colorectal cancer 3. IMMU-114, used in IMMU-140, targets HLA-DR for solid and liquid cancers
SN-38 Payload
1. SN-38 more potent than parent compound, irinotecan 2. ADC delivers up to 136-fold more SN- 38 than irinotecan in vivo
Linker for SN-38
1. Hydrolysable linker for payload release 2. High drug-to-antibody ratio (7.5:1)
6
─ Pan-epithelial cancer antigen with broad expression in many different cancers ─ ≥80% of patients have moderate to strong expression by immunohistochemistry ─ Internalizes upon antibody binding - ideal target for drug delivery with antibody-drug conjugates
─ Binds human breast, lung, colon, renal, prostate, urothelial, and many other solid cancers
Trop-2 expression in TNBC liver tumor biopsy
7
2018 2019 - 2020 Beyond 2020
Commercialize sacituzumab govitecan in U.S. with 3rd line+ metastatic triple- negative breast cancer (mTNBC) as first indication
govitecan in multiple metastatic breast cancer patient segments and in advanced urothelial cancer (UC)
in hard-to-treat solid cancers (e.g. advanced prostate, head-and-neck, and ovarian cancers)
sacituzumab govitecan lifecycle plan (monotherapy and combinations)
(IMMU-130) and IMMU-140 manufacturing, positioning, and development plan
8
Establish sacituzumab govitecan as new standard of care in later-line mTNBC
1. Submit BLA for accelerated approval in 3rd-line mTNBC by end of May 2018 2. Complete CMC preparations before FDA review
− Pre-approval inspection activities continue − Commercial drug manufacturing continues
3. Build a best-in-class commercial organization and a blockbuster brand in oncology
− Full launch readiness by Q4 2018
4. Continue confirmatory ASCENT study in mTNBC
− Enrolling patients in both U.S. and Europe
5. Define registration and commercialization strategy in Europe
− Need to balance speed to market vs reimbursement
Build foundational therapy in TNBC and advanced UC across treatment lines
1. TNBC
− Conduct monotherapy and combination studies in 1st- and 2nd-line TNBC − Pursue strategic clinical partnership for combination studies with PARP- and checkpoint-inhibitors in 1st-line setting − Explore combinations with platinum and taxanes
2. Advanced UC
− Define exact 3rd--line target patient population with input from FDA − Enroll additional patients in agreed upon patient segment − Pursue Breakthrough Therapy Designation and accelerated approval − Initiate earlier-line combination studies with PARP- and checkpoint-inhibitors
BLA = biologics license application, CMC = chemistry, manufacturing, and controls, PARPi = poly (adenosine diphosphate ) ribose polymerase inhibitor
9
Process Development Process Validation BLA Submission Pre-Approval Inspection Commercial Launch
2017 2017/2018 May 2018 Q3 2018 Q4 2018
10
Launch process 2nd sourcing and scale up Process improvement and intellectual property enhancement 1. Multiple sacituzumab govitecan indications 2. Geographic expansion 3. Margin improvement 2018 2019 2018-2022
Until progression or unacceptable toxicity
11
Metastatic TNBC (ASCO/CAP guidelines) Sacituzumab govitecan 10 mg/kg Days 1 and 8, every 21 days
Scanned every 8 weeks
Key eligibility criteria
>1 therapy if progressed within 12 months
Evaluations
PRs, and ≥20% tumor reductions
Trop-2 expression
N = 110
12
Drug Phase N Population ORR (%) PFS (mos) OS (mos)
1st line treatment
Carboplatin1 3 188 1st line 31 3.1 12.4 Docetaxol1 3 188 1st line 36 4.5 12.3 Cisplatin/ Carboplatin2 2 86 1st line (80.2%) 25.6 2.9 11.0
>1st line treatment
Ixabepilone3 2 (pooled analysis) 60 Resistant to anthracycline, cyclophosphamide & taxane or taxane only 6 - 17 1.6 - 2.7
3 (pooled analysis) 208 Prior or resistant to anthracycline & taxane 15 1.7
3 (pooled analysis) 199 > 1 prior chemo 11 2.8 12.4
* Includes breast cancer drugs with data from Phase 2/3’s with minimum mTNBC sample size > 60; ORR and PFS data Source of data: 1) Tutt A, SABCS 2014; 2) Isakoff SJ, J Clin Oncol 2015; 3) Perez EA, Breast Can Res Treat 2010; 4) Pivot X, Ann Oncol 2016
13
