Measurements of direct photons in Au + Au collisions with PHENIX - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

measurements of direct photons in au au collisions with
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Measurements of direct photons in Au + Au collisions with PHENIX - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Measurements of direct photons in Au + Au collisions with PHENIX Hard Probes 2013 Benjamin Bannier for the PHENIX collaboration Stony Brook University November 5, 2013 1 / 19 Outline Low momentum direct photons: 0 . 4 GeV / c < p T < 5 .


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Measurements of direct photons in Au + Au collisions with PHENIX

Hard Probes 2013 Benjamin Bannier for the PHENIX collaboration

Stony Brook University

November 5, 2013

1 / 19

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

Low momentum direct photons: 0.4 GeV/c < pT < 5.0 GeV/c How are low momentum real photons measured in PHENIX? Spectra and centrality dependence of the low momentum real photons from RHIC

2 / 19

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Low momentum direct photons

◮ long mean free path, escape heavy ion collision with almost

no final state interaction

◮ produced at all stages of the collision in scatterings of

constituents of each other or the medium

◮ probe complete temperature and flow evolution of the collision ◮ experimentally characterized by momentum-dependent yields

and angular correlations with event planes

3 / 19

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Low momentum direct photons (experiment)

(a) PRL 104, 132301 (2010)

2 4 6 8 10 12

  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

(b)

)

BBC 2

Φ (

2

v

dir.

γ 2 4 6 8 10 12

  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

(a)

  • Min. Bias

)

BBC 2

Φ (

2

v π )

BBC 2

Φ (

2

v

inc.

γ 2 4 6 8 10 12

  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

(d)

0.6 fm/c 0.4 fm/c 2 4 6 8 10 12

  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

(c)

0~20 [%] 2 4 6 8 10 12

  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

(f)

2 4 6 8 10 12

  • 0.05

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

(e)

20~40 [%]

2

v

dir.

γ ,

inc.

γ , π [GeV/c]

T

p

(b) PRL 109, 122302 (2012)

4 / 19

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Low pT photons via external conversions in PHENIX

Rγ = Y γ

incl.

Y γ

hadron

= εf Nγ

incl.

π0

Y γ

hadron

Y γ

π0

Requirements:

◮ clean photon sample ◮ high π0-tagging efficiency εf

Photon sample

◮ measurement of low momentum photons in electromagnetic

calorimeters is difficult due to e.g. MIPs

◮ PHENIX has good electron reconstruction capability down to

pT = 200 MeV/c

◮ reconstruct real photons down to 400 MeV/c from e+e− pairs

→ no hadron contamination

5 / 19

slide-6
SLIDE 6

[GeV]

cgl

M

0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03

[GeV]

atm

M

0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03

100 200 300 400 500 600

Pairs from Data

  • e

+

FG e

◮ momentum can be reconstructed assuming production at the

nominal event vertex or a defined radius

◮ conversion pairs can be selected through their invariant mass

under hypotheses for production radius Nγ

  • incl. = Y γ

incl.pconvae+e−εe+e−

6 / 19

slide-7
SLIDE 7

[GeV]

cgl

M

0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03

[GeV]

atm

M

0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03

100 200 300 400 500 600

Pairs from Data

  • e

+

FG e

◮ momentum can be reconstructed assuming production at the

nominal event vertex or a defined radius

◮ conversion pairs can be selected through their invariant mass

under hypotheses for production radius Nγ

  • incl. = Y γ

incl.pconvae+e−εe+e−

7 / 19

slide-8
SLIDE 8

π0-decay photon tagging

◮ a second photon measured with very loose cuts in the

calorimeter is paired with converted photons

◮ the combinatorial background is modelled with a mixed-event

sample of uncorrelated converted and calorimeter photons Nγ

π0 = Y γ π0pconvae+e−εe+e− × εf

(a) pT,γ = 0.8 − 1.0 GeV/c (b) pT,γ = 2.0 − 2.5 GeV/c

8 / 19

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tagging efficiency correction εf

,

◮ 2nd photon in acceptance → ε ◮ 2nd photon lost → f

The tagging efficiency εf is calculated in a Monte Carlo simulation.

◮ f can be calculated accurately, ε ≈ 90%

incl.

π0

= Y γ

incl.pconvae+e−εe+e−

Y γ

π0pconvae+e−εe+e− × εf =

Y γ

incl.

Y γ

π0εf

9 / 19

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Rγ in Au + Au at √sNN = 200 GeV

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

0-20% (a) 20-40% (b) 1 2 3 4 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 40-60% (c) 1 2 3 4

pT [GeV/c]

60-92% (d)

Au+Au

√sNN = 200GeV

PRL 104, 132301 2007 2010 PH ENIX

preliminary

Figure: Rγ from virtual and real photons (red, blue) in 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60% and 60-92% more central collisions.

10 / 19

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Direct photon pT spectrum

10−6 10−5 10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 101 1 2π pT d2N dpTdy [(GeV/c)−2] 0-20% (a) 20-40%

Au+Au

√sNN = 200GeV (b) 1 2 3 4 10−6 10−5 10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 101 40-60% (c) 1 2 3 4 5

pT [GeV/c]

60-92% (d)

TAA-scaled pp fit 2007, 2010 PRL 104, 132301 PH ENIX

preliminary

Figure: Direct photon pT spectra Yγ = (Rγ − 1)Y hadron

γ

in 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60% and 60-92% more central collisions. A Ncoll-scaled fit a

  • 1 + p2

T/b

−c to RHIC pp data is shown in green.

11 / 19

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Excess photon pT spectrum

10−6 10−5 10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 101 1 2π pT d2N dpTdy [(GeV/c)−2] 0-20% (a)

Teff = (237±25±29)MeV/c

20-40% (b)

Au+Au

√sNN = 200GeV

Teff = (260±33±31)MeV/c

1 2 3 4 10−6 10−5 10−4 10−3 10−2 10−1 100 101 40-60% (c)

Teff = (228±28±27)MeV/c

1 2 3 4 5

pT [GeV/c]

60-92% (d)

Teff = (254±53±25)MeV/c

Ae−pT/Teff data - scaled p+ p PH ENIX

preliminary

Figure: Excess photon pT spectra after subtraction of hard-scattering component in 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60% and 60-92% more central

  • collisions. Red lines are fits of Ae−pT /Teff in pT = 0.6 − 2.0 GeV/c.

12 / 19

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Centrality dependence of excess photon yield

101 102

Npart

10−3 10−2 10−1 100 101 dN dy

pT > 0.4GeV/c pT > 0.6GeV/c pT > 0.8GeV/c pT > 1.0GeV/c pT > 1.2GeV/c pT > 1.4GeV/c PH ENIX

preliminary 101 102

Npart

10−5 10−4 10−3 dN dy /N1.48 part

Au+Au

√sNN = 200GeV

PH ENIX

preliminary

Figure: Left: Integrated excess photon yield as a function of Glauber

  • Npart. Right: Residuals of fits to power laws ANx

part with

x = 1.48 ± 0.08(stat) ± 0.04(sys).

dN dy (pT) =

5 GeV/c

  • p(i)

T =pT

2πp(i)

T ∆p(i) T

  • 1

2πpT d2N dpTdy

  • p(i)

T 13 / 19

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary

We have measured Rγ and pT spectra for real photons. Real and virtual photons show similar Rγ. An excess yield of photons is seen across all centralities. No change in the shape of the photon pT spectra is seen between centralities outside uncertainties. The excess photon yield grows stronger than Npart in the pT window 0.6 − 2.0GeV/c and is described by a power law with x = 1.48 ± 0.08(stat) ± 0.04(sys).

14 / 19

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Backup

15 / 19

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Characterization of excess photon pT spectra

Excess photon spectra are roughly exponential in low pT range. The shape of the spectra doesn’t change outside uncertainties across centralities.

0-20% 20-40% 40-60% 60-92% [Teff] 237 ± 25 ± 29 260 ± 33 ± 31 228 ± 28 ± 27 254 ± 53 ± 25 MeV/c

Integrated yields

To quantify the centrality-dependence of the yield we can calculate dN dy (pT) =

5 GeV/c

  • p(i)

T =pT

2πp(i)

T ∆p(i) T

  • 1

2πpT d2N dpTdy

  • p(i)

T 16 / 19

slide-17
SLIDE 17

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

pT [GeV/c]

−4 −2 2 4

(spectrum - fit)/fit

0-20% 20-40% 40-60% 60-92% PH ENIX

preliminary 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

pT [GeV/c]

−1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5

(spectrum - fit)/fit

0-20% 20-40% 40-60% 60-92% PH ENIX

preliminary

Figure: Normalized fit residuals for fits of the excess photon spectra to an exponential in pT = 0.6 . . . 2.0 GeV/c (left) and zoomed (right).

17 / 19

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Hadron decay photon simulation

To calculate Rγthe efficiency-corrected ratio needs to be scaled by the expected ratio of photons yields from hadron and π0 decays

Y γ

hadron/Y γ π0.

We implement a cocktail including

◮ π0 → γγ ◮ η → γγ, π+π−γ ◮ η′ → γγ, π+π−γ, ωγ ◮ ω → π0γ

using experimental π pT spectra and mT scaling for other mesons with experimental meson/π0 ratios.

18 / 19

slide-19
SLIDE 19

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

0-20% (a) 20-40% (b) 1 2 3 4 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 40-60% (c) 1 2 3 4

pT [GeV/c]

60-92% (d)

Au+Au

√sNN = 200GeV

PRL 104, 132301 2007+2010 PH ENIX

preliminary

Figure: Rγ from virtual and real photons in 0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60% and 60-92% more central collisions.

19 / 19