Orientations bipolaires et chemins tandem Eric Fusy (CNRS/LIX) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Orientations bipolaires et chemins tandem Eric Fusy (CNRS/LIX) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Orientations bipolaires et chemins tandem Eric Fusy (CNRS/LIX) Travaux avec Mireille Bousquet-M elou et Kilian Raschel Journ ees Alea, 2017 Tandem walks A tandem-walk is a walk in Z 2 with step-set { N, W, SE } in the plane Z 2 in the
Tandem walks
A tandem-walk is a walk in Z2 with step-set {N, W, SE}
in the plane Z2 in the half-plane {y ≥ 0} in the quarter plane N2 cf 2 queues in series y x SE N W
Link to Young tableaux of height ≤ 3
- There is a bijection between:
tandem walks of length n staying in the quadrant N2, ending at (i, j) Young tableaux of size n and height ≤ 3, of shape
- i
j 1 2 5 8 9 1 1 3 6 7 1 0 1 3 4 1 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 2 1 3
walk tableau N SE W (after k steps, current y = #N − #SE, current x = #SE − #W) start end
Link to Young tableaux of height ≤ 3
- There is a bijection between:
tandem walks of length n staying in the quadrant N2, ending at (i, j) Young tableaux of size n and height ≤ 3, of shape
- i
j 1 2 5 8 9 1 1 3 6 7 1 0 1 3 4 1 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 2 1 3
walk tableau N SE W (after k steps, current y = #N − #SE, current x = #SE − #W) start end
- Let q[n; i, j] := # tandem walks of length n in N2, ending at (i, j)
m Hook-length formula: for n of the form n = 3m + 2i + j we have q[n; i, j] = (i + 1)(j + 1)(i + j + 2)n m!(m + i + 1)!(m + i + j + 2)!
Algebraicity when the endpoint is free
Let Q(t; x, y) =
- n,i,j
q[n; i, j]tnxiyj Then Q(t, 1, 1) is the series counting Motzkin walks, i.e., Y ≡ t Q(t, 1, 1) satisfies Y = t · (1 + Y + Y 2) Y = t + t · Y + t · Y 2 Theorem: [Gouyou-Beauchamps’89], [Bousquet-M´
elou,Mishna’10]
Bijection with Motzkin walks
1 2 5 8 9 1 1 3 6 7 1 0 1 3 4 1 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 2 1 3
[Gouyou-Beauchamps’89]
tandem walk in N2 tandem walk in N2 Young tableau
- f height ≤ 3
Bijection with Motzkin walks
1 2 5 8 9 1 1 3 6 7 1 0 1 3 4 1 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 2 1 3
[Gouyou-Beauchamps’89]
Robinson Schensted involution with no tandem walk in N2 tandem walk in N2 Young tableau
- f height ≤ 3
Bijection with Motzkin walks
1 2 5 8 9 1 1 3 6 7 1 0 1 3 4 1 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 2 1 3
[Gouyou-Beauchamps’89]
Robinson Schensted involution with no matching with no nesting tandem walk in N2 tandem walk in N2 Young tableau
- f height ≤ 3
Bijection with Motzkin walks
1 2 5 8 9 1 1 3 6 7 1 0 1 3 4 1 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 2 1 3
[Gouyou-Beauchamps’89]
Robinson Schensted involution with no matching with no nesting Motzkin walk no nesting FIFO tandem walk in N2 tandem walk in N2 Young tableau
- f height ≤ 3
Bijection with Motzkin walks
1 2 5 8 9 1 1 3 6 7 1 0 1 3 4 1 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 1 2 1 3
[Gouyou-Beauchamps’89]
Robinson Schensted involution with no matching with no nesting Motzkin walk no nesting no crossing FIFO LIFO tandem walk in N2 tandem walk in N2 Young tableau
- f height ≤ 3
Reformulation with half-plane tandem-walks
There is a bijection between:
- tandem walks of length n
- tandem walks of length n
staying in the quarter plane N2 staying in the half-plane {y ≥ 0} and ending at y = 0
- ⇔
start end start end Rk: The bijection preserves the number of SE steps t y
An extension of the walk model
General model: step-set: • the SE step level:= i + j level 1 level 2 level 3 SE x y
- every step (−i, j) (with i, j ≥ 0)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
start end Example:
An extension of the walk model
General model: step-set: • the SE step level:= i + j level 1 level 2 level 3 SE x y
- every step (−i, j) (with i, j ≥ 0)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
start end Example: There is still a bijection between:
- general tandem walks of length n in the quarter plane N2
- general tandem walks of length n in {y ≥ 0} ending at y = 0
The bijection preserves the number of SE-steps and the number of steps in each level p ≥ 1
Bipolar and marked bipolar orientations
N S bipolar orientation: inner vertex inner face
(on planar maps) = acyclic orientation with a unique source S and a unique sink N with S, N incident to the outer face
Bipolar and marked bipolar orientations
A N S A′ N S bipolar orientation: marked bipolar orientation: indegree=1
- utdegree=1
inner vertex inner face
a marked vertex A′ =N on left boundary a marked vertex A=S on right boundary (on planar maps) = acyclic orientation with a unique source S and a unique sink N with S, N incident to the outer face
The Kenyon et al. bijection
N=A A
′=S
S N A A
′
S A
′
S A
′
S A
′
S N A A
′
N A
′
A S A S N A
′
S A
′
A N S A
′
A N
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 S N =A A
′
2 N =A N =A N =A
general tandem-walk (in Z2)
SE step black vertex
The Kenyon et al. bijection
step (−i, j) inner face of degree i+j+2
marked bipolar orientation
bijection
[Kenyon, Miller, Sheffield, Wilson’16]
The Kenyon et al. bijection
N S A′ A N S A′ A N S A′ N S A′ A A
- steps (−i, j) create a new inner face (of degree i + j + 2)
- SE steps create a new black vertex
N S A′ A N S A′ A N =A S A′ S A′ N =A
+ SE-step + SE-step
[Kenyon, Miller, Sheffield, Wilson’16]
Parameter-correspondence in the bijection
1 + # steps # plain edges (not dashed) # “face-steps” # inner faces # SE-steps # black vertices
- f level p
- f degree p + 2
end
δ L
minimal
L′
A S N
L′+1 δ L+1
- rdinate
δ′
minimal abscissa
δ′
A′ start
An involution on marked bipolar orientations
L′+1 δ′ δ A N S A′ L+1 δ L′+1 L+1 δ′
An involution on marked bipolar orientations
L′+1 δ′ δ A N S A′ L+1 δ′ δ L′+1 L+1 A S N A′ δ L′+1 L+1 δ′
mirror
L′+1 L+1 δ δ′ δ ↔ δ′
Effect of the involution on walks
A S N
L′+1 δ L+1 δ′
A′
L+1 δ′ L′+1 δ
end
δ L
minimal
L′
- rdinate
δ′
minimal abscissa start N S A′ A end
L
minimal
L′
- rdinate
δ′
minimal abscissa start
δ
involution δ ↔ δ′
Quarter plane walks ↔ half-plane walks ending at y = 0
end
δ L
minimal
L′
- rdinate
δ′
minimal abscissa start end
L
minimal
L′
- rdinate
δ′
minimal abscissa start
δ
- Specialize the involution at {L′ = 0, δ′ = 0}
L δ δ L
δ ↔ δ′
Quarter plane walks ↔ half-plane walks ending at y = 0
end
δ L
minimal
L′
- rdinate
δ′
minimal abscissa start end
L
minimal
L′
- rdinate
δ′
minimal abscissa start
δ
- Specialize the involution at {L′ = 0, δ′ = 0}
L δ δ L
- Specialize at {δ′ ≤ a, L′ ≤ b} ⇒ quarter plane walks starting at (a, b)
δ ↔ δ′
Generating function expressions
level 1 level 2 level 3 SE Let Q(t) be the generating function of general tandem-walks in N2
- counted w.r.t. the length (variable t)
- with a weight zi for each “face-step” of level i
Then Y ≡ t Q(t) is given by Y = t · (1 + w0Y + w1Y 2 + w2Y 3 + · · · ) where wi = zi + zi+1 + zi+2 + · · · level 0
Generating function expressions
level 1 level 2 level 3 SE Let Q(t) be the generating function of general tandem-walks in N2
- counted w.r.t. the length (variable t)
- with a weight zi for each “face-step” of level i
Then Y ≡ t Q(t) is given by Y = t · (1 + w0Y + w1Y 2 + w2Y 3 + · · · ) where wi = zi + zi+1 + zi+2 + · · · level 0 Y Y 2 Y 3 Y 4
Generating function expressions
level 1 level 2 level 3 SE Let Q(t) be the generating function of general tandem-walks in N2
- counted w.r.t. the length (variable t)
- with a weight zi for each “face-step” of level i
Then Y ≡ t Q(t) is given by Y = t · (1 + w0Y + w1Y 2 + w2Y 3 + · · · ) where wi = zi + zi+1 + zi+2 + · · · level 0 Y Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Rk: alternative proof (earlier!) with obstinate kernel method
Generating function expressions
level 1 level 2 level 3 SE Let Q(t) be the generating function of general tandem-walks in N2
- counted w.r.t. the length (variable t)
- with a weight zi for each “face-step” of level i
Then Y ≡ t Q(t) is given by Y = t · (1 + w0Y + w1Y 2 + w2Y 3 + · · · ) where wi = zi + zi+1 + zi+2 + · · · level 0 Y Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Let Q(a,b)(t) := GF of general tandem walks in N2 starting at (a, b) Then t Q(a,b)(t) = explicit polynomial in Y (with positive coefficients) Rk: Rk: alternative proof (earlier!) with obstinate kernel method
Quarter plane walks ending at (i, 0)
The series Fi(t) :=
n q[n; i, 0]tn counts bipolar orientation of the form
with t for # edges, and weight zr for each inner face of degree 0 ≤ r ≤ p i root S N root-face degree i+2
Quarter plane walks ending at (i, 0)
The series Fi(t) :=
n q[n; i, 0]tn counts bipolar orientation of the form
with t for # edges, and weight zr for each inner face of degree 0 ≤ r ≤ p i root S N root-face degree i+2 Asymptotic enumeration q[n; i, 0] ∼n→∞ Ci · γn · n−4 where Ci = c · αi(i + 1)(i + 2) Rk: For undirected rooted maps M[n; i] ∼n→∞ Ci · γn · n−5/2
from [Denisov-Wachtel’11]
where Ci = c · αi4−ii 2i
i
- (with applications to peeling)
Quarter plane walks ending at (i, 0)
The series Fi(t) :=
n q[n; i, 0]tn counts bipolar orientation of the form
with t for # edges, and weight zr for each inner face of degree 0 ≤ r ≤ p i root S N root-face degree i+2 Asymptotic enumeration q[n; i, 0] ∼n→∞ Ci · γn · n−4 where Ci = c · αi(i + 1)(i + 2) Rk: For undirected rooted maps M[n; i] ∼n→∞ Ci · γn · n−5/2
from [Denisov-Wachtel’11]
where Ci = c · αi4−ii 2i
i
- (with applications to peeling)
Exact enumeration
Let Hi(t) = GF of
i
Then Fi(t) = Hi(t) − 1
t Hi+2(t)
+ p
r=0(r + 1)ziHi+r+2(t)
Proof using obstinate kernel method
- r from Kenyon et al. + local operations