N = 110 Female/Male, n 109/1 Median age, years (range) 55 (31-81) Race White Black Asian Other Not specified 75% 7% 4% 4% 10% ECOG performance status 1 30% 70% Median time from metastatic disease to study entry, years (range) 1.5 (0.2-9.8) >3rd line for metastatic disease 3rd line* >4th line 100% 41% 59% N = 110 Prior chemotherapy drugs** Taxanes Anthracyclines Cyclophosphamide Platinum agents Gemcitabine Fluoropyrimidine agents Eribulin Vinorelbine Prior checkpoint inhibitors 98% 86% 85% 75% 57% 51% 45% 15% 17% Sites of metastatic disease at study entry*** Lung/mediastinum Liver Bone Chest wall 58% 46% 45% 24%
* Two patients who progressed within 12 months of (neo)adjuvant therapy only received one line in the metastatic setting; ** Used in >10% patients; *** Metastatic sites reported in >20% patients
1. Clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD ≥6 months) = 45% (50/110) 2. 74% (75/102) of patients with at least one CT response assessment had reduction of target lesions (sum of diameters) 3. 102 patients had ≥1 scheduled CT response assessment, 8 patients withdrew prior to assessment (4 PD, 4 MRI brain metastasis)
14
*Patients with at least 20% tumor reduction (n = 56) were reviewed; **Confirmed objective response rate per RECIST; ***Waterfall is based on local assessment.
15
1. Median time to onset of response: 2.0 months (range: 1.5-13.4) 2. 9 long-term responders were progression free for >1 year from start of treatment (4 responders >2 years) 3. 12 patients were still receiving sacituzumab govitecan at time of data cutoff, June 30, 2017
Months from start of sacituzumab govitecan
6 12 18 24 30 36
Complete response Partial response Continuing treatment as of June 30, 2017 cutoff Left study with PR (censored) Onset of objective response
* Patients with at least 20% tumor reduction (n = 56) were reviewed.
Local BICR* Median duration of response, months (95% CI) 7.6 (4.8, 11.3) 9.1 (4.1, 14.3)
16
Last prior time on treatment calculated as last dose date – first dose date. Sacituzumab govitecan time on treatment calculated as (date off study or data cut
time for any agent used
17
ORR, % (n/N) Overall 34% (37/110) Age <55 ≥55 37% (20/54) 30% (17/56) Onset of metastatic disease 1.5 years ≥1.5 years 29% (16/55) 38% (21/55) Prior regimens for metastatic disease 3rd line 4th line 36% (16/45) 32% (21/65) ORR, % (n/N) Visceral involvement at study entry Yes No 30% (26/88) 50% (11/22) Trop-2 IHC (n = 62) 0-1 (weak, absent) 2-3 (moderate, strong) No Trop-2 IHC available 0% (0/5) 40% (23/57) 29% (14/48) Prior checkpoint inhibitors 47% (9/19)
* Based on local assessment
1. Adverse events were managed with supportive medication or dose modifications – 25% of patients had dose modifications predominantly to 7.5 mg/kg 2. Two patients (1.8%) discontinued due to adverse events (grade 3 transient infusion reaction/grade 2 fatigue 3. There were no treatment-related deaths
18
Body system Adverse event All grades Grade 3 or 4 Hematologic Neutropenia 63% 41% Febrile neutropenia 8% 7% Anemia 52% 10% Leukopenia 24% 14% Gastrointestinal Nausea 63% 5% Diarrhea 56% 8% Vomiting 46% 5% Constipation 32% 1% Other Fatigue 50% 7% Alopecia 36% NA Decreased appetite 30% 0% Hyperglycemia 23% 4% Hypomagnesemia 21% 1% Hypophosphatemia 15% 8%
Includes all events >20% (all grades) or >5% (grade 3 or 4); NA = not applicable
19
Median (95% CI): 5.5 months (4.8, 6.6)
85/110 (77%) number of events
Number at risk 106 60 18 10 6
Months Progression-free Survival (%)
20 40 60 80 100 4 8 12 16
Median (95% CI): 12.7 months (10.8, 13.6)
71/110 (64%) deaths reported
Months Overall Survival (%)
20 40 60 80 100 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Number at risk 110 93 83 60 37 19 15 12 9
* Based on local assessment
Progression-free survival Overall survival
20
Primary Endpoint
(Blinded Independent Central Read)
Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) 10 mg/kg IV, days 1 and 8 every 21 days Treatment of physician choice
Stratification Factors Continue treatment until progression N = 488 Enrolling in both US & EU
Locally Advanced or Metastatic TNBC
Refractory/relapsed after ≥2 prior SOC chemotherapies for advanced disease
OR
1 therapy for patients who progressed within 12 months of completion of (neo)adjuvant therapy
therapies
(capped at 15% at baseline)
Secondary Endpoint
Survival
A Relatively High Recurrence Rate from Early-Stage Disease and High Treatment Rates in 3rd Line Create a Sizeable Opportunity at Launch
21
Source: Immunomedics Primary Market Research 2018, Health Advances interviews and analysis, UpToDate, NCCN.
