Optimization of the Generation of Graphene via Hydrogen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

optimization of the generation of graphene via hydrogen
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Optimization of the Generation of Graphene via Hydrogen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Optimization of the Generation of Graphene via Hydrogen Intercalation Determining the Best T emperature and Time for Making Graphene by Separating the Buffer Layer from the Silicon Carbide Substrate Malynda L. Wood Southwest DeKalb High


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Optimization of the Generation of Graphene via Hydrogen Intercalation

Determining the Best T emperature and Time for Making Graphene by Separating the Buffer Layer from the Silicon Carbide Substrate Malynda L. Wood Southwest DeKalb High School

  • Dr. Edward Conrad

July 25, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Problem

 Prior samples

intercalated at1100oC damaged

 Needed best

temperature and time to get undamaged samples

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Graphene

 Two dimensional

structure

 One atom thick  Strong  Conductive

"Graphen" by AlexanderAlUS - Own work. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Buffer Layer

 Buffer layer between substrate and

graphene on silicon face

 Buffer layer is structurally similar to

graphene that is covalently bonded to the substrate

 Hydrogen intercalation can break the

covalent bonds between silicon and the buffer layer

 Converts the buffer layer to quasi-free-

standing graphene

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Research Objective

 Determine optimum method of

  • btaining graphene through hydrogen

intercalation by

  • Determining optimum temperature
  • Determining optimum time
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methodology

 Intercalation process

  • First Nano Graphene Furnace
  • 600 torr H2
  • H2 99.999% purity
  • 900 sccm flow rate
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Methodology

 Samples

intercalated for 2 hours at :

  • 700 C
  • 800 C
  • 900 C
  • 950 C
  • 1000 C
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Methodology

  • Samples intercalated

for 3 hours at:

 700 C  900 C

  • Sample intercalated

for 10 min at

 900 C

  • All samples

evaluated by Raman Spectroscopy

slide-9
SLIDE 9

700 C 800 C 900 C 950 C 1000 C

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Findings

 Of the temperatures tested 900 C

provided the best results

 Of the times tested 10 minutes

produced the best results

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Next Steps

 Further experiments on finding the

best time

 Determining if these times and

temperatures also apply to etched samples and nanoribbons

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Lesson Plan

 Resistance

  • Conductors vs

Insulators

  • Factors affecting

resistance

 Resistance on a

wire simulations

 Resistance on a

wire lab

 Research paper on

Graphene

slide-16
SLIDE 16

I thankfully acknowledge the following for their invaluable assistance

 National Science Foundation Grant

(DMR1005880)

 Dr. Ed Conrad  Feng Wang  Matthew Conrad  Katie Jenkins  Meredith Nevius  John Pham