Orientifold ABJM Matrix Model: ! Chiral Projections and Worldsheet - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Orientifold ABJM Matrix Model: ! Chiral Projections and Worldsheet - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Orientifold ABJM Matrix Model: ! Chiral Projections and Worldsheet Instantons Tomoki Nosaka (KIAS) Based on: [Moriyama-TN, 1603.00615] August 8, YITP Workshop Strings and Fields 2016 Introduction
In#grand#poten,al#J(μ), An#mysterious#rela,on#between#instanton#effects#and# refined&topological&string#on#local#P###x#P####was#found:
1#######1
J(µ) = C 3 µ3
eff + Bµeff + A + O(e−µeff)
with Par,,on#func,on#of#ABJ(M)#theory#is#corrected#by#nonDperturba,ve# effect#in#1/N,#which#correspond#to#closed#M2s#winding#on#S##/Z
7 k
=instantons
AdS4 S7 M2#on#S##/Z
3 k
AdS4 S7 M2#on#RP3
Introduction
[HatsudaDMarinoDMoriyamaDOkuyama][HondaDOkuyama]
gs = 2 k
Jnp(µeff) =
∞
X
n,d ∞
X
g=0
(−1)nd n nd
g (2 sin πgs)2g−2e−nd·Teff + ∂
∂gs gs X
n,d,jL,jR
N d
jL,jR
−2 sin πnsL
gs 2 sin πnsR gs
2πn2(2 sin πn
gs )3
e−
nd·Teff gs
ZU(N)k×U(N+M)−k = Z i∞
−i∞
dµ 2πieJ−µN
:#Kahler#parameters
Teff = 4µeff k ± 2πi ⇣1 2 − M k ⌘
Does relation exist for more general backgrounds?
Q:#How#can#we#extend&this&structure#for#general#theories?
· · ·
N##D3s NS5 (1,k)5 AdS4 × S7/Zk
U(N%%)###xU(N%%)
AdS4 × S7/(Zq, Zp, Zk)
O3#plane
AdS4 × S7/ b Dk
(ABJ(M)): new&35cycles&=&new&instantons
1##k############2#Dk
1
N##D3s
2 [ImamuraDKimura][TerashimaDYagi] [ABJ,HLLLP] [AharonyDBergmanDJafferisDMaldacena]# [AharonyDBergmanDJafferis]# [HosomichiDLeeDLeeDLeeDPark]
Jnp(µeff) =
∞
X
n,d ∞
X
g=0
(−1)nd n nd
g (2 sin πgs)2g−2e−nd·Teff + ∂
∂gs gs X
n,d,jL,jR
N d
jL,jR
−2 sin πnsL
gs 2 sin πnsR gs
2πn2(2 sin πn
gs )3
e−
nd·Teff gs
Par,,on#func,on#of#these#theories#allow#Fermi#gas#formalism :#density#operator#of#some#1d#QM
To do: exactly solve “next-simplest model”
:#natural#generalisa,on#of# ○##Solved#only#for#(i)#q=p=2,#N##=N#and#(ii)#orbifold#ABJ(M)
J(µ) ∼ Tr log(1 + eµb ρ)
b ρ = e− b
H
b ρ = 1 (2 cosh
b Q 2 )q
1 (2 cosh
b P 2 )p
b ρABJM ⇣ b ρABJM = 1 2 cosh
b Q 2
1 2 cosh
b P 2
⌘
[MoriyamaDTN]# [HatsudaDHondaDOkuyama]
U(N%%)###xU(N%%)###xU(N%%%%%)####xU(N%%)
1##k%############i##0###########q+1#Dk#############j##0 qD1###################################pD1
○##N##=N##=…=N→
1######2
a
N 1 N 2 N 1 N 2 N 1 N 2 N N N N [HondaDMoriyama]
powerful,#but#not#enough#for#finite#k ○##General#rank##{N##}##is#difficult…
a
○##Next#largest#SUSY looks#different#from This#talk:####O(N%%)###xUSp(2N%%)
1##k###################2##Dk/2
in#localiza,on#computa,on) (due#to#different
(N = 5) b ρ Z1-loop b ρABJM
○ …
To do: exactly solve “next-simplest model”
Par,,on#func,on#of#these#theories#allow#Fermi#gas#formalism :#density#operator#of#some#1d#QM
J(µ) ∼ Tr log(1 + eµb ρ)
b ρ = e− b
H
⇣ b ρABJM = 1 2 cosh
b Q 2
1 2 cosh
b P 2
⌘
powerful,#but#not#enough#for#finite#k O3#plane
○##Instantons
b ρO×USp = b ρU×U · 1 ± b R 2
b ρOSp can#be#rewriken#as#chiral&projec9on#of
( b R : |Qi ! | Qi)
[Honda,1512][Okuyama,1601][MoriyamaDSuyama,1601][MoriyamaDTN,1603]
O(e−2µ) O(e−4µ/k) ,
are#generated#from#those#in#ABJM# ○##Instantons#on#new#cycle O(e−µ) were#determined#for k ∈ N ○
[MoriyamaDTN,1603] [Okuyama,1601][MoriyamaDSuyama,1601]
Instantons#in#O(N%%)###xUSp(2N%%)########were#completely#determined#!
Recent developments in model
1##k####################2##Dk/2
O × USp b ρABJM
theories
O × USp
r : (z1, z2, z3, z4) → (iz∗
2, −iz∗ 1, iz∗ 4, −iz∗ 3)
Zk : (z1, z2, z3, z4) → (e
2πi k z1, e 2πi k z2, e 2πi k z3, e 2πi k z4)
b Dk = (Zk, r)
O3D 1/2#NS5 (1,k)/2#5 O3+
O(2N)###xUSp(2N+2M)
k###############################Dk/2
O(2N+1)###xUSp(2N+2M)
k%%%%%%%%%%#####################Dk/2 1/2#NS5 (1,k)/2#5 O3D ~ O3+ ~
O(2N+2M)###xUSp(2N)
k#####################Dk/2
O(2N+2M+1)###xUSp(2N)
k%%%%%%%%%%###########Dk/2
AdS4 × S7/ b Dk
with
O3+ O3D O3D ~ O3+ ~ D3#charge (NSNS,RR) G (0,0) (1/2,0) (0,1/2) (1/2,1/2) O(2N) O(2N+1) USp(2N) D1/4 +1/4 (O3D#=#1/2#D3#on#O3D) ~
Goal:#to#determine#perturba,ve#part#and#instanton#coefficients (leading#in#4d#SUGRA)
|Z(N)| = Z i∞
−i∞
dµ 2πieJ(µ)−µN
for
J(µ) O × USp
:#closed#M2s#winding#on#3Dcycle
J(µ) = µ3 3π2k + · · · + O(e−µ) log Z ∼ −2π √ kN 3/2 3 α`(µ)e− 4`µ
k
β`(µ)e−2`µ γ`(µ)e−`µ
S3/Zk ⊂ S7/ b Dk RP3 ⊂ S7/ b Dk RP30/r ⊂ S7/ b Dk
r ∈ b Dk : (z1, z2, z3, z4) → (iz∗
2, −iz∗ 1, iz∗ 4, −iz∗ 3)
(instanton) ○##Large#N#expansion#of#Z(N)
J(µ)
µ
○
⊂ S7/ b Dk
Large######expansion#of
(µ ∼ √ kN ∼ R3
AdS)
Large μ contributions to
Hint 1: O3 = chiral projection for
b ρO×USp = b ρU×U · 1 ± b R 2
○##Consistent#with#HananyDWiken’s#sDrules#and#duality ○##Recently#we#found#simple#rela,on#between b
ρ
U(N)xU(N+2M) O(2N+1)xUSp(2N+2M) O(2N)xUSp(2N+2M) O(2N+2M)xUSp(2N) U(N)xU(N+2M+1) U(N+2MD1)xU(N)
ー + ー
U(N+2M)xU(N) O(2N+2M+1)xUSp(2N)
ー
[Honda][Moriyama-Suyama] [Moriyama-TN]
b R : |Qi ! | Qi
○##Let#us#consider#
- b
ρU(N)×U(N+M)
- ± and#denote J±(µ) = Σ(µ) ± ∆(µ)
2
○##For#large#N#expansion#it#is#more#convenient#to#rewrite ○##Modified#grand#poten,al###########differs#from##########by#“oscilla,ons”
Hint 2: Total vs Modified grand potential
|Z(N)| = Z πi
−πi
dµ 2πie
e J(µ)−µN
|Z(N)| = Z i∞
−i∞
dµ 2πieJ(µ)−µN
e J(µ) J(µ)
e
e J(µ) =
X
n∈Z
eJ(µ+2πin) e
e J(µ) =
X
N≥0
eµN|Z(N)| e
e J(µ) = det(1 + eµb
ρ)
○##Total#grand#poten,al###########is#given#by
e J(µ)
e J(µ) = J(µ) + log h 1 + X
n6=0
eJ(µ+2πin)J(µ)i
