osha s revised
play

OSHAs Revised Recordkeeping Rule, and Post-Incident Drug Test Issue - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

January 24-25, 2017 OSHAs Revised Recordkeeping Rule, and Post-Incident Drug Test Issue Camille Villanova 202-255-6194 cvsafety@hotmail.com January 24-25, 2017 Overview OSHA Recordkeeping Standards, Policies, Drug Testing OSHA


  1. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 243 Dec. 19, 2016 ACTION: Final Rule; Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation To Make and Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness Effective January 18, 2017 Need … to clarify that the duty to make and maintain accurate records of work-related injuries and illnesses is an ongoing obligation…

  2. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 243 December 19, 2016 ACTION: Final Rule ; Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation To Make and Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness Effective January 18, 2017 REVISED Prior 1904.0 The purpose of this rule (part 1904.0 Purpose 1904) is to require employers to make The purpose of this and maintain accurate records of and report work-related fatalities, injuries, and rule (Part 1904) is illnesses, and to make such records to require available to the Government and to employers to record employees and their representatives so and report work- that they can be used to secure safe and related fatalities, healthful working conditions. For injuries and purposes of this part, accurate records are records of each and every recordable illnesses . injury and illness that are made and maintained in accordance with the requirements of this part.

  3. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 243 December 19, 2016 ACTION: Final Rule ; Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation To Make and Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and Illness Effective January 18, 2017 REVISED 1904.0 The purpose of this rule (part 1904) is to require employers to make and maintain accurate records of and report work-related fatalities, injuries, and illnesses, and to make such records available to the Government and to employees and their representatives so that they can be used to secure safe and healthful working conditions. For purposes of this part, accurate records are records of each and every recordable injury and illness that are made and maintained in accordance with the requirements of this part.

  4. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 29 CFR 1904.4 (2001) 243 December 19, 2016 (a) Basic requirement. (a) Basic requirement. Each employer required Each employer required by this part to keep by this part to keep records of fatalities, records of fatalities, injuries, and illnesses injuries, and illnesses must record each fatality, must, in accordance with injury, and illness that: the requirements of this part, make and maintain (1) Is work-related; and an accurate record of (2) Is a new case; and each and every fatality, (3) Meets one or more of the injury, and illness that: general recording criteria of §1904.7 or the application to specific cases of §1904.8 through §1904.12

  5. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 243 December 19, 2016 ACTION: Final Rule 1904.35(b)(2) Do I have to give my employees and their representatives access to the OSHA injury and illness records? Yes, your employees, former employees, their personal representatives, and their authorized employee representatives have the right to access accurate OSHA injury and illness records, with some limitations, as discussed below.

  6. Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 157 /Thursday , August 14, 2014 Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses Of the 18 questions 5 main questions address Adverse action or discipline that may discourage an employee from reporting and injury or illness In this group is the mention of drug testing

  7. Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 157 /Thursday , August 14, 2014 Proposed Rules Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses The drug testing discussion lead-in is: Adverse actions mentioned by participants in the public meeting ( January 09–10, 2014 ) included … requiring employees who reported an injury to undergo drug testing where there was no reason to suspect drug use , …

  8. Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 157 /Thursday , August 14, 2014 Proposed Rules Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses A question in this "adverse action" group is: Are you aware of employer practices or policies to take adverse action against persons who report injuries or illnesses? Please describe them?

  9. Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 157 /Thursday , August 14, 2014 Proposed Rules Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses A question in this "adverse action" group is: Are you aware of any particular situations where an employee decided not to report an injury or illness to his or her employer because of a fear that the employer would take adverse action against the employee? If so, please describe the situation, including the nature of the injury or illness and the reasons the employee had for believing he or she would be retaliated against.

  10. Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 157 /Thursday , August 14, 2014 Proposed Rules Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses A question in this "adverse action" group is: What kinds of adverse actions might lead an employee to decide not to report an injury or illness? Are there other employer actions that would not dissuade a reasonable employee from reporting an injury or illness?

