On multiple SLEs Eveliina Peltola Universit de Genve; Section de - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on multiple sles
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On multiple SLEs Eveliina Peltola Universit de Genve; Section de - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On multiple SLEs Eveliina Peltola Universit de Genve; Section de Mathmatiques < eveliina.peltola@unige.ch > July 25th 2018 Based on joint works with Vincent Beffara (Universit Grenoble Alpes, Institut Fourier) , and Hao Wu (Yau


slide-1
SLIDE 1

On multiple SLEs

Eveliina Peltola

Université de Genève; Section de Mathématiques

< eveliina.peltola@unige.ch >

July 25th 2018 Based on joint works with Vincent Beffara (Université Grenoble Alpes, Institut Fourier), and Hao Wu (Yau Mathematical Sciences Center, Tsinghua University)

ICMP, Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics Session

slide-2
SLIDE 2

P

1

Motivation

critical models in statistical physics, scaling limits conformal invariance of interfaces & correlations

2

Multiple SLEs: classification

“global” multiple SLEs “local” multiple SLEs (i.e., commuting SLEs)

3

Partition functions of multiple SLEs

marginals of global multiple SLEs local ⇔ global ???

4

Relation to connection probabilities

multichordal loop-erased random walks / UST branches level lines of the Gaussian free field double-dimer pairings Ising model crossing probabilities

1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

M

⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊕ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊖ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ⊕

x2 x1 x3 x4 x5 x6

⊖ ⊕

1

slide-4
SLIDE 4

E:  I 

put random spins σx = ±1 at vertices x of a graph nearest neighbor interaction: P [config.] ∝ exp

1

T

  • x∼y σxσy
  • phase transition at critical temperature T = Tc

look at correlation of a pair of spins at x and y

C(x, y) = E [σxσy] − E [σx] E [σy] when |x − y| >> 1:

T < Tc

C(x, y) ∼ const.

T = Tc

C(x, y) ∼ |x − y|−β

Tc < T

C(x, y) ∼ e− 1

ξ |x−y|

scaling limit at critical temperature Tc: conformal invariance

2

slide-5
SLIDE 5

C    I 

Dobrushin boundary conditions: ∂Ωδ {⊕ segment} {⊖ segment} interface of Ising model

δ→0

−→ Schramm-Loewner evolution, SLE3

[ Chelkak, Duminil-Copin, Hongler, Kemppainen, Smirnov (2014) ]

3

slide-6
SLIDE 6

C    I 

x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6

fix discrete domain data (Ωδ; xδ

1, . . . , xδ 2N)

consider critical Ising model in

Ωδ ⊂ δZ2 with alternating ⊕/⊖ b.c.

Izyurov (2015): interfaces

δ→0

−→ (local) multiple SLE3

Proof: multi-point holomorphic observable

4

slide-7
SLIDE 7

C    I 

x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6

... then we have:

fix discrete domain data (Ωδ; xδ

1, . . . , xδ 2N)

consider critical Ising model in

Ωδ ⊂ δZ2 with alternating ⊕/⊖ b.c.

Izyurov (2015): interfaces

δ→0

−→ (local) multiple SLE3

Proof: multi-point holomorphic observable

If we condition on the event that the interfaces connect the boundary points according to a given connectivity ... Theorem The law of the N macroscopic interfaces of the critical Ising model converges in the scaling limit δ → 0 to the N-SLEκ with κ = 3.

Wu [arXiv:1703.02022] Proof: convergence for N = 1 and Beffara, P. & Wu [arXiv:1801.07699] classification of multiple SLE3

4

slide-8
SLIDE 8

C    FK-I 

x

2

x

3

x

1

x

4

x

5

x

6

x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6

fix discrete domain data (Ωδ; xδ

1, . . . , xδ 2N)

consider critical FK-Ising model in

Ωδ ⊂ δZ2 with alternating free/wir b.c.

Kemppainen & Smirnov (2018): 2 interfaces

δ→0

−→ hSLE16/3

Proof: holomorphic observable

5

slide-9
SLIDE 9

C    FK-I 

x

2

x

3

x

1

x

4

x

5

x

6

x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6

... then we have:

fix discrete domain data (Ωδ; xδ

1, . . . , xδ 2N)

consider critical FK-Ising model in

Ωδ ⊂ δZ2 with alternating free/wir b.c.

Kemppainen & Smirnov (2018): 2 interfaces

δ→0

−→ hSLE16/3

Proof: holomorphic observable

If we condition on the event that the interfaces connect the boundary points according to a given connectivity ... Theorem The law of the N macroscopic interfaces of the critical FK-Ising model converges in the scaling limit δ → 0 to the N-SLEκ with κ = 16/3.

Beffara, P. & Wu [arXiv:1801.07699] Proof: convergence for N = 1 and classification of multiple SLE16/3

5

slide-10
SLIDE 10

S-L  SLEκ

5

slide-11
SLIDE 11

S’    SLEκ

gt Xt = gt(γ(t))

Theorem [Schramm ∼2000]

∃ ! one-parameter family (SLEκ)κ≥0

  • f probability measures on chordal

curves with conformal invariance and domain Markov property encode SLEκ random curves in random conformal maps (gt)t≥0 driving process image of the tip:

Xt := lim

z→γ(t)gt(z) = √κBt

gt : H \ γ[0, t] → H solutions to

Loewner equation: d dtgt(z) = 2

gt(z) − Xt , g0(z) = z

6

slide-12
SLIDE 12

C    SLEκ

family of random curves in

(Ω; x1, . . . , x2N)

various connectivities encoded in planar pair partitions α ∈ LPN

xbj CL

j

CR

j

xaj

Theorem Let κ ∈ (0, 4] ∪ {16/3, 6}. For any fixed connectivity α of 2N points, there exists a unique probability measure on N curves such that conditionally on N − 1 of the curves, the remaining one is the chordal SLEκ in the random domain where it can live.

Dubédat (2006); Kozdron & Lawler (2007–2009); Miller & Sheffield (2016); Miller, Sheffield & Werner (2018); P. & Wu (2017); Beffara, P. & Wu (2018)

7

slide-13
SLIDE 13

U: ∃     N-SLEκ

Theorem Let κ ∈ (0, 4] ∪ {16/3, 6}. For any fixed connectivity α of 2N points, there exists at most one probability measure on N curves such that conditionally on N − 1 of the curves, the remaining one is the chordal SLEκ in the random domain where it can live. Idea of proof:

[ Beffara, P. & Wu [arXiv:1801.07699] ]

sample curves according to conditional law

⇒ Markov chain on space of curves

prove that there is a coupling of two such Markov chains, started from any two initial configurations, such that they have a uniformly positive chance to agree after a few steps

⇒ there is at most one stationary measure

8

slide-14
SLIDE 14

U: ∃     N-SLEκ

Theorem Let κ ∈ (0, 4] ∪ {16/3, 6}. For any fixed connectivity α of 2N points, there exists at most one probability measure on N curves such that conditionally on N − 1 of the curves, the remaining one is the chordal SLEκ in the random domain where it can live. Remarks: uniformly exponential mixing: ∃ coupling s.t.

P[X4n ˜ X4n] ≤ (1 − p0)n

9

slide-15
SLIDE 15

U: ∃     N-SLEκ

Theorem Let κ ∈ (0, 4] ∪ {16/3, 6}. For any fixed connectivity α of 2N points, there exists at most one probability measure on N curves such that conditionally on N − 1 of the curves, the remaining one is the chordal SLEκ in the random domain where it can live. Remarks: uniformly exponential mixing: ∃ coupling s.t.

P[X4n ˜ X4n] ≤ (1 − p0)n

the case of N = 2 was proved in Miller & Sheffield: IG II using the coupling of SLE with the Gaussian free field (GFF) but N ≥ 3 curves cannot be coupled with the GFF

  • ur proof does not use the GFF in any way

9

slide-16
SLIDE 16

U: ∃     N-SLEκ

Theorem Let κ ∈ (0, 4] ∪ {16/3, 6}. For any fixed connectivity α of 2N points, there exists at most one probability measure on N curves such that conditionally on N − 1 of the curves, the remaining one is the chordal SLEκ in the random domain where it can live. Remarks: uniformly exponential mixing: ∃ coupling s.t.

P[X4n ˜ X4n] ≤ (1 − p0)n

the case of N = 2 was proved in Miller & Sheffield: IG II using the coupling of SLE with the Gaussian free field (GFF) but N ≥ 3 curves cannot be coupled with the GFF

  • ur proof does not use the GFF in any way

update: N = 2, κ ∈ (0, 8): Miller, Sheffield, Werner (2018)

9

slide-17
SLIDE 17

C   N-SLEκ

Theorem For any fixed connectivity α of 2N points, there exists at least one probability measure on N curves such that conditionally on N − 1 of the curves, the remaining one is the chordal SLEκ in the random domain where it can live.

  • 1. From scaling limits of multiple interfaces in critical models

works for κ ∈ {2, 3, 4, 16/3, 6}

[ Schramm & Sheffield (2013); Izyurov (2015); Beffara, P. & Wu (2018) ]

10

slide-18
SLIDE 18

C   N-SLEκ

Theorem For any fixed connectivity α of 2N points, there exists at least one probability measure on N curves such that conditionally on N − 1 of the curves, the remaining one is the chordal SLEκ in the random domain where it can live.

  • 1. From scaling limits of multiple interfaces in critical models

works for κ ∈ {2, 3, 4, 16/3, 6}

[ Schramm & Sheffield (2013); Izyurov (2015); Beffara, P. & Wu (2018) ]

  • 2. Global construction by Brownian loop measure

works for κ ∈ (0, 4]

[ Dubédat (2006); Kozdron & Lawler (2007–2009); P. & Wu (2017) ]

10

slide-19
SLIDE 19

C   N-SLEκ

Theorem For any fixed connectivity α of 2N points, there exists at least one probability measure on N curves such that conditionally on N − 1 of the curves, the remaining one is the chordal SLEκ in the random domain where it can live.

  • 1. From scaling limits of multiple interfaces in critical models

works for κ ∈ {2, 3, 4, 16/3, 6}

[ Schramm & Sheffield (2013); Izyurov (2015); Beffara, P. & Wu (2018) ]

  • 2. Global construction by Brownian loop measure

works for κ ∈ (0, 4]

[ Dubédat (2006); Kozdron & Lawler (2007–2009); P. & Wu (2017) ]

  • 3. Global construction using CLEκ works for κ ∈ [8/3, 8)

10

slide-20
SLIDE 20

C   N-SLEκ

Theorem For any fixed connectivity α of 2N points, there exists at least one probability measure on N curves such that conditionally on N − 1 of the curves, the remaining one is the chordal SLEκ in the random domain where it can live.

  • 1. From scaling limits of multiple interfaces in critical models

works for κ ∈ {2, 3, 4, 16/3, 6}

[ Schramm & Sheffield (2013); Izyurov (2015); Beffara, P. & Wu (2018) ]

  • 2. Global construction by Brownian loop measure

works for κ ∈ (0, 4]

[ Dubédat (2006); Kozdron & Lawler (2007–2009); P. & Wu (2017) ]

  • 3. Global construction using CLEκ works for κ ∈ [8/3, 8)

4?. Local construction by Loewner evolutions expect ∀κ ∈ (0, 8) [ Bauer, Bernard & Kytölä (2005); Dubédat (2006) ]

10

slide-21
SLIDE 21

C   N-SLEκ

Theorem For any fixed connectivity α of 2N points, there exists at least one probability measure on N curves such that conditionally on N − 1 of the curves, the remaining one is the chordal SLEκ in the random domain where it can live.

  • 1. From scaling limits of multiple interfaces in critical models

works for κ ∈ {2, 3, 4, 16/3, 6}

[ Schramm & Sheffield (2013); Izyurov (2015); Beffara, P. & Wu (2018) ]

  • 2. Global construction by Brownian loop measure

works for κ ∈ (0, 4]

[ Dubédat (2006); Kozdron & Lawler (2007–2009); P. & Wu (2017) ]

  • 3. Global construction using CLEκ works for κ ∈ [8/3, 8)

4?. Local construction by Loewner evolutions

  • k ∀ κ ∈ (0, 4]

expect ∀κ ∈ (0, 8) [ Bauer, Bernard & Kytölä (2005); Dubédat (2006) ]

10

slide-22
SLIDE 22

M    

Theorem: Let κ ∈ (0, 4] ∪ {16/3, 6}. For any fixed connectivity α of 2N points, there exists a unique probability measure on N curves s.t. conditionally on N − 1 of the curves, the remaining one is the chordal SLEκ in the random domain where it can live. Proposition Let κ ∈ (0, 4]. The marginal law of the curve starting from x1 is given by the Loewner chain with driving process

dWt = √κ dBt + κ ∂1 log Zα

  • Wt, V2

t , V3 t , . . . , V2N t

  • dt,

W0 = x1

dVi

t =

2dt

Vi

t − Wt

, Vi

0 = xi,

for i 1

Therefore, local N-SLEκ with partition function Zα

= global N-SLEκ associated to connectivity α

  • P. & Wu [arXiv:1703.00898]

11

slide-23
SLIDE 23

C 

11

slide-24
SLIDE 24

A:  

Idea: discrete connection probabilities

δ→0

−→ partition functions: lim

δ→0 P [interfaces form connectivity α] =

Zα(x1, . . . , x2N)

  • β Zβ(x1, . . . , x2N)

[ Suggested e.g. by Bauer, Bernard, Kytölä (2005)]

12

slide-25
SLIDE 25

A:  

Idea: discrete connection probabilities

δ→0

−→ partition functions: lim

δ→0 P [interfaces form connectivity α] =

Zα(x1, . . . , x2N)

  • β Zβ(x1, . . . , x2N)

[ Suggested e.g. by Bauer, Bernard, Kytölä (2005)]

Gaussian free field (κ = 4) with alternating boundary data

+λ, −λ, +λ, −λ, . . . [ P. & Wu [arXiv:1703.00898] ]

double-dimer model (κ = 4) [ Kenyon & Wilson (2011) ] boundary touching branches in uniform spanning tree (κ = 2) with wired boundary [ Karrila, Kytölä, P. [arXiv:1702.03261] ] critical Ising model with alternating b.c. [ in progress... ]

12

slide-26
SLIDE 26

T !