options meeting introductions
play

OPTIONS MEETING INTRODUCTIONS Board Members Ron Stratton Patrick - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

OPTIONS MEETING INTRODUCTIONS Board Members Ron Stratton Patrick Laury John Nuttall Bruce Portillo Ruth Hatcher David Brandenburg Jim Abrahamson (Valley Task Force Chair) Joshua Hart David Whelchel (Valley Task Force) Valley Task Force


  1. OPTIONS MEETING

  2. INTRODUCTIONS Board Members Ron Stratton Patrick Laury John Nuttall Bruce Portillo Ruth Hatcher David Brandenburg Jim Abrahamson (Valley Task Force Chair) Joshua Hart David Whelchel (Valley Task Force) Valley Task Force Tom Judson , General Manager Mike Taggart , Director of Maintenance & Construction Keith Ihms , Director of Golf Maintenance. RS

  3. INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT • The Board of Directors is considering all options. • The Board of Directors has not made any decisions regarding the future of the valley courses. RS

  4. PLEASE HOLD YOUR QUESTIONS • There will be a question and answer section at the end of this presentation. Please hold your questions until the end. • There is a good chance that your questions will get answered during the presentation. • This presentation, and other important information, is available on the POA’s website. www.bellavistapoa.com/valley-flood-study/ RS

  5. COMMITMENTS • The Board’s continued vision is to maintain the beauty and enjoyment of our “front yard”, which is the Little Sugar Creek Valley. • The Board’s continued mission is to provide attractive recreational amenities, including golf, for the use and enjoyment of our membership. • It is the Board’s responsibility to find the most economically feasible and practical strategies to accomplish this. RS

  6. COUNTRY CLUB AS A PRIORITY • Flood mitigation efforts for the Country Club (our flagship facility). • More practical and feasible compared with Kingswood and/or Berksdale. • Substantial investments already made to the golf course. • Pump station • Irrigation upgrades • New green • Bunkers • Low water crossing currently underway RS

  7. QUICK RECAP

  8. QUICK RECAP • Over the last 10 years, Bella Vista has experienced flooding in 2008, 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2017. (slide 16 from the last presentation) • Clean up and repairs from these many floods has cost the POA $2,122,651. Flood expense for just the Valley was $1,343,000. • Country Club $793,000 (pump station, irrigation upgrade, new green) • Kingswood $312,000 • Berksdale $238,000 TJ

  9. QUICK RECAP - CONTINUED • It will cost approximately $3,765,000 to stabilize the streambanks spread along all three courses and replace the five “flat” bridges. • Bridge replacement: $2,040,000 (slide 16) • Berksdale (4 bridges) $1,614,000 • Kingswood (1 bridge) $426,000 • Country Club zero • Streambank stabilization (LPSTP & Gabion Walls): $1,725,000 (slide 37) • Berksdale $663,000 • Kingswood $560,000 • Country Club $502,000 • Estimated time to complete the engineering, permitting, and construction for the above projects is 18 to 24 months. TJ

  10. QUICK RECAP - CONTINUED • The findings of the hydrology study determined that there is no way to prevent Little Sugar Creek from flooding. (slide 7) • As land in the watershed upstream continues to get urbanized, the frequency and intensity of flooding in the valley will increase. (slides 8-10) • Berksdale sustains the most damage of the three courses because it is the first to get hit by the flood water and the Creek bends the most. • 36 out of 54 greens are under the level for 10 year flooding. It would be almost impossible to get the permits necessary to raise all of these greens, aside from the enormous cost in undertaking such a project. Raising the greens would also change the playability and character of these courses. TJ

  11. WWW.BELLAVISTAPOA.COM/VALLEY-FLOOD-STUDY/

  12. FINANCIAL FACTS

  13. REVENUE BY CATEGORY – 2018 BUDGET $717,000 $594,000 $1,650,000 $1,915,000 $8,337,000 $4,891,000 Assessments Golf F&B Recreation Lot Sales & Transfer Fees All Other Information available on website TJ

  14. NET INCOME/(LOSS) BEFORE DEPRECIATION – 2018 BUDGET Assessments & Golf F&B Recreation MAC Marketing Administration $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 THE POA IS BUDGETED TO BREAK EVEN $3,000,000 FOR 2018. ASSESSMENTS OFFSET THE $2,000,000 DEPARTMENTAL LOSSES. $1,000,000 $- OTHER F&B MARKETING $(1,000,000) REC & LAKES MAC $(2,000,000) GOLF $(3,000,000) Information available on website TJ

