paducah ky
play

Paducah, KY Next Steps Workshop 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Paducah, KY Next Steps Workshop 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA Work for Today Setting context Data review Strategy Identification Action Planning Citizen-centric Decision making The NCS Data-influenced


  1. Paducah, KY Next Steps Workshop 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA

  2. Work for Today Setting context Data review Strategy Identification Action Planning

  3. Citizen-centric Decision making The NCS Data-influenced Decision making Envision, Engage, Educate, Earmark, Enact, Evaluate

  4. Setting Context What is the context for our work today ?

  5. Group Work  What words best describe Paducah?  What makes Paducah unique?  If you had a magic wand, what changes would you make to Paducah?

  6. Paducah’s Mission & Principles Mission Statement Paducah is financially sustainable, provides first class services delivered in a cost effective manner and has quality infrastructure and facilities. The City . engages citizens, exercises community leadership on local public service issues and is recognized as a regional leader. Guiding Principles • Paducah is a vibrant and beautiful river city which is the heart of four rivers region. • Our region has a strong economy . • Our city has a national reputation for the arts and tourism . • We are a hometown for families and an inclusive community. • Our residents enjoy a quality community and fun things to do . • Paducah - a great place to call home .

  7. Data Review What do residents think about your community?

  8. The National Citizen Survey™ (The NCS) Standard questionnaire administered in  approximately 70 communities yearly across nation Over 350 participants in over 40 states  Benchmarks based on 600+ jurisdictions 

  9. About The NCS  Community Livability Residents  Community Characteristics  Governance Communities Community- Private are partnerships based  Participation sector organizations among... Govern- ment

  10. Facets of Community Livability Recreation Mobility Economy Safety and Wellness Quality of Community Overall Education Community Built Natural and Engagement Environment Environment Enrichment

  11. The NCS & Paducah  Second iteration of the NCS  Random scientific sample of 1,400 households  370 returned surveys; 29% response rate  ±5% margin of error Demographic Custom comparisons benchmarks

  12. National Benchmark Comparisons 12

  13. Community Characteristics

  14. Overall Quality of Life in Paducah 68% 63% 2013 2016 Percent excellent or good

  15. 2016 Community Characteristics Highest Lowest Bicycle travel Overall safety Public Transportation Safety in neighborhood Affordable quality housing Safety in downtown Overall economic health Overall ease of travel Employment opportunities Travel by car Mental health care Religious/spiritual events Openness and acceptance K-12 Education 15

  16. 2016 Benchmark Comparisons Lower Ratings: 0 • Overall economic health • Openness and acceptance of the 50 received 2 community towards people of diverse higher backgrounds received similar ratings received ratings lower ratings

  17. 2016 Ratings Compared to 2013 16 20 received 0 higher received similar ratings received ratings lower ratings

  18. Governance

  19. Overall Quality of City Services 64% 60% 2013 2016 Percent excellent or good

  20. Public Trust: Trends & Benchmarks Services provided by 67% Paducah 65% 64% Customer service 60% Value of services for taxes paid 42% 42% 41% Overall direction 37% 39% 37% 37% Welcoming citizen involvement Services provided by the Federal Government 2013 2016 = Comparison to the benchmark 2016 Percent excellent or good

  21. Demographic Comparisons Public Trust  Residents who had lived in the community 6 to 20 years were more likely to give negative ratings to:  Overall service delivery by City  The job Paducah does at welcoming citizen involvement  Overall customer service by Paducah employees  Residents who had lived in the community 5 years or less were more likely to give positive ratings to:  Treating all residents fairly  Generally acting in best interest of the community 21

  22. 2016 Service Ratings Highest Lowest Police services Street repair Fire services Sidewalk maintenance Ambulance/EMS Recycling Fire prevention Land use, planning & zoning Garbage collection Code enforcement City parks Cable television Public libraries Economic development 22

  23. 2016 Benchmark Comparisons Lower ratings: • Cable television • Street repair • Economic development 0 • Sidewalk maintenance • Overall direction • Recycling • Confidence in City • Yard waste pick-up 31 received government 15 • Drinking water • Being honest higher • Storm drainage received similar ratings • Sewer services received ratings • Power utility lower • Utility billing ratings • Code enforcement

  24. 2016 Ratings Compared to 2013 Ratings that declined over time: 2 • Snow removal • Sidewalk maintenance 32 received 5 • Garbage collection higher • Yard waste pick-up received similar ratings • Power utility received ratings lower ratings

  25. Participation

  26. Overall Sense of Community 57% 55% 2013 2016 Percent excellent or good

  27. 2016 Participation Ratings Highest Lowest Used public transportation instead Was NOT the victim of a crime of driving Purchased goods/services in Economy  positive impact on Paducah income Campaigned for an issue, cause or Visited a City park candidate Talked to or visited with neighbors Contacted Paducah elected officials Done a favor for a neighbor Participated in a club Read or watched local news Attended a local public meeting 27

  28. 2016 Benchmark Comparisons Lower Ratings: 1 • Walked or biked instead of driving • Recycled at home 31 received 4 • Conserved water higher • Did NOT observe a code violation received similar ratings received ratings lower ratings

  29. 2016 Ratings Compared to 2013 Ratings that declined over time: 2 • Residents who attended or watched a local public meeting 11 received 4 • Residents who volunteered higher • Residents who participated in a club received similar ratings received ratings lower ratings

  30. Priorities of Residents

  31. 2016 Resident Ratings by Facet Higher than national benchmark Similar to national benchmark Lower than national benchmark Most important Education Built Safety and Environment Enrichment Natural Recreation Environment and Wellness Community Mobility Economy Engagement 31

  32. Recycling Program Likelihood of Participation Very likely 40% Somewhat likely 27% Very Somewhat unlikely unlikely 23% 11% 32

  33. Contact with Police Dept. Contact with Paducah Police Department in the last 12 months Yes 40% No 60% 33

  34. Contact with Police Dept. Excellent Good Professionalism 54% 25% 80% Knowledge 43% 37% 80% Responsiveness 45% 34% 79% Courtesy 53% 26% 79% Overall impression 44% 21% 75% 34

  35. Demographic Comparisons Economy  Economy will have a positive impact was given higher ratings by residents who:  had lived in the community for 20 years or less  Overall economic health rated higher by residents who:  had lived in community for 5 years or less  Were 34 or younger  Overall quality of business and service establishments rated higher by residents who:  Had lived in community 5 years or less  Had income $25,000 or greater  Were 34 or younger  Were White alone, not Hispanic 35

  36. Group Work • Which findings did you expect? • Which parts, if any, of the data were surprising? • Are there places we need to dig deeper? Given the survey results, what are possible topic areas of focus?

  37. NRC Conclusions  Paducah residents continue to enjoy a high quality of life  The Natural and Built Environment is an area of opportunity  Paducah’s Economy has improved and continues to be a focus area for residents  Though not all changes were significant, most items improved over time

  38. Identify Strategies What strategies will make the biggest difference?

  39. Toolbox of Actions for Community Betterment Engage Educate Enact Earmark Change Evaluate Envision 39

  40. Envision Assess Failure to plan Plan = plan to fail Act Reassess 40

  41. Earmark Staff Services Budgets Address Needs 41

  42. Educate Education Outreach Marketing 42

  43. Engage Capacity Building Partnerships Community Engagement 43

  44. Enact Pros Cons 44

  45. Evaluate Resident Opinion Stakeholder Informal opinion evaluation Evaluate Secondary Outputs data 45

  46. Strategies: Micro-Business Start-Up • Develop 5 year micro-business development plan Plan • Convene community task force • Write community grants (think creatively) Resource Allocation • Provide seed money/other resources to small businesses • Launch a buy-local campaign Public Education • Provide training and technical assistance to small businesses • Work with college to provide Tech training to residents Collaborate • Develop an Encore University • Develop policies to encourage small business start-ups Develop Policy • Survey program participants Assessment • Track new-business starts and annual revenues 46

  47. Strategies to consider…  Address the issue at multiple levels  Promote partnerships between departments, community sectors and communities  Solve multiple problems  Are realistic!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend