Patient and Healthcare Professional Involvement in EUnetHTA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

patient and healthcare professional involvement in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Patient and Healthcare Professional Involvement in EUnetHTA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Patient and Healthcare Professional Involvement in EUnetHTA Activities Michelle Mujoomdar, PhD - Senior Scientific Officer EUnetHTA JA3 directorate, Zorginstituut Nederland PCWP/HCPWP Joint Meeting EMA 27 June 2017 European network for


slide-1
SLIDE 1

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

Patient and Healthcare Professional Involvement in EUnetHTA Activities

Michelle Mujoomdar, PhD - Senior Scientific Officer EUnetHTA JA3 directorate, Zorginstituut Nederland PCWP/HCPWP Joint Meeting EMA – 27 June 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

2

Project Coordinator: The Dutch National Health Care Institute (ZIN)

EUnetHTA JA3 Participants

81 partners consisting of national, regional and non-for- profit agencies that produce or contribute to HTA

slide-3
SLIDE 3

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

3

Organisational and Governance Structure

DG SANTE and CHAFEA

WP2 Dissemination WP3 Evaluation WP4 Joint Production WP5 Evidence Generation WP6 Quality Management WP7 Implementation

Lead: AETS-ISCIII Lead: TLV Lead: NIPHNO Co-lead: LBI ZIN Lead: HAS Co-lead: GBA Lead: IQWiG Co-lead: KCE Lead: NICE Co-lead: Agenas

WP1 Network Coordination - Dutch Health Care Institute Executive Board

slide-4
SLIDE 4

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

WP4 Joint Production

  • To produce rapid REA on other technologies and on pharmaceuticals
  • To provide a system for topic selection and prioritization

WP5 Evidence Generation

  • To conduct Early Dialogues (joint HTA or parallel/joint with regulators)
  • To link additional data collection to on-going activities

WP6 Quality Management

  • To provide quality management for EUnetHTA joint products
  • To further develop methodologies and tools for joint work if necessary

Summary of select activities in JA3

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

WP4 Joint Production

  • To produce rapid REA on other technologies and on pharmaceuticals
  • To provide a system for topic selection and prioritization

WP5 Evidence Generation

  • To conduct Early Dialogues (joint HTA or parallel/joint with regulators)
  • To link additional data collection to on-going activities

WP6 Quality Management

  • To provide quality management for EUnetHTA joint products
  • To further develop methodologies and tools for joint work if necessary

Summary of select activities in JA3

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

6

WP4 – Joint Production

slide-7
SLIDE 7

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

7

Planning for Patient Involvement in WP4 – Joint Production

  • Patient involvement was a focused discussion at the F2F meeting

for WP4 in Sept 2016

  • Objectives were:

– to discuss how we can better involve patients in the production process of EUnetHTA assessments. – to enhance the impact of patients’ perspectives in EUnetHTA’s assessments. – to share experiences so we can define a concrete proposal for future work.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

8

Patient Involvement in WP4 – Joint Production

  • Variable experience with involving patients with WP4 partners
  • Patients were involved in several phases of the HTA process –

scoping, review of the assessment report, and decision-making

  • The methods used varied between agencies
slide-9
SLIDE 9

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

  • Patients preferred over representatives
  • In some cases (e.g. screening or health priority setting) healthy citizens

should be involved

  • Local, regional, and national patients are preferred over supranational
  • Patients should be reimbursed – if possible – for their time giving input.
  • Disclosure of material and immaterial benefits – along with and COI is

required

  • Methods to involve patients should be appropriate and validated; results

transparent and open to public access.

Patient Involvement in WP4 – Joint Production

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

10

Patient & HCP Involvement in WP4 – Joint Production

  • General agreement that involving patients and HCP during the scoping

phase is particularily helpful – To ensure inclusion of patient relevant outcomes – To consider QoL, ethical, and social issues – To better understand the clinical condition, care pathway, and current treatments available – To understand what constitutes a clinically meaningful difference

  • General agreement that choice of method will depend on the topic and
  • activity. Method needs to be fit-for-purpose.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

11

WP5 – Evidence generation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

  • Build on experiences and lessons from Shaping European Early Dialogues

(SEED) project

  • Consider new and different ways of involving patients – e.g, approaches used

by other HTA agencies

  • For Parallel Consultation with EMA, explore opportunities to coordinate

approaches for patient involvement

  • Respective role of European networks of associations and national associations

should be clarified

  • Some (limited) budget available for patient and expert involvement

Patient Involvement in Early Dialogues - Preliminary Thoughts

slide-13
SLIDE 13

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

13

Challenges

  • Limited experience with

pharmaceutical joint REAS in JA3

  • Aligning HTA process –

respecting national policies

  • Same applies to

collaboration with EMA

  • European-level versus national
  • rganisations
  • Limited resources
  • To learn how PCWP and

HCPWP engages with EMA

  • Strategic and operational
  • Areas of focus for work plans
  • Areas of overlap / synergy

with EUnetHTA or EUnetHTA/EMA joint work plan

Opportunities

slide-14
SLIDE 14

European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA3 2016-2020 | www.eunethta.eu

Thank you

Email: MMujoomdar@zinl.nl Twitter: @M_Mujoomdar