Indonesian Perspective: THE NEW REGIME IN HANDLING CORPORATE CRIME
Kiki Ahmad Yani
(Prosecutor) REGIONAL WORKSHOP On PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION ACLC, September 24, 2019
Kiki Ahmad Yani (Prosecutor) REGIONAL WORKSHOP On PRIVATE SECTOR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Indonesian Perspective: THE NEW REGIME IN HANDLING CORPORATE CRIME Kiki Ahmad Yani (Prosecutor) REGIONAL WORKSHOP On PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION ACLC, September 24, 2019 Procurement process Getting License Private sector Tax payment
Indonesian Perspective: THE NEW REGIME IN HANDLING CORPORATE CRIME
Kiki Ahmad Yani
(Prosecutor) REGIONAL WORKSHOP On PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION ACLC, September 24, 2019
Private sector involvement Procurement process Getting License Tax payment Legal Dispute Etc
CONSPIRATION IN PROCUREMENT PROCESS
PUBLIC OFFICIALS Has authority to development budget and project PARLIAMENT MEMBERS giving approval for the budget that submitted by the officials COMPANY/PRIVATE SECTOR Looking for company profit by joining the government procurement
DISTRIBUTION of BRIBE
Parliament member 7%-10% Company profit (who win the project tender) 10%-15% Procurement committee 2 % High level official 2 % Project leader 1 % Miscellaneous fee 2 % Local official 2 %
Total fee and company profit
REMAINING BUDGET
Company profit (who get the transferred project) 5%-10%
TERM FOR MONEY USED TO BRIBE
fee
(Minister, Governor, Mayor, Regent, etc)
(Director, manager, head of division, etc); and
WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE?
Case statistics based on the PERPETRATORS
(Per June 2019)
NO JABATAN 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 JUMLAH 1 Parliaments members (in all level) 2 7 8 27 5 16 8 9 19 23 20 103 8 255 2 Minister/high level public official 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 9 3 2 1 1 27 3 Ambassador 2 1 1 4 4 Commissioner 3 2 1 1 7 5 Governor 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 2 20 6 Mayor/regent/deputy mayor 3 6 6 5 4 3 3 3 12 4 9 13 30 9 110 7 Echelon I, II, III dan IV 2 9 15 10 22 14 12 15 8 6 2 7 10 43 24 8 207 8 Judge 1 2 2 3 2 3 1 3 5 22 9 Prosecutor 1 2 3 1 1 8 10 Police 1 1 2 11 Advocate/lawyer 2 1 2 2 4 1 12 12 Individual/private sector 1 4 5 3 12 11 8 10 16 24 16 18 26 28 56 26 264 13 Others 4 1 2 3 4 8 1 2 8 8 3 21 13 31 9 118 14 Corporation 1 4 1 6 TOTAL 4 23 29 27 55 45 65 38 49 59 61 62 98 123 260 64
1062
The obstacles to bring the corporate to the court
law Procedure
(Supreme Court Regulation/SCR) Perma No.13/2016 Concerning law procedures in handling corporation as a criminal Consist of:
13, 15, 18)
corporation has no crime prevention mechanism;
employees commit a criminal offense; and
criminal act;
The JUDGE
could define a CORPORATE LIABILITY in the following ways:
DGI (PT Duta Graha Indonesia), the company name has changed to PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring
projects).
Rp700 million (US$ 50.000,)
Judges also
PT DGI to pay restitution worth Rp 85.490.234.737 (US$ 6.2 million), from Rp240 billion (US$ 17 million)
procurement has been revoked for 6 months
The corporate has been named as a suspect
COMPANY CRIME PT . PUTRA RAMADHAN (PT TRADHA)
Money laundering
PT . NINDYA KARYA (state company)
Conspiration in government procurement
PT . TUAH SEJATI
Conspiration in government procurement
PT . MERIAL ESA
Giving bribe
PT . PALMA SATU
Giving bribe
Terima Kasih