ongoing cancer research school of public health and
play

Ongoing Cancer Research: School of Public Health and Health - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ongoing Cancer Research: School of Public Health and Health Professions Jean W actaw ski-W ende, PhD Dean, School of Public Health and Health Professions SUNY Distinguished Professor Monday, February 1 6 , 2 0 1 6 UB Council Meeting Cancer


  1. Ongoing Cancer Research: School of Public Health and Health Professions Jean W actaw ski-W ende, PhD Dean, School of Public Health and Health Professions SUNY Distinguished Professor Monday, February 1 6 , 2 0 1 6 UB Council Meeting

  2. Cancer is a national priority  Obama “Cancer Moonshot” (Targeting treatments, screening and prevention)  Cuomo NYS funding to Screen/ Treat Cancer  2016 estimates:  1.69 million new cancer cases in the US (110K NYS)  596,000 deaths (35K NYS)  US lifetime risk: 1 in 3 women; 1 in 2 men

  3. Public Health Focus on disease occurrence in larger populations and groups • Prevention focused • Research on risk factors for disease; Prevention trials • Mechanistic studies (clinical translational) • At UB SPHHP, w e have a trem endous am ount of ongoing • w ork in cancer

  4. W om en’s Health I nitiative 1 9 9 3 – present ( now thru 2 0 2 0 …) A 12 year (now 22+ ) study of the major causes of disease and death in postmenopausal women.

  5. W om en’s Health I nitiative 2 Horm one Therapy Trials: 3 Controlled Trials Coronary Heart Disease & Fractures 2 7 ,3 4 7 Adverse effect for Breast Cancer? 6 8 ,1 3 5 Calcium / Vitam in D Trial: 3 6 ,2 8 2 Fractures & Colorectal Cancer Dietary Modification Trial: 4 8 ,8 3 5 Breast & Colorectal Cancers & Coronary Heart Disease 1 Observational Observational Study Study 9 3 ,6 7 6 1 6 1 ,8 0 8 w om en total

  6. Pool 1 Clinical Centers (30) WHI Clinical Centers (40) Minority Clinical Centers (10) Seattle Minneapolis Portland Detroit Milwaukee Buffalo Worcester Madison Boston Iowa CityChicago Bronx Pittsburgh Pawtucket Stony Brook Columbus Sacramento Newark Reno Cincinnati Oakland Washington, DC Stanford Winston-Salem Los Angeles Memphis Chapel Hill Torrance Orange San Diego Atlanta Tucson Birmingham San Antonio Honolulu Gainesville Houston Miami

  7. Balance of Risks & Benefits: The WHI E+P Trial, 2002 (Mean Follow-up = 5.6 yrs) Risks No Effect Benefits 29% Increase CHD 34% (Hip) Fracture Reduction 44% Increase Ischemic Stroke Endometrial 44% Fewer Colorectal Cancer 113% Increase Pulmonary Cancers (but more aggressive) Emboli Death 26% Increase Breast Cancer Threshold Level STOPPED Early, Harm JAMA, 2002

  8. Total Prescriptions Dispensed for Combination Estrogen/Progestin Products, 1995 - July 2003 25000 20000 PREMPRO PREMPHASE TRX (000) 15000 PREMPRO LOW DOSE FEMHRT ACTIVELLA 10000 PREFEST COMBIPATCH 5000 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 YTD July 2003 Year IMS Health, National Prescription Audit Plus™, 1995 – July 2003, extracted August 2003.

  9. one example Public Health Impact…

  10. Clinical Trial: CEE+ MPA vs. Placebo Breast Cancer Risk During I ntervention and Postintervention Chlebowski RT, Kuller L, Prentice R, et al. N Engl J Med 360;6:11-25

  11. Economic and Public Health Impact… … another example

  12. Econom ic and Health I m pact of the W HI Estrogen+ Progestin Trial Roth et al, Annals of I nternal Medicine, May 2 0 1 4 Trial cost $260 million (in 2012 dollars) , produced a net economic return of $37.1 billion:  a return of $140 for every dollar invested in the trial. Estimated health benefits (10 years following):  $4.3 million fewer women used HT from 2002-2012  Prevented (estimated in the following 10 years): • 126,000 fewer cases of breast cancer • 76,000 fewer cases of cardiovascular disease • 80,000 fewer cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE)

  13. Cancer Focus in W HI : Additional research  Risk Factors: Diet, 2 nd hand smoke, co-morbidities, medications, physical activity,  race/ ethnicity…  Periodontal Disease – total cancer, lung, upper GI, breast  Blood/ Tumor biomarkers:  Telomeres, proteome, metabolome, genetics/ genomics (consortium)  Hundreds of scientific papers, ancillary grants  Two national team science awards for this work

  14. Oral Microbiom e, Periodontal pocket Periodontal Disease Gingiva Periodontal ligament Oral bacteria Oral bacteria Alveolar bone Gingivitis Gingivitis Inflammation Periodontitis Periodontitis Bone and tissue Bone and tissue destruction destruction Tooth loss Tooth loss

  15. OsteoPerio 1 5 -Year Follow -up Feasibility Study: Microbiom e Com position Differs by Periodontal Health/ Disease Healthy Severe Periodontitis

  16. Cancer: Buffalo OsteoPerio Microbiom e Study OsteoPerio Microbiome: Ongoing $4M NIH funded study (2014-2019) 1000 women, 15 years, 3 time points Bacterial composition in:  Cancer Cases vs No Cancer  Tumor Blocks compared to Oral samples  Potential to develop new targeted interventions

  17. Active in Cancer Research R25 Training grant SPHHP Faculty

  18. Thank you. Questions?

  19. Anti-cancer Approaches with PoP Nanoparticles Jonathan Lovell Department of Biomedical Engineering February 15, 2015 UB council presentation 20/18

  20. DOXIL – the first “nanomedicine” • Long circulating doxorubicin “liposome” by J&J • Kaposi’s sarcoma, multiple myeloma, metastatic ovarian, breast (off label) • Less cardio-toxic vs free drug • Poor drug bioavailability 21/18

  21. Putting chlorophyll to work PoP 22/18

  22. 23/18

  23. Spatial and temporal control of release Carter al., Nature Communications, 2014 24/18

  24. Chemophototherapy 25/18

  25. Enhanced accumulation Patient derived pancreatic tumors 26/18

  26. Enhanced distribution Luo et al., J Controlled Release, 2015 27/18

  27. PoP-liposomes vs. photodynamic therapy Dox-PoP PDT PoP-liposomes vs. conventional chemo. 28/18

  28. Dox-PoP-liposomes: Storage Stability 29/18

  29. Translational strategy for chemophototherapy 1. Manufacture 2. Stability/Sterility 3. PK/tox 4. Phase I/II trial -Local breast cancer recurrence -No anesthesia, easy irradiation -High prevalence -Dox used for breast -Other candidates: liver & brain via fibers. 30/18

  30. Local and metastatic cancer Targeted therapy 31/18

  31. Functionalization of Co PoP with tagged proteins Shao et al., Nature Chemistry, 2015 32/18

  32. 33/18

  33. Cargo-loaded liposomes with a targeting ligand 34/18

  34. Summary • Light-activated PoP liposomes • New local tumor treatment • Higher drug deposition • Uniform drug distribution • Formulation finalized • Future directions: clinical manufacturing and trials • Targeted Cobalt PoP liposomes • Enabling technology for ligand attachment • Translatable screening platform for targeted delivery • Future directions: drug targeting; multivalent targeting • Future directions: vaccines 35/18

  35. Acknowledgements Lab members Collaborators Funding POSTECH, Korea Chulhong Kim, PhD University of Wisconsin Weibo Cai, PhD McMaster University Joaquin Ortega PhD University of Waterloo Mikko Karttunen, PhD Roswell Park Cancer Institute Ravi Pandey , PhD 36/18

  36. Thank you! j flovell@ buffalo.edu Department of Biomedical Engineering 37/18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend