Kiki Ahmad Yani (Prosecutor) REGIONAL WORKSHOP On PRIVATE SECTOR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

kiki ahmad yani
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Kiki Ahmad Yani (Prosecutor) REGIONAL WORKSHOP On PRIVATE SECTOR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Indonesian Perspective: THE NEW REGIME IN HANDLING CORPORATE CRIME Kiki Ahmad Yani (Prosecutor) REGIONAL WORKSHOP On PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION ACLC, September 24, 2019 Procurement process Getting License Private sector Tax payment


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Indonesian Perspective: THE NEW REGIME IN HANDLING CORPORATE CRIME

Kiki Ahmad Yani

(Prosecutor) REGIONAL WORKSHOP On PRIVATE SECTOR CORRUPTION ACLC, September 24, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Private sector involvement Procurement process Getting License Tax payment Legal Dispute Etc

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CONSPIRATION IN PROCUREMENT PROCESS

PUBLIC OFFICIALS Has authority to development budget and project PARLIAMENT MEMBERS giving approval for the budget that submitted by the officials COMPANY/PRIVATE SECTOR Looking for company profit by joining the government procurement

slide-4
SLIDE 4

DISTRIBUTION of BRIBE

Parliament member 7%-10% Company profit (who win the project tender) 10%-15% Procurement committee 2 % High level official 2 % Project leader 1 % Miscellaneous fee 2 % Local official 2 %

+

Total fee and company profit

44 %

REMAINING BUDGET

  • nly

56%

+

Company profit (who get the transferred project) 5%-10%

slide-5
SLIDE 5

TERM FOR MONEY USED TO BRIBE

  • Commitment fee
  • Arranger fee
  • Lobbying fee
  • Marketing/Commercial

fee

  • Washington Apple
  • Malang apple
  • Donuts
  • Attention
  • Cheese
  • coffee
  • Chapter
  • Banana
  • Sugar
  • Cake
  • Book
  • Birthday present
  • Entertain
  • Et cetera
slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Parliament Member;
  • High level government official

(Minister, Governor, Mayor, Regent, etc)

  • Project leader;
  • Management of the corporation

(Director, manager, head of division, etc); and

  • The corporate….?!?

WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Case statistics based on the PERPETRATORS

(Per June 2019)

NO JABATAN 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 JUMLAH 1 Parliaments members (in all level) 2 7 8 27 5 16 8 9 19 23 20 103 8 255 2 Minister/high level public official 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 9 3 2 1 1 27 3 Ambassador 2 1 1 4 4 Commissioner 3 2 1 1 7 5 Governor 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 3 1 1 2 20 6 Mayor/regent/deputy mayor 3 6 6 5 4 3 3 3 12 4 9 13 30 9 110 7 Echelon I, II, III dan IV 2 9 15 10 22 14 12 15 8 6 2 7 10 43 24 8 207 8 Judge 1 2 2 3 2 3 1 3 5 22 9 Prosecutor 1 2 3 1 1 8 10 Police 1 1 2 11 Advocate/lawyer 2 1 2 2 4 1 12 12 Individual/private sector 1 4 5 3 12 11 8 10 16 24 16 18 26 28 56 26 264 13 Others 4 1 2 3 4 8 1 2 8 8 3 21 13 31 9 118 14 Corporation 1 4 1 6 TOTAL 4 23 29 27 55 45 65 38 49 59 61 62 98 123 260 64

1062

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The obstacles to bring the corporate to the court

  • 1. Legal void and loophole of the

law Procedure

  • 2. Corporate mens rea
  • 3. Enforcement (of judicial order)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

(Supreme Court Regulation/SCR) Perma No.13/2016 Concerning law procedures in handling corporation as a criminal Consist of:

  • The Objective of the SCR. (article 2)
  • Qualification of the corporate crime. (article 3-6)
  • In case if the corporate conducting merger, acquisition, separation or
  • dissolution. (article 7-8, 16-17)
  • The summon and who will represent the corporate. (article 9, 10, 11,

13, 15, 18)

  • Type of Indictment. (article 12)
  • Restitution. (article 20)
  • Confiscated assets of the corporate. (article 21)
  • Criminal convictions. (article 23-26)
  • Enforcement (of judicial order). (article 27-33)
  • etc
slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 1. The

corporation has no crime prevention mechanism;

  • 2. The corporation lets its members or

employees commit a criminal offense; and

  • 3. The corporation gains benefit of the

criminal act;

The JUDGE

could define a CORPORATE LIABILITY in the following ways:

slide-11
SLIDE 11

PT . DGI case

  • PT

DGI (PT Duta Graha Indonesia), the company name has changed to PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring

  • Found guilty of corruption in many projects (8

projects).

  • The Judges ordered PT DGI to pay a fine worth

Rp700 million (US$ 50.000,)

  • The

Judges also

  • rdered

PT DGI to pay restitution worth Rp 85.490.234.737 (US$ 6.2 million), from Rp240 billion (US$ 17 million)

  • Rights to join the auction of government

procurement has been revoked for 6 months

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The corporate has been named as a suspect

COMPANY CRIME PT . PUTRA RAMADHAN (PT TRADHA)

Money laundering

PT . NINDYA KARYA (state company)

Conspiration in government procurement

PT . TUAH SEJATI

Conspiration in government procurement

PT . MERIAL ESA

Giving bribe

PT . PALMA SATU

Giving bribe

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Terima Kasih