p e t r a t h e r m Exploring for Sustainable Energy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

p e t r a t h e r m
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

p e t r a t h e r m Exploring for Sustainable Energy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Paralana Engineered Geothermal Project Latest Developments Reid P.W., Messeiller M, Hasting M. and Albaric J. GMUSG & SACOME Resource Industry Conference August 2 013 p e t r a t h e r m Exploring for Sustainable Energy


slide-1
SLIDE 1

p e t r a t h e r m

Exploring for Sustainable Energy

The Paralana Engineered Geothermal Project – Latest Developments

Reid P.W., Messeiller M, Hasting M. and Albaric J. GMUSG & SACOME Resource Industry Conference August 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclaimer

This presentation has been prepared by Petratherm Limited (Petratherm). The information contained in this presentation is a professional opinion only and is given in good faith. Certain information in this document has been derived from third parties and though Petratherm has no reason to believe that it is not accurate, reliable or complete, it may not have been independently audited or verified by Petratherm. Any forward-looking statements included in this document involve subjective judgment and analysis and are subject to uncertainties, risks and contingencies, many of which are

  • utside the control of, and maybe unknown

to, Petratherm. In particular, they speak only as of the date of this document, they assume the success of Petratherm’s strategies and they are subject to significant regulatory, business, competitive and economic uncertainties and risks. Actual future events may vary materially from the forward looking statements and the assumptions on which the forward looking statements are based. Recipients of this document (“ Recipients ” ) are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Petratherm makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of information in this document and does not take responsibility for updating any information or correcting any error or

  • mission which may become apparent after

this document has been issued. To the extent permitted by law, Petratherm and its officers, employees, related bodies corporate and agents (“Agents”) disclaim all liability, direct, indirect or consequential (and whether or not arising out of the negligence, default or lack of care of Petratherm and/or any of its Agents) for any loss or damage suffered by a Recipient or other persons arising out of, or in connection with, any use

  • r

reliance

  • n

this presentation

  • r

information. All amounts in Australian dollars (AUD) unless stated otherwise.

Disclaimer and competent persons statement

Competent Persons Statement

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results, Geothermal Resources or Geothermal Reserves is based on information compiled by Peter Reid, who appears on the Register of Practicing Geothermal Professionals maintained by the Australian Geothermal Energy Group Incorporated at the time of the publication of this report. Peter Reid is a full time employee of the Company. Peter Reid has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style and type of geothermal play under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the Second Edition (2010) of the Australian Code for Reporting Exploration Results, Geothermal Resources and Geothermal Reserves. Peter Reid has consented in writing to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Petratherm overview

Our company

Projects spanning Australia, Spain and China

Projects across the spectrum of geothermal technology

Flagship project – Paralana in SA’s northern Flinders Ranges

MADRID & BARCELONA Direct use heat, EGS & hydrothermal TENERIFE & GRAN CANARIA Conventional volcanic PARALANA & EAST GIPPSLAND EGS & HSA CHINA Exclusive exploration agreement

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Petratherm Project Areas

Northern Flinders Ranges Lake Frome

(JV with Beach Energy)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Paralana Independent Resources Statement – Nov 2011

Depth Interval (metres) Inferred (PJth) Indicated (PJth) Measured (PJth) Total (PJth) <3,500 2,400 1,100 3,500 3,500 - 4,000 4,900 4,400 41 9,300 4,000 - 4,500 5,900 5,700 12,000 4,500 - 5,000 6,900 6,700 14,000 Total (PJth) 20,000 18,000 41 38,000

The information on this slide that relates to Geothermal Resources is an extract from a report compiled by Dr Graeme Beardsmore, who appears on the Register of Practicing Geothermal Professionals maintained by the Australian Geothermal Energy Group Incorporated at the time of the publication

  • f this Slide. Dr Beardsmore is employed by Hot Dry Rocks Pty Ltd, an independent consulting group that provides professional services to Petratherm
  • Ltd. Dr Beardsmore has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style and type of geothermal play under consideration and to the activity which

he/she is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the Second Edition (2010) of the ‘Australian Code for Reporting Exploration Results, Geothermal Resources and Geothermal Reserves’. Dr Beardsmore has consented in writing to the inclusion on the slide of the matters based

  • n his information in the form and context in which they appear.

Paralana Joint Venture: Petratherm 79%, Beach Energy 21%. If remaining staged equity investments are met, Beach Energy may earn up to 36% .

  • Initial stimulated rock volume = 5.4 MWe power potential for 30 years
  • Paralana Resource at the 3500–4000 metre depth interval is estimated a 9,300 PJth

which is sufficient to generate 1,300 MWe of electrical power for 30 years

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Resource Development Model – Heat Exchanger Within Insulator (HEWI), and Fractures at Basin-Basement Interface (FABBI)

Targeting Fracture Permeability in

Mesoproterozoic metasediments - bedding / joint surfaces (HEWI model)

Fracture Permeability at Basin / Basement Interface (FABBI model)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2D seismic interpretation suggests faults and fractures may be regionally extensive below a thick quartzite sequence

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Paralana 2 – Drilling

  • New Weatherford Owned

2000HP Le Tourneau Lightning Rig

  • 57 metres high ~ 10 Stories
  • 85 Semi-Trailer Loads
  • Spudded June 30, 2009

p e t r a t h e r m

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Paralana 2 well summary

Depth 4003m (G.L. A.H.D.)

Well cased and cemented to 3725m

Extrapolated bottom hole temperature ~ 190oC

High pressure geothermal brines intersected from 3680m

Zircon dating confirms 1585 ± 11 Ma Reservoir Sequence

Contains numerous fractures and faults

6m perforated interval between 3679 and 3685m

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Paralana 2 – Brine Intersected

 High torque, intervals of high ROP’s, drilling breaks

and increase in well bore deviation

 Inflow of over-pressured geothermal brines between

3670 - 3864 m

 Shut in pressure indicated ~ 3,300 psi, of

  • verpressure and mud system weighted up to

13.2ppg to stop flow.

 Well bore stability problems limited wire line logging

to LWD measurements to 3725 m

Numerous large Fractures/Faults Intersected!

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Passive seismic array

  • MEQ - Array

Managed by IESE

  • 1 deep borehole

sonde at 1800m in Paralana 1b

  • 6 borehole sondes ~

200m

  • 10 surface

seismometers

  • 4 accelerometers
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fracture Stimulation – Key Statistics

3.1 million litres injected

Injection rates: 3.2 - 27 l/sec

Equilibrium WHP prior and post

  • peration 3940 psi.

Acid treatments allow higher pumping rates.

Sand proppant successfully placed at end of the treatment.

Photo: courtesy Advertiser, July 2011

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Note - This pressure rise is only at surface, not downhole

Fracture Stimulation – Pressure and flow rate

slide-15
SLIDE 15

MEQ array successfully recorded micro-seismicity:

11,000 events triggered and located by MIMO

4,351 events handpicked

Ground motion – acceleration and velocity – always within the safe limits established in the risk management plan.

Good correlation between pumping rates and micro- seismic events

Micro-seismic events – main fracture

The first micro-seismic events appear on the screens at the micro-seismic monitoring centre at Paralana

slide-16
SLIDE 16

N

10-15 July Injection Data = Red 15 July to 29 October 2011 Post Injection Data = Green View North

3,200m 4,200m

View West

3,200m 4,200m

Micro-seismic events

Data courtesy of Hasting Micro-Seismic Consulting

slide-17
SLIDE 17

View North

3,200m 4,200m

Paralana – Fracture Stimulation

  • A complex frac shape – creating a 3D

volume rather than along a plane, which may allow a high heat recovery factor

  • Natural fractures and brines present
  • The fractured volume is an enhancement
  • f the naturally fractured system
  • Reservoir is over-pressured which may

assist production flows

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Paralana Flow Test, Oct 2011

  • 1.28 million litres produced
  • Flow rate – 1 – 6 litres/sec
  • Bottom 200 metres - well fluid temperature 171oC
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Extraction model for a pumped EGS well

Net MW Capacity of a Pumped Well vs Temperature (Binary Cycle Power Generation)

Sanyal (Geothermex) et. al. 2007* independent expert paper reports :

  • Standard industry pump operating

temperature limit is ~ 190oC

  • Max MW per well ~7.3MW (unless pumps

improve on setting depth and pump rate) Paralana Extraction Model :

  • Targeting optimal temperature parameters to

maximize output of a pumped EGS well

  • Temperatures of 190oC confirmed at 4,000m
  • JV decision not to drill deeper than 4km

based on cost/depth trade-off – validated

  • Paralana target flow is 75 litres/sec or PI ~ 4

achieving a net capacity of 3.5 MW

Source: Sanyal et. al. (2007) Net power Capacity of Geothermal Wells versus reservoir Temperature – A Practical Perspective

* Sanyal 2007 paper available for download at

www.geothermal-energy.org/pdf/IGAstandard/SGW/2007/sanyal3.pdf

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Paralana – Next Stage Project Funding

Next stage of works budgeted at around $26 million

Covers drilling Paralana 3, fracture stimulation and demonstration of commercial flows. This work is the immediate precursor to building a 3.5 MW pilot plant.

Petratherm awarded a $13 million Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) Grant to fund close to half of the total costs.

Beach Energy – Paralana JV partner- have 21% project equity share

Petratherm – project equity share is 79%

Petratherm could receive up to $7.2 million in cash rebates* for eligible expenditures under the R&D Tax Incentive scheme (* post eligible spend & assessment)

Net cost to Petratherm to achieve Demonstration of Commercial Flows (DCF) potentially around $3 million. If DCF is successful, then this will unlock the $24.5 million REDP grant to construct 7.5MW in two 3.5MW Stages.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Key milestones for the Paralana geothermal project

Paralana JV project planned milestones

3rd Qtr 2011: Main fracture stimulation 

3rd Qtr 2011 : Flow test 

Mid 2014: drilling of the Paralana 3 deep producer well

Late 2014: Large scale hydraulic stimulation works of Paralana 2 and 3

Mid-2015: Circulation Test – Demonstration of Flows

Early 2016: Commission first stage 3.5 MW power plant

slide-22
SLIDE 22