  15. GOLF – NET LOSS PRIOR TO ASSESSMENT SUBSIDY $- 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 $(500,000) $367,000 Average annual assessment support per course . $(1,000,000) ($2.2) Million $(1,500,000) $(2,000,000) $(2,500,000) TJ

  16. CAPITAL PROJECTS 2012 TO 2017 GOLF $4,201,000 ALL OTHER $7,325,000 TJ

  17. COMBINED TOTAL ROUNDS PLAYED Flood year Flood year 250,000 200,000 150,000 No floods, mild winter, no closure of courses due to construction. 100,000 50,000 - 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TJ

  18. ROUNDS OF GOLF BY COURSE 80,000 Flood & reduction to 70,000 9-holes 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 Course construction 20,000 Course construction 10,000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Country Club Highlands Kingswood& Berksdale Metfield Scotsdale TJ

  19. FORECASTED ROUNDS – NEXT FIVE YEARS 200,000 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 1.Enhancement of facilities. 60,000 2.Effective marketing efforts. 3.Player development. 40,000 4.Growth of guest rounds. 20,000 - 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 TJ

  20. OUR ONLY 36-HOLE FACILITY • In 2017, the POA held five 36-hole events. • Three out of these five events were for charities and were priced at a discount. • The POA has not lost any 36-hole events from 2016 to 2018. The customers would have preferred a central location, but none of them canceled their event. • Where else will they play? TJ

  21. BIG PICTURE QUESTIONS

  22. THE BIG QUESTIONS • Is it economically and practically feasible to maintain the Country Club as a golf course? • Is it economically and practically feasible to maintain Kingswood as a golf course? • Is it economically and practically feasible to maintain Berksdale as golf course? • For each of the above: • If yes, how much will it cost and how do we fund it? • If not, what is the most attractive and feasible alternative use of the land? • How many golf courses should we have? • How will these decisions impact the long-term success of Bella Vista? RS

  23. REVERSIONARY CLAUSE MYTH • There is no reversionary clause on any of the Valley courses. In other words, the POA controls the land and can repurpose it, provided the land is used for recreation. • Cooper does hold a deed restriction on the land, which could require approval or partnership with Cooper for the land to be used for commercial purposes. • Many of the churches in the POA do have reversionary clauses attached to the church land. It is possible that this myth about the POA land is born out of the churches’ reversionary clauses. RS

  24. ECONOMIC REALITIES

  25. COUNTRY CLUB • Substantial investments have already been made: • Pump station $181,000 • New green (new #17) $59,500 • Irrigation upgrade $140,000 • Bunker upgrade $166,100 • Low water crossing from new #10 to #11 $50,000 • Total completed (or almost completed) $596,600 • Remaining work that still needs to be done: • Streambank stabilization $502,000 • Raising of select greens (est. six greens) $750,000 • Total remaining $1,252,000 RS

  26. Note: No inflation factor Berksdale included Expense (+000) Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 Total Assessment Supplement $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $3,670 Bridges $406 $406 $377 $426 $1,615 Streambanks $663 $663 Basic Capital projects $500 $500 Total $1,436 $773 $744 $1,293 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $6,448 Flood clean up/repair/loss ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

  27. Note: No inflation factor Kingswood included Expense (+000) Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 Total Assessment Supplement $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $3,670 Bridges $426 $426 Streambanks $560 $560 Basic Capital projects $500 $500 Total $1,353 $867 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $367 $5,156 Flood clean up/repair/loss ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

  28. Note: No inflation Berksdale & factor Kingswood included Expense (+000) Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 Total Assessment Supplement $734 $734 $734 $734 $734 $734 $734 $734 $734 $734 $7,340 Bridges $832 $406 $377 $426 $2,041 Streambanks $1,223 $1,223 Basic Capital projects $500 $500 $1,000 Total $2,789 $1,640 $1,111 $1,660 $734 $734 $734 $734 $734 $734 $11,604 Flood clean up/repair/loss ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

  29. PROBABILITY OF A “MAJOR” FLOOD 10 YEAR EVENT • Cumulative Binomial Probability Calculator • 10 Year period • 35% chance of no “Major” event • 65% chance of one or more “Major” events • 26% chance of more than one “Major” event • As land in the watershed upstream continues to get urbanized, the frequency and intensity of flooding in the valley will increase. RS

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend