On (rational) Shi tableaux Robin Sulzgruber 78 th S eminaire - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on rational shi tableaux
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On (rational) Shi tableaux Robin Sulzgruber 78 th S eminaire - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On (rational) Shi tableaux Robin Sulzgruber 78 th S eminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire March 26 th 29 th 2017 Ottrott France Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 1 / 33 Setting the stage Robin Sulzgruber On


slide-1
SLIDE 1

On (rational) Shi tableaux

Robin Sulzgruber 78th S´ eminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire March 26th–29th 2017 • Ottrott • France

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 1 / 33

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Setting the stage

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 2 / 33

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Setting the stage

Definition Let V be a Euclidean vector space, α ∈ V a non-zero vector and k ∈ Z. Define the affine hyperplane Hα,k =

  • x ∈ V : x, α = k
  • .

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 2 / 33

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Setting the stage

Definition Let V be a Euclidean vector space, α ∈ V a non-zero vector and k ∈ Z. Define the affine hyperplane Hα,k =

  • x ∈ V : x, α = k
  • .

Define the reflection in Hα,k as sα,k(x) = x + 2k − x, α α, α α .

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 2 / 33

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Setting the stage

Definition Let V be a Euclidean vector space, α ∈ V a non-zero vector and k ∈ Z. Define the affine hyperplane Hα,k =

  • x ∈ V : x, α = k
  • .

Define the reflection in Hα,k as sα,k(x) = x + 2k − x, α α, α α . Definition An irreducible crystallographic root system is a finite subset Φ ⊆ V with some properties.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 2 / 33

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Setting the stage

Definition Let V be a Euclidean vector space, α ∈ V a non-zero vector and k ∈ Z. Define the affine hyperplane Hα,k =

  • x ∈ V : x, α = k
  • .

Define the reflection in Hα,k as sα,k(x) = x + 2k − x, α α, α α . Definition An irreducible crystallographic root system is a finite subset Φ ⊆ V with some properties. The Weyl group of Φ is the group generated by the reflections sα,0 for α ∈ Φ+.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 2 / 33

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The root system of type A2

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 3 / 33

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The root system of type A2

α2 = e2 − e3 α1 + α2 = e1 − e3 α1 = e1 − e2

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 3 / 33

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The root system of type A2

Hα2,0 Hα1,0 Hα1+α2,0 α2 = e2 − e3 α1 + α2 = e1 − e3 α1 = e1 − e2

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 3 / 33

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The root system of type A2

Hα2,0 Hα1,0 Hα1+α2,0 The reflections sα1,0, sα2,0 generate the symmetric group S3.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 3 / 33

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The affine Weyl group

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 4 / 33

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The affine Weyl group

Definition The affine arrangement of Φ is defined as Aff =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, k ∈ Z
  • .

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 4 / 33

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The affine Weyl group

Definition The affine arrangement of Φ is defined as Aff =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, k ∈ Z
  • .

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 4 / 33

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The affine Weyl group

Definition The affine arrangement of Φ is defined as Aff =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, k ∈ Z
  • .

The regions of the affine arrangement are called alcoves.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 4 / 33

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The affine Weyl group

Definition The affine arrangement of Φ is defined as Aff =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, k ∈ Z
  • .

The regions of the affine arrangement are called alcoves. The affine Weyl group W is the group generated by all reflections in the hyperplanes of Aff. It acts simply transitively on the set of alcoves.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 4 / 33

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The Shi arrangement

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 5 / 33

slide-17
SLIDE 17

The Shi arrangement

Definition The Shi arrangement is defined as Shi =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, k ∈ {0, 1}
  • .

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 5 / 33

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The Shi arrangement

Definition The Shi arrangement is defined as Shi =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, k ∈ {0, 1}
  • .

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 5 / 33

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The Shi arrangement

Definition The Shi arrangement is defined as Shi =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, k ∈ {0, 1}
  • .

Theorem (Shi 1987, 1997) The Shi arrangement has (h + 1)r regions and 1 |W |

r

  • i=1

(di + h) dominant regions.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 5 / 33

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The Shi arrangement

Definition The Shi arrangement is defined as Shi =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, k ∈ {0, 1}
  • .

Theorem (Shi 1987, 1997) The Shi arrangement has (h + 1)r regions and 1 |W |

r

  • i=1

(di + h) dominant regions. (n + 1)n−1

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 5 / 33

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The Shi arrangement

Definition The Shi arrangement is defined as Shi =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, k ∈ {0, 1}
  • .

Theorem (Shi 1987, 1997) The Shi arrangement has (h + 1)r regions and 1 |W |

r

  • i=1

(di + h) dominant regions. (n + 1)n−1 = 42 = 16

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 5 / 33

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Shi arrangement

Definition The Shi arrangement is defined as Shi =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, k ∈ {0, 1}
  • .

Theorem (Shi 1987, 1997) The Shi arrangement has (h + 1)r regions and 1 |W |

r

  • i=1

(di + h) dominant regions. (n + 1)n−1 = 42 = 16 1 n + 1 2n n

  • Robin Sulzgruber

On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 5 / 33

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The Shi arrangement

Definition The Shi arrangement is defined as Shi =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, k ∈ {0, 1}
  • .

Theorem (Shi 1987, 1997) The Shi arrangement has (h + 1)r regions and 1 |W |

r

  • i=1

(di + h) dominant regions. (n + 1)n−1 = 42 = 16 1 n + 1 2n n

  • =

6 · 5 · 4 4 · 3 · 2 · 1 = 5

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 5 / 33

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The m-Shi arrangement

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 6 / 33

slide-25
SLIDE 25

The m-Shi arrangement

Definition The m-Shi arrangement is defined as Shim =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, −m < k ≤ m
  • .

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 6 / 33

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The m-Shi arrangement

Definition The m-Shi arrangement is defined as Shim =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, −m < k ≤ m
  • .

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 6 / 33

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The m-Shi arrangement

Definition The m-Shi arrangement is defined as Shim =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, −m < k ≤ m
  • .

Theorem (Athanasiadis 2004, Yoshinaga 2004) The Shi arrangement has (mh + 1)r regions and 1 |W |

r

  • i=1

(di + mh) dominant regions.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 6 / 33

slide-28
SLIDE 28

The m-Shi arrangement

Definition The m-Shi arrangement is defined as Shim =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, −m < k ≤ m
  • .

Theorem (Athanasiadis 2004, Yoshinaga 2004) The Shi arrangement has (mh + 1)r regions and 1 |W |

r

  • i=1

(di + mh) dominant regions. (mn + 1)n−1

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 6 / 33

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The m-Shi arrangement

Definition The m-Shi arrangement is defined as Shim =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, −m < k ≤ m
  • .

Theorem (Athanasiadis 2004, Yoshinaga 2004) The Shi arrangement has (mh + 1)r regions and 1 |W |

r

  • i=1

(di + mh) dominant regions. (mn + 1)n−1 = 49

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 6 / 33

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The m-Shi arrangement

Definition The m-Shi arrangement is defined as Shim =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, −m < k ≤ m
  • .

Theorem (Athanasiadis 2004, Yoshinaga 2004) The Shi arrangement has (mh + 1)r regions and 1 |W |

r

  • i=1

(di + mh) dominant regions. (mn + 1)n−1 = 49 1 mn + 1 mn + n n

  • Robin Sulzgruber

On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 6 / 33

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The m-Shi arrangement

Definition The m-Shi arrangement is defined as Shim =

  • Hα,k : α ∈ Φ+, −m < k ≤ m
  • .

Theorem (Athanasiadis 2004, Yoshinaga 2004) The Shi arrangement has (mh + 1)r regions and 1 |W |

r

  • i=1

(di + mh) dominant regions. (mn + 1)n−1 = 49 1 mn + 1 mn + n n

  • = 12

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 6 / 33

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Walls and floors

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 7 / 33

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Walls and floors

Definition A hyperplane Hα,k is called wall of an alcove if it supports a facet of the alcove.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 7 / 33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Walls and floors

Definition A hyperplane Hα,k is called wall of an alcove if it supports a facet of the alcove. A wall is called floor if it separates the alcove from the fundamental alcove.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 7 / 33

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Walls and floors

Definition A hyperplane Hα,k is called wall of an alcove if it supports a facet of the alcove. A wall is called floor if it separates the alcove from the fundamental alcove.

[4, 2, 0]

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 7 / 33

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The height of a hyperplane

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 8 / 33

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The height of a hyperplane

Definition Define the height of a hyperplane Hα,k as |ht(α) − hk|.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 8 / 33

slide-38
SLIDE 38

The height of a hyperplane

Definition Define the height of a hyperplane Hα,k as |ht(α) − hk|.

[1, 2, 3] 13 10 7 4 1 2 5 8 11 14 14 11 8 5 2 1 4 7 10 13 7 4 1 2 5 Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 8 / 33

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Shi alcoves

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 9 / 33

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Shi alcoves

Theorem (Shi 1987, Athanasiadis 2005, Thiel 2015) The regions of the m-Shi arrangement are in bijection with alcoves whose floors have height less than mh + 1.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 9 / 33

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Shi alcoves

Theorem (Shi 1987, Athanasiadis 2005, Thiel 2015) The regions of the m-Shi arrangement are in bijection with alcoves whose floors have height less than mh + 1.

[4, 2, 0] [1, −1, 6] [2, 0, 4] [1, 0, 5] [1, 2, 3] [2, 1, 3] [2, 3, 1] [3, 1, 2] [1, 3, 2] [3, 2, 1] [−1, 3, 4] [0, 1, 5] [0, 2, 4] [−2, 5, 3] [−1, 4, 3] [0, 4, 2] 13 10 7 4 5 8 11 14 14 11 8 5 4 7 10 13 10 7 4 5 8 1 2 2 1 1 2

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 9 / 33

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 10 / 33

slide-43
SLIDE 43

[7, 2, −3] [4, −1, 3] [5, 0, 1] [4, 0, 2] [1, −4, 9] [2, −3, 7] [1, −3, 8] [4, 2, 0] [5, 1, 0] [5, 3, −2] [6, 1, −1] [4, 3, −1] [6, 2, −2] [1, −1, 6] [2, −2, 6] [2, 0, 4] [3, −2, 5] [1, 0, 5] [3, −1, 4] [1, 2, 3] [2, 1, 3] [2, 3, 1] [3, 1, 2] [1, 3, 2] [3, 2, 1] [−1, 0, 7] [0, −2, 8] [0, −1, 7] [1, 5, 0] [2, 4, 0] [3, 4, −1] [−2, 2, 6] [−1, 1, 6] [−1, 3, 4] [0, 1, 5] [−2, 3, 5] [0, 2, 4] [−2, 5, 3] [−1, 4, 3] [−1, 6, 1] [0, 4, 2] [−2, 6, 2] [0, 5, 1] [−4, 6, 4] [−3, 4, 5] [−3, 5, 4] [−5, 8, 3] [−4, 7, 3] [−3, 7, 2] 19 16 13 10 7 8 11 14 17 20 20 17 14 11 8 7 10 13 16 19 16 13 10 7 8 11 14 4 1 2 5 5 2 1 4 4 1 2 5

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 10 / 33

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Inverse Shi alcoves

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 11 / 33

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Inverse Shi alcoves

Theorem (Fishel, Vazirani 2010) The regions of the m-Shi arrangement are in bijection with the alcoves inside the simplex bounded by the hyperplanes of height mh + 1.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 11 / 33

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Inverse Shi alcoves

Theorem (Fishel, Vazirani 2010) The regions of the m-Shi arrangement are in bijection with the alcoves inside the simplex bounded by the hyperplanes of height mh + 1.

[−2, 2, 6] [1, 5, 0] [0, 1, 5] [1, 0, 5] [1, 2, 3] [2, 1, 3] [3, 1, 2] [2, 3, 1] [1, 3, 2] [3, 2, 1] [0, 4, 2] [2, 0, 4] [0, 2, 4] [4, −1, 3] [−1, 4, 3] [−1, 3, 4] 16 13 10 7 1 2 5 8 11 14 14 11 8 5 2 1 7 10 13 16 7 1 2 5 8 11 4 4 4

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 11 / 33

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 12 / 33

slide-48
SLIDE 48

[−5, 2, 9] [−2, 5, 3] [3, −2, 5] [−2, 3, 5] [1, 8, −3] [−3, 1, 8] [1, −3, 8] [−2, 2, 6] [2, −2, 6] [6, −2, 2] [2, 6, −2] [−2, 6, 2] [6, 2, −2] [1, 5, 0] [5, 1, 0] [0, 1, 5] [5, 0, 1] [1, 0, 5] [0, 5, 1] [1, 2, 3] [2, 1, 3] [3, 1, 2] [2, 3, 1] [1, 3, 2] [3, 2, 1] [−3, 4, 5] [5, −3, 4] [−3, 5, 4] [1, −1, 6] [−1, 1, 6] [−1, 6, 1] [4, 2, 0] [2, 4, 0] [0, 4, 2] [2, 0, 4] [4, 0, 2] [0, 2, 4] [4, −1, 3] [−1, 4, 3] [3, 4, −1] [−1, 3, 4] [4, 3, −1] [3, −1, 4] [0, 7, −1] [−1, 0, 7] [0, −1, 7] [7, −4, 3] [−4, 7, 3] [−4, 3, 7] 22 19 16 13 10 4 1 2 5 8 11 14 17 17 14 11 8 5 2 1 4 10 13 16 19 22 10 4 1 2 5 8 11 14 17 7 7 7

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 12 / 33

slide-49
SLIDE 49

A rational analogue

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 13 / 33

slide-50
SLIDE 50

A rational analogue

Definition Let p be a positive integer relatively prime to the Coxeter number h. An alcove is called p-stable if its inverse lies inside the simplex bounded by the hyperplanes of height p.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 13 / 33

slide-51
SLIDE 51

A rational analogue

Definition Let p be a positive integer relatively prime to the Coxeter number h. An alcove is called p-stable if its inverse lies inside the simplex bounded by the hyperplanes of height p. Theorem (Thiel 2015) The number of p-stable alcoves equals pr. The number of dominant p-stable alcoves equals 1 |W |

r

  • i=1

(p + ei).

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 13 / 33

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 14 / 33

slide-53
SLIDE 53

[−3, 2, 7] [0, 5, 1] [1, 0, 5] [0, 1, 5] [0, 2, 4] [2, 0, 4] [4, 0, 2] [2, 4, 0] [0, 4, 2] [4, 2, 0] [−2, 3, 5] [5, −2, 3] [−2, 5, 3] [3, 2, 1] [2, 3, 1] [1, 3, 2] [2, 1, 3] [3, 1, 2] [1, 2, 3] [3, −1, 4] [−1, 3, 4] [−1, 4, 3] [1, 6, −1] [−1, 1, 6] [1, −1, 6] 13 10 7 4 1 2 8 11 14 17 17 14 11 8 2 1 4 7 10 13 13 10 7 4 1 2 8 5 5 5 Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 14 / 33

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 15 / 33

slide-55
SLIDE 55

[−3, 2, 7] [3, −1, 4] [1, 0, 5] [2, 0, 4] [0, 2, 4] [0, 1, 5] [−2, 3, 5] [−1, 1, 6] [−1, 3, 4] [−2, 2, 6] [4, 0, 2] [5, −2, 3] [4, −1, 3] [3, 2, 1] [3, 1, 2] [1, 3, 2] [2, 1, 3] [2, 3, 1] [1, 2, 3] [0, 5, 1] [0, 4, 2] [−1, 4, 3] [1, 6, −1] [2, 4, 0] [1, 5, 0] 16 13 10 7 4 1 2 5 8 11 14 17 17 14 11 8 5 2 1 4 7 10 13 16 13 10 7 4 1 2 5 8 11

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 15 / 33

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Shi tableaux

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 16 / 33

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Shi tableaux

Definition (Fishel, Tzanaki, Vazirani 2011) Let w(A◦) be a dominant Shi alcove and α ∈ Φ+. Define tmh+1(α, w) as the number of Shi hyperplanes

  • f the form Hα,k that separate w(A◦) and A◦.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 16 / 33

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Shi tableaux

Definition (Fishel, Tzanaki, Vazirani 2011) Let w(A◦) be a dominant Shi alcove and α ∈ Φ+. Define tmh+1(α, w) as the number of Shi hyperplanes

  • f the form Hα,k that separate w(A◦) and A◦.

The Shi tableau of w is the collection of the numbers tmh+1(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 16 / 33

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Shi tableaux

Definition (Fishel, Tzanaki, Vazirani 2011) Let w(A◦) be a dominant Shi alcove and α ∈ Φ+. Define tmh+1(α, w) as the number of Shi hyperplanes

  • f the form Hα,k that separate w(A◦) and A◦.

The Shi tableau of w is the collection of the numbers tmh+1(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

[4, 2, 0] [2, 0, 4] [1, 2, 3] [0, 2, 4] [0, 4, 2] Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 16 / 33

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Shi tableaux

Definition (Fishel, Tzanaki, Vazirani 2011) Let w(A◦) be a dominant Shi alcove and α ∈ Φ+. Define tmh+1(α, w) as the number of Shi hyperplanes

  • f the form Hα,k that separate w(A◦) and A◦.

The Shi tableau of w is the collection of the numbers tmh+1(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

[4, 2, 0] [2, 0, 4] [1, 2, 3] [0, 2, 4] [0, 4, 2]

w = [4, 2, 0]

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 16 / 33

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Shi tableaux

Definition (Fishel, Tzanaki, Vazirani 2011) Let w(A◦) be a dominant Shi alcove and α ∈ Φ+. Define tmh+1(α, w) as the number of Shi hyperplanes

  • f the form Hα,k that separate w(A◦) and A◦.

The Shi tableau of w is the collection of the numbers tmh+1(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

[4, 2, 0] [2, 0, 4] [1, 2, 3] [0, 2, 4] [0, 4, 2]

w = [4, 2, 0] t4(α1, w) = 1

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 16 / 33

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Shi tableaux

Definition (Fishel, Tzanaki, Vazirani 2011) Let w(A◦) be a dominant Shi alcove and α ∈ Φ+. Define tmh+1(α, w) as the number of Shi hyperplanes

  • f the form Hα,k that separate w(A◦) and A◦.

The Shi tableau of w is the collection of the numbers tmh+1(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

[4, 2, 0] [2, 0, 4] [1, 2, 3] [0, 2, 4] [0, 4, 2]

w = [4, 2, 0] t4(α1, w) = 1 t4(α2, w) = 1

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 16 / 33

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Shi tableaux

Definition (Fishel, Tzanaki, Vazirani 2011) Let w(A◦) be a dominant Shi alcove and α ∈ Φ+. Define tmh+1(α, w) as the number of Shi hyperplanes

  • f the form Hα,k that separate w(A◦) and A◦.

The Shi tableau of w is the collection of the numbers tmh+1(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

[4, 2, 0] [2, 0, 4] [1, 2, 3] [0, 2, 4] [0, 4, 2]

w = [4, 2, 0] t4(α1, w) = 1 t4(α2, w) = 1 t4(α1 + α2, w) = 1

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 16 / 33

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Rational Shi tableaux

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 17 / 33

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Rational Shi tableaux

Definition Let w(A◦) be dominant and p-stable and α ∈ Φ+. Define tp(α, w) as the number of hyperplanes of the form Hα,k with height less than p that separate w(A◦) and A◦.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 17 / 33

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Rational Shi tableaux

Definition Let w(A◦) be dominant and p-stable and α ∈ Φ+. Define tp(α, w) as the number of hyperplanes of the form Hα,k with height less than p that separate w(A◦) and A◦. The rational Shi tableau of w is defined as the collection of numbers tp(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 17 / 33

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Rational Shi tableaux

Definition Let w(A◦) be dominant and p-stable and α ∈ Φ+. Define tp(α, w) as the number of hyperplanes of the form Hα,k with height less than p that separate w(A◦) and A◦. The rational Shi tableau of w is defined as the collection of numbers tp(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

[−3, 2, 7] [2, 0, 4] [0, 2, 4] [4, 0, 2] [1, 2, 3] [0, 4, 2] [2, 4, 0] 7 4 1 2 5 8 11 5 2 1 4 7 10 13 4 1 2 5 8

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 17 / 33

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Rational Shi tableaux

Definition Let w(A◦) be dominant and p-stable and α ∈ Φ+. Define tp(α, w) as the number of hyperplanes of the form Hα,k with height less than p that separate w(A◦) and A◦. The rational Shi tableau of w is defined as the collection of numbers tp(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

[−3, 2, 7] [2, 0, 4] [0, 2, 4] [4, 0, 2] [1, 2, 3] [0, 4, 2] [2, 4, 0] 7 4 1 2 5 8 11 5 2 1 4 7 10 13 4 1 2 5 8

w = [−3, 2, 7]

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 17 / 33

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Rational Shi tableaux

Definition Let w(A◦) be dominant and p-stable and α ∈ Φ+. Define tp(α, w) as the number of hyperplanes of the form Hα,k with height less than p that separate w(A◦) and A◦. The rational Shi tableau of w is defined as the collection of numbers tp(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

[−3, 2, 7] [2, 0, 4] [0, 2, 4] [4, 0, 2] [1, 2, 3] [0, 4, 2] [2, 4, 0] 7 4 1 2 5 8 11 5 2 1 4 7 10 13 4 1 2 5 8

w = [−3, 2, 7] t5(α1, w) = 1

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 17 / 33

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Rational Shi tableaux

Definition Let w(A◦) be dominant and p-stable and α ∈ Φ+. Define tp(α, w) as the number of hyperplanes of the form Hα,k with height less than p that separate w(A◦) and A◦. The rational Shi tableau of w is defined as the collection of numbers tp(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

[−3, 2, 7] [2, 0, 4] [0, 2, 4] [4, 0, 2] [1, 2, 3] [0, 4, 2] [2, 4, 0] 7 4 1 2 5 8 11 5 2 1 4 7 10 13 4 1 2 5 8

w = [−3, 2, 7] t5(α1, w) = 1 t5(α2, w) = 1

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 17 / 33

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Rational Shi tableaux

Definition Let w(A◦) be dominant and p-stable and α ∈ Φ+. Define tp(α, w) as the number of hyperplanes of the form Hα,k with height less than p that separate w(A◦) and A◦. The rational Shi tableau of w is defined as the collection of numbers tp(α, w) for α ∈ Φ+.

[−3, 2, 7] [2, 0, 4] [0, 2, 4] [4, 0, 2] [1, 2, 3] [0, 4, 2] [2, 4, 0] 7 4 1 2 5 8 11 5 2 1 4 7 10 13 4 1 2 5 8

w = [−3, 2, 7] t5(α1, w) = 1 t5(α2, w) = 1 t5(α1 + α2, w) = 2

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 17 / 33

slide-72
SLIDE 72

The Main Conjecture

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 18 / 33

slide-73
SLIDE 73

The Main Conjecture

Conjecture Every dominant p-stable element w ∈ W is uniquely determined by its rational Shi tableau.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 18 / 33

slide-74
SLIDE 74

The Main Conjecture

Conjecture Every dominant p-stable element w ∈ W is uniquely determined by its rational Shi tableau. Theorem The conjecture is true in type An−1.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 18 / 33

slide-75
SLIDE 75

The Main Conjecture

Conjecture Every dominant p-stable element w ∈ W is uniquely determined by its rational Shi tableau. Theorem The conjecture is true in type An−1. Open Problem Characterise the set of rational Shi tableaux.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 18 / 33

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Inverting the rational Shi tableau in type An−1

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 19 / 33

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Inverting the rational Shi tableau in type An−1

Example Consider the affine permutation of type A4 w = [7, −1, 11, 3, −5].

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 19 / 33

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Inverting the rational Shi tableau in type An−1

Example Consider the affine permutation of type A4 w = [7, −1, 11, 3, −5]. Then the alcove of w−1 is contained in the simplex bounded by the hyperplanes of height p = 8.

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 19 / 33

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Inverting the rational Shi tableau in type An−1

Example Consider the affine permutation of type A4 w = [7, −1, 11, 3, −5]. Then the alcove of w−1 is contained in the simplex bounded by the hyperplanes of height p = 8. The Shi tableau of w is given by 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1

α12 α13 α14 α15 α23 α24 α25 α34 α35 α45

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 19 / 33

slide-80
SLIDE 80

To Dyck paths via row-sums and column-sums

2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1

α12 α13 α14 α15 α23 α24 α25 α34 α35 α45

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 20 / 33

slide-81
SLIDE 81

To Dyck paths via row-sums and column-sums

2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1

α12 α13 α14 α15 α23 α24 α25 α34 α35 α45

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 20 / 33

slide-82
SLIDE 82

To long cycles (Ceballos, Denton, Hanusa 2016)

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 21 / 33

slide-83
SLIDE 83

To long cycles (Ceballos, Denton, Hanusa 2016)

3 4 5 8 9 10 12 13 4 6 9 11 13 1 2 6 7 11 1 2 3 5 7 8 10 12

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 21 / 33

slide-84
SLIDE 84

To long cycles (Ceballos, Denton, Hanusa 2016)

3 4 5 8 9 10 12 13 4 6 9 11 13 1 2 6 7 11 1 2 3 5 7 8 10 12 (4, 2, 6, 9, 7, 11, 13, 12, 10, 8, 5, 3, 1)

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 21 / 33

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Back to Dyck paths (Ceballos, Denton, Hanusa 2016)

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 22 / 33

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Back to Dyck paths (Ceballos, Denton, Hanusa 2016)

(4, 2, 6, 9, 7, 11, 13, 12, 10, 8, 5, 3, 1)

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 22 / 33

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Back to Dyck paths (Ceballos, Denton, Hanusa 2016)

(4, 2, 6, 9, 7, 11, 13, 12, 10, 8, 5, 3, 1)

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 22 / 33

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Back to Dyck paths (Ceballos, Denton, Hanusa 2016)

(4, 2, 6, 9, 7, 11, 13, 12, 10, 8, 5, 3, 1)

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 22 / 33

slide-89
SLIDE 89

To n and p flush abaci (Anderson 2002)

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 23 / 33

slide-90
SLIDE 90

To n and p flush abaci (Anderson 2002)

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 23 / 33

slide-91
SLIDE 91

To n and p flush abaci (Anderson 2002)

8 16 24 32 40

  • 5

3 11 19 27 35

  • 10
  • 2

6 14 22 30

  • 15
  • 7

1 9 17 25

  • 20
  • 12
  • 4

4 12 20

  • 25
  • 17
  • 9
  • 1

7 15

  • 30
  • 22
  • 14
  • 6

2 10

  • 35
  • 27
  • 19
  • 11
  • 3

5

  • 40
  • 32
  • 24
  • 16
  • 8

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 23 / 33

slide-92
SLIDE 92

To n and p flush abaci (Anderson 2002)

8 16 24 32 40

  • 5

3 11 19 27 35

  • 10
  • 2

6 14 22 30

  • 15
  • 7

1 9 17 25

  • 20
  • 12
  • 4

4 12 20

  • 25
  • 17
  • 9
  • 1

7 15

  • 30
  • 22
  • 14
  • 6

2 10

  • 35
  • 27
  • 19
  • 11
  • 3

5

  • 40
  • 32
  • 24
  • 16
  • 8

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 23 / 33

slide-93
SLIDE 93

To n and p flush abaci (Anderson 2002)

8 16 24 32 40

  • 5

3 11 19 27 35

  • 10
  • 2

6 14 22 30

  • 15
  • 7

1 9 17 25

  • 20
  • 12
  • 4

4 12 20

  • 25
  • 17
  • 9
  • 1

7 15

  • 30
  • 22
  • 14
  • 6

2 10

  • 35
  • 27
  • 19
  • 11
  • 3

5

  • 40
  • 32
  • 24
  • 16
  • 8

6

. . .

1

. . .

  • 4

. . .

  • 9

. . .

  • 14

. . .

21 16 11

. . .

17

. . .

12

. . .

7

. . .

2

. . .

  • 3

. . .

  • 8

. . .

  • 13

. . .

22

. . .

  • 2

. . .

  • 7

. . .

  • 12

. . .

23 18 13 8 3

. . .

9

. . .

4

. . .

  • 1

. . .

  • 6

. . .

  • 11

. . .

24 19 14

. . .

  • 5

. . .

  • 10

. . .

25 20 15 10 5

. . .

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 23 / 33

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Shift back to affine permutations (Lascoux 2001)

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 24 / 33

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Shift back to affine permutations (Lascoux 2001)

6

. . .

1

. . .

  • 4

. . .

  • 9

. . .

  • 14

. . .

21 16 11

. . .

17

. . .

12

. . .

7

. . .

2

. . .

  • 3

. . .

  • 8

. . .

  • 13

. . .

22

. . .

  • 2

. . .

  • 7

. . .

  • 12

. . .

23 18 13 8 3

. . .

9

. . .

4

. . .

  • 1

. . .

  • 6

. . .

  • 11

. . .

24 19 14

. . .

  • 5

. . .

  • 10

. . .

25 20 15 10 5

. . .

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 24 / 33

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Shift back to affine permutations (Lascoux 2001)

6

. . .

1

. . .

  • 4

. . .

  • 9

. . .

  • 14

. . .

21 16 11

. . .

17

. . .

12

. . .

7

. . .

2

. . .

  • 3

. . .

  • 8

. . .

  • 13

. . .

22

. . .

  • 2

. . .

  • 7

. . .

  • 12

. . .

23 18 13 8 3

. . .

9

. . .

4

. . .

  • 1

. . .

  • 6

. . .

  • 11

. . .

24 19 14

. . .

  • 5

. . .

  • 10

. . .

25 20 15 10 5

. . .

  • 9

. . .

  • 14

. . .

  • 19

. . .

16 11 6 1

  • 4

. . .

2

. . .

  • 3

. . .

  • 8

. . .

  • 13

. . .

  • 18

. . .

17 12 7

. . .

  • 12

. . .

  • 17

. . .

18 13 8 3

  • 2
  • 7

. . .

  • 1

. . .

  • 6

. . .

  • 11

. . .

  • 16

. . .

19 14 9 4

. . .

10

. . .

5

. . . . . .

  • 5

. . .

  • 10

. . .

  • 15

. . .

20 15

. . .

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 24 / 33

slide-97
SLIDE 97

Shift back to affine permutations (Lascoux 2001)

6

. . .

1

. . .

  • 4

. . .

  • 9

. . .

  • 14

. . .

21 16 11

. . .

17

. . .

12

. . .

7

. . .

2

. . .

  • 3

. . .

  • 8

. . .

  • 13

. . .

22

. . .

  • 2

. . .

  • 7

. . .

  • 12

. . .

23 18 13 8 3

. . .

9

. . .

4

. . .

  • 1

. . .

  • 6

. . .

  • 11

. . .

24 19 14

. . .

  • 5

. . .

  • 10

. . .

25 20 15 10 5

. . .

  • 9

. . .

  • 14

. . .

  • 19

. . .

16 11 6 1

  • 4

. . .

2

. . .

  • 3

. . .

  • 8

. . .

  • 13

. . .

  • 18

. . .

17 12 7

. . .

  • 12

. . .

  • 17

. . .

18 13 8 3

  • 2
  • 7

. . .

  • 1

. . .

  • 6

. . .

  • 11

. . .

  • 16

. . .

19 14 9 4

. . .

10

. . .

5

. . . . . .

  • 5

. . .

  • 10

. . .

  • 15

. . .

20 15

. . . w−1 = [−7, −4, 4, 7, 15]

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 24 / 33

slide-98
SLIDE 98

Shift back to affine permutations (Lascoux 2001)

6

. . .

1

. . .

  • 4

. . .

  • 9

. . .

  • 14

. . .

21 16 11

. . .

17

. . .

12

. . .

7

. . .

2

. . .

  • 3

. . .

  • 8

. . .

  • 13

. . .

22

. . .

  • 2

. . .

  • 7

. . .

  • 12

. . .

23 18 13 8 3

. . .

9

. . .

4

. . .

  • 1

. . .

  • 6

. . .

  • 11

. . .

24 19 14

. . .

  • 5

. . .

  • 10

. . .

25 20 15 10 5

. . .

  • 9

. . .

  • 14

. . .

  • 19

. . .

16 11 6 1

  • 4

. . .

2

. . .

  • 3

. . .

  • 8

. . .

  • 13

. . .

  • 18

. . .

17 12 7

. . .

  • 12

. . .

  • 17

. . .

18 13 8 3

  • 2
  • 7

. . .

  • 1

. . .

  • 6

. . .

  • 11

. . .

  • 16

. . .

19 14 9 4

. . .

10

. . .

5

. . . . . .

  • 5

. . .

  • 10

. . .

  • 15

. . .

20 15

. . . w−1 = [−7, −4, 4, 7, 15] w = [7, −1, 11, 3, −5]

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 24 / 33

slide-99
SLIDE 99

This is the end.

Thank you!

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 25 / 33

slide-100
SLIDE 100

Shi coordinates

nl. Hl.

*

l;,

r,ii,"

*

[l-,

11

H,r,-,

.r/

4/

h;3

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 26 / 33

slide-101
SLIDE 101

Shi coordinates

nl. Hl.

*

l;,

r,ii,"

*

[l-,

11

H,r,-,

.r/

4/

h;3

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 26 / 33

slide-102
SLIDE 102

Sign types +

+-

/+

+o

+

+f a-

a

  • +
  • +

H,q,

H,.,o

  • \
  • +

\q"

+

  • +

v.

$'

  • rQ

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 27 / 33

slide-103
SLIDE 103

Sign types +

+-

/+

+o

+

+f a-

a

  • +
  • +

H,q,

H,.,o

  • \
  • +

\q"

+

  • +

v.

$'

  • rQ

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 27 / 33

slide-104
SLIDE 104

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 28 / 33

slide-105
SLIDE 105

[8, 4] [3, −1] [3, 1] [4, 2] [6, 2] [−2, −6] [−2, −4] [−1, −3] [1, −3] [3, 4] [7, 4] [4, 3] [6, 3] [−2, −1] [−2, 1] [2, −1] [2, 1] [−1, −2] [−1, 2] [1, −2] [1, 2] [−2, 4] [2, 4] [−1, 3] [1, 3] 15 11 7 5 9 13 17 17 13 9 5 7 11 15 13 9 5 7 11 15 14 10 6 6 10 14 3 1 1 3 1 3 2 2

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 28 / 33

slide-106
SLIDE 106

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 29 / 33

slide-107
SLIDE 107

[3, 9] [−2, 4] [2, 4] [4, 2] [−4, 2] [−7, −1] [7, −1] [−1, 7] [1, 7] [3, 4] [3, −4] [4, 3] [−4, 3] [−2, −1] [2, −1] [−2, 1] [2, 1] [−1, −2] [−1, 2] [1, −2] [1, 2] [3, −1] [3, 1] [−1, 3] [1, 3] 19 15 11 7 3 1 5 9 9 5 1 3 7 11 15 19 17 13 9 5 1 3 7 14 10 6 2 2 6 10 14

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 29 / 33

slide-108
SLIDE 108

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 30 / 33

slide-109
SLIDE 109

[−4, −13] [1, −8] [−1, −8] [−2, −9] [−2, −11] [6, −3] [4, −3] [3, −4] [3, −6] [11, 2] [9, 2] [8, 1] [8, −1] [16, 7] [14, 7] [13, 6] [13, 4] [−4, −8] [−4, −12] [−3, −9] [−3, −11] [1, −3] [−1, −3] [1, −7] [−1, −7] [2, −4] [−2, −4] [2, −6] [−2, −6] [6, 2] [4, 2] [6, −2] [4, −2] [7, 1] [3, 1] [7, −1] [3, −1] [11, 7] [9, 7] [11, 3] [9, 3] [12, 6] [8, 6] [12, 4] [8, 4] [−4, −3] [−4, −7] [−3, −4] [−3, −6] [1, 2] [−1, 2] [1, −2] [−1, −2] [2, 1] [−2, 1] [2, −1] [−2, −1] [6, 7] [4, 7] [6, 3] [4, 3] [7, 6] [3, 6] [7, 4] [3, 4] [−4, 2] [−4, −2] [−3, 1] [−3, −1] [1, 7] [−1, 7] [1, 3] [−1, 3] [2, 6] [−2, 6] [2, 4] [−2, 4] [−4, 7] [−4, 3] [−3, 6] [−3, 4] 27 23 19 15 11 9 13 17 21 25 29 29 25 21 17 13 9 11 15 19 23 27 25 21 17 13 9 11 15 19 23 27 26 22 18 14 10 10 14 18 22 26 7 3 1 5 5 1 3 7 5 1 3 7 6 2 2 6

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 30 / 33

slide-110
SLIDE 110

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 31 / 33

slide-111
SLIDE 111

[6, 17] [1, 12] [−1, 12] [12, −1] [−12, −1] [−4, 7] [4, 7] [7, 4] [−7, 4] [−9, 2] [9, 2] [2, 9] [−2, 9] [−14, −3] [14, −3] [−3, 14] [3, 14] [6, 12] [6, −12] [12, 6] [−12, 6] [1, 7] [−1, 7] [1, −7] [−1, −7] [7, 1] [7, −1] [−7, 1] [−7, −1] [−4, 2] [4, 2] [−4, −2] [4, −2] [2, −4] [2, 4] [−2, −4] [−2, 4] [−9, −3] [9, −3] [−9, 3] [9, 3] [−3, −9] [−3, 9] [3, −9] [3, 9] [6, 7] [6, −7] [7, 6] [−7, 6] [1, 2] [−1, 2] [1, −2] [−1, −2] [2, 1] [2, −1] [−2, 1] [−2, −1] [−4, −3] [4, −3] [−4, 3] [4, 3] [−3, −4] [−3, 4] [3, −4] [3, 4] [6, 2] [6, −2] [2, 6] [−2, 6] [1, −3] [−1, −3] [1, 3] [−1, 3] [−3, 1] [−3, −1] [3, 1] [3, −1] [6, −3] [6, 3] [−3, 6] [3, 6] 31 27 23 19 15 11 7 3 1 5 9 13 13 9 5 1 3 7 11 15 19 23 27 31 29 25 21 17 13 9 5 1 3 7 11 22 18 14 10 6 2 2 6 10 14 18 22

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 31 / 33

slide-112
SLIDE 112

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 32 / 33

slide-113
SLIDE 113

[−3, 1] [2, 6] [2, 4] [1, 3] [−1, 3] [2, 1] [−2, 1] [1, 2] [−1, 2] 11 7 3 1 5 9 13 13 9 5 1 3 7 11 9 5 1 3 7 11 10 6 2 2 6 10 Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 32 / 33

slide-114
SLIDE 114

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 33 / 33

slide-115
SLIDE 115

[2, 6] [−3, 1] [3, 1] [1, 3] [−1, 3] [2, 1] [2, −1] [1, 2] [−1, 2] 7 3 1 5 9 13 13 9 5 1 3 7 5 1 3 7 11 10 6 2 2 6 10

Robin Sulzgruber On (rational) Shi tableaux March 2017 33 / 33