SLIDE 1
OREGON NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND THE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
OREGON NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND THE - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
OREGON NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND THE TUALATIN BASIN Extent and Species Covered Floodplain Definitions History of the Opinion in Oregon June 2009 Audobon Society of Portland, NWF, Northwest Environmental Defense
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Floodplain Definitions
SLIDE 4
History of the Opinion in Oregon
June 2009 Audobon Society of Portland, NWF, Northwest Environmental Defense Center, and AssociaCon of Northwest Steelheaders filed an ESA lawsuit against FEMA July 2010 FEMA entered into an agreement with the PlainCffs seIling the lawsuit, and requiring FEMA to iniCate formal consultaCon with NMFS February 2013 FEMA submits Program Level Biological Assessment for the NaConal Floodplain Insurance Program April 2016 NMFS releases Biological Opinion with Reasonable and Prudent AlternaCves June 2016 FEMA provides Community noCficaCon
SLIDE 5
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives
- 1. Notice, Education, and Outreach: September
2016 (Done)
- 2. Interim Measures: March 2018
- 3. Mapping Flood and Flood-Related Hazard Areas
3A and 3E: March 2018 3B-3D, 3F-3G: September 2019
- 4. Floodplain Management Criteria: January 2019
- 5. Data Collection and Reporting: March 2018
- 6. Compliance and Enforcement: September 2019
SLIDE 6
Impacts to the Tualatin Basin?
SLIDE 7
Moving Forward
- DLCD Workgroups
– Mapping – Habitat Assessment and Mitigation – Regulatory – Local Permitting and Process
- Washington County: Washington County has been tracking
this topic for the past three years.
- Willamette Partnership: Working with Communities on
Smart Floodplain Management and an integrated approach to floodplain management.
- Others: Lawsuits
SLIDE 8
- RPA 2A: Require development in SFHA be mitigated to achieve no
net loss of natural floodplain functions.
- RPA 2B: Identify a 170’ riparian buffer zone, limiting
development to select impacts
- RPA 2C: FEMA shall deny or decline to process requests for LOMR-
Fs that fail to show impacts were avoided or mitigated
- RPA 2D: FEMA shall review all CLOMR and CLOMR-Fs to determine
whether proposed project will adversely affect natural floodplain functions.
- RPA 2E: Track and report all permitted development activities and
mitigation as soon as practicable.
- RPA 2F: FEMA shall recommend that the State prioritize floodplain
development buyouts based on presence of high priority salmonid populations.
Reasonable and Prudent Alternative #2
SLIDE 9
- RPA 3A: Modify Flood Hazard Mapping Protocols
- RPA 3B: Map Riverine Erosion Zones
- RPA 3C: Depict the High Hazard Area on FIRMs
- RPA 3D: Depict the area of future conditions flood hazard
- RPA 3E: Revise Map Adoption Procedures
- RPA 3F: Map residual flood hazards and risks behind levees
- RPA 3G: Provide accurate maps based on the best available