SLIDE 1
2014 Voice and Accountability from WGI
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org
2
On Governance & Corruption - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
On Governance & Corruption - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
On Governance & Corruption , ,
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
2014 Rule of Law
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org
3
SLIDE 4
2014 Control of Corruption
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org Kaufmann, D.. and A. Kraay
4
SLIDE 5
Ukraine Governance Indicators: 2000, 2007, 2014
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org
5
SLIDE 6
Worldwide Governance Indicator Trends: Control of Corruption in Select Countries
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Governance Indicator % Ranking
2000 2007 2014
6
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org Kaufmann, D. and A. Kraay
SLIDE 7
2015 American Chamber of Commerce: Corruption by Institutions
1 7 7 14 27 36 39 61 87
20 40 60 80 100 Police Patrol Service State agencies Other State enterprises Police Central government Local authorities Prosecutor's offfice Courts
% of Respondents
7
Source: American Chamber of Commerce in Ukraine, survey of 99 member businesses http://ti-ukraine.org/en/system/files/docs/news/survey_on_perception_of_corruption.pdf
SLIDE 8
Perceived Trends in Corruption by Oblast (Early vs Late 2015): Survey of Companies, Perceived Changes prior 6 months) [Source: TI, Gfk, PrvtBnk, PWC, see footnote, Preliminary chart]
- 1.75
- 1.25
- 0.75
- 0.25
0.25 Khmelnytskyi Luhansk Chernivtsi Ternopil Odessa Kherson Zhytomyr Zakarpattia Cherkasy Kharkiv Lviv Mykolaiv Volyn Ukraine Average Kyiv City Chernihiv Kyiv Kirovohrad Sumy Dnipropetrovsk Poltava Vinnytsia Rivne Donetsk Zaporizhia Ivano-Frankivsk
Average Score
Wave 1 Wave 2
8
Note: Scale is from -5 to +5 where -5 is significant deterioration, +5 is significant improvement, and 0 is no change. Columns pointing downwards below zero means deterioration. Wave 1 conducted in early 2015 (?); Wave 2 in late summer 2015. Preliminary, cation in interpretation is warranted. Source: Transparency International, Gfk, Privatbank, and PricewaterhouseCoopers, survey of company directors (2471 respondents) http://www.corruption- index.org.ua/index_en.html
SLIDE 9
Some reflections & lessons from experience
- Ukraine choice: aspires to be like Russia vs. Poland
(or, Venezuela vs. Chile)? To ‘win’, principles:
- Central government cannot do it alone: i) Subnational
Reforms, & ii) Ukraine Citizens/NGO/MPs/media
- Competition across oblasts/cities, power of data &
Citizens -- towards an Anticorruption Observatory, with public data on: i) corruption; ii) Impunity (Index?), & iii) implementation of anticorruption reforms
- Transparency: economic, financial, institutional, political
- Reform SOEs, & Judiciary (No to Impunity – Guatemala?)
- Tax Reform: Simple, No discretion or loopholes, enforce
YES, IT CAN BE DONE, BY PEOPLE AND LEADERSHIP!
9
SLIDE 10
2014 Voice and Accountability from WGI
Source: Worldwide Governance Indicators, http://www.govindicators.org
10
SLIDE 11