1L Chemotherapy 10-11k Patients
2017 TNBC Incidence in U.S. 30-35k Patients
Stage I Stage II Stage III
Stage IV
Resection +/- Adjuvant Chemo Resection +/- Neoadjuvant Chemo +/- Adjuvant Chemo 2L Chemotherapy 9-10k Patients 3L Chemotherapy 8-9k Patients
Treatment Rate
1st Line 95-100% 3rd Line 80-85% 2nd Line 85-90%
Resection +/- Neoadjuvant Chemo +/- Adjuvant Chemo
30-40%
7-10% Target population for the initial indication
22
Cancer Type1 Number
Confirmed % ORR2 DOR PFS3 OS3 Medians (months / 95% CI) TNBC 110 34% 7.6
(4.8 – 11.3)
5.5
(4.8 – 6.6)
12.7
(10.8 – 13.6)
UC 41 34% 12.6
(7.5 – 12.9)
7.1
(5.0 – 10.7)
16.1
(10.5 – 17.2)
SCLC 50 14% 5.7
(3.6 – 19.9)
3.7
(2.1 – 4.3)
7.5
(6.2 – 8.8)
NSCLC 47 19% 6.0
(4.8 – 8.3)
5.2
(3.2 – 7.1)
9.5
(5.9 – 16.7)
1 TNBC = triple-negative breast, UC = urothelial, SCLC = small-cell lung, NSCLC = non-small-cell lung cancer 2 Objective response rate (%ORR) = (complete response + partial response)/number of patients 3 Based on number of intention-to-treat patients of 110, 41, 50 and 54 for TNBC, UC, SCLC and NSCLC, respectively
Patients all previously heavily treated
TNBC results presented at 2017 SABCS, UC results presented at ESMO 2017 Congress, SCLC results published in Clin Cancer Res. 23(19):5711-5719, 2017, NSCLC results published in J Clin Oncol. 35(24):2790-2797, 2017
23
− Covering composition of matter, synthesis and uses
years) protecting
− Methods of treating cancer over broad range of dosages − Methods of production, and certain combination therapies − Composition of matter patents expire in 2023 in the U.S., and in 2029 in Europe
− Patents issued in Australia, Canada, China, Europe, Israel, Japan, Mexico and South Korea
24
− Royalty Pharma acquiring royalty rights on global net sales of sacituzumab govitecan across all indications
a) Royalty Rate starts at 4.15% and tiers down to 1.75% based on annual sales exceeding $6 billion
− Immunomedics receiving
a) $175 million upfront cash payment b) $75 million in equity investment at $17.15 per share, a >15% premium over a 15-day trailing average closing price
govitecan
2020
Debt (convertible senior notes) $20 Million Basic shares outstanding (fully diluted) 167 (191) Million
25
Cash balance as of 3/31/2018 $359 Million
27
Presented at ESMO 2017 Congress
Confirmed ORR (RECIST 1.1) = 34% Median # prior therapies = 3 (range, 1 – 6)
2 0 4 0 6 0 B e s t R e s p o n se
B e s t % c h a n g e in T L fro m b a s e lin e
S D P D
C o m p le te re s p o n s e P a rtia l re s p o n s e S ta b le d is e a s e P ro g re s s io n
P rio r c h e c k p o in t in h ib ito r T x
28
Confirmed ORR (RECIST 1.1) = 14% Median # prior therapies = 2 (range, 1 – 7)
Clinical Cancer Research 23(19):5711-5719, 2017
2 0 4 0 6 0 8 0 B e s t R e s p o n s e
B e s t % c h a n g e in T L fro m b a s e lin e
P a r tia l r e s p o n s e S ta b le d is e a s e P r o g r e s s io n
8 m g /k g (a ll o th e rs , 1 0 m g /k g )
43/50 response assessable pts who completed 1 treatment cycle are represented 7 pts did not complete 1 treatment cycle and did not have a CT-response assessment
29
Journal of Clinical Oncology 35(24):2790-2797, 2017
2 0 4 0 B est % ch an g e in targ et lesion s fro m b aseline
P a rtia l re s p o n s e (c o n firm e d ) (P R ) U n c o n firm e d P R (P R u ) (s ta b le d is e a s e ) S ta b le d is e a s e P ro g re s s io n
S q u a m o u s c e ll h is to lo g y 8 m g /k g s ta rtin g d o s e P rio r c h e c k p o in t in h ib ito r T x
+ + e a rly C T a s s e s s m e n t a fte r 2 d o s e s
Confirmed ORR (RECIST 1.1) = 19% Median # prior therapies = 3 (range, 2 – 7)
30
− A drug exploits a mutation that enhances its potency in cells having this mutation more than cells lacking the defect − BRCA1/2 mutations in breast cancer, including TNBC, affect repair of dsDNA breaks − PARPi blocks repair of ssDNA breaks and exacerbates defects caused by BRCA1/2 mutations
blocks repair of ssDNA breaks
govitecan) and PARPi could be synergistic in TNBC patients without BRCA1/2 mutations
BRCA 1/2 = BReast CAncer genes 1 and 2, dsDNA and ssDNA = double-stranded and single-stranded DNA
Preclinical Data Support Evaluation of Targeted Topoisomerase-I Inhibition (Sacituzumab Govitecan)/PARPi Combination in TNBC
31
7 1 4 2 1 2 8 3 5 4 2 4 9 5 6 6 3 0 .0 0 0 .2 5 0 .5 0 0 .7 5 1 .0 0 1 .2 5
O la p a r ib ( 5 0 m g /k g ) IM M U - 1 3 2 ( 2 5 0 g ) C o n t r o l A D C ( 2 5 0 g ) O la p a r ib p lu s IM M U - 1 3 2 O la p a r ib p lu s C o n t r o l A D C S a lin eT im e P o s t-T u m o r T ra n s p la n t (d a y s ) T u m o r V o lu m e s ± S D (cm
3)A D C A d m in is tra tio n O la p a rib A d m in is tra tio n
H C C 1 8 0 6
1 4 2 8 4 2 5 6 7 0 8 4 9 8 1 1 2 0 .0 0 0 .2 5 0 .5 0 0 .7 5 1 .0 0
O la p a r ib ( 5 0 m g /k g ) IM M U -1 3 2 ( 2 0 0 g ) C o n tr o l A D C (2 0 0 g ) O la p a r ib p lu s IM M U - 1 3 2 O la p a r ib p lu s C o n t r o l A D C S a lin eT im e P o s t-T u m o r T ra n s p la n t (d a y s ) T u m o r V o lu m e s ± S D (cm
3)A D C A d m in istra tio n O la p a rib A d m in istra tio n
M D A -M B -4 6 8
HCC1806 (BRCA1/2 mutated) MDA-MB-468 (BRCA1/2 wild type, PTEN mutation)
In in vivo TNBC models, targeted topoisomerase-I inhibition (sacituzumab govitecan)/PARPi combination achieved synergistic growth inhibition in both BRCA1/2 mutated and wild-type cells
PTEN = Phosphatase and tensin homolog. Source of data: Cardillo TM et. al. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017; 23(13):3405-3415.