J+ + J− = JU×U + (oscillations)
Josc = log h 1 + X
n6=0
eJ(µ+2πi)J(µ)i J = µ3 k + · · · = O(e−µ/k)
Perturbative & O(e−µ) in Σ(µ)
det(1 + eµb ρ+) det(1 + eµb ρ−) = det(1 + eµb ρ) e
e J+(µ)
e
e J−(µ)
e
e JU×U(µ)
In#modified#grand#poten,al, = = =
ΣMB(µ) = JMB
U×U =
∂ ∂gs gs X
n,d,jL,jR
N d
jL,jR
−2 sin πnsL
gs 2 sin πnsR gs
2πn2(2 sin πn
gs )3
e−
nd·Teff gs
Σpert(µ) = Jpert = C 3 µ3
eff + Bµeff + A
○##No#direct#rela,on#to#unprojected#grand#poten,al ex.#M=0:
[Moriyama-Suyama] [Okuyama]
∆(µ)
e JU×U(µ), JU×U(µ)
○##S,ll#we#can#compute#small#k#expansion# #####and#exact#values#of#leading#instanton#coefficients#for#a#few#k’s Whole#structure#for#general#(k,M)#was#guessed#as
∆(µ) = µ 2 + A0 +
1
X
`=1
γ`e`µ
X
`
γ`e−`µ = 8 > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > : 1 4 log 1 + 2 √ 2e−µ + 4e−2µ 1 − 2 √ 2e−µ + 4e−2µ (k ≡ 1, 7 mod 8) −1 4 log 1 + 2 √ 2e−µ + 4e−2µ 1 − 2 √ 2e−µ + 4e−2µ (k ≡ 3, 5 mod 8) 1 4 log(1 + 16e−2µ) (k ≡ 2, 6 mod 8) 1 2 log(1 + 4e−µ) (k ≡ 0 mod 8)
= perturbative + half instantons
in
O(e−µ/k) Σ(µ)
n− n+ m n
n± = n ± m
X
n
eJU×U(µ+2πin) = X
n+
eJ+(µ+2πin+) X
n−
eJ−(µ+2πin−)
X
n+,n−
= X
m,n
+((n+ − n−): odd)
e∆(µ+2πin+)−∆(µ+2πin−) = in+−n−
eJU×U(µ) = X
m
(−1)me
Σ(µ+2πim) 2
+ Σ(µ−2πim)
2
−Σ(µ)
○##Special#simplifica,on#for :#Direct#rela,on#between#worldsheet#instanton#coefficients no#contribu,on
Worldsheet instantons
[Moriyama-TN]
⇣ J±(µ) = Σ(µ) ± ∆(µ) 2 ⌘
New “Gopakumar-Vafa invariants”
:#GV#invariants#for#local#P##x#P
1######1
polynomial#(nonDlinear)#of# nd
g :#?
n0d
g =
ΣWS(µ) = 2
1
X
n,d 1
X
g=0
(−1)nd n n0d
g
⇣ 2 sin 2π k ⌘2g2 e 4nd·µ
k
JWS
U(N)×U(N)(µ) = ∞
X
n,d ∞
X
g=0
(−1)nd n nd
g
⇣ 2 sin 2π k ⌘2g−2 e− 4nd·µ
k
d (0,1) (1,1) (1,2) (1,3) (2,2) (1,4) (2,3) n0d −1 −2 −3 −4 −16 −5 −55 n0d
1
1 4 10 53 20 318 n0d
2
−1 −6 −64 −21 −757 n0d
3
1 37 8 1002 n0d
4
−10 −1 −792 n0d
5
1 378 n0d
6
−106 n0d
7
16 n0d
8
−1 d (0,1) (1,1) (1,2) (1,3) (2,2) (1,4) (2,3) nd −2 −4 −6 −8 −32 −10 −110 nd
1
9 68 nd
2
−12 nd
3
JU(N)×U(N)(µ) = Σ(µ) + log " 1 + 2
∞
X
m=1
(−1)m exp hΣ(µ + 2πim) + Σ(µ − 2πim) 2 − Σ(µ) i#