  11. Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 157 /Thursday , August 14, 2014 Proposed Rules Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses A question in this "adverse action" group is: OSHA encourages employers to enforce safety rules as part of a well-functioning workplace safety program. Are there any employer practices that OSHA should explicitly exclude under this provision to ensure that employers are able to run an effective workplace safety program?

  12. Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 157 /Thursday , August 14, 2014 Proposed Rules Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses A question in this "adverse action" group is: OSHA encourages employers to enforce safety rules as part of a well-functioning workplace safety program. Are there any employer practices that OSHA should explicitly exclude under this provision to ensure that employers are able to run an effective workplace safety program?

  13. Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 157 /Thursday , August 14, 2014 Proposed Rules Improve Tracking of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses A question in this "adverse action" group is: What other actions can OSHA take to address the issue of employers who discourage employees from reporting injuries and illnesses?

  14. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016 Final Rule Effective on January 1, 2017, Except 1904.35 and 1904.36, which become effective on August 10, 2016 Preamble p 29672: OSHA received a number of comments expressing concern that this section of the final rule will have a chilling effect on employers disciplining employees who violate safety rules, thereby contributing to a less safe work environment. It is important to note that the final rule prohibits employers only from taking adverse action against an employee because the employee reported an injury or illness.

  15. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016 Final Rule Effective on January 1, 2017, Except 1904.35 and 1904.36, which become effective on August 10, 2016 Preamble p 29672: It is important to note that the final rule prohibits employers only from taking adverse action against an employee because the employee reported an injury or illness . Nothing in the final rule prohibits employers from disciplining employees for violating legitimate safety rules, even if the same employee who violated a safety rule also was injured as a result of that violation and reported that injury or illness (provided that employees who violate the same work rule are treated similarly without regard to whether they also reported a work-related illness or injury).

  16. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016 Final Rule Effective on January 1, 2017, Except 1904.35 and 1904.36, which become effective on August 10, 2016 Preamble p 29672: ... Nothing in the final rule prohibits employers from disciplining employees for violating legitimate safety rules , even if the same employee who violated a safety rule also was injured as a result of that violation and reported that injury or illness (provided that employees who violate the same work rule are treated similarly without regard to whether they also reported a work-related illness or injury)…

  17. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016 Final Rule Effective on January 1, 2017, Except 1904.35 and 1904.36, which become effective on August 10, 2016 Preamble p 29672: ... Nothing in the final rule prohibits employers from disciplining employees for violating legitimate safety rules, even if the same employee who violated a safety rule also was injured as a result of that violation and reported that injury or illness ( provided that employees who violate the same work rule are treated similarly without regard to whether they also reported a work-related illness or injury )…

  18. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble pp 29672-3: Commenter's also pointed to policies mandating automatic post-injury drug testing as a form of adverse action that can discourage reporting. See, … Exs 1675,1695. Although drug testing of employees may be a reasonable workplace policy in some situations, it is often perceived as an invasion of privacy, so if an injury or illness is very unlikely to have been caused by employee drug use, or if the method of drug testing does not identify impairment but only use at some time in the recent past, requiring the employee to be drug tested may inappropriately deter reporting.

  19. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble pp 29672-3: Commenter's also pointed to policies mandating automatic post-injury drug testing as a form of adverse action that can discourage reporting. See, e.g., Exs. 1675, 1695. Although drug testing of employees may be a reasonable workplace policy in some situations, it is often perceived as an invasion of privacy, so if an injury or illness is very unlikely to have been caused by employee drug use, or if the method of drug testing does not identify impairment but only use at some time in the recent past, requiring the employee to be drug tested may inappropriately deter reporting …

  20. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble pp 29672-3: … so if an injury or illness is very unlikely to have been caused by employee drug use, or if the method of drug testing does not identify impairment but only use at some time in the recent past, requiring the employee to be drug tested may inappropriately deter reporting …

  21. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29673: Some commenter's stated their belief that drug testing of employees is important for a safe workplace ;

  22. Comment : https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=OSHA-2013-0023-1603 MCAA …Post-accident drug testing is a critical part of any satisfactory company safety and health program. … purpose of protecting all workers on the jobsite, not just the would-be users. [sic Also], being found under the influence of a drug following post-accident testing is often all it takes to prompt an affected employee to seek help through an employee assistance program or some other source…

  23. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29673: … some [sic Commenter's] expressed concern that OSHA planned a wholesale ban on drug testing (Exs. 1667, 1674) …

  24. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29673: … To the contrary, this final rule does not ban drug testing of employees …

  25. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29673: … OSHA believes the evidence in the rulemaking record shows that blanket post-injury drug testing policies deter proper reporting …

  26. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29673: … this final rule does not ban drug testing of employees …

  27. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29673: However, the final rule does prohibit employers from using drug testing (or the threat of drug testing) as a form of adverse action against employees who report injuries or illnesses

  28. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29673: … Employers need not specifically suspect drug use before testing, but there should be a reasonable possibility that drug use by the reporting employee was a contributing factor to the reported injury or illness in order for an employer to require drug testing …

  29. POLICY Letter of Interpretation August 23, 2016 https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document ?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=31061 … An employee was operating a powered industrial truck (a "walkie"). Her foot became jammed between the walkie and a pallet and her steel toed shoe bent and cut the top of her toe. She received four stitches for the laceration. At the time of the incident, the employee was taking prescription medication for a non-work related condition …

  30. POLICY Letter of Interpretation August 23, 2016 https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document ?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=31061 … Section 1904.5(a) states, [the employer] must consider an injury or illness to be work-related if an event or exposure in the work environment either caused or contributed to the resulting condition …

  31. POLICY Letter of Interpretation August 23, 2016 https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document ?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=31061 … The injury described in your scenario resulted from operation of workplace equipment. …

  32. POLICY Letter of Interpretation August 23, 2016 https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document ?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=31061 … Under Section 1904.5(b)(2)(ii),… an event or exposure in the work environment can play no part in the injury. The facts of your scenario do not meet this exception because the injury described resulted from operation of workplace equipment …

  33. POLICY Letter of Interpretation August 23, 2016 https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document ?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=31061 … the exemption to work relatedness under Section 1904.5(b)(2)(vi) would not apply for the same reason. Under Section 1904.5(b)(2)(vi) you are not required to record an injury or illness if the injury or illness is solely the result of self-medication for a non-work-related condition … [sic HAS TO BE RECORDED]

  34. POLICY Letter of Interpretation August 23, 2016 https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document ?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=31061 … At the time of the incident, the employee was taking prescription medication for a non-work related condition … HAS TO BE RECORDED

  35. 29 CFR 1904 January 19, 2001 Effective Jan 1, 2002 1904.5(b)(2) Exceptions to 'Work-Related' Are there situations where an injury or illness occurs in the work environment and is not considered work-related? Yes, an injury or illness occurring in the work environment that falls under one of the following exceptions is not work- related, and therefore is not recordable.

  36. 29 CFR 1904 January 19, 2001 Effective Jan 1, 2002 1904.5(b)(2) From 9 Exceptions to 'Work-Related' (ii) The injury or illness involves signs or symptoms that surface at work but result solely from a non-work-related event or exposure that occurs outside the work environment. (vi) The injury or illness is solely the result of personal grooming, self medication for a non-work-related condition, or is intentionally self-inflicted.

  37. POLICY … his hand was caught between two objects. After receiving treatment for the injury, the employee was immediately given a post-accident drug test. The results of the drug test indicated the employee was intoxicated from alcohol … Letter of Interpretation March 21, 2016 https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_tabl e=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=30545

  38. POLICY …OSHA's Office of Occupational Medicine and Nursing … concluded that the intake of alcohol does not treat the disorder of alcoholism. Instead, drinking alcohol is a manifestation of the disorder. Accordingly, the injury described in the scenario above does not meet the exception in Section 1904.5(b)(2)(vi) for self-medication. Letter of Interpretation March 21, 2016 https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document ?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=30545

  39. POLICY … drinking alcohol is a manifestation of the disorder. Accordingly, the injury described in the scenario above does not meet the exception [sic for work related] in 1904.5(b)(2)(vi) for self-medication . Has to Be Recorded Letter of Interpretation March 21, 2016 https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document ?p_table=INTERPRETATIONS&p_id=30545

  40. POLICY 278 Letters of Interpretation from October 29, 2001 to September 12, 2016

  41. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule From Preamble p 29673: …commenter's also raised the concern that the final rule will conflict with drug testing requirements contained in workers' compensation laws … If an employer conducts drug testing to comply with the requirements of a state or federal law or regulation, the employer's motive would not be retaliatory and the final rule would not prohibit such testing … Section 4(b)(4) of the Act prohibits OSHA from superseding or affecting workers' compensation laws …

  42. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule From Preamble p 29673: … If an employer conducts drug testing to comply with the requirements of a state or federal law or regulation, the employer's motive would not be retaliatory and the final rule would not prohibit such testing … Section 4(b)(4) of the Act prohibits OSHA from superseding or affecting workers' compensation laws …

  43. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29673: … However, the final rule does prohibit employers from using drug testing (or the threat of drug testing) as a form of adverse action against employees who report injuries or illnesses …

  44. Occupational Safety and Health Act December 29, 1970 Section 11 Judicial Review Paragraph (c) 11c

  45. Occupational Safety and Health Act December 29, 1970 SEC. 11c Judicial Review (c) (1) No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because such employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to this Act or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding or because of the exercise by such employee on behalf of himself or others of any right afforded by this Act …

  46. Occupational Safety and Health Act December 29, 197 0 SEC. 11c Judicial Review (2) Any employee who believes that he has been discharged or otherwise discriminated against by any person in violation of this subsection may, within thirty days after such violation occurs, file a complaint with the Secretary alleging such discrimination. Upon receipt of such complaint, the Secretary shall cause such investigation to be made as he deems appropriate. If upon such investigation, the Secretary determines that the provisions of this subsection have been violated, he shall bring an action in any appropriate United States district court against such person. In any such action the United States district courts shall have jurisdiction, for cause shown to restrain violations of paragraph (1) of this subsection and order all appropriate relief including rehiring or reinstatement of the employee to his former position with back pay.

  47. Occupational Safety and Health Act December 29, 1970 SEC. 11c Judicial Review (2) Any employee who believes that he has been discharged or otherwise discriminated against by any person in violation of this subsection may, within thirty days after such violation occurs, file a complaint with the Secretary alleging such discrimination. Upon receipt of such complaint, the Secretary shall cause such investigation to be made as he deems appropriate. …

  48. January 2001 1904.36 May 12, 2016 1904.36 Prohibition against Prohibition against discrimination. discrimination. In addition to §1904.35, Section 11(c) of the Act section 11(c) of the OSH Act prohibits you from also prohibits you from discriminating against an discriminating against an employee for reporting a employee for reporting a work-related fatality, injury work-related fatality, injury, or illness. That provision of or illness. That provision of the Act also protects the the Act also protects the employee who files a safety employee who files a safety and health complaint, asks and health complaint, asks for access to the Part 1904 for access to the part 1904 records, or otherwise records, or otherwise exercises any rights exercises any rights afforded afforded by the OSH Act. by the OSH Act.

  49. Employee Involvement 2001 1904.35 May 12, 2016 1904.35 (a) Basic requirement. Your (a) Basic requirement. Your employees and their employees and their representatives representatives must be involved in the must be involved in the recordkeeping system in recordkeeping system in several ways. several ways. (a)(1) You must inform each (a)(1) You must inform each employee of how he or she employee of how he or she is is to report an injury or to report a work-related injury illness to you. or illness to you. (a)(2) You must provide (a)(2)You must provide employees with the limited access to your injury information described in and illness records for your paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this employees and their section. representatives.

  50. Employee Involvement 2001 1904.35 May 12, 2016 1 904.35 (a)(2)You must provide limited access (a)(2) You must provide employees with to your injury and illness records for the information described in paragraph your employees and their (b)(1)(iii) of this section. representatives. (a)(3) You must provide access to your injury and illness records for your employees and their representatives as described in paragraph (b)(2) of this section.

  51. Employee Involvement 2001 1904.35 May 12, 2016 1904.35 (b)(1)(i) You must set up (b)(1)(i) You must establish a way for employees to a reasonable procedure for report work-related employees to report work- injuries and illnesses related injuries and illnesses promptly; and promptly and accurately. A procedure is not reasonable if it would deter or discourage a reasonable employee from accurately reporting a workplace injury or illness;

  52. Employee Involvement 2001 1904.35 May 12, 2016 1904.35 (b)(1)(ii) You must tell (b)(1)(ii) You must inform each employee how to each employee of your report work-related procedure for reporting injuries and illnesses to work-related injuries and you. illnesses; (b)(1)(iii) You must inform each employee that: (b)(1)(iii) (A) Employees have the right to report work-related injuries and illnesses; and …

  53. How to Inform May 12, 2016 1904.35 (b)(1)(ii) You must inform Federal Register Vol. 81, each employee of your No. 92, May 12, 2016, procedure for reporting Final Rule work-related injuries and Preamble p 29688 illnesses; … inform…employees of their right to report (b)(1)(iii) You must inform injuries and illnesses. each employee that: This requirement (b)(1)(iii) (A) Employees can be met by have the right to report posting a work-related injuries and recently-revised illnesses; and … version of the OSHA Poster …

  54. English Spanish Vietnamese Portuguese Korean Polish Haitian Creole Chinese Arabic Nepali

  55. OSHA MEMORANDUM Regional Administrators POLICY State Designees November 10, 2016 Interim Enforcement Procedures for New Recordkeeping Requirements Under 29 CFR 1904.35 if OSHA determines that the employer has not posted the poster and has not otherwise informed employees… CSHO will provide the employer a copy of the poster. If the employer posts the poster, immediate abatement is accomplished and no citation will be issued. If the employer does not post the poster, a citation may be issued.

  56. Employee Involvement 2001 1904.35 May 12, 2016 1904.35 (b)(1)(iii) (B) Employers are prohibited from discharging or in any manner discriminating against employees for reporting work-related injuries or illnesses; and (b)(1)(iv) You must not discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee for reporting a work-related injury or illness.

  57. Federal Register Vol 82, Number 5 , Jan 9, 2017 Occupational Exposure to Beryllium Final Rule 1910.1024, 1926.1124 Preamble p 2700 … OSHA's Recordkeeping Rule [sic 1904] gives employees the right to report work-related illnesses such as CBD or other beryllium-related health effects, and Section 1904.35(b)(1)(iv) of that rule prohibits retaliation against employees for reporting these health effects …

  58. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29627: … new provision 1904.35(b)(1)(iv) is that it provides OSHA with additional enforcement tools to promote the accuracy and integrity of the injury and illness records employers are required to keep under part 1904. For example, under section 11(c), OSHA may not act against an employer unless an employee files a complaint …

  59. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29627: … [sic New ]1904.35(b)(1)(iv)… OSHA will be able to cite an employer for taking adverse action against an employee for reporting an injury or illness, even if the employee did not file a complaint [sic 11c complaint] …

  60. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29627: … [sic New ] 1904.35(b)(1)(iv) … citations can result in orders requiring employers to abate violations, which may be a more efficient tool to correct employer policies and practices than the remedies authorized under section 11(c), which are often employee-specific …

  61. Occupational Safety and Health Act December 29, 1970 11c (1) No person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because such employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to this Act or has testified or is about to testify in any such proceeding or because of the exercise by such employee on behalf of himself or others of any right afforded by this Act.

  62. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29627: … [sic New ] 1904.35 (b)(1)(iv) … citations can result in orders requiring employers to abate violations, which may be a more efficient tool to correct employer policies and practices than the remedies authorized under section 11(c), which are often employee-specific …

  63. 1910.1020 Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records 1910.1020 (c)(6)(i)(F) Employee medical complaints

  64. 1910.1020 Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records is different from 1904.9 (a) ... If an employee is medically removed under the medical surveillance requirements of an OSHA standard, you must record the case on the OSHA 300 Log…

  65. 1910.1020Access to Employee Exposure and MedicalRecords (c)(6)(ii) ‘‘Employee medical record’’ does not include medical information in the form of: 1020 (c)(6)(ii)(D) Records concerning voluntary employee assistance programs (alcohol, drug abuse, or personal counseling programs) if maintained separately from the employer's medical program and its records …

  66. POLICY OSHA Instruction CPL 02-00-160 Effective Date: August 2, 2016 Subject: Field Operations Manual (FOM) No mention of Drug Testing https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_02-00-160.pdf

  67. POLICY OSHA Instruction CPL 02-00-160 Effective Date: August 2, 2016 Subject: Field Operations Manual ( FOM ) Chapter 3 Inspection Procedures VI. Review Of Records Chapter 4 Violations Chapter 9 Complaint and Referral Processing Chapter 10 section II-Construction (Reserved) https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_02-00-160.pdf

  68. OSHA Instruction CPL 02-00-160 Effective Date: August 2, 2016 POLICY Subject: Field Operations Manual ( FOM ) Chapter 3 INSPECTIONS III. B. 2. CSHOs shall use established written guidelines and criteria, such as Agency directives and LEPs, in conjunction with information gathered during the records or program review and walkaround inspection, to determine whether expanding the scope of an inspection is warranted https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_02-00-160.pdf

  69. https://www.osha.gov/dep/enforcement/ews_memo _09302015.html POLICY September 30, 2015 SUBJECT :Enforcement Weighting System (EWS) … The values in the Enforcement Weighting System are calculated using reports of time and resources devoted to inspection or investigation activity … … inspection resources on more complex, strategic, and impactful enforcement activity …

  70. POLICY https://www.osha.gov/dep/enforcement/ews_me mo_09302015.html September 30, 2015 SUBJECT :Enforcement Weighting System (EWS) … inspection resources on more complex, strategic, and impactful enforcement activity … 8 EUs-Significant Cases 7 EUs-Process Safety Management Inspections 5 EUs-Ergonomic Hazard Inspections 4 EUs-Heat Hazard Inspections 3 EUs-Non-PEL Exposure Hazard Inspections 3 EUs-Workplace Violence Hazard Inspections 3 EUs-Fatality / Catastrophe Inspections 2 EUs-Personal Sampling Inspections 2 EUs-Federal Agency Inspections 2 EUs-Combustible Dust Inspections 1/9 EUs-Non-formal Complaint Investigations 1/9 EUs-Rapid Response Investigations

  71. OSHA Instruction CPL 02-00-160 Effective Date: August 2, 2016 POLICY Subject: Field Operations Manual ( FOM ) Chapter 4 VIOLATIONS. B. 4. c. All relevant documents (e.g., autopsy reports, police reports, job specifications, site plans, OSHA-300/301, equipment manuals, employer work rules, employer sampling results, employer safety and health programs , and employer disciplinary policies ). https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/Directive_pdf/CPL_02-00-160.pdf

  72. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29672: … Vague work rules are particularly subject to abuse by the employer … … vague work rules such as work carefully or maintain situational awareness …

  73. other Vague Phrases could be: … avoid hazards or maintain interest in safety …

  74. Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 92 May 12, 2016, Final Rule Preamble p 29672: … Vague work rules are particularly subject to abuse … such as by the employer work carefully or maintain situational awareness … … legitimate workplace safety rule should require or prohibit specific conduct related to employee safety or health so it can be applied fairly and not used as a pretext for retaliation …

  75. Don't Operate Machinery Unless Guards Are In Place

  76. OSHA Instruction CPL 02-00-160 ( FOM ), Effective August 2, 2016 POLICY Chapter 3 Inspection Procedures , VI. Review of Records. A. Injury and Illness Records. 1. Collection of Data (a) At the start of each inspection, the CSHO shall review the employer’s injury and illness records for five prior calendar years, record the information on a copy of the OSHA-300 screen, and enter the employer’s data using the OIS Application on the NCR (micro). This shall be done for all general industry, construction, maritime, and agriculture inspections and investigations .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend