OSCP Preparation Guidance Feedback Workshop Spill Assessment Team - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
oscp preparation guidance feedback workshop
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

OSCP Preparation Guidance Feedback Workshop Spill Assessment Team - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jan 13, 2023 334 likes •538 views

OSCP Preparation Guidance Feedback Workshop Spill Assessment Team Matt Smith Camille Boxall Rhys Jones Zoe Jones Introduction Safety induction Refreshments provided; breaks as required Format; focused discussion Unanswered

slide-1
SLIDE 1

OSCP Preparation Guidance Feedback Workshop

Spill Assessment Team

Matt Smith Camille Boxall Rhys Jones Zoe Jones

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • Safety induction
  • Refreshments provided; breaks as required
  • Format; focused discussion
  • Unanswered questions will be taken on notice

2

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Intent

  • Purpose

– To provide an opportunity to offshore petroleum operators to give constructive feedback to the regulator in relation to areas of improvement in the Oil Spill Contingency Plan Preparation Guidance Note.

  • Objectives

– To improve the guidance note through operator feedback – To understand operators concerns in preparing OSCPs – Consider priorities and scope for any of further guidance

  • Assumptions

– NOPSEMA material previously presented is taken as read – NOPSEMA general information is understood

3

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Context

  • Independent and professional regulator
  • Principles of regulatory guidance

– Legislated function to provide advice – Must not create pseudo regulation – Provided to industry to consider possible approaches

4

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Spill Assessment Team

  • Goal

– To ensure industry, government and the regulator are prepared and ready to response to significant oil spill incidents from offshore petroleum activities.

  • Activities

– Timely and efficient assessment – Comprehensive and thorough inspection – Robust systems and processes – Informed and supportive stakeholders – Appropriate response readiness

5

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

slide-6
SLIDE 6

OSCP Preparation GN

Consultation Timeline

6

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

7 November 1 January 6 March 13 April APPEA Environment Conference Established need 27 April 30 June NOPSEMA Starts Regulation Interim Guidance Published Rev 0 Consolidated Guidance Published Rev 2 [Annual Reviews] Consultation Period (30 days) Included updates from regulatory experience Received feedback

  • n GN
  • AMOSC
  • DOT Victoria
  • DMP WA

Consultation Workshop Offshore petroleum

  • perators

20 March 7 March NOPSEMA EP/OSCP Workshops Outline of general principles in guidance Provide general feedback

  • n failings in current

submissions

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Workshop Rules

  • Comments and feedback should;

– Be unrelated to specific situations – Focus on application/interpretation of the regulations – Clearly describe issue and have a specific question

7

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Topic Areas

  • OSCP Approach
  • Oil spill modelling
  • Net Environmental Benefit Assessment (NEBA)
  • Definitions and terminology
  • The National Plan
  • Acceptability criteria
  • Industry Challenge: Operational Plan vs Stating Your Case
  • OSCP vs Incident Action Plan
  • Government Response
  • Response Techniques

8

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Environmental risks of operations Environmental risks of operations for potential emergency conditions

OSCP Approach

9

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

Proposed Activity

Hydrocarbon Release Identify & Evaluate Impacts and Risks Performance Objectives, Standards & Measurement Criteria Response Technique Identify & Evaluate Impacts and Risks Performance Objectives, Standards & Measurement Criteria

Implementation Strategy inc. OSCP

RESPONSE TECHNIQUES

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Modelling

  • No regulatory requirement for modelling
  • Possible assistance…

– in describing your environment (zone of potential impact) – in describing your impacts and risks (resources at risk) – in providing focus locations for response techniques – in identifying equipment stockpile locations – in providing incident specific information – in identifying monitoring sites

10

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

slide-11
SLIDE 11

NEBA

  • NEBA is not a regulatory term
  • Possible assistance…

– in evaluating impacts and risks – demonstrating ALARP (natural recovery?) – deciding on (response) activities included in a submission – supporting information for the implementation strategy – support achieving a stated objective – confirm or amend the priorities for protection

11

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Definitions

  • For the operator to

define and justify…

– …reasonable… – …significant… – …appropriate… – …relevant… – …sufficient… – …practicable… – …credible…

12

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

  • For the regulator to

assess…

– …reasonable.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

National Plan

  • Is not legislation
  • Implements the intent of the OPRC
  • NOPSEMA is the Statutory Agency
  • ‘Handover/takeover’ of responsibility concept

inadequate for application to the OPGGSA

  • Operator always retains combat responsibility
  • Dispersant approvals are gained from an accepted

EP and OSCP

13

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Acceptability Criteria

  • Regulation 11

– Nature & Scale – ALARP – Acceptable – Performance Obj, Stnds, Measurement Criteria – Implementation Strategy – Stakeholder Consultation – Complies with the Act and the Regulations

14

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Performance Objectives

  • Performance Objectives

– What do you want to achieve?

  • Response outcome focus?
  • Environmental outcome focus?
  • Performance Standards

– How are you going to achieve it?

– Detail your minimum standard? – Timing/resources/technique mobilisation?

  • Measurement Criteria
  • How do you measure when it has been achieved?

– Auditable record of achievement? – Monitor efficacy of response techniques? – Termination criteria?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

OSCP vs IAP

  • How do you want to manage the risk?

– Management systems differ – Perception of risk differ – Locations differ – Mitigation measures differ – Specifics of operations differ

16

OSCP Preparation Guidance

Feedback Workshop

27 April 2012

JUSTIFICATION REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS OSCP 14(8)

INCIDENT OCCURS

OSCP? IAP? IAP?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Industry Challenge: Balance

Planning Process Justification

  • f Activities

Planning Output (OSCP) STATING YOUR CASE TO OPERATE OPERATIONAL PLAN

slide-18
SLIDE 18

VESSEL DISPERSANT AERIAL SURVEILLANCE CAPPING / CONTAINMENT SUB-SEA DISPERSANT SATELLITE MONITORING VESSEL MONITORING VESSEL CONTAINMENT & RECOVERY AERIAL DISPERSANT IN-SITU BURNING SHORELINE COLLECTION BOOMING PROTECTION BOOMING SHORELINE CLEANUP WASTE MANAGEMENT ??? ??? MEDIA MANAGEMENT

Response Techniques

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Any Questions?