PANS [4] L ARS D AVIDSON Lars Davidson, www.tfd.chalmers.se/lada - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
PANS [4] L ARS D AVIDSON Lars Davidson, www.tfd.chalmers.se/lada - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
L ARGE E DDY S IMULATION OF H EAT T RANSFER IN B OUNDARY LAYER AND B ACKSTEP F LOW U SING PANS [4] L ARS D AVIDSON Lars Davidson, www.tfd.chalmers.se/lada PANS L OW R EYNOLDS N UMBER M ODEL [7] k u t + ( k u U j )
PANS LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER MODEL [7]
∂ku ∂t + ∂(kuUj) ∂xj = ∂ ∂xj
- ν + νu
σku ∂ku ∂xj
- + (Pu − εu)
∂εu ∂t + ∂(εuUj) ∂xj = ∂ ∂xj
- ν + νu
σεu ∂εu ∂xj
- + Cε1Pu
εu ku − C∗
ε2
ε2
u
ku νu = Cµfµ k2
u
εu , C∗
ε2 = Cε1 + fk
fε (Cε2f2 − Cε1), σku ≡ σk f 2
k
fε , σεu ≡ σε f 2
k
fε Cε1, Cε2, σk, σε and Cµ same values as [1]. fε = 1. f2 and fµ read f2 =
- 1 − exp
- − y∗
3.1 2 1 − 0.3exp
- −
Rt 6.5 2 fµ =
- 1 − exp
- − y∗
14 2 1 + 5 R3/4
t
exp
- −
Rt 200 2 Baseline model: fk = 0.4.
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 2 / 28
NUMERICAL METHOD
Incompressible finite volume method Pressure-velocity coupling treated with fractional step Differencing scheme for momentum eqns:
◮ 95% 2nd order central and 5% 2nd order upwind differencing
scheme (baseline) OR
◮ 100% 2nd order central differencing
Hybrid 1st order upwind/2nd order central scheme k & ε eqns. 2nd-order Crank-Nicholson for time discretization
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 3 / 28
BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW: DOMAIN
x y L H δinlet Inlet: δinlet = 1 (covered by 45 cells), Reθ = 3 600, Uin = ρ = 1. Stretching 1.12 up to y/δ ≃ 1. Domain: L/δin = 3.2, H/δin = 15.6, Zmax = 1.5δin Resolution: ∆z+
in ≃ 27, ∆x+ in ≃ 54
Grid: 66 × 96 × 64 (x, y, z)
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 4 / 28
ANISOTROPIC SYNTHETIC FLUCTUATIONS: I [3, 2, 5]
Prescribe an homogeneous Reynolds tensor, uiuj (here from DNS)
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 5 / 28
ANISOTROPIC SYNTHETIC FLUCTUATIONS: I [3, 2, 5]
( u
′ 1
u
′ 1
)
λ
x1,λ ( u
′ 2
u
′ 2
)
λ
x2,λ u′
1,λu′ 2,λ = 0
Prescribe an homogeneous Reynolds tensor, uiuj (here from DNS) isotropic fluctuations in principal directions, (u′
1u′ 1)λ = (u′ 2u′ 2)λ,
u′
1,λu′ 2,λ = 0
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 5 / 28
ANISOTROPIC SYNTHETIC FLUCTUATIONS: I [3, 2, 5]
( u
′ 1
u
′ 1
- λ
x1,λ ( u
′ 2
u
′ 2
- λ
x2,λ u′
1,λu′ 2,λ = 0
Prescribe an homogeneous Reynolds tensor, uiuj (here from DNS) isotropic fluctuations in principal directions, (u′
1u′ 1)λ = (u′ 2u′ 2)λ,
u′
1,λu′ 2,λ = 0
re-scale the normal components, (u′
1u′ 1)λ > (u′ 2u′ 2)λ, using the
eigenvalues u′
1,λu′ 2,λ = 0
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 5 / 28
ANISOTROPIC SYNTHETIC FLUCTUATIONS: II
u′
1u′ 1 > u′ 2u′ 2
x1 u′
2u′ 2
x2 u′
1u′ 2 = 0
Transform from (x1,λ, x2,λ) to (x1, x2) u′2
1
u′2
2
= 23, u′2
1
u′2
3
= 5 from (u′
1u′ 1)peak in DNS channel flow, Reτ = 500
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 6 / 28
INLET CONDITIONS FOR ku AND εu AS IN [6]
A pre-cursor RANS simulation using the AKN model (i.e. PANS with fk = 1) is carried out. At Reθ = 3 600, URANS, VRANS, kRANS are taken. ¯ uin = URANS + u′
synt, ¯
vin = VRANS + v′
synt, ¯
win = w′
synt
Anisotropic synthetic fluctuations are used. The fluctuations are scaled with ku/ku,max. ku,in = fkkRANS, εu,in = C3/4
µ
k3/2
u,in/ℓsgs, ℓsgs = Cs∆, ∆ = V 1/3,
Cs = 0.05
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 7 / 28
INLET TURB. FLUCTUATION, TWO-POINT CORRELATIONS
−2 2 4 6 200 400 600 800 1000
stresses y/H
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
ˆ z/δ, ˆ z/H Bww(ˆ z) Two-point correlation : u+
rms,
: v+
rms,
: w+
rms
: u′v′+
- : inlet;
: x = 3δin
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 8 / 28
BOUNDARY LAYER: VELOCITY AND SKIN FRICTION
1 10 50 1000 5 10 15 20 25
y+ U+ 100%CDS
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 3.6 x 10
−3
x Cf : x = δin; : x = 2δin; : x = 3δin; : DNS [8] : 100% CDS; : 100% CDS, Uin from AKN; : 25% larger inlet fluct.; : 25% larger in- let fluct., Cs = 0.07; markers: 0.37 (log10Rex)−2.584 (+: AKN; ◦: DNS);
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 9 / 28
REYNOLDS STRESSES
−1 1 2 3 500 1000 1500
y+ uv urms
−1 1 2 3 500 1000 1500
y+ uv vrms, wrms, urms : x = δin; : x = 2δin; : x = 3δin. x = 3δin; Markers: DNS [8]
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 10 / 28
BACKWARD FACING STEP: DOMAIN
4.05H 21H 4H H x y qw ReH = 28 000 Experiments by Vogel & Eaton [9] Mean inlet profiles from RANS (same as in boundary layer) Grid: 336 × 120 in x × y plane. Zmax = 1.6H, Nk = 64, ∆z+
in = 31.
Anisotropic synthetic fluctuations, u′, v′, w′ (same as for boundary layer flow); no fluctuations for t′ Constant heat flux, qw, on lower wall.
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 11 / 28
BACKSTEP FLOW. SKIN FRICTION AND STANTON
NUMBER
−5 5 10 15 20 −2 −1 1 2 3 4 x 10
−3
x/H Cf
5 10 15 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4x 10
−3
x/H St : PANS; : PANS, 50% smaller inlet fluctuations; : WALE; •: PANS, no inlet fluctuations; : 2D RANS; ◦,•: experiments [9].
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 12 / 28
BACKSTEP FLOW: VELOCITIES.
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6
¯ u/Uin x = −1.13H
−0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
¯ u/Uin x = 3.2H
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
¯ u/Uin x = 14.86H : PANS; : PANS, 50% smaller inlet fluctuations; : WALE;
- : PANS, no inlet fluctuations;
: 2D RANS; ◦: experiments [9].
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 13 / 28
BACKSTEP FLOW: RESOLVED STREAMWISE STRESS.
0.05 0.1 0.15 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6
urms/Uin y/H x = −1.13H
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
urms/Uin x = 3.2H
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
urms/Uin x = 14.86H : PANS; : PANS, 50% smaller inlet fluctuations; : WALE;
- : PANS, no inlet fluctuations;
: 2D RANS; ◦: experiments [9].
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 14 / 28
BACKSTEP FLOW: TURBULENT VISCOSITIES.
2 4 6 8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6
νu/ν y/H x = −1.13H
5 10 15 20 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
νu/ν x = 3.2H
5 10 15 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
νu/ν x = 14.86H : PANS; : PANS, 50% smaller inlet fluctuations; : WALE;
- : PANS, no inlet fluctuations;
: 2D RANS/10;
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 15 / 28
FORWARD/BACKWARD FLOW
Fraction of time, γ, when the flow along the bottom wall is in the downstream direction.
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
x/H γ : PANS; : PANS, 50% smaller inlet fluctuations; : WALE;
- : PANS, no inlet fluctuations; ◦: experiments [9].
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 16 / 28
SHEAR STRESSES. x = 3.2H
−5 5 10 15 x 10
−4
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
y/H PANS
−5 5 10 15 x 10
−4
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
RANS : 2νt¯ s12; : ν ∂¯ u ∂y ; : −uv; ◦: 2νt¯ s12 − uv.
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 17 / 28
SHEAR STRESSES. x = 14.86
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 x 10
−3
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
y/H PANS
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 x 10
−3
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
RANS : 2νt¯ s12; : ν ∂¯ u ∂y ; : −uv; ◦: 2νt¯ s12 − uv.
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 18 / 28
TERMS IN THE ¯ u EQUATION. x = 3.2H
−0.06 −0.04 −0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
y/H PANS
−0.06 −0.04 −0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
RANS : ∂ ∂y (2νt¯ s12); : ν ∂2¯ u ∂y2 ; : −∂¯ u¯ u ∂x ; +: −∂¯ u¯ v ∂y ; ⋆: −∂¯ p ∂x , △: −∂uv ∂y .
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 19 / 28
TERMS IN THE ¯ u EQUATION. x = 14.86H
−0.06 −0.04 −0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
y/H PANS
−0.06 −0.04 −0.02 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
RANS : ∂ ∂y (2νt¯ s12); : ν ∂2¯ u ∂y2 ; : −∂¯ u¯ u ∂x ; +: −∂¯ u¯ v ∂y ; ⋆: −∂¯ p ∂x , △: −∂uv ∂y .
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 20 / 28
HEAT FLUXES. x = 3.2H
−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
y/H PANS
−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
RANS : νt σt ∂¯ t ∂y
- ;
: ν σℓ ∂¯ t ∂y ; : −v′t′. ◦: νt σt ∂¯ t ∂y
- − v′t′.
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 21 / 28
HEAT FLUXES. x = 14.86H
−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
y/H PANS
−1 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
RANS : νt σt ∂¯ t ∂y
- ;
: ν σℓ ∂¯ t ∂y ; : −v′t′. ◦: νt σt ∂¯ t ∂y
- − v′t′.
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 22 / 28
TERMS IN THE ¯ t EQUATION. x = 3.2H
−100 −50 50 100 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
y
PANS
−100 −50 50 100 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
RANS : ∂ ∂y νt σt ∂¯ t ∂y
- ;
: ν σℓ ∂2¯ t ∂y2 ; : −∂¯ u¯ t ∂x ; +: −∂¯ v¯ t ∂y ; △: −∂v′t′ ∂y .
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 23 / 28
TERMS IN THE ¯ t EQUATION. x = 14.86H
−50 50 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
y/H PANS
−50 50 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1
RANS : ∂ ∂y νt σt ∂¯ t ∂y
- ;
: ν σℓ ∂2¯ t ∂y2 ; : −∂¯ u¯ t ∂x ; +: −∂¯ v¯ t ∂y ; △: −∂v′t′ ∂y .
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 24 / 28
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Developing boundary layer
◮ Synthetic fluctuations give fully developed conditions after a couple
- f boundary layer thicknesses
◮ 5% upwinding dampens resolved fluctuations; can be compensated
by 25% larger inlet fluctuations
Backstep flow
◮ Very good agreement with experiments ◮ 2D RANS predicts turbulent diffusion surprisingly well ◮ Synthetic inlet fluctuations give an improved Stanton number;
- therwise small effect in the reciculation region
◮ LRN PANS and WALE equally good ◮ 5% upwinding has a negligble effect in the recirculation region www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 25 / 28
REFERENCES I
[1] ABE, K., KONDOH, T., AND NAGANO, Y. A new turbulence model for predicting fluid flow and heat transfer in separating and reattaching flows - 1. Flow field calculations.
- Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 37, 1 (1994), 139–151.
[2] BILLSON, M. Computational Techniques for Turbulence Generated Noise. PhD thesis, Dept. of Thermo and Fluid Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology, G¨
- teborg, Sweden, 2004.
[3] BILLSON, M., ERIKSSON, L.-E., AND DAVIDSON, L. Modeling of synthetic anisotropic turbulence and its sound emission. The 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA 2004-2857, Manchester, United Kindom, 2004.
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 26 / 28
REFERENCES II
[4] DAVIDSON, L. Large eddy simulation of heat transfer in boundary layer and backstep flow using PANS (corrected version can be downloaded at http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada/). In Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, THMT-12 (Palermo, Sicily/Italy, 2012). [5] DAVIDSON, L., AND BILLSON, M. Hybrid LES/RANS using synthesized turbulent fluctuations for forcing in the interface region. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 27, 6 (2006), 1028–1042. [6] DAVIDSON, L., AND PENG, S.-H. Embedded LES with PANS. In 6th AIAA Theoretical Fluid Mechanics Conference, AIAA paper 2011-3108 (27-30 June, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2011).
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 27 / 28
REFERENCES III
[7] MA, J., PENG, S.-H., DAVIDSON, L., AND WANG, F. A low Reynolds number variant of Partially-Averaged Navier-Stokes model for turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 32, 3 (2011), 652–669. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2011.02.001. [8] SCHLATTER, P., AND ORLU, R. Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 659 (2010), 116–126. [9] VOGEL, J. C., AND EATON, J. K. Combined heat transfer and fluid dynamic measurements downstream a backward-facing step. Journal of Heat Transfer 107 (1985), 922–929.
www.tfd.chalmers.se/˜lada THMT-12, Palermo, Sept 2012 28 / 28