On ringing gravitational waves from black holes
Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto Univeristy) Hiroyuki Nakano, Tatsuya Narikawa, Kenichi Ohara, Kazuki Sakai, Hisaaki Shinkai, Hideyuki Tagoshi, Hirotaka Takahashi, Nami Uchikata, Shun Yamamoto, Takahiro Yamamoto
On ringing gravitational waves from black holes Takahiro Tanaka - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
On ringing gravitational waves from black holes Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto Univeristy) Hiroyuki Nakano, Tatsuya Narikawa, Kenichi Ohara, Kazuki Sakai, Hisaaki Shinkai, Hideyuki Tagoshi, Hirotaka Takahashi, Nami Uchikata, Shun Yamamoto, Takahiro
Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto Univeristy) Hiroyuki Nakano, Tatsuya Narikawa, Kenichi Ohara, Kazuki Sakai, Hisaaki Shinkai, Hideyuki Tagoshi, Hirotaka Takahashi, Nami Uchikata, Shun Yamamoto, Takahiro Yamamoto
B: NS binaries
A-01 Testing gravity A-02 Gravity and Cosmology A-03 BH binary formation
C: Supernovae
A: BH binaries
Internal structure of NS B-01 Gamma-ray burst and BH B-02 r –process elements B-03 SN explosion mechanism C-01 SN explosion mechanism via n observation C-02 10/ 19
using gravitational waves
4
5
(Detweiler ApJ239 292 (1980))
6
QNM excitation
*
*
by WKB approximation
a solution connecting in-going and out-going waves.
the extremum of the effective potential V.
extremum determines the QNMs
approximate answer to the above question.
(Schutz &Will, ApJ, 291 (1985))
(Nakamura et al., Phys.Rev. D93 (2016))
8 6 4 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
(Nakamura, Nakano, TT arXiv:1601.00356)
[%]
Error of WKB approx. near horizon near infinity
7
(Nakano, TT, Nakamura, arXiv:1506.00560)
horizon Extremum of V
Light ring radius
3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1
Radius r /GM
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
frequency is rather close to horizon, especially for rapidly rotating case.
QNM frequencies in GR
Schwarzschild case
(Nakamura, Nakano, arXiv:1602.02385)
forbidden region
9
Frequency Amplitude
Numerical relativity simulation tells that the evolution of frequency and amplitude in GR is rather simple and smooth. ⇒We construct waveform with modified fR and fI with Gaussian noise. Then, can we extract fR and fI ?
10
n *
s: data h: template with parameter q Sn(f ):=2
−∞ +∞ 𝑒𝜐 𝑜 𝑢 𝑜 𝑢 + 𝜐
𝑓2𝜌𝑗𝑔𝜐 n: noise
11
The reference matched filtering shows the best performance on average but here it is a little cheating, since we used the modified ring-down wave form that is used to generate the mock data, which is unknown in reality.
12
Frequency Amplitude For parameter estimation, let’s use another template set than that used to generate the mock data! The final values of fR and fI are unchanged, but the interpolation is done differently.
13
AR method shows rather good performance except for low SNR case. Error in the estimate of fR
10 20 30 40 50 60 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
What is AR? ⇒Auto-Regressive model
14
S.Yamamoto, H.Shinkai (OIT)
Fitting data in time sequence with linear func.
at 20〜30. Even for short segment, AR model shows clear peak in the power-spectrum.
15
HHT method may work better for small SNR, contrary to our naïve expectation, although the number of samples is still too small. Error in the estimate of fR
Empirical Mode decomposition
16
u(t):upper envelope
l(t):lower envelope
Hilbert-Spectral Analysis We drop high and low frequency modes by filtering the data [ fL, fH ] We extract fR (from q (t)) and fI (from a(t)). The choice of initial filtering band [ fL, fH ] is a little ad hoc.
Ohara, Sakai, Takahashi
Iterate this process until m(t) becomes sufficiently small
17
18
modified gravity by using gravitational wave data.
down frequency.
be biased.
frequencies, but impressive improvement of the estimation accuracy has not been actually achieved in our group.
further improved.
appropriate modified waveform being used