one sided mean approximation on the euclidean sphere to
play

One-sided mean approximation on the Euclidean sphere to the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

One-sided mean approximation on the Euclidean sphere to the characteristic function of a spherical layer by algebraic polynomials Anastasiya Torgashova Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia Joint research with Marina Deikalova


  1. One-sided mean approximation on the Euclidean sphere to the characteristic function of a spherical layer by algebraic polynomials Anastasiya Torgashova Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia Joint research with Marina Deikalova

  2. Notation. Statement of the problem Let R m , m ≥ 2 , be the Euclidean space with the inner product m ∑ xy = x k y k , k =1 x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m ) , y = ( y 1 , y 2 , . . . , y m ) , and the norm | x | = √ xx. For r > 0 , let S m − 1 ( r ) = { x ∈ R m : | x | = r } be the sphere of radius r centered at the origin S m − 1 = S m − 1 (1)

  3. For a pair of numbers η = ( a, b ) , − 1 ≤ a < b ≤ 1 , consider the spherical layer G ( η ) = { x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m ) ∈ S m − 1 : a ≤ x m ≤ b } centered at the “north pole” e m = (0 , 0 , . . . , 0 , 1) of the sphere. In the case b = 1 , a = h, − 1 < h < 1 , the set G ( η ) is the spherical cap C ( h ) = { x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m ) ∈ S m − 1 : x m ≥ h } .

  4. Let L ( E ) = L 1 ( E ) be the space of functions measurable and integrable on a set E with the norm ∫ ∥ f ∥ L ( E ) = E | f ( x ) | dx. Let L ∞ ( E ) be the space of measurable essentially bounded functions on E with the norm ∥ f ∥ L ∞ ( E ) = ess sup {| f ( x ) | : x ∈ E } ; this is the conjugate space for L ( E ) . On the unit sphere S m − 1 of the space R m , m ≥ 2 , consider the classical ( m − 1) -dimensional Lebesgue measure. For a subset E ⊂ S m − 1 , denote by | E | m − 1 or | E | its measure.

  5. Denote by P n,m the set of algebraic polynomials c α x α , ∑ P n ( x ) = | α | = α 1 + · · · + α m ≤ n, α = ( α 1 , . . . , α m ) ∈ Z m + x α = x α 1 1 x α 2 2 · · · x α m x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m ) ∈ R m , m , of degree (at most) n in m variables with real coefficients c α . For a pair of measurable functions f and g on the sphere S m − 1 , the inequality f ≤ g means that f ( x ) ≤ g ( x ) for almost all x ∈ S m − 1 .

  6. For a function f measurable and bounded on the sphere S m − 1 , consider the sets P − n,m ( f ) = { P ∈ P n,m : P ≤ f } , P + n,m ( f ) = { P ∈ P n,m : P ≥ f } . In order that these sets were nonempty, assume that f is bounded from below and from above, respectively.

  7. Consider the values of the best approximation in the space L to a function f by the set P n,m from below and from above: e − n,m ( f ) = inf {∥ f − P ∥ : P ∈ P − n,m ( f ) } , e + n,m ( f ) = inf {∥ f − P ∥ : P ∈ P + n,m ( f ) } . Polynomials at which the infima are attained are called the polynomials of best ( integral ) approximation to the function f from below and from above , respectively, or extremal polynomials .

  8. The main aim of this study is the best approximation from below in the space L ( S m − 1 ) to the charateristic function { 1 , x ∈ G ( η ) , 1 G ( η ) ( x ) = 0 , x ̸∈ G ( η ) , of the spherical layer G ( η ) by the set of polynomials P − n,m ( 1 G ( η ) ) . More exactly, we study the value e − n,m ( 1 G ( η ) ) = (1) = inf {∥ 1 G ( η ) − P n ∥ L ( S m − 1 ) : P n ∈ P − n,m ( 1 G ( η ) ) } ; here, according to the notation introduced above, P − n,m ( 1 G ( η ) ) = { P n ∈ P n,m : P n ≤ 1 G ( η ) } .

  9. The crucial fact is that the function 1 G ( η ) ( x ) , x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m ) , defined on the sphere S m − 1 , is zonal; i.e., this functions depends only on the coordinate x m of the point x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m ) ∈ S m − 1 : f ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m ) = g ( x m ) , x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m ) ∈ S m − 1 , where g is a univariate function defined on the interval [ − 1 , 1] . For the function f = 1 G ( η ) , the function g in this relation is the characteristic function of the interval [ a, b ] .

  10. Reduction to a one-dimensional problem The passage to polar coordinates on the sphere S m − 1 leads to the following representation of the integral of a function f ∈ L ( S m − 1 ) over the unit sphere: 1 ∫ ∫ g ( t )(1 − t 2 ) ( m − 3) / 2 dt . f ( x ) dx = | S m − 2 | S m − 1 − 1 where 1 (√ ) ∫ 1 − t 2 x ′ , t dx ′ . g ( t ) = f � � � S m − 2 � � S m − 2 �

  11. For a real number t , denote by Λ( t ) the hyperplane of points x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m − 1 , t ) ∈ R m . We will write points x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m − 1 , t ) ∈ Λ( t ) in the form x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m − 1 , t ) = ( x ′ , t ) , x ′ = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m − 1 ) ∈ R m − 1 . For t ∈ ( − 1 , 1) , the section of the sphere S m − 1 by the hyperplane Λ( t ) is the ( m − 2) -dimensional sphere √ 1 − t 2 centered at the S m − 2 ( a ) of radius a = a ( t ) = point te m and parallel to the coordinate space R m − 1 of points x ′ = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m − 1 ) . We identify this sphere with the sphere S m − 2 ( a ) ⊂ R m − 1 .

  12. The function 1 (√ ) ∫ 1 − t 2 x ′ , t dx ′ g ( t ) = f � � � S m − 2 � � S m − 2 � can be interpreted as the averaging g = Sf of the function f over sections of the sphere by hyperplanes. The averaging operator S defined by this formula is a bounded linear operator from the space L ( S m − 1 ) to the space L ϕ 1 ( − 1 , 1) of functions integrable over the interval ( − 1 , 1) with the ultraspherical weight α = m − 3 ϕ ( t ) = (1 − t 2 ) α , . 2 For the averaging operator, we have the inequality | S m − 2 | · ∥ Sf ∥ L ϕ f ∈ L ( S m − 1 ) . 1 ( − 1 , 1) ≤ ∥ f ∥ L ( S m − 1 ) ,

  13. For an algebraic polynomial P n ∈ P n,m of degree n in m variables, the function 1 (√ ) ∫ 1 − t 2 x ′ , t dx ′ g n ( t ) = ( SP n )( t ) = S m − 2 P n � � � S m − 2 � � � is a univariate algebraic polynomial of the same degree n. Thus, S P n,m ⊂ P n , P n = P n, 1 . Actually, it is not hard to understand that S P n,m = P n .

  14. Lemma 1. Let m ≥ 3 . If a function f is defined, integrable, bounded on the sphere S m − 1 , and zonal, then S ( P − n,m ( f )) = P − n ( Sf ) . This fact is quite obvious.

  15. The function 1 G ( η ) is zonal; more exactly, x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m ) ∈ S ( m − 1) , 1 G ( η ) ( x ) = 1 I ( η ) ( x m ) , where 1 I ( η ) is the characteristic function of the interval I = I ( η ) = ( a, b ) :  1 , t ∈ ( a, b ) ,  1 I ( η ) ( t ) = 0 , t ∈ [ − 1 , 1] \ ( a, b ) .  Consider the best approximation from below E − n,ϕ ( 1 I ( η ) ) = (2) 1 ( − 1 , 1) : p n ∈ P − = inf {∥ 1 I ( η ) − p n ∥ L ϕ n ( 1 I ( η ) ) } to the step function 1 I ( η ) in the space L ϕ 1 ( − 1 , 1) by n ( 1 I ( η ) ) = P − the set P − n, 1 ( 1 I ( η ) ) of (univariate) algebraic polynomials whose graphs lie under the graph of the function 1 I ( η ) .

  16. Lemma 2. For any m ≥ 3 , n ≥ 0 , and a, b ∈ ( − 1 , 1) , we have n,m ( 1 G ( η ) ) = | S m − 2 | E − e − n,ϕ ( 1 I ( η ) ) and if a polynomial p ∗ n in one variable is extremal in problem (2) ( i.e., the infimum in (2) is attained at this polynomial ) , then the zonal polynomial P ∗ n ( x ) = p ∗ R m , is extremal in n ( x m ) , x = ( x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x m ) ∈ problem (1) on the sphere.

  17. One-sided approximation on an interval Consider in more detail the problem of one-sided approximation from below to the characteristic function  1 , t ∈ ( a, b ) ,  1 I ( t ) = 0 , t ̸∈ ( a, b ) ,  of the interval I = ( a, b ) by the set of algebraic polynomials (in one variable) of given degree n ≥ 0 L ψ L ψ ( − 1 , 1) in the space = with a more general nonnegative weight ψ (as compared to the ultraspherical weight ϕ ) on ( − 1 , 1) . The problem is in calculating the value E − 1 ( − 1 , 1) : p n ∈ P − n,ψ ( 1 I ) = inf {∥ 1 I − p n ∥ L ψ n ( 1 I ) } (3)

  18. [BMQ] Bustamante J., Mart ´ ınez Cruz R., Quesada J.M. Quasi orthogonal Jacobi polynomials and best one-sided L 1 approximation to step functions, J. Approx. Theory. 2015. Vol. 198. P. 10–23. [BDR] Babenko A.G., Deikalova M.V., R´ ev´ esz Sz.G. Weighted one-sided integral approximations to characteristic functions of intervals by polynomials on a closed interval, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 2017. Vol. 297, Suppl. 1. P. S11–S18 In these papers, problem (3) was solved in the case when one of the end-points of the interval I = ( a, b ) coincides with the corresponding end-point ± 1 of the initial interval ( − 1 , 1) .

  19. These results and the method of their proving allow us to solve problem (3) under the assumption that the weight ψ is even and the interval I = ( a, b ) is symmetric about 0; i.e., a = − h and b = h, where 0 < h < 1 . Indeed, consider the auxiliary problem of approximation of the function  t ∈ [0 , h 2 ) , 1 ,  1 h ( t ) = t ∈ [ h 2 , 1] , 0 ,  on the interval [0 , 1] . Studying this problem, we use the results and method of [BDR] applied to the interval [0 , 1] .

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend