On Governance & Corruption - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On Governance & Corruption Висновки з міжнародного досвіду і фактів щодо, наслідки для України Даніель Кауфман , президент Інституту управління природними ресурсами (Daniel Kafumann, President & CEO, NRGI) Презентація -- Одеса , Україна Concluding Panel, Odesa, Ukraine 6 грудня 2015 – December 6 th

2014 Voice and Accountability from WGI 2 Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org

2014 Rule of Law 3 Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org

2014 Control of Corruption 4 Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org Kaufmann, D.. and A. Kraay

Ukraine Governance Indicators: 2000, 2007, 2014 5 Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org

Worldwide Governance Indicator Trends: Control of Corruption in Select Countries 100 2000 2007 2014 90 Governance Indicator % Ranking 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 6 Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org Kaufmann, D. and A. Kraay

2015 American Chamber of Commerce: Corruption by Institutions 87 Courts 61 Prosecutor's offfice 39 Local authorities 36 Central government 27 Police 14 State enterprises 7 Other 7 State agencies 1 Police Patrol Service 0 20 40 60 80 100 % of Respondents 7 Source: American Chamber of Commerce in Ukraine, survey of 99 member businesses http://ti-ukraine.org/en/system/files/docs/news/survey_on_perception_of_corruption.pdf

Perceived Trends in Corruption by Oblast (Early vs Late 2015): Survey of Companies, Perceived Changes prior 6 months) [ Source: TI, Gfk, PrvtBnk, PWC, see footnote, Preliminary chart] Wave 1 Wave 2 0.25 Average Score -0.25 -0.75 -1.25 -1.75 Khmelnytskyi Luhansk Chernivtsi Ternopil Odessa Kherson Zhytomyr Zakarpattia Cherkasy Kharkiv Lviv Mykolaiv Volyn Ukraine Average Kyiv City Chernihiv Kyiv Kirovohrad Sumy Dnipropetrovsk Poltava Vinnytsia Rivne Donetsk Zaporizhia Ivano-Frankivsk Note: Scale is from -5 to +5 where -5 is significant deterioration, +5 is significant improvement, and 0 is no change. Columns pointing downwards below zero means deterioration. Wave 1 conducted in early 2015 (?); Wave 2 in late summer 2015. Preliminary, cation in interpretation is warranted. Source: Transparency International, Gfk, Privatbank, 8 and PricewaterhouseCoopers, survey of company directors (2471 respondents) http://www.corruption- index.org.ua/index_en.html

Some reflections & lessons from experience • Ukraine choice: aspires to be like Russia vs. Poland (or, Venezuela vs. Chile)? To ‘win’, principles: • Central government cannot do it alone: i) Subnational Reforms, & ii) Ukraine Citizens/NGO/MPs/media • Competition across oblasts/cities, power of data & Citizens -- towards an Anticorruption Observatory, with public data on: i) corruption; ii) Impunity (Index?), & iii) implementation of anticorruption reforms • Transparency: economic, financial, institutional, political • Reform SOEs, & Judiciary (No to Impunity – Guatemala?) • Tax Reform: Simple, No discretion or loopholes, enforce YES, IT CAN BE DONE, BY PEOPLE AND LEADERSHIP! 9

2014 Voice and Accountability from WGI 10 Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org

Дякую ! www.resourcegovernance.org