Outline What was the process? What did we create? What is behind - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

outline what was the process what did we create what is
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Outline What was the process? What did we create? What is behind - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Creating a Culture of Sustained Professional Growth & Reflection Within the Evaluation Process Sara Deveaux, Sara Deveaux,Director of the Henry R. Kravis Center 63 for Excellence in Teaching, Loomis Chaffee @kravisteaching


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Creating a Culture of Sustained Professional Growth & Reflection Within the Evaluation Process

Sara Deveaux, Sara Deveaux,Director of the Henry R. Kravis Center ‘63 for Excellence in Teaching, Loomis Chaffee @kravisteaching Sara_Deveaux@loomis.org Andrew Matlack, Andrew Matlack, Dean of Faculty, Loomis Chaffee Andrew_Matlack@loomis.org

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline What was the process? What did we create? What is behind the scenes that allows us to do this work?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Learning objectives:

Evaluationcan be part of a larger process focused on professional growth and development. Numerous sustained professional growth

  • pportunities are a necessary component of

faculty development. Conversations about teaching are an integral part of school culture.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Reflection Opportunities

Identify the pillars at the heart of your evaluation system. Would you change them if you could? Identify the cornerstones that currently allow for a culture of professional growth at your

  • school. What would you change or

add? Identify three ideas that you can take back to your school.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

"The holistic evaluation (residential and coaching as well as teaching) is essential.” “I like that it focuses on classroom culture.” "Strenuous, yet valuable.”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

"Year 5 should be different than year 3, and from years 1 and 2 for that matter.” “The process should be more self-directed and reflective. We know the one who does the work does the learning.” “Do we do anything at all to support our senior teachers?” “There’s no follow up between evaluation events, no continuum.” "Evaluation fatigue: death by feedback”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Faulty Premises

  • Our evaluation system is a mechanism used to

remove poorly performing teachers

  • Evaluation is the best way to train new and

beginning teachers

  • Bonus: summative feedback makes people better

at their craft

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

What was the process?

  • Research

○ Internal: Faculty-wide survey; 20 Interviews ○ External: ■ “Which factors have the greatest positive effect on students’ learning?” ■ “What makes teachers credible?” ■ “When does PD work best?”

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What was the process?

  • Research

○ Internal: Faculty-wide survey; 20 Interviews ○ External:

  • Set goals/pillars
  • Build the system
  • Present; seek feedback; revise; propose
slide-11
SLIDE 11

What was the process?

  • Research

○ Internal: Faculty-wide survey, 20 Interviews ○ External

  • Set goals/pillars
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Three Pillars

  • We want our system to feel Simple

Simple

  • We want professional growth to be Sustained

Sustained

  • We want evaluation to be Faculty Owned

Faculty Owned

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

New Evaluation System Year 1

[New Faculty Cohort]

“Evaluation A” (Year 2) Self-evaluation Educational Philosophy SET Department Head Obs (3) Senior Colleague Obs (1) Year 3 [PD] “Evaluation B” (Year 4) Year 5 [PD]

Dept Head

slide-16
SLIDE 16

New Evaluation System Year 1

[New Faculty Cohort]

“Evaluation A” (Year 2) Self-evaluation Educational Philosophy SET Department Head Obs (3) Senior Colleague Obs (1) Year 3 [PD] “Evaluation B” (Year 4) Self-evaluation Video of a class Department Head Obs (1) SET DoF Obs (2) Year 5 [PD]

DoF Dept Head

slide-17
SLIDE 17

New Evaluation System Year 1

[New Faculty Cohort]

“Evaluation A” (Year 2) Self-evaluation Educational Philosophy SET Department Head Obs (3) Senior Colleague Obs (1) Year 3 [PD] “Evaluation B” (Year 4) Self-evaluation Video of a class Department Head Obs (1) SET DoF Obs (2) Year 5 [PD]

AD DoF Dept Head

slide-18
SLIDE 18

New Evaluation System Year 1

[New Faculty Cohort]

“Evaluation A” (Year 2) Self-evaluation Educational Philosophy SET Department Head Obs (3) Senior Colleague Obs (1) Year 3 [PD] “Evaluation B” (Year 4) Self-evaluation Video of a class Department Head Obs (1) SET DOF Obs (2) Year 5 [PD]

Dorm Head DoF Dept Head AD

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Intentional Change to pedagogy and a critical examination of the results.

  • How might student writing be improved with a

redesign of the traditional feedback cycle?

  • How does the use of collaborative assessments

impact individual student learning?

  • How might “flipping” the teaching of some of the

content in my class impact student engagement and mastery?

Evaluation C = Inquiry Project ADoF

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Evaluation C

SET; begin to create guiding question Meet with cohort; design and propose project Implement; collect data; analyze; reflect Meet with ADoF for formal feedback

= Inquiry Project

Winter Spring Spring Prior YR

ADoF

Fall

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Dean of Faculty office Kravis Center for Excellence in Teaching

Evaluations Professional Development

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

What are your pillars? Faculty owned Sustained Simple

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Creating a Culture of Growth

Sustained professional growth Conversations & collaboration Faculty voice and choice

Increased faculty investment

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Outline What was the process? What did we create? What is behind the scenes that allows us to do this work?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The Four Cornerstones

  • Support
  • Dedicated PD time
  • Internal PD offerings
  • Opportunities for conversations
slide-30
SLIDE 30

1

Support from the top

Head of School Sheila Culbert interacting with faculty during a PD event.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The Kravis Center

The Henry R. Kravis ‘63 Center for Excellence in Teaching provides the space and time to guide and nurture faculty in their pursuit of pedagogical excellence by creating a sense of ownership and intentionality surrounding professional growth; the ultimate goal is to instill in faculty the same passion for lifelong learning that we aim to instill in our students.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

2Dedicated

PD time

slide-33
SLIDE 33

PD needs to be:

  • Sustained and focused: provide the time to

learn, practice, implement, and reflect

  • Experimental: create opportunities for
  • bservation, coaching, and support
  • Collaborative: provide time and space for

conversation

slide-34
SLIDE 34

3 Internal PD offerings

  • Books on Learning and Teaching (BLT)
  • Instructional Coaches
  • Sessions on pedagogy and current topics

in education

  • Diversity, equity and inclusion
  • Technology training
slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37

4 Creating the Conversations

  • Monday Musings
  • Collaborative programming
  • Open Classroom Weeks
  • Twitter @kravisteaching
slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • Celebration of Teaching and Learning

Gallery W alk

  • Workshop on PoCC
  • Presentation of Inquiry projects
  • Recording classes and feedback

Visibility

slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Identify Identify the cornerstones that currently allow for a culture of professional growth at your school. What would you change or add?

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Identify three three ideas that you can take back to your school.

  • Something that you could

implement now that would take minimal effort

  • Something that may take some

effort.

  • A “pie-in-the-sky” idea
slide-45
SLIDE 45

Questions?

Sara Deveaux, Sara Deveaux,Director of the Henry R. Kravis Center for Excellence in Teaching, Loomis Chaffee @kravisteaching Sara_Deveaux@loomis.org Andrew Matlack, Andrew Matlack, Dean of Faculty, Loomis Chaffee Andrew_Matlack@loomis.org

slide-46
SLIDE 46

… Thank you for coming!

Sara Deveaux, Sara Deveaux,Director of the Henry R. Kravis Center for Excellence in Teaching, Loomis Chaffee @kravisteaching Sara_Deveaux@loomis.org Andrew Matlack, Andrew Matlack, Dean of Faculty, Loomis Chaffee Andrew_Matlack@loomis.org

slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48