Palm Beach State College 1 Institutional Research & - PDF document

10/23/2019 Palm Beach State College 1 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 1  Overview  Benchmarks  Satisfaction with services  Other student characteristics  Strengths and opportunities  Other considerations Institutional Research & Effectiveness 2 1

10/23/2019 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 3 CCSSE defines student engagement as “the amount of time and energy that students invest in meaningful educational practices.” Institutional Research & Effectiveness 4 2

10/23/2019 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 5  616 total institutions  ~350,000 students during the cohort period  200 Achieving the Dream colleges  49 “extra large” colleges (> 15,000 students)  22 Florida colleges  1,487 students from 100 lower ‐ division and developmental education classes at Palm Beach State  Classes conducted entirely online are not included Institutional Research & Effectiveness 6 3

10/23/2019 Survey Credit students Survey Credit students participants age 18+, Spring participants age 18+, Spring 2019 2019 Race/ethnicity Gender American Indian 0.5% 0.2% Female 56.4% 58.3% Asian 2.3% 2.8% Male 40.0% 39.9% Black/African American 24.5% 27.4% Other 0.4% ‐ Hispanic/Latino 34.0% 31.7% No response/not reported 1.0% 1.7% Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 0.1% 0.2% White 26.7% 30.9% Age Other 2.9% ‐ 18 ‐ 19 31.8% 25.6% More than one race 3.1% 2.6% 20 ‐ 21 24.5% 22.7% No response/not reported 5.9% 4.2% 22 ‐ 24 15.6% 17.7% 25 ‐ 29 12.4% 15.3% 30 ‐ 39 7.7% 11.4% 40+ 6.1% 7.4% Institutional Research & Effectiveness 7 Palm Beach State College CCSSE 2019 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 8 4

10/23/2019 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 9  Active and Collaborative Learning  Student Effort  Academic Challenge  Student ‐ Faculty Interaction  Support for Learners Institutional Research & Effectiveness 10 5

10/23/2019 Measures the extent to which students are involved in their own education. Institutional Research & Effectiveness 11 Top 10% XL 60 54.4 53.8 56.0 55.7 55.0 54.0 50 50.4 50.6 49.7 48.0 48.2 47.2 47.2 45.8 40 30 20 10 0 All students Part ‐ time Full ‐ time PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 12 6

10/23/2019 100 % often/very often 80 PBSC 2019 mean score significantly higher 64.7 than national cohort 60 62.9 61.8 59.9 (p<.001, effect size >=.2) 52.1 52.1 49.1 45.3 40 43.2 39.0 36.9 35.1 28.7 27.0 27.0 20 21.4 0 4a. Asked questions in class or 4b. Made a class presentation 4f. Worked with other students 4g. Worked with classmates contributed to class discussions on projects during class outside of class to prepare class assignments PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 14 100 % often/very often 80 60 48.3 48.9 46.1 46.2 40 20 9.2 8.7 8.3 8.4 8.6 8.4 7.6 6.4 0 4h. Tutored or taught other 4i. Participated in a community ‐ 4q. Discussed ideas from your students (paid or voluntary) based project (service ‐ learning readings or classes with others activity) as part of a regular course outside of class (students, family members, co ‐ workers, etc.) PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 15 7

10/23/2019 Measures students’ behaviors and attitudes toward their coursework. Institutional Research & Effectiveness 16 Top 20% Among extra large colleges Top 10% XL 53.4 54.3 60 59.9 56.3 55.9 55.6 53.7 50 51.3 51.1 50.1 49.8 48.0 47.5 47.1 40 30 20 10 0 All students Part ‐ time Full ‐ time PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 17 8

10/23/2019 100 % often/very often % never % 5 or more 80 72.0 70.1 68.4 67.2 60 59.4 52.1 52.2 51.7 40 36.1 33.9 34.1 31.6 20 20.1 21.2 20.2 20.2 15.4 14.7 14.5 12.1 0 4c. Prepared two or more 4d. Worked on a paper or 4e. Come to class without 4e. Come to class without 6b. Number of books read drafts of a paper or project that required completing readings or completing readings or on your own (not assignment before turning integrating ideas or assignments assignments assigned) for personal it in information from various enjoyment or academic sources enrichment PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 19 100 % 11 or more % who used at least once during year PBSC 2019 mean score PBSC 2019 mean score significantly higher 80 significantly higher than XL college and than ATD and national national cohorts cohorts (p<.001, effect size >=.2) 60 (p<.001, effect size >=.2) 63.6 61.7 60.6 54.8 48.5 40 43.7 44.3 40.0 38.8 29.0 27.6 20 22.1 20.6 0 10a. Hours spent preparing for 12.1d. Peer or other tutoring 12.1e. Skill labs (writing, math, 12.1h. Computer lab class (studying, reading, writing, etc.) rehearsing, doing homework, etc.) PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 20 9

10/23/2019 Measures the level of intellectual and creative challenge provided by the coursework. Institutional Research & Effectiveness 21 Top 10% XL 60 53.5 52.5 55.2 55.0 54.7 53.7 50 50.2 49.7 49.6 48.7 47.8 46.9 47.0 47.0 40 30 20 10 0 All students Part ‐ time Full ‐ time PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 22 10

10/23/2019 100 % quite a bit/very much 80 71.6 71.1 70.4 69.1 68.3 68.5 68.0 64.8 65.6 60 65.2 64.6 63.7 60.7 60.1 60.4 60.3 59.2 58.1 57.7 56.4 40 20 0 5b. Work emphasizes 5c. Work emphasizes 5d. Work emphasizes 5e. Work emphasizes 5f. Work emphasizes using analyzing the basic forming a new idea or making judgements about applying theories or information you have read elements of an idea, understanding from the value or soundness of concepts to practical or heard to perform a new experience, or theory various pieces of information, arguments, problems or in new skill information or methods situations PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 24 100 % quite a bit/ % often/very often % 5 or more % 6+ (on 7 ‐ pt scale) very much 80 75.6 74.6 74.9 73.0 60 61.9 60.3 59.5 58.5 59.2 58.2 57.8 54.9 54.3 54.2 52.8 51.6 Mean 4.76 4.66 4.84 4.89 40 29.5 27.5 25.0 20 22.1 0 4o. Worked harder than 6a. Number of assigned 6c. Number of written 7. The extent to which 9a. Encouraging you to you thought you could to textbooks, manuals, papers or reports of any your examinations during spend significant amounts meet an instructor's books, or packets of length the current academic year of time studying standards or expectations course readings have challenged you to do your best work PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 25 11

10/23/2019 Measures the level of personal contact students have with their instructors. Institutional Research & Effectiveness 26 Top 20% Among extra large colleges Top 10% XL 60 51.1 50.0 55.6 54.5 53.7 50 52.4 50.9 49.7 49.5 48.0 47.8 47.8 47.5 45.2 40 30 20 10 0 All students Part ‐ time Full ‐ time PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 27 12

10/23/2019 100 % often/very often 80 68.7 68.0 67.0 65.3 60 53.4 52.4 51.1 49.7 40 34.6 34.0 32.0 30.8 20 0 4j. Used e ‐ mail to communicate 4k. Discussed grades or 4l. Talked about career plans with with an instructor assignments with an instructor an instructor or advisor PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 29 100 % often/very often 80 60 62.0 62.3 61.3 58.9 40 20 19.8 18.8 18.4 18.1 11.7 11.1 10.4 10.0 0 4m. Discussed ideas from your 4n. Received prompt feedback 4p. Worked with instructors on readings or classes with instructors (written or oral) from instructors activities other than coursework outside of class on your performance PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 30 13

10/23/2019 Measures the level of positive working and social relationship students have with the college, as well as the services targeted to assist them. Institutional Research & Effectiveness 31 Top 10% XL 60 53.9 54.5 54.9 54.2 52.8 50 51.5 51.0 50.2 49.8 49.1 49.1 48.0 47.4 47.1 40 30 20 10 0 All students Part ‐ time Full ‐ time PBSC 2016 PBSC 2019 Extra large colleges 2017 ‐ 19 ATD cohort 2017 ‐ 19 Institutional Research & Effectiveness 32 14