Pablo Colman - Operational Excellence Doctorate Candidate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

pablo colman operational excellence doctorate candidate
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Pablo Colman - Operational Excellence Doctorate Candidate - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Pablo Colman - Operational Excellence Doctorate Candidate Co-authors: Mishaal Al Harbi Operational Excellence Consultant (Company A) Pauline Found Professor and Supervisor Productivity VSM Auditing SIPOC EFQM Line Balancing


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Pablo Colman - Operational Excellence Doctorate Candidate Co-authors: Mishaal Al Harbi – Operational Excellence Consultant (Company A) Pauline Found – Professor and Supervisor

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The challenge Auditing EFQM Assessments VSM SIPOC Line Balancing Statistical Analysis DMAIC Productivity Now Goal

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Proposed Model

Requirements Audits and Assessments based on ISO 19011, EFQM, Malcolm Baldrige, etc. Findings (Conformities

  • Non

Conformitites, etc) Detailed Report /Action Plan Lean Six Sigma Projects Define the need Assessment

  • f core

function using Lean and Six Sigma tools (i.e. VSM, SPC,) Link findings to the Quality Management System Detailed Report / Action Plan CI Projects

Current Assessment Process Enhanced Model

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Literature Review – 150 documents

  • Theories (i.e. Bureaucracy)
  • Audits and Assessments
  • Quality Management Systems & Tools
  • Six Sigma
  • Oil and Gas Industry statistics
  • Compliance Vs Performance

Case study – Company A*

Approach

* The data collected is confidential and Company A will remain anonymous throughout the paper/presentation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Literature Review Bureaucracy Organizational structure Quality Management Systems

Integration of Lean Six Sigma in Audits is not a common practice today – Limited Literature Audits are supposed to measure effectiveness Culture and individual differences should not be underestimated

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Oil and Gas sector Adopted a Quality Management System based on ISO 9001 and EFQM Model

50 Internal Corporate Assessments ever year

  • Team: Multidisciplinary
  • Duration: 5 weeks
  • Methodology: ISO 19011 and EFQM

Following each Assessment, the assessed organization completes a survey to provide their feedback

Case Study – Company A QMS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Case Study – Assessment in Company A

Enabling Elements

PLAN DO CHECK ADJUST Indicators Benchmarks Performance

Focus Areas

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Case Study - Data Source Sample size Assessed Organizations Surveys 60 Feedback from the assessors 29 Assessment Reports (Traditional)  20 Assessment Reports  1747 Statements Assessment Reports (Enhance Model) 2 Hypothesis: H01: The main focus of the OE assessments is compliance against company standards and requirements H02: The integration of Lean and Six Sigma tools in the auditing methodology will yield better results and enhanced value obtained from the assessments Data:

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Case Study - Analysis

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00

  • Integration between

Sub-Systems (Safety, Environment, Reliability) and Depth of the assessment

  • The assessments
  • f these

subsystems is mainly driven by compliance

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Case Study - Analysis

Compliance 57% Performance 43%

The majority

  • f

the assessors agree that the main focus of the OE assessments is compliance

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Case Study - Analysis

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%

Improvement Opportunities

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Case Study - Analysis

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%

Focus of the Statements

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Case Study – New approach

Opportunity – Traditional Approach Opportunity – Integrated Model QMS Process The Org XX have not established customer focus meetings and should consider starting to conduct them The “examination” tables are currently fully booked and it takes 1-2 months to get a slot. The analysis of the utilization shows that only 60% of the time the tables are actually being used. The Org X should evaluate the root causes in collaboration with its customers to enhance this measurement “Customer Focus”

Define the need Assessment

  • f core

function using Lean and Six Sigma tools (i.e. VSM, SPC,) Link findings to the Quality Management System Detailed Report / Action Plan CI Projects

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Hypothesis:

  • H01: Focus is compliance
  • H02: The integrated approach yields better results (i.e.

Productivity increase by a factor of 3 following the assessment)*

Recommendations

* More samples are required to ensure the sustainability of this approach

slide-15
SLIDE 15

There is an opportunity to combine the assessment process and Lean Six Sigma Tools to yield better results Main focus of the Assessments today is Compliance – we need to move more towards performance Way Forward Evaluate how culture and individual differences impact the assessment process Conduct more case studies to optimize the proposed assessment model

Recommendations

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Q&A

